Skip to main content

Day: 25 February 2015

Interview: Southern

I meet Thom and Lucy Southern in their dressing room as they prepare to go onstage to support Hudson Taylor later. The sibling likeness in the pair is immediately striking, they are both small, slight and charming with matching pale eyes and fair hair. A brother and sister duo in their early 20s who are close enough to live together and, indeed, spend almost all their time together travelling and writing is pretty rare but they say their relationship is the keystone of their song-writing process. It starts with “Thom playing guitar,” and they bounce off each other so naturally that “even if Thom starts singing, I’ll start singing too, because I know where he’s going,” Lucy nods.

Like me, the pair grew up in Belfast; we actually went to the same school and, although a few years apart we know each other so talk inevitably turns to home. Belfast is one of those ‘village cities’ with a communal nosiness and a sense of shared achievements that can be equal parts reassuring and suffocating. The pair say they are asked a lot about their decision to relocate to London and they even experience the odd disgruntled fan posting “why do you never play Belfast anymore,” on YouTube videos. “We got a lot out of Belfast though, I started busking there,” says Thom, who started busking at 15 and even travelled to Nashville a few times with a Belfast songwriting competition, but they both agree “there could be more support for artists.”

Thom thinks that cutting their teeth on the folk-centric Belfast live circuit “gives us a culture to the music that nobody else has,” and affirms, “we’re proud of being from Belfast, it gives the music an edge, because not a lot of acts break from Ireland.” Although the ‘folk niche’, as Lucy puts it doesn’t completely accommodate the growth of new bands, as Lucy points out, “with friends in Paris, we travelled there a lot for gigs and always had our sights set very high, and you need to go to places like London to get the record labels; the management and industry is all there,” they mention the Coral’s Paul Duffy who they’ve worked with recently as an opportunity they would never have had if not in London. Thom laughs, “well exactly, you know, if you wanna have two jobs, stay in Belfast.”

I wonder if they notice how their musical style has evolved from their folky Belfast busking days with the addition of new live band members, Eoghan Clifford on drums and Darryl Pruess on bass. Eoghan being from Manchester “definitely added a more Northern vibe,” to their sphere of influence. With the band spending time together musical tastes will seep into the collective consciousness and thanks to Eoghan they “started listening to a lot more Stone Roses.” Thom chips in “Darryl brings a quite experimental early 80s kind of punk sound with his bass. If I was to play my guitar on my own it would be a straight up kind of Rolling Stones vibe but Eoghan adds a rock element and Darryl a punky rift, while Lucy’s harmony adds even more genres.”

Independent label Marathon have been great for letting them develop this sound and not pressuring the pair to have “a certain clean sound for the radio,” Thom agrees enthusiastically, “they’ve done exactly what their name is,” letting the pair take the time to put together an album they’re “really, really happy with.” We discuss the idea that the idea of ‘the album’ as a whole is coming back in, from The War on Drugs to Flying Lotus to Beck, this year has definitely seen a focus on constructing an album concept. “Yeah,” Lucy agrees, “what we’ve grown up on is albums, I love that feeling of being on a car journey listening to an album and loving each song that comes up.” Accordingly they have spent time crafting an album that won’t “just be a few hits, it’s more about the concept of the album, but at the same time they’ll all be catchy songs, we like making catchy pop music,” says Thom.

The album has been “produced by Mark Rankin, who worked with Queens of the Stoneage, produced Bombay Bicycle Club’s last album, even worked with Adele, and she’s won a grammy like.” Thom’s excitement here is tangible, there really is the sense that years of busking and moving around to put themselves in the right place at the right time have been building up to these next few months, with the pair “touring in March and April releasing an album in May, and then we got our tour of Ireland and the festivals in the summer,” and potentially making it big “if everything works out.”

