Skip to main content

Day: 13 February 2013

Theatre Profile: Dame Helen Mirren

This month sees Dame Helen Mirren’s return to stage in the role for which she is without doubt most synonymous. Mirren’s return to the stage in playing her most famous screen role, Elizabeth II, will likely delight theatre and film lovers alike.

Her portrayal of Her Majesty in The Queen saw Mirren receive some of the best reviews of her career, not to mention the Oscar for Best Actress in 2006.

Therefore the prospect of Mirren returning to the role could be something of a double-edged sword as there will be no shortage of theatre goers queuing to see her reprisal but there is a real risk that the play will not live up to the success of the film.

But we have every reason to be hopeful. The Audience is a considerably broader study of the Queen’s life: framing it through her meetings with each successive British Prime Minister from Churchill to Cameron.

It also reunites Mirren with the writer of The Queen, Peter Morgan who is also making his own return to stage after the global success of Frost/Nixon. So with the same pedigree in place and under the direction of top British director Stephen Daldry, Mirren can hope for as much success on stage with the role as she had on screen.

It’s easy to forget that before Mirren was an internationally renowned movie star she started as a working actress at the Royal Shakespeare Company where she remained for almost ten years playing some of Shakespeare’s best female roles from Lady  Macbeth to Ophelia in Hamlet.

Mirren’s formal training at the RSC allowed her to play all manner of roles from those of Tennessee Williams to her most recent stage appearance in the title role in Phedre at the National Theatre in 2009.

Even when she started to enjoy greater success on screen, most notably as hard-as-nails police detective Jane Tennison in the long running TV series Prime Suspect, Mirren continued her dual life as as a creature of both stage and screen.

Whilst she may not be as acclaimed in both arenas as other great dames like Judi Dench, Mirren’s ability to play both sexy and stately means she has avoided slipping into the typical matriarch roles as she has got older. Indeed even Dame Judi can not have claimed to have played both a prostitute and a regendered Prospero in The Tempest, as Mirren did in 2010.

So as we await her return to the role of the Queen (one of the three queens she’s played in her career) we can assume it’ll be of the more stately than sexy variety. Although Mirren does continue to surprise us.

Read it again; take a spin on the literary jukebox

Maria Popova’s Literary Jukebox is not a blog. It doesn’t offer you any information, or original content, or even services. It falls into that sub-category of online offerings that is less functional than economical: it recycles existing material and simply ‘shares’ it with you. Popova’s personal designator for this activity is “curator of interestingness” – which is good, and her Literary Jukebox takes this premise, one shared by Instagrammers the internet over, and carves something interesting, and yes, I would say original, out of existing materials.

The Jukebox is a side project for the ‘curator’s’ website, brainpickings.com (sounds more gruesome than it is), which similarly cherry-picks those things Popova thinks so interesting she wants to give them a bigger audience. The Jukebox doesn’t promise you much, but it delivers exactly that much – it gives you a few moments of pure, simple enjoyment. (I dare you not to smile.) It consists of this: every day Popova picks a quote from a favourite book and matches it with a thematically coherent song. That’s it. And it’s great.

As I write this, the quote is from Anaïs Nin’s Diary of Anais Nin, Vol. 5 1947-1955: “Maturity is first the shedding of what you are not, and then the balancing of what you are in relation to the human being you love, and allowing the selves of that person which are not related to you to exist independently, outside of the relationship.”
And the song, Paulo Nutini’s ‘Growing up Beside You’. Which doesn’t sound like a perfect combination, but when you read the quote as the song plays (instruction: always click play on the song before you even scroll down to see what the song is, and to read the quote. So much better), but with the soundtrack of Nutini, Nin’s spare words become even more poetic, musical almost; and in the presence of such poetry, Nutini’s voice sounds raw, his music bittersweet and intoxicating. You don’t expect it to work, but both ingredients taste even better put together.

Tomorrow the sandwich will be made of Charles Dickens and Billie Holiday. Dickens, from Great Expectations, “Take nothing on its looks; take everything on evidence. There’s no better rule.” and Holiday’s ‘Foolin Myself’. This one, more incongruous, is even better.
http://literaryjukebox.brainpickings.org/

Money-spinning movie franchises

It is testament to the startling lack of originality within Hollywood movie studios that few are surprised to see the Star Wars franchise resurrected. More than 35 years after the original came out Disney, who recently acquired LucasFilms, are planning to make another three films with the original cast e.g. Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill etc. Is this what audiences want, or is it purely a calculated decision by some accountants to churn out some more revenue from the brand name?

Sadly there have been many instances of this shameless marketing ploy of luring audiences in with the promise of a return to former glories, and then selling them short. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a prime example. 20 years after the last (and what should have been final) instalment of the Indiana Jones story, this abomination of a sequel was made, mainly at the behest of producer and co-writer, George Lucas. Due to his inability to do anything original he decided to give us another glimpse of the whip cracking archaeologist, with dire consequences. Aside from the completely incomprehensible story line and budget special effects the film was riddled with cringe inducing performances from the likes of Shia LeBeouf and Cate Blanchett. The director Steven Spielberg even admitted later that the movie shouldn’t have been made. However, the movie made three quarters of a billion dollars around the world in box office revenue and there has been talk of an Indiana Jones 5.

Clearly then the numbers add up, making the quality of the movie secondary. The failure of the 2012 movie John Carter shows us the flip side of that coin, a big blockbuster movie without an established brand name meant audiences weren’t as easily suckered in when it was discovered to be a terrible movie.

