web analytics

The Mancunion

Britain's biggest student newspaper, serving Greater Manchester

Union exec dodged work for a month and still got paid

• Former Campaigns Officer took 10-and-a-half weeks off work
• Fellow trustees powerless to stop “abuse of power”
• Just 30% of campaigns budget spent

By

A Students’ Union trustee who was paid to campaign on student issues skipped work for over a month and still got paid, with the Students’ Union powerless to act.

Last year’s Campaigns Officer Amanda Walters took 10 and-a-half weeks off work between 2011 and 2012, far more than the 30-day allowance for members of the University of Manchester Students’ Union Executive.

Ms Walters claimed she was entitled to the extra holiday because she had worked so hard the previous year. But The Mancunion can reveal that a letter, sent by her colleagues at the Union, warned her not to take more time off. The document, written by her fellow trustees in March, accuses her of abusing her position and taking advantage of them.

“You have undeniably taken a significantly larger amount of time away from work than the rest of the executive … it feels very much like you have taken serious advantage of your situation,” the document reads.

The trustees admitted they were unable to stop her from skipping work and no disciplinary action was taken against her when she decided to travel abroad anyway.

Mo Saqib, who was Academic Affairs Officer at the time, told The Mancunion: “I didn’t believe going to her would achieve anything, and indeed it didn’t.”

“The entire [holiday] system was self-regulated. There was just a mutual trust that people wouldn’t take the piss.”

Ms Walters was in the second year of her role as Campaigns Officer, having been elected unopposed by 3,112 students in 2011.

The Students’ Union has no record of Exec holidays from last year because they were organised informally among each other.

Nick Pringle, General Secretary of the Students’ Union and a former co-worker of Amanda Walters, said: “I was made aware by my predecessor that she had concerns over another officer’s attendance at work which she dealt with.”

“We’ve now got formal employment contracts which stipulate our holiday entitlement and arrangements for taking time off and we’ve got processes in place to properly record absences for the first time.”

“If an elected official was to take ten weeks holiday then this would obviously be completely unacceptable.”

Despite the new contracts, it remains extremely difficult to punish or remove a member of the Exec if they dodge responsibilities or fail to turn up for work.

Khalil Secker, the current Campaigns Officer endorsed by Ms Walters, refused to criticise his predecessor. “As all this happened before my time I feel unable to comment. However, I can promise students that I won’t take more than my allotted leave.”

Ms Walters was responsible for campaigning for students’ rights and her £16,600 annual salary was paid for in part by tuition fees.

She was heavily involved in the student protests of 2010 and admitted to being inside the Tory HQ building when it was ransacked by protesters.

She told Sky News the following day that she “had no qualms about criminal damage” in the name of student protest.

Ms Walters told Sky News: “There’s a democratic deficit in this country when someone can be elected on a certain pledge, and then turn around and say they’re no longer going to keep that.”

But Amanda Walters spent only 30% of her campaigning budget. This included spending £1,845 for the Palestinian cause, but devoting just £30 to education.

The dispute over holiday centred on Time off in Lieu (TOIL), which allows for extra holiday to compensate an employee who works beyond paid hours.

It is thought Amanda Walters felt she had earned TOIL from her work in the previous year. But her colleagues claimed this was “unfair” and represented an “abuse of the position.”

They told Ms Walters there was an unwritten agreement that TOIL would only be taken within reason and members of the Executive would follow the general guidelines for staff, which required any TOIL to be taken near the time in which it was accumulated.

Amanda Walters ignored repeated requests for comment by The Mancunion.

  • Thom Allen

    What a surprise – the exec are only interested in furthering their own political careers.