You Can’t Handle the Truth – Laughter Etiquette

Every frequent cinemagoer will be aware of the dramatic effect which audience reactions can have on a particular cinematic experience. Whilst the sense of shared viewing can add an extra dimension to a film, your personal reaction is necessarily moulded by those of the people around you. Admittedly, certain extreme audience reactions can be hilarious, as anyone who went to see Magic Mike can vouch for, but there are times when sitting with a group of people who are particularly prone to fits of giggles can prevent you from taking a film at all seriously (I’m still angry with myself for laughing through 90 per cent of Her).

Whilst over-the-top audience laughter is ordinarily an irritating but largely harmless cinematic side-effect, there are some contexts in which it becomes not only a distracting reaction, but a disturbing one. This was particularly noticeable during my second viewing of the film Whiplash. One of its most memorable scenes is Andrew’s first rehearsal with the studio band, when we first get a sense of the extreme dynamic of his relationship with his mentor. It’s important that this scene has an initially comedic tone; having laughed at Fletcher’s clever one-liners (“That is not your boyfriend’s dick. Do not come early”), we feel even more uncomfortable when we realise just how far he’s prepared to go. However, countless slaps-in-the-face later, and the laughter produced by the audience at the cringe-worthily painful insult “worthless friendless faggot-lipped little piece of shit” is if anything even more uproarious. My response to this may be an overreaction, but sitting in a room full of people who seem to find a middle-aged man threatening to fuck a teenage boy like a pig to be the comedic event of the century is an unsettling experience.

This lack of empathy is, perhaps, indicative of a larger problem in cinema, as the majority of commercially successful films are very often so tailored to their target audience that they are made to fit uncompromisingly into a definite genre. It is unsurprising that this kind of lazy commercial filmmaking has produced a society of lazy and undiscerning viewers, who are unable to detect tonal changes or emotional nuance. Whilst it may seem an inane thing to moan about, people’s emotional reactions to art and their ability to empathise with fictional characters can say a lot about their interactions with others more generally. More challenging cinema for the mass market is to be encouraged if such widespread voyeuristic tendencies are to be prevented.

Exeter University Students up in arms over ‘impossible’ economics exam

An exam paper has been contested by economic students at the University of Exeter after spelling mistakes together with other errors were found within the paper. According to the students, the exam was also “un-reflective of course content”.

An online petition has been submitted by more than 200 students, demanding that the university examine the paper and conduct an investigation. In addition, they have asserted that during their course they did not receive an adequate preparation for the exam they had to take.

In a statement a representative of the students has said: “it is unacceptable that the university should be making such mistakes, considering the fact that [we] are actually paying £9000 tuition fees a year”.

About two-thirds of the students who took the exam have sent formal complaints to the university. However, the University of Exeter has claimed that strict rules are applied to all exam papers and that they are checked diligently.

A spokesman of the University of Exeter declared that controls are undertaken “”internally and by an external examiner” during every exam. Different aspects are verified such as adequate level of questions compared to module topics and paper general accuracy.

He added further: “This procedure was correctly followed for this exam paper. The business school treats all complaints seriously, and we are now working with students and staff regarding this issue.

“Our procedures are being accelerated in this instance to address the concerns raised by our students.”

Students however have said that is not the first time that such mistakes have happened and there was a similar situation in 2012 for the same module. At that time, the university resolved the issue by adjusting the marks that were previously released.

Some of the aggrieved students have argued that a similar solution ought to be adopted for for the present matter, considering that in January the average mark of the exam on economic principles and policy was very low, only 53 per cent. Students, who usually achieved high marks with an average of 80 per cent, got only 40 per cent. The lowest grades were around 10 per cent.

Economic students sent their petitions individually to Exeter’s vice-chancellor, but they also wish to have the opportunity to take action as a group and arrange a meeting with senior managers from the university and the business school. They hope that in the next few days this can be done.

A similar episode also took place at the University of Sheffield last month. With third year students protesting for an exam on economics that they took in the last semester, which they described as “impossible”.