This trend of resurrecting franchises that were hugely successful in previous decades has grown in the last ten years. The recent release of A Good Day to Die Hard, the fifth installment of the Die Hard franchise, sees an ageing Bruce Willis wheeled out to save the world again – even after the relatively poor fourth chapter Die Hard 4.0 (2007). More than 20 years after the original (and best) Die Hard the story development has been painfully uninspired, as the sequels have seen John McClane employing his brand of all-American justice upon the bad guys in increasingly vast settings, graduating from a single building in the first to the entire nation of Russia in the latest.Die Hard 5 will inevitably make money regardless of how good it is and there is already talk by the studio producers of a sixth incarnation.

Some might argue that these movies aren’t hurting anyone, in fact quite the opposite, since they make money they must be entertaining people right? Due to diminishing expectations by movie going patrons of what a blockbuster movie has to offer, people pay their money to watch trash like Transformers or Pirates of the Caribbean purely because there is little else on offer at multiplexes. Big brainless studio productions dominate the box office market but aren’t made to stand up to repeat viewing, making them an equation designed to line the pockets of studio executives.  Think of the money that could have been spent on nurturing talent, producing original films by exciting writers and directors, and making a mark in the history of cinema instead of rebooting franchises with such films as Rambo (2008) Rocky Balboa (2006) or Terminator Salvation. Sadly audience satisfaction isn’t the main concern of Hollywood studios but rather their exploitation.

Vlogbrothers come to Manchester

At the Monastery on Gorton Lane, the Vlogbrothers John and Hank Green spoke to a sold-out 450 person crowd as part of The Fault In Our Stars live tour. The duo have over 900,000 subscribers on YouTube and have been vlogging (video blogging) for the last five years. They were in Manchester to promote older brother John’s latest book The Fault in Our Stars’ release in paperback.

The book topped bestseller lists and sold around 1 million copies, thanks to support from the loyal fans known as ‘Nerdfighters’ who fight for nerd culture.

The irony of speaking in a monastery was not lost on John Green who dropped out of divinity school while trying to be ordained as priest. “You can drop out of school, and still achieve your dreams”, he says.

John told the audience how, while working as a student chaplain, he became disillusioned by the suffering befalling so many children. Unable to handle his position, he moved to writing and tried to write a book about his experiences.

The problem was that the book was nothing more than wish fulfilment: about a handsome young chaplain who got with all the beautiful doctors. He returned to this book throughout his career but it wasn’t until he met a young girl called Esther Earl, who tragically died of thyroid cancer, that he began to make progress. His experience with Esther encouraged him to write the book again with the focus shifted to the children rather the chaplain. The Fault in Our Stars aimed to show the bravery of children suffering with cancer, how they were as smart and as funny as other children and how we can sometimes dehumanise them.

John’s brother Hank was also entertaining, performing a series of songs on topics as diverse as ‘Harry Potter Eight’ (that was its real title, right?). Fans had the opportunity to question the Vlogbrothers as Nerdfighter and Olympic gymnast Jennifer Pinches joined them. Questions ranged from whether they liked Marmite to what their favourite experience in Britain had been so far.

One question John Green couldn’t answer was whether he could reveal anything about the newly announced The Fault in Our Stars movie. Watch this space.

The Fault in Our Stars (John Green) – Review

The Fault in ours Stars, written by John Green, is a love story between two teenagers with cancer (it’s more fun than it sounds). It became The New York Times’ #1 bestseller and was branded “damn near genius” by Time Magazine. When I came to read it I confess, I was scared, because of this central, unrelenting theme, our generation’s biggest collective fear: cancer.

Hazel Grace Lancaster is our narrator; she was diagnosed with thyroid cancer when she was 13 years old, and is dependent on a ‘miracle’ drug that is prolonging her life for an undetermined period, only preventing her tumours from growing.

She spends a lot of her time at home, in Indianapolis, watching America’s Next Top Model and thinking about death. Worried that her daughter might be depressed, Hazel’s mum makes her attend a Cancer Kid Support Group and it is there she meets Augustus Waters.

Augustus is 17 years old, and is in remission, after suffering from osteosarcoma and losing a leg from it. Their interaction begins with a book that Hazel lends to Augustus, and ends in love.

Even if the storyline doesn’t scream ‘funny’, Green makes it very funny. Hazel’s narration is very witty, and her talks with Augustus are always philosophical, yet so teenagerly romantic. One thing that surprised me in this book is the fact that the author, despite being a man, narrates the book through a girl’s perspective, and does so extremely well.

This book provides a different approach to cancer. One we’re not used to in media representations. It’s never easy to handle such a delicate subject but Green presents something real about the lives of those affected – it’s hard on everyone involved, but no one stops being their own person because they have cancer, no one stops being a teenager because they are a patient.

These are reflections about life and death and all in between. It should come with a warning (but not the one I presumed): it will make you think, about all of this and the end of it.