  • Inndia

    Dear Mancunion,
    Last week’s front-page article concerning Amanda Walters is disgraceful. I can’t comprehend why the Mancunion would be so highly critical of an officer who was extremely dedicated to serving the student body. Amanda was an officer for two years and throughout that time she took a lead role in the campaign against rising tuition fees, mobilising thousands of students on marches, letter writing campaigns and lobbying MP’s. After the rise in fees, Amanda campaigned extensively within the University to protect courses from cuts and against rises in postgraduate fees. Amanda also provided huge amounts of support and training to societies in the union in addition to leading several other campaigns.
    Since The Mancunion recognises that officers are allowed to take Time Off in Lieu (TOIL), it seems contradictory that the article focuses around the claim that Amanda took off four and a half weeks more holiday than she was entitled. It is unreasonable to make such a claim without providing quantifiable evidence of her supposed misconduct.
    The other main point of the article criticises Amanda’s campaign spend, ‘Amanda only spent 30% of her campaigning budget devoting just £30 to education.’ This figure seems unusually low if you take into account that one return coach to London costs around £1000 alone. Secondly, suggesting that money spent on campaigning for the year is indicative of effective change is naive. A poorly run campaign, which wastes a lot of union money should ring more alarm bells. Surely, more pragmatic measures of success would be policies passed, students attending events or change implemented.
    In my experience of campaigning with Amanda on education cuts and various other issues, I found that she was always at hand with support and enthusiasm. Her passion for improving the lives of students was clear for anyone to see, so I am left wondering, why would the Mancunion wrote such a one sided article about a former officer?
    Additionally, I cannot understand why current events would not make front-page news. For example, a protest that happened last week on campus about the closure of the Applied Community and Youth Work Studies Programme was not reported on the front page, despite being a current event. I believe this is terrible journalism.

  • Ruth

    In response to last week’s defamatory front page article on Amanda Walter’s conduct in her role as Campaigns Officer, I’d like to reiterate Inndia’s concerns at the standard of journalism that The Mancunion is appearing to promote. Not only is the article entirely unbalanced in its argument, but it also hinges on unsubstantiated claims, and presents opinion and hearsay as fact. Had the author bothered to explore this issue more thoroughly, he would have found a host of student campaigners and activists, as well as members of the wider student population, that found Amanda to be an extremely dedicated and dynamic member of the student executive. While it is undoubtedly true that the system for regulating the working patterns of Executive members has been woefully inadequate, I would suggest that, in this case, the ambiguous protocol attached to TOIL, and the difficulty in definitively proving the number of hours worked, has caused Amanda Walters to be scapegoated by other members of the Exec team for working long hours in order to take justified breaks. The article’s author would do well to explore beyond his current inflammatory, misleading and downright lazy journalistic style.

  • Rosie

    Woah! She got 6 weeks holiday,took another 4-and-a-half-weeks off and only spent 30% of last year’s budget?! That’s taking the piss!

    If I did that in my job I’d be sacked on the spot!!

    Excellent article. The paper should be holding these people to account.

  • The Mancunion

    Inndia,

    Since your complaint was made in an official capacity to The Mancunion, we shall respond properly via e-mail. However, we would point out on here that neither of the above complaints properly justify the extended leave.

    There were no records kept of holiday accounts, a story in itself, but we were satisfied with the source. Were there substantial ambiguity over it, Union staff would have pulled the article for legal reasons.

    We are the first year to introduce a self-imposed Code of Practice, which was signed, sealed and approved by the Union, to act as a further check on our articles. The Union must be satisfied that all articles pass this code, and in this case they clearly felt the facts presented here were beyond reasonable doubt.

    The Mancunion.

  • Khalil Secker

    As the current campaigns officer I can say that the under-spent budget is completely understandable. The main expenses for campaigning are:

    -Train tickets for visiting speakers
    -Posters, flyers and banners
    -Coaches to demo’s

    Only the last one costs much money and during Amanda’s 2nd year there was no major national student demo.

    As quoted in the article, I don’t know the full circumstances under which Amanda took time off during her 2nd year. I have heard consistently though that during her first year she went hell-for-leather. My general impression of her was as someone who was extremely passionate about campaigning.

  • Dave

    Here’s Amanda defending criminal damage at Millbank in 2010.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oc7IoeJFS60

    A shame she was more passionate about taking holidays than doing her job.