The Orange Grove to be converted into flats

The Orange Grove, situated in the heart of the Fallowfield area, will be demolished and converted into flats. This building, located in Wilmslow Road, was previously a student pub, but it was closed over two years ago and has since remained vacant.

Around 35 flats and commercial spaces are planned to be developed on the ground floor. Those supporting the development have asserted that it will be a key element for the development of the area by the construction of a ‘high quality building’.

However, this project has raised concerns within the Fallowfield community and residents have complained that this will significantly increase the student population in the area. They are concerned that incidents of antisocial behaviour might increase, as they believe it did after Mayfield Court was developed into student accommodation.

The committee backing the development have responded that students are not the target of the development. They added: “[We] acknowledge that there are concerns about the proposal. However, [we] consider these to have been addressed.”

Chris Paul, Withington councillor, asserted that this development may probably cause more risks for cyclists, considering the consequences that higher traffic could have on the nearby Fallowfield Loop. He further added that last year a cyclist died after an accident on Wilbraham Road.

He said: “This authority has got a very poor record, in my view, of enforcing proper arrangements around building sites for cyclists and pedestrians, including some of our own developments.”

After mentioning the development project of Whitworth Art Gallery as a positive model, he said: “I would urge the committee to consider requiring there to be some very clear arrangements during construction to ensure pedestrians and cyclists are safeguarded.”

Withington MP John Leech claimed that Fallowfield needs more accommodation for families and not new flats. Concerning the decision taken by the council to approve the plan, he said: “This is another example of Labour’s one party state in Manchester ignoring the legitimate concerns of local residents.”

University degree not worth £9000, say 81 per cent of students

Four in five UK students value their degrees at lower than they are paying, according to a recent survey by Student Money Saver (SMS), an online news provider. The research also found that 15 per cent of students value their degree at the same amount and only four per cent value their degree at more than they are paying.

This information came out as the Labour Shadow Minister for Universities, Science and Skills, Liam Byrne, endorsed the principle of tertiary education being free of charge.

Speaking to an audience at King’s College London on the 15th February, Byrne said: “Obviously I would love free education. I would want it to be free just like the NHS, but I’m not going to make a promise that is not deliverable.”

Byrne’s statement on the issue indicates that he sees affordability rather than the principle that graduates should directly contribute as the main reason not to abolish tuition fees.

Results of the SMS survey show that students are still largely optimistic their increased earnings will more than cover their university costs, though 19 per cent believe they will not earn enough over their lifetime to cover their degree and nine per cent believe that their degree will not help them earn more money once joining the workforce.

The survey was conducted in November 2014 using a one thousand-student sample. In general, it concluded that students are broadly dissatisfied with high fees and do not believe their degrees are good value for money.

Ed Miliband, Leader of the Labour Party, has recently stated his intention to lower the cap to £6000. As The Mancunion reported last week, this suggestion has been met with strong criticism from the academic community, with Vice-Chancellors from 20 leading English universities signing a letter to The Times stating that proposed cuts in tuition fees would cause substantial damage to the economy and students’ educations.

The survey by SMS can be found here

Racial discrimination still exists in top universities

Racial inequality remains prevalent throughout all areas of British higher education, including admissions, staffing and employment, according to a new report by the Runnymede Trust, a London-based think tank.

Led by academics from the University of Manchester and Leeds Beckett University, the report found that black and minority ethnic (BME) students are less likely to get into the more prestigious institutions, notwithstanding their A-level results.

David Lammy MP, in his foreword for the Runnymede Trust report, said: “Whether in terms of admissions, attainment, employment, the student experience or indeed staffing, universities still have some way to go to ensure equality for ethnic minorities in Britain.

“So despite the lofty ideals of universities, they do no better—and are in fact doing worse—than many other institutions in British society when it comes to race equality.”

Omar Khan, Director of the Runnymede Trust, said: “Evidence that white British students with lower A-level results are more likely to get into elite British universities than Asian students with higher A-level results suggests there is unconscious bias, if not positive discrimination, in favour of white university applicants in 2015.”