Theatre: Right Side Up

Manchester’s theatre scene is swamped with productions that regurgitate heteronormative and regressive values. Take Grease, which showed a few months ago at The Palace Theatre. The production was unimaginative and lacking in irony; failing, most critically, to pay attention to the shift in gender dynamics since the 1950s.
Horrified, I watched as teenage girls vacated the theatre, pummeled with the message that innocence and frigidity get you nowhere, but aspiring to fit into trousers that resemble a second skin will bag you popularity and the, all-important, boyfriend.
In another disenchanting theatre venture, I recently went to see The Accrington Pals (currently showing at The Royal Exchange) which has the audacity to stage the domestic boredom experienced by women in the First World War (for a rather ironic coma-inducing three hours). In one of the most impressive theatres in the city, I find myself reeling in offense as I watch ‘lovestruck’ women moan to each other that they have become ‘queer in the head’ (!!) while making tea on circuit.
If I wanted to go to a Stepford Wives convention I would have visited my grandmother’s house, thank you very much.
Despite sitting close to the front, I choose freedom take and wee snooze – perhaps a mistake as it turns out dribbling all over myself was enough to challenge the play’s precarious position as primary spectacle. My point is, mainstream theatre re-packages old stories, digs up dated issues and implicitly promotes old-fashioned values – it’s dry like a martini (the one that no one actually enjoys) and that needs to be shaken AND, sorry Bond, seriously stirred.
Enter The Secret Diaries of a Teenage Queer. I expected this play to be abysmal. It is a low-budget, three-man production with a title that recalls crass televised and filmic explorations of ‘real-women’s lives’ like Secret Diary of a Call Girl (commonly compared to Sex and the City) and Bridget Jones’ Diary.
I was prepared for something along the lines of ‘The Story of Tracey Beaker with a queer twist’. Rather embarrassingly, my preconceptions are immediately challenged. I am informed on arrival that the play sold out months in advance, leading The Contact Theatre to provide a matinee slot which failed to stem the demand as a waiting list continued to build.
In the outlandish possibility that a play like this one would show at one of Manchester’s larger theatres, the full-house that Grease failed to bring about might actually be achieved. As it stands, ‘alternative’ theatre with ‘non-normative’ story-lines feature at small, independent venues with packed-out audiences while larger theatres recycle the old stuff, drawing pitiful crowds. Clearly, Manchester theatreland would benefit from broadening its horizons.
The Secret Diaries of a Teenage Queer portrays the self-outing process of Hayley – a woman from the north who re-lives memories from her angst-ridden teenage years while unpacking old boxes in her father’s flat. Hayley’s box-rummaging triggers memories of tunes from the late eighties and early nineties which take us back to the years when she contended with social pressures to have a boyfriend and ‘put out’ like ‘every normal girl in school’.
Sexuality is shown to be a tyrannically unquestionable area of teenage development, exemplified by best friend Deb’s horrified response when Hayley comes out to her:
Deb: ‘All I’ve ever done is try make you normal like me. You keep your mouth shut!’
Hayley: ‘I haven’t done anything wrong!’
Deb: ‘You have! In your head! You are a fucking dirty queer pig!’
Similarly, though with less venom, Hayley’s father admits years later: ‘I didn’t want you to be g…’ The Secret Diaries of a Teenage Queer profoundly demonstrates the hostile space in which one ‘comes out’. Playwright Sarah Evans says that she seeks to explore ‘the in between site of tolerance and acceptance’ that a homosexual must straddle in twenty-first century English society. 
Indeed, we see that achieving a sense of acceptance in oneself does not protect the individual from being shunned and shamed. Notably, however, the play posits the outed position as an important one, even if it risks being vulnerable to attack and social exclusion. It is realistic but empowering.
Post-performance workshops are on offer to young people which will be used to re-shape this ‘work-in-progress’ (director Rachel Moorhouse), showing a rare openness in theatre to make changes to the script according to audience feedback.
The play can be seen to follow in the footsteps of Tony Kushner’s Angels in America (1993) – possibly the most successful ‘coming out narrative’ ever staged – which was edited numerous times while it was on circuit as Kushner kept in touch with the turbulent political changes occurring at the time. Still, Angels, like many plays of its kind, deals exclusively with men’s outing processes, so Moorhouse is covering relatively new ground even in the ‘alternative’ theatre scene.
Hayley’s story is in fact a dramatization of real teenage diaries given to Evans – this is not ‘real-life’ re-packaged for mere entertainment, but an appropriation of actual lived experiences to deliver an impacting comment of a timely topic.
Another progressive, and unprecedented, aspect to this production is the unusual casting of female characters. Sarah Emmott, who plays Hayley, and Jennifer Jordan O’Neill (Deb), are not your typical ‘size-impossible’ actresses. They are full-figured women with bodies an audience can relate to and, most progressively, their figures are totally irrelevant to the story – unlike say, Hairspray where a ‘larger than life’ female protagonist is staged as a ‘hilarious fatso’ with unrealistically big dreams.
Emmott and O’Neill use their bodies constantly – they dance, physically fight and, most terrifically, they EAT. Actual chips, crisps and even an English Breakfast feature in scenes which take place in ordinary environments from the home to the park and play a normalizing role, bringing conversations about sexuality out of the psychotherapist’s office and into the everyday.
This is a play that concerns all women, all people in fact who are interested in challenging taboos that are entrenched in the social mindset, even it just means emerging with an affirmation that carbohydrates can be eaten guilt-free.
At its heart, The Secret Diaries of a Teenage Queer is not just about being gay. It is also about the immense challenge of resisting pressure to conform in society – an inevitably up-hill struggle for those who are brave enough to lay their own tracks.
Its power, however, lies in the demonstration that sexuality is an ‘especially dense transfer point for relations of power’ (Michael Foucault, The History of Sexuality, 1976), as it does not shy away from giving the audience a dose of cold realism at the end when Hayley and her wife are denied the right to adopt and raise a family.
That warm, fulfilled feeling that theatre so often delivers was robbed of each audience member and instead I was left with a sense of deep dissatisfaction, fuelling a desire to strive to re-align dominant attitudes towards sexuality.
This performance blows the middle-class, nuclear-family catering purpose of theatre right out of the water. This is about using the arts to inspire social change. This, homos, heteros, queers and questionings, is theatre.

How to look sexy

Why oh why do girls repeatedly feel the need to promote their sexiness by exposing full skin and by revealing every curve of the female form? This is not to say short bodycon dresses cannot be a principal means of showcasing some of what a girl has to offer, but surely there are more subtle and alluring ways that say ‘sexy and cute’ rather than saying ‘sexy and easy’.

The well-known saying ‘less is more’ is most often heard with regard to sex appeal, yet its significance is often passed off in favour of the more ‘minimalist’ look. The less you show, the more people will wonder. Instead of your outfit saying ‘look at what I’ve got’, an outfit can also create mystery. Therefore, by revealing the back but hiding the front or wearing a low-neck top with something longer than black knickers, an outfit can be suggestive rather than explicit.

Sexiness is confidence. Therefore wearing something that makes you feel insecure or paranoid can be completely counter-effective. Why wear heels so high when you either require 100% attention paid to each step taken in order to keep your balance, or you resemble a mammoth aggressively lurching down the road? Similarly, although that little sexy black dress looks good on the hanger, its allure cannot be mirrored on the female body when the whole night is spent tugging down the bottom of the dress to ensure it covers your bum cheeks or pulling up the neck so your boobs don’t pop out.

Striking simplicity is key in creating sex appeal. Bright red lipstick or (and I emphasise the ‘or’) bold, smoky eye shadow will instantly grab attention in a more enticing way than smothering the face in the entire contents of your make up bag.

What has sexual liberation done for fashion?

In an age where sex is integral to the world of fashion, it is hard to imagine a time when little more than an ankle was advertised. While fashion before the sexual revolution did bring us flapper girls, cloche hats and the ‘New Look’ fashion of the late 1940s, this era of sexual liberation is unrivalled in its impact on the world of fashion.

During the 1960s and 1970s the combination of student protests, contraceptives and second-wave feminism resulted in pivotal changes to society. The ‘swinging sixties’ has become a symbol for the social conflict between the old and the new, the rigid and the forward thinking. The period gave more autonomy to young women who were given choices of when to be mothers, who to have sex with and how to express themselves. The emergence of Hugh Hefner and Playboy saw sex being brought to the forefront of the media, and sex toys, S&M and aphrodisiacs gained popularity.

Photo: Bert Stern Photo: Goldie Worrall @Tumblr

This eruption of youth known as the ‘Youthquake’ resulted in a revolution in the fashion industry. During the 1960s, youth throughout the West began to rebel against traditional clothing styles and generate new trends. In 1965 British designer Mary Quant dramatically raised the hemline of her skirts to create the miniskirt, which oozed empowerment and independence, liberating women and their legs.

In France, the designer André Courrèges similarly displayed his minimalistic, space-age above the knee dresses in 1964. The miniskirt also led to fabulously controversial accessories, such as provocative zip-up knee high boots made of stretch vinyl, known as ‘go-go’ boots and tights replaced nylon stockings, liberating women from garter belts. The miniskirt’s controversy continued to flourish, being made from see-through materials and loose crochet fabrics, making underwear an important fashion accessory. The sexual revolution played a role in the transformation of the desirable woman.

The 1950s high-heels and big-breasted woman was replaced by the ‘Lolita look’, more recognizable in today’s world. Androgynous and long-legged, the most famous model of this description was Twiggy, who initiated the adoption of the geometric bob and heavily mascaraed lashes that we still know and love. This androgynous look was enriched in the late 1970s with the punk movement in which prevalent rock stars such as Blondie pioneered the scene based upon anti-fashion, which tried to avoid mainstream trends. With punk designers such as Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm McLaren, the mini was transformed into PVC and of course black leather, an item so predominant today. Whereas in the 1960s the mini was accessorized with tights, the punk movement accompanied retro miniskirts with ripped fishnets to reflect the movement’s rebellious nature. Also born were some of our wardrobes’ most staple items, such as leather jackets, blazers, dress shirts and brothel creepers.

Photo: Pop Kampol Photo: fashioncriminals.tumblr

The 1960s also saw the birth of the ‘hip-hugger’, the ancestor of low-rise jeans, which rose to popularity during the hippie movement of the late 1960s/1970s. Bell-bottomed hip-huggers were paired with paisley-printed tops and nehru-collared jackets to create the bohemian aesthetic. Integral to the infamous disco culture of the 1970s, hip-huggers continued to prevail until the 1980s when they were replaced with higher-waistlines, admired today. However, in 1996 Alexander McQueen transformed the hip-hugger into the low-rise jean in his Dante collection show featuring Kate Moss, and such styles were continuously worn into the noughties.

It is unquestionable that some of the most familiar fashion trends had their seeds sewn in the political and social rebellions of the Sexual Revolution. As sex became accepted, desired and celebrated, women bore their gorgeous legs, their seductive midriffs and the love affair between sex and fashion began.

Are we all closet burlesque?

Six-inch heels and a 16-inch waist, large cocktail glasses and delicate satin gloves, luscious red lips and ’50s curls – there is an array beautiful things that you will find in an evening of burlesque.

Burlesque artists are enchanting to look at. You only have to see Dita Von Teese and you become lost in the curiosities of her costume. Many desire vintage glamour and sophistication and although corsets, pompadour hair and satin gloves do not feature in much of our usual everyday attire, the elegance of burlesque may not actually be that far from our everyday wear as we may first assume.

An art form from the 17th century, burlesque entertains through music, comedy and the art of the tease. It differs from stripping in the way that burlesque is about art and the tension of the tease while stripping is about nudity. Some burlesque dancers choose not to get naked at all. Burlesque is classy, comedic and charming – what girl would not want to be a part of that? Thanks to Ms. Teese, we can!

Photo: shopdecadesinc.com

In late 2012, the femme fatale launched her own dress collection, which can be bought online at shopdecadesinc.com. She also has her own lingerie line, perfume and book The Art of the Teese and intends to do bags and accessories – it’s never been easier to add the essence of burlesque into everyday life. This glamorous style has also inspired the high street. Take for example bustier tops, suspender tights and exposed seems that run down the leg, these are sold in Topshop, Miss Selfridge and Primark. Mesh tops and dresses were everywhere last season: exposing a little flesh is sexy and sophisticated. Dita Von Teese has donned this look on the red carpet at Cannes Film Festival in 2007 and at Jonathan Saunders celebration dinner earlier this year. Even staple garment the pencil skirt, teamed with vintage and Victorian accessories will give you the risqué edge.