Among other results, the report found that 1.5 per cent of students who go to university are Black Caribbean but that in the prestigious Russell Group of research-intensive universities, only 0.5 per cent of them make it. Likewise, Black African students make up 4.4 per cent of university students but only 2.2 per cent of Russell Group students are from that minority group.

Robie Shilliam, a Queen Mary University of London academic who participated in the research, said: “Unless we subscribe to the idea that black people are inherently more stupid than white people we have to say that there is something going on structurally in these universities.

“If that’s the case then universities which are supposed to provide a meritocratic basis for future life are actually reproducing existing inequalities and might actually be deepening them.”

Pam Tatlow, who participated in the Runnymede Trust’s research and is Chief Executive of Million+, a think tank, said, “a small number of universities, about 30 in total, educate 60 per cent of all black students and 36 per cent of all Asian students. But perhaps unsurprisingly, these are not the universities that politicians mention very often.”

Some scholars in the project have also pointed out that access to data about admissions processes is becoming increasingly restricted and thus providing a totally transparent view of the situation is becoming a harder task.

The Mancunion contacted all 24 universities in the Russell Group. Efforts to obtain comments from the universities of Birmingham, Cambridge, Durham, Edinburgh, Exeter, Imperial College London, Leeds, London School of Economics, Newcastle, Nottingham, Queen’s University Belfast, University College London, Warwick and York, which together make 15 of the 24 institutions in the group, were unsuccessful.

A spokesperson for Cardiff University, the only university in the group to recognise the existence of inequality in admissions, said: “The university recognises that there are still challenges to address in ensuring equality for BME applicants and students.”

The universities of Oxford, Glasgow and King’s College London rejected the problems pointed out by the report in the strongest terms, with a representative for the University of Oxford describing the inequality claims as “unsubstantiated,” a spokesman for the University of Glasgow citing its policy of “zero tolerance on all forms of discrimination,” and a speaker for King’s College London saying that “we take the issue of fair access very seriously.”

The universities of Bristol, Liverpool, Sheffield and Southampton remitted all comments to the Russell Group head office.

Wendy Piatt, Director General of the Russell Group, said: “A crucial piece of the jigsaw is missing because the [Runnymede Trust’s] research takes no account of the entry requirements for the courses that students apply to. Many good students haven’t taken the subjects needed for entry and universities need students not only to have good grades, but grades in the right subjects for the course they want to apply for.”

A spokesperson for Queen Mary University of London said: “Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) has a long and proud tradition of diversity, engagement with our East London community, and increasing access to higher education. We celebrate the diversity of our student body and aspire to be recognised as a prime destination for students from lower participation backgrounds”.

A spokesperson for the University of Manchester said: “The University of Manchester has a commitment to addressing gaps in participation between equality groups through our Access Agreement. As part of this the university undertakes targeted outreach work for protected groups such as adult learners, BME groups, gender-targeted activities and disabled learners.

“Work to increase the participation of BME groups in higher education is co-ordinated through a dedicated post based at the university and working in partnership with the Race Relations Resource Centre—a Trust based within Manchester Central Library.”

The full report ‘Aiming Higher: Race, Inequality and Diversity in the Academy’ can be found at the Runnymede Trust website.

Reassembling the self: the art of schizophrenia

Susan Aldworth, collaborating with works by Camille Ormston and Kevin Mitchinson who both have schizophrenia, created the ‘Reassembling the Self’ exhibit. Combining art, science, psychiatry and individual histories, Aldworth has created works that explore the different perceptions and experiences of an individual with schizophrenia.

Aldworth studied Philosophy at Nottingham University and printmaking at Sir John Cass in London. She has been described as an experimental printmaker and filmmaker, producing Memoires, a short film about schizophrenia.

Kevin Mitchinson suffered from auditory hallucinations, anxiety, depression and episodes of paranoia. The voices were described as:
‘Continually present, at times shouting and bullying, and always critical of his every thought and action’.