But of course, Ms. Teese is not the only reason why burlesque has grown in popularity over the years, it has appeared on the catwalks of Dior, Ziad Ghanem and Jean Paul Gaultier. Burlesque has grown considerably over the years; it appears in books, movies, on catwalks and on the hangers in our wardrobes. We dress more burlesque than we think we do and come into contact with it more than we’ll ever know.

Catwalk of Shame

A rite of passage, some might say, the ‘Walk of Shame’ is an experience akin to the nightmare in which you find yourself naked in the middle of an exam hall. Except in this case, it is your raucous exploits that are exposed instead of your bare skin (although this does depend on which club night you attended). Whether you’ve had a night of drunken passion or have simply passed out in your friend’s kitchen (usually the latter), we’ve all found ourselves strolling the streets of Manchester looking anything but sexy, never mind sane. Harvey Nichols’ Christmas ad in 2011, met by much controversy, highlighted the dos and don’ts of walking home the morning after the night before.

Sadly, most of us resemble the don’ts. Why? Often similar to your choice of partner, last night’s vamped-up hair and makeup just does not quite translate in the cold light of day. Or, even worse, you may have finally bagged the person of your dreams but are worried you have the face of their nightmares. Like in the opening scene of Bridesmaids, one’s first instinct will be to slyly reapply the face so meticulously put on the previous night. However, placing more makeup over last night’s stale makeup will only make matters worse. A make up wipe or even just some tissue paper and moisturiser are your best bet, a clear face is always better than blotches of lipstick and mascara covered up half-heartedly by concealer.

Then there’s the dangerous dash home in which you are guaranteed to see everyone you know. Is there truly a way of pulling off a walk notorious for its cringe-inducing effects? Is a life of clean living and chastity our only option? There are a few things to try if you insist on a life of debauchery, filled with many of these turmoil-fuelled mornings. A purse friendly jar of Nivea crème never goes amiss, mints and a mini hairbrush (always needed during a night out anyway). Minimalists in the beauty department always win in the morning-after stakes, the less makeup you wear the less mess it can cause. And it goes without saying that the more casually dressed goers-out will have less of an ordeal – but where’s the fun in that?

I’m too sexy for my shirt: or maybe not

Sex and fashion are inextricably linked. Forgetting their more practical purposes for a moment, clothes are of and for the body and the body is the ultimate symbol of sex. A heady mix of different kinds of attraction, the two are locked in a Cathy and Heathcliff-esque love-affair that is destructive, constructive and absolutely compelling. Every sexual revolution has a clothing counterpart: the flapper dresses of the ’20s, the mini-skirts and unprecedented popularity of the bikini in the ‘60s, to the power shoulders and we-are-here-and-so-is-our-hair attitude of the ‘80s.

Yet, over the last decade or so you’d be forgiven for thinking fashion and sex had had something of a lovers’ tiff. The admittedly slim but indisputably sexy Cindy Crawfords and Naomi Campbells of the ‘90s had given way to waifs, the size-zero debate raged and Lara Stone was, well, nobody. And yet, though it might have been banished from the catwalks with its bushy tail between its perfect pins, sex and its power to make us want never truly died. If I say David Beckham, I’m willing to bet what’s left of my January loan (not much) that at least one of the images that has popped into your head is of him in some state of undress, moodily lit, muscles most probably glistening, with or without a coil of rope.

It’s the same story elsewhere: Tom Ford’s campaigns are notorious for their nudity and Dakota Fanning’s campaign photos for Marc Jacobs’ Lola (inspired by the classic novel Lolita), came under fire for being more Vladimir Nothingon than Nabokov. And why? Because sex sells for one thing, but we knew that already. But also because at one point every single one of us has thought about what we wear in relation to sex. If you say you haven’t, well, you’re lying.

And although, accept the intimate relationship that sex and fashion shares, we must; reduce fashion to mere chocolate-wrapper status, we must never. Fashion has never lost its spark when it’s dared to distance itself from sexy. Take androgyny for example, a theme that has reappeared in various guises season after season and is only about sex in the gender sense of the word. Fashion will always be more about inspiration than perspiration (yuck). In short, fashion is about more than just sex, but much like the rest of the world, it likes a bit sometimes.

Getting Lippy With It

It’s 7pm on Thursday 14th February, 2013 and you’re about to embark on that highly anticipated Valentine’s date. The nerves have kicked in and as you check your reflection in the mirror for what feels like the thousandth time, you wonder if that flourish of red lipstick is just a step too far. Even in our current society, where trends such as underwear-as-outerwear are deemed acceptable, we still find ourselves embroiled in the red lipstick debate: is it sexy or trashy? Do red lips whisper ‘come-hither’ or do they scream ‘I’m-gagging-for-it’?

Whatever your opinion, there’s no doubt that lipstick – the most pertinent and controversial of make-up materials – has a fascinating history. Mesopotamian women, circa 3000 BC, originally made it from crushed gemstones, and other ancient civilizations used it as decoration during tribal events. However, in medieval Europe it was banned due to its satanic connotations, and so began the trials of this cosmetic essential. Long labelled the tool of prostitutes and ‘loose’ women due to its association with female genitalia, lipstick and other make-up only became socially acceptable in the 1920s. This paved the way for the era of the red lip during the 1950s, in which it became the staple accessory of screen sirens and fashion icons. Could we imagine iconic images of Elizabeth Taylor or Marilyn Monroe without their red lips? Thanks to these stars, make-up is now a core feature in most young females’ lives – but why do we still feel so shy about brandishing a bold, sexy, colourful red lip?