He stated that art has helped him reach his current level of recovery, where he is in control of his voices and is rarely paranoid. His confidence also remains at a high.

Camille Ormston has painted seriously since 1996 and investigates herself as the subject of the works. Art has also aided Camille’s recovery and improved her confidence.

Professor Anya Hurlbert at Newcastle University has described the exhibition as being ‘at heart about human identity, the sense of self and how it holds itself together’.

She further stated that:
‘From the human mind comes human identity, a constant subject of Susan Aldworth’s work’ and
‘In people with schizophrenia, the brain rhythms go awry, perceptions disintegrate, and so-it is thought-does the sense of self.’

There are many misconceptions about the condition of schizophrenia. It is usually confused with other condition such as multiple personality disorder. At the core, the NHS describe it as ‘a mental health condition that causes a range of different psychological symptoms, including:

• Hallucinations – hearing or seeing things that do not exist.
• Delusions – unusual beliefs not based on reality which often contradict the evidence.
• Muddled thoughts based on the hallucinations or delusions.
• Changes in behaviour.

Treatments include antipsychotic medication, talking treatments such as cognitive behavioural therapy, social support and community activities to encourage recovery such as art therapy.

There is a stigma attached to schizophrenia, as mentioned previously, the idea that it is a ‘split personality disorder’ or that sufferers are violent. On the contrary, the majority of people suffering with schizophrenia are not violent. Professor Anya Hulbert said:

‘The diagnosis of schizophrenia often still elicits fear and condemnation at the worst, pity and protectiveness at best.’

She further stated that other disorders such as depression or bipolar disorder have been somewhat normalised in society, whereas schizophrenia has not. This is likely due to it being less common and the misunderstanding of symptoms as being dangerous. She said:

‘Everyone knows what it feels like to be depressed. But what does it feel like to be ‘schizophrenic’?’

A lot of work went into achieving this project, including interviewing people with schizophrenia, studying electrophysiology, visual psychophysics etc. and discussing treatments with psychiatrists.

Why did you decide to do it?
For the last 15 years, my work as an artist has focused on what it means to be human. I studied Philosophy at university before I studied Fine Art, and I always had an interest in the relationship between the mind and the body. There was a moment in 1999, when I found myself on a hospital operating table having a brain scan – I could see into the workings of my brain, real time, on a monitor as they scanned it whilst I was still conscious. I was watching myself think. It was an epiphany! This brain landscape was worth exploring as an artist. And also, the imagery of the scans was uniquely beautiful. It left me wondering what is human consciousness? How is it summoned up from the 3 pounds or so of flesh of the brain?

Since then, I have spent my time considering what it is to be human. I have worked with scientists, doctors and people with Alzheimer’s, Schizophrenia, Epilepsy, and Downs Syndrome. I have talked to Philosophers and psychologists. I work across traditional academic disciplines. All these different narratives have an influence on my work.

Contemporary scanning techniques give us access to the internal living body, with imagery that is both beautiful and vital. Neuroscience is beginning to unravel how the brain works and presenting to us with extraordinary digital images. I would be crazy to ignore this new profound visual language.

Neuroscience is a profoundly visual science – and the scans of the brain provide me, as an artist, with a new visual link between the external surface of the body and the subjective experience of being that person. The relationship between mind and body.

But at the heart of my work, is an interest in what it is to be me, and more interesting, what it is to be someone else. I am not a scientist. I am not trying to solve the hard problem of human consciousness. Neither is my work simply illustrative – I am not trying to represent the physical brain or explain science. I am working with contemporary scanning technologies, and tapping into a contemporary interest or belief in neuroscience as the latest creed to offer a rational explanation of the human condition. My work is simply about what it is to be human… I work across academic disciplines to explore and examine ideas. But in the end my work is art. It asks questions but never tries to proffer solutions.