I am one of those females who cannot be without her make-up bag, let alone her lipstick. My name is Joanna Dryden and I am a self-confessed lipstick addict. The MAC counter at Selfridges is my sanctuary (I should probably seek help, I know), yet even I find myself caught up in the conflict of whether I’ll end up looking Elizabeth Taylor-esque or more like a lady of the night. The way to achieve the former is to ensure your lippy is impeccably applied and to think about the outfit you’re pairing it with. A classic dark-palette evening look with red lips spells instant glamour, but recently stars such as Marion Cotillard have been pairing bright dresses in shades of pink or yellow with their rouge, thereby updating the trend.

picture: mydaily.co.uk

The wonder of lipstick in its rainbow of colours is in its ability to completely transform an outfit, and red in particular can work wonders on us, making our teeth look whiter and brightening our complexion. Be bold and embrace the lipstick trend and remember that when it comes to red lipstick, it’s all about how you wear it. Take your lead from Gwen Stefani and Dita von Teese in keeping it apple-red and impeccably applied, but beware of the tacky Kat Slater look: stay away from the leopard print bralet.

picture: photobucket

Money: how to save it and how to make it

Money: there is just never enough of it. We students regularly put off checking just how far into our overdrafts we are, and we all have those weeks during which we live solely on Basics pasta. The good news, however, is that there are ways to put the smile back on your bank account’s face. Here are a few simple ideas which could work wonders.

 

Money saving:

Put pen to paper

Keep a note of every single thing you spend in a week. At the end of the week, highlight any purchases which were unnecessary (such as takeaways and trips to Costa or Starbucks). Aim to cut these bad spending habits out for the foreseeable future, or find a solution to them. For instance, if buying coffee is your nemesis, invest in a flask to take to uni with you instead.

 

Leave your debit card at home

We are all guilty of taking our card out for ‘emergency’ purposes on nights out. When you use your card, it is easy to feel as though you are not spending real money. Set yourself a limit for the night, draw it out and leave the card at home. I repeat, leave the card at home. It is surprising how much this will save in the long run.

 

Sell your old books and clothes

Let’s face it, having to buy books for several modules each semester eats away at our bank balances. Once you are finished with your books, don’t leave them to collect dust. If you know someone who may need them, sell them on, even if it is for a slightly cheaper price. There are numerous Facebook pages for Freshers’ which can be great for advertising your used goods. By doing this you are spending less in the long term, as you are making a bit back on what you originally spent.

The same goes for clothes – sort your wardrobe out and get Ebaying!

Money making:

Part time jobs

This may be stating the obvious, but the best way to manage your student budget is to get a casual or part-time job (timetable permitting, of course). The Careers Service and GOV.uk both advertise some great opportunities. Plus, the transferable skills you will gain from a job can be used to help boost your CV and your employability, as well as your bank balance. It’s a win-win situation.

 

Check your emails

Keep on top of your student email account and reap the rewards. Just recently, the Careers Service have sent out an email asking second and third year students to pick up a copy of their annual Careers Guide, sign up to a focus group and let them know what they think about it. For those who are chosen to take part, the feedback sessions include free refreshments and a payment of £10. That’s pre-drinks sorted!

The Times’ Final Year Student Survey is another money making opportunity lying in your inbox. If you know twenty five third years who wouldn’t mind participating, then this could earn you up to £90. This wouldn’t take much effort and could easily pay for a few weeks’ food shopping. So why not give it a go?

Sexy gone wrong

You have probably seen her, you may have even been her. Let’s face it, in bodycon’s glory days we probably were all her. I’m talking about the girl. Her pockets (and arse cheeks) poke out from underneath her ill-advised high-waisted denim shorts, her disco pants groan with the effort of containing her curves, there’s too much crop and not enough top in whatever t-shirt she’s squeezed into, and you can bet the Jane Norman sale rail that she won’t be wearing tights. This is sexy gone wrong.

But I’m not here to judge, nor to criticise, nor to pretend that we haven’t all, in some state of inebriation, forgetting ourselves and our dignity, heard and answered the siren call of the short, tight and later, in the queue for Sankeys, absolutely bloody freezing. I’m here to tell you that there is another way, and it’s a warm one.

It’s not an uncommon sight to see girls, come rain, heavier rain, or slush (the only weather Manchester allows) tight-less, coatless, and by the end of the night probably soulless despite knowing deep down that goose-bumps and chattering teeth do neither a good look make nor a hot individual’s number get (not that I’m at all suggesting this should be your aim, merely a nice bonus!). Yet it needn’t be so, black opaques are your friend, as is the cloakroom, yes, it may mean one less drink at the bar, but let’s face it: a vodka jacket’s no substitute for a real one and I have amazed many a (fairly tipsy, I’ll admit) girl in the toilets with my ability to conceal a cardigan in even the tiniest of handbags. A bit of practise is all it takes.

I recently saw a girl in the queue for a club wearing a hoody and, it seemed, (owing to what appeared to be her bare bum peeking out from beneath it) little else, this provoked a good ten minutes of ‘is she or isn’t she in the buff?!’ speculation before we got close enough to see that she was indeed wearing clothes, they were just invisible to the naked eye and we’d forgotten our microscopes. Please don’t let this be you. Wear some tights, retain your dignity. It really is that simple.

Top 5: Sexy ad campaigns

1. Agent Provocateur

Undoubtedly one of the sexiest brands out there, this advert features a ‘magic camera’ which unleashes your true side. Now it turns out Monica Cruz’s happens to be a sexual deviant who likes to don an array of lacy lingerie and rub her body all over.