Reassembling the Self was a portraiture and self-portraiture project exploring schizophrenia which I developed during my time as Artist in Residence at the Institute of Neuroscience at Newcastle University from 2010- 2013. I worked with basic scientists, clinicians and two artists with a schizophrenia diagnosis exploring some of the complex narratives of schizophrenia. It was a difficult project.

Schizophrenia is poorly understood and the main purpose of the project was to address some of the misconceptions and stigma around the condition. Initially I had planned to make portraits of Camille and Kevin, two artists with a schizophrenia diagnosis who I was working with on the project. But their self-portraits were more powerful and authentic than any representation I would make. I decided to include their extraordinary work in the exhibition.

I made word portraits of Kevin and Camille ‘Dreaming Voices 1 and 2’ which were made up from their own words when describing the ‘internal voices that they hear.

Has it been something you’ve worked on for quite a while?
I started making the work for the exhibition in 2011. I was lucky enough to work with the legendary lithographer Stanley Jones who invited me to work with him on the 12 lithographs you see in Reassembling the Self. These are aggressive and difficult works. The reassembled anatomy is a metaphor for the pain and difficulty of having schizophrenic when you can feel that your self is being stolen away from you by your own anatomy. The relationship between the physical brain and your sense of self in this context is very complicated.

Did you find it hard or easy to depict it in an artistic way?
It was very challenging. I didn’t want to make any statement myself about what schizophrenia might or might not be. I wanted to make work which invited the audience to experience an alienation from their sense of Self.

So, the Reassembling the Self lithographs are formal portraits of Schizophrenia itself. The idea is simple. A body attacks itself – and this is represented by a reassembled anatomy where huge ear bones and a hip bone become the shoulders bones, where a large pair of ears form an arse. A distorted anatomy as a visual equivalent of distortions to ones sense of Self which can happen in schizophrenia.

These prints also show the extraordinary technical versatility of lithography as a form. These are plate lithographs. Seamlessly I was able to mix digital photography, ancient anatomical illustrations with drawn marks and a painterly quality. Colour is subtle. I can’t think of any other technique which would have let me do this.

I also used eye tracking technology to make a self-portrait called Self 2. It was an interesting experiment to draw with one’s eyes rather than one’s hand. The process exposed the way one looks at things rather than the way one draws. It also might tell us something about the way an individual perceives the world.

Do you think there is a general misconception about people with schizophrenia?
People with schizophrenia are often treated appallingly in the press. There is a huge amount of ignorance and mythology around the condition. This ‘bad press’ can lead to people feeling socially isolated. But like all conditions, it is on a spectrum… and not very different from being me or being you.

What do you hope the ‘Reassembling the Self’ project will do to Schizophrenia, if anything?
I hope that the exhibition and the project will open up wider discussion about the experience of schizophrenia. And maybe help to explode some of the stigma surrounding the condition. This is the third time we have shown this exhibition in the UK, and each time it has attracted an interested and diverse audience.

There is a symposium about schizophrenia organized by Manchester University, open to all, at Waterside Arts Centre on May 13th. We hope to bring together under one roof many different people, from varied backgrounds, academic and non-academic, people affected by and dealing with schizophrenia including clinicians, mental health professionals, artists and interested people to explore many aspects of living with, and treating schizophrenia. It promises to be a very special day. All welcome but you need to register.

Did the use of different materials (e.g. etching and lithograph) intend on sending out a different message in your art? Same with the use of colour contrasts e.g. black and white.
As I described I worked with Stanley Jones at the Curwen Studio to make the lithographs. The etchings were commissioned by the Arts Council last year to add to the exhibition as it toured the UK. I wanted to make work which explored the fragility of human identity. How a stroke, or a brain injury or illness can fundamentally change who we are. I am a hairdresser’s daughter, and have always been fascinated by hair. Hair is about lots of lines working together on your head. It is also very near to the brain – hair grows from the skull.