Photo: groomguru.co.uk
2. Tom Ford
It’s hard to search for sexy adverts without finding an abundance of Tom Ford’s work. Everything he does is perfectly crafted, as is this. There are many other racy ones there, but the wet, wet, wet look here just adds to the heat.
Photo: fashion.telegraph.co.uk
3. Dior

Sexy doesn’t have to be naked, which is demonstrated here. Almost with an Audrey Hepburn look about her, this black and white shot for Dior is stunning. Kunis’s figure is exquisitely crafted, as is the sly little look we are getting from her. And then there’s her slimline too.

Photo: ezcopylyrics.blogspot.com
4. Louis Vuitton

Now Louis Vuitton certainly jumped on the Olympic bandwagon last year with their campaign featuring Michael Phelps in a bath. Clearly there wasn’t room to fit his feet in the picture, though his intense look adds a sultry atmosphere to this campaign, where he has nearly bared all.

Photo: Cecelia Zalazar
5. Chanel
A further example of how sexy doesn’t have to be naked. With her very fragile look, the shapes Keira Knightly makes with her body are equally as sexy as the motorbike she is mounted on. As always, Chanel has given in to the classic side of sexy.

Review: Zero Dark Thirty

In the opening scene of Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty, the real-life story of the CIA’s search for Osama Bin Laden, a collection of telephone recordings from inside the collapsing World Trade Center is played. It’s a dark introduction and one that establishes Bigelow’s eagerness to emphasise the truth behind the film before throwing the audience head-first into one of the film’s torture scenes and introducing Jessica Chastain’s Maya, the largely fictionalised protagonist of the story.

As a rookie agent, Maya operates as our eyes and ears in this dark political landscape. She is a character who is horrified by her first contact with the extreme interrogation techniques of the CIA but who then develops into a chillingly effective interrogator herself. Chastain’s perfectly nuanced performance gives life to a character that could have been unlikeable and apathetic in the wrong hands: it is with every subtle gesture and flicker of emotion that we see a little bit more of this ice-cold character’s human side.

Bigelow adopts a similarly distant style, which could explain the director’s recent Oscar snub. In an attempt to free the film from any typical Hollywood embellishments, the events of the story are portrayed in a matter-of-fact, documentary style. Her commitment to the truth, on the other hand, robs the film of some tension and drive in the first act, an hour or so entirely dedicated to gathering intelligence. However, in the second act, and not a moment too soon, Zero Dark Thirty finally hits another gear and accelerates towards a conclusion with a thrilling sense of urgency and purpose that was slightly lacking up until that point. It is here that Bigelow demonstrates why she is an Oscar-winner. The build up to, and execution of, the raid on Bin Laden’s compound is a master-class in action directing.

Despite its achievements in film-making, and there are many, Zero Dark Thirty left me feeling empty. Ultimately, without any comment on the actions, methods or even people within the CIA, the film isn’t as thought-provoking or emotionally engaging as it should have been. The side-lining of Maya in favour of an underdeveloped Navy Seals Team in the climactic scene does nothing to raise the emotional stakes.

Zero Dark Thirty is a film that is difficult to define. It is an action film with only one action scene; a film about politics with no political stance and a thriller with a limited number of thrills. But somehow it works on all of these levels. The fascinating true-story is enough to hold the audience’s attention throughout the near 3-hour running time and no one can have you on the edge of your seat quite like Bigelow. It is refreshing to see a contemporary thriller leave the audience to form their own opinions although some may be frustrated by the film’s deliberate neutrality. The combination of a director and actor working at the top of their game elevate this complex film above most others, even if you leave the cinema wanting a bit more.

2013’s top dieting trends

So 2013 is still in its infantile stages and, as is customary during every New Year, masses of people have been kick-starting their resolutions to get fit and lose weight. Cue a surge of Slim Fast adverts, Weight Watchers TV commercials and fitness experts battling to create the latest dieting trend that will help Jennifer Anniston to lose half an ounce, which millions of women will be inspired to test out for themselves.

Here are some of the dieting fads set to arise within the coming year…

Smart phone dieting

It became popular in late 2012, but the New Year has seen a substantial increase in the number of fitness and dieting apps being released daily onto the app market. Not only are these apps inexpensive and easily accessible, many of them also allow users to keep track of their calorie, fat and sugar intake, giving them the nutritional statistics for millions of items. By syncing the app with social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, you can also post weight loss updates for all your friends and followers to see. Just imagine the look on the face of that skinny girl from Sixth Form, who told your mates that your arse looked like the size of Jupiter in that Asos bodycon dress, when she reads that you’ve managed to drop a dress size in 4 weeks. That’s enough motivation to put down that chocolate bar and reach for the fruit bowl, surely.

Quality, not quantity

Hallelujah, the experts have finally decided that high calorie options are good for us! But before you skip over to McDonalds for a Big Mac Meal, only very few of these options are considered ‘healthy’. Now, instead of concentrating on the quantity of calories, nutritionists believe that we should check out the quality of these calories. For example, despite containing some 30 more calories, a banana is a lot healthier than a Penguin bar. It is the nutrition per bite that counts, rather than the calorie consumption as a whole. 57% of experts reckon that this approach to dieting will be the key to weight loss for future dieters.

Go gluten-free

Yes, you heard right, we should follow the diet of all those who suffer with wheat intolerance. This ‘trendy’ diet abolishes any signs of a ‘wheat belly’ and apparently followers see dramatic results within weeks. But be warned, gluten is found in many products which would be even tougher to part with than bread, such as ice cream (sob). Ladies beware, it can even be found in your favourite lip balms. The wheat we could part with; the beauty sacrifices, however, are another story.

How To: Come-to-bed eyes

Some say the eyes are the windows to the soul, others might say they are the window to the perfect romantic evening on the 14th. There’s no denying that eyes are an important feature on a girl, with 8 out of 10 guys saying it’s the first thing they notice, so here are some simple steps to create a sultry smoky eye to bag yourself that perfect date.

Step 1: Add a shimmery base colour to the eyes, such as silver or gold, spreading up to the brow bone and focusing specifically on the inner corner of the eye, then running it underneath the lower lashes. I use Rimmel Glam Eyes Mono Eye Shadow in Gold Rush, using just my finger.

picture: Halee Wells

Step 2: Using a small eye shadow brush, or again, just your finger, blend a darker shadow such as brown or black, into the socket. Start by brushing over the lid, then outwards towards the brow bone and the outer corner of the eye to create a slightly winged effect. The key here is blending for that real smoky look. Finally with the same shadow, blend a small amount under the lower lash. I use L’Oreal Color Infallible Eye Shadow in Eternal Black, infused with a subtle silver shimmer.

picture: Halee Wells

TIP: Try not to blend your dark shades too close to the brow bone, we’re going for a killer stare tonight, not a killer punch.

Step 3: Apply liquid liner to the top of your lashes, starting from the inner corner, winging out at the end. I use Rimmel Glam Eyes Liquid Liner in Black. For a more intense stare, take a kohl black liner and run along the bottom lash line. Collection 2000 Intense Colour Supersoft Kohl Pencil in Black Magic is a perfect soft liner which lasts all night long.

picture: Halee Wells

TIP: For a more feline eye, take your liquid liner flick longer and wider, for a doll look, take it shorter but higher… Meow!

Step 4: MASCARA. Don’t be afraid here girls, three to four coats is perfect to finish the look, or even add some false lashes if you dare. My Holy Grail mascara has to be L’Oreal Mega Volume Collagene 24 Hour Mascara: a make up bag essential!

picture: Halee Wells

And that’s it! Your ultimate smoky eye. Don’t be afraid to experiment with other colours, just about any shade works with these simple steps.

Sex: The good, the bad and the ugly

Sex. That three letter word. In our collective experience, few of us have had good sex with all of our partners. There’s the guy who basically masturbates but replaces his hand with a girl, the girl who lies there like a corpse and then there’s the overly nervous bunch who just can’t seem to let go at all. But what actually makes sex good? And are my friends correct when they say that the best sex they have ever had was with someone who they were emotionally involved with?

Firstly, I am sure that we will all agree that there are basics for good sex. A physical attraction is key – I have only ever slept with one person I didn’t fancy (after far too much wine I hasten to add) and even writing this, I have to suppress the urge to vomit all over my keyboard.

Secondly, we are not in a porn movie. Overly dirty talk is really not necessary and can just be off putting. The same goes for overly complicated dirty talk. A guy once asked my friend if she wanted to see his penis… in French  – she was just confused. One last thing, don’t believe everything you read in magazines. Not all men are going to want you to get off with their armpits for instance (yes, I actually read that in a men’s magazine).

Without stereotyping, the general female opinion does seem to be that relationship sex is the best. You’re connected on an emotional level, so you feel comfortable and relaxed, but it’s still exciting. Equally, I have some male friends who prefer to be involved with the girls they sleep with, rather than picking up some randomer in a very short dress from POUT.

However, we all know that one night stands can be fun and that they will satisfy your needs if you’re withstanding an agonising dry spell. That said, do you want to risk the flash of awkward panic every time someone who looks like them rears their head in Blue 3? Or the pressure of them expecting post encounter text contact?

The conclusion is that a bit of both is fine – enjoy one night stands and relationship sex (although ideally not at the same time, as this may lead to problems). But, if you want truly good sex, find somebody you like (and who knows what you like) and a real emotional connection rather than an alcohol-induced one.

 

Preview: Trance

After a year of wowing the world with his Olympic Opening Ceremony, Danny Boyle (no Sir Danny, thank you kindly) is keeping the setting of London.  Once again demonstrating his impressive versatility, Trance is the story of art thief, Simon (James McAvoy) who has inconveniently forgotten where his recent steal is hidden. This comes much to the annoyance of Franck (Vincent Cassel) who is keen to unlock the secret from Simon’s subconscious. Enlisting the help of hypnotherapist Elizabeth (Rosario Dawson) to help recover its location, Simon quickly  begins to discover that the stakes are far higher than he originally anticipated.

The prospect of Boyle tackling yet another new genre is a tantalising one. He will likely be hoping it will join the likes of  Inception,  a film which appealed to a large mainstream audience without having to sacrifice a complex narrative. And with Boyle’s penchant for arresting visuals we can hope for another critical success after his two previous films, 127 Hours and Slumdog Millionaire, were nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars (the latter winning the award).

Boyle once again has gathered an excellent international cast, with McAvoy hoping Boyle may be looking for another long-term Scottish muse after his acrimonious split with Ewan McGregor (the two famously fell out when Boyle cast Leonardo Dicaprio over him in The Beach). The American Rosario Dawson and French Vincent Cassel join him to emphasise the global nature of the London art scene.

Few directors can claim to have directed films covering everything from zombie apocalypses and crack addicts to Mumbai slumdogs and ill-fated space missions (Sunshine– his most underrated film), but Boyle continues to refuse to be strapped to one genre. Rather than be seduced by the charm of Hollywood after his Oscar success, he’s remained in good ol’ Blighty and continued to defy expectations. After all, who would have guessed that after the huge success of Slumdog Millionaire Boyle would choose his next project to be a 90 minute film about man trapped between a rock and a hard place (if you’ll excuse the pun).

But, if the trailers are anything to go by, Trance could be a new addition to Boyle’s eclectic repertoire and we can only hope that he continues to constantly alter our expectations. Maybe a romantic comedy next? But set it in a mental institution, just to keep it fresh.