I wanted to use human hair to draw with, and I worked with master printer Nigel Oxley to make The Entangled Self suite of etchings you can see in the exhibition. The etchings continue my interest in making work printing with marks taken directly from the human body in an exploration of human identity and portraiture. Hair produces extremely fragile lines – at the limit of what you can capture on an etching plate. These prints are a reflection on how fragile our sense of who we are really is.

In the film Memoirs, how did you go about making it and why did you use and what was the significance of the dancing figures?
My film ‘Memoirs’ was based on an extraordinary account by Daniel Paul Schreber in 1895 of his descent into psychosis.

‘Can there be any prospect more terrible for a human being …than the prospect of losing one’s reason ‘, Daniel Paul Schreber, Memoirs of My Nervous Illness 1895

I worked with the animator and composer Barney Quinton. We collage together archive film footage from the Welcome Film Library, working from the images that Schreber described in his book. Schreber reveals how he “considered himself chosen to redeem the world, and to restore to it the lost state of Blessedness. This, however, he could only do by first being transformed from a man into a woman….” and the dancing figures represent his wish to become a woman.

Reassembling the Self is a free exhibit at the Waterside Arts Centre in Sale and is running until Saturday 30th May 2015.

“De Profundis” by Oscar Wilde – review

Stephen Fry is currently spearheading the campaign to get the Queen to pardon those who were persecuted of the ‘gross indecency’ law that plagued the minds and the justice system of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for decades.

49000 men were wrongly imprisoned, made to suffer for no reason, and forced to live with undeserved shame and guilt that led some to end their lives prematurely. They were given hormone-changing drugs and were sterilised. All this simply because of their sexuality.

This petition needs to be heard. Its demands must be answered. No person should be subjected to this by their country on account of their sexuality.

Oscar Wilde is a literary hero of Stephen Fry. Hearing Fry talk about him in a recent show where he was promoting his new book, you realise what an inspiration Wilde is to him: His literary works enticed a young Fry, but it was his persecution of the ‘gross indecency’ law that helped Fry cope with his own homosexual feelings.

Wilde’s incarceration was just like any other, an innocent man thrown into jail, restricted of freedom and liberties all because he was gay. They took Wilde’s pen, and they took his books, but ultimately, they took his life. The harsh conditions of prison, where the slogan was “Hard labour, hard fare, hard bed,” led to the deterioration of health for Wilde and he would die shortly after completing his sentence.

However, in prison Wilde was granted access to several books, and was allowed to write. Of the books he chose, many had spiritual meaning. Dante’s Divine Comedy spoke to Wilde the most, as well as the Bible in three different languages. In between reading, and the hard labour, Wilde penned a letter to Lord Alfred Douglas, the man who he had once been intimate with.

The letter would later be published in full and uncensored, under the name De Profundis, and is autobiographical, detailing Wilde’s reflections on his life and what led him to being incarcerated, as well as the spiritual development that he underwent during his time in prison. The letter opens with a desperately sad statement:

“…Suffering is one very long moment. We cannot divide it by seasons. We can only record its moods, and chronicle their return. With us time itself does not progress. It revolves. It seems to circle round one centre of pain.”

The first half of the letter is dedicated to Wilde’s reflections on his time spent with Douglas where he reveals their tumultuous relationship, and how he traded a life of quiet intellect for his pursuit of “uncompleted passions, of appetite without distinction, desire without limit, and formless greed.” The letter reads like Wilde has a lot of angry regrets, that he blames Douglas for his descent into dedicating his life to carnal lusts which would lead to his imprisonment, but eventually he forgives Douglas.

The second half of the letter has more of an introspected focus that incorporates a religious awakening of Wilde, as well as a realisation of what life could be about:

“I have said of myself that I was one who stood in symbolic relations to the art and culture of my age. There is not a single wretched man in this wretched place along with me who does not stand in symbolic relation to the very secret of life. For the secret of life is suffering.”

This last remark just shows what prison can do to a human being. Once a man who loved life, who wrote fantastic plays, degraded to despairing about his own time on earth, and all caused by being accused of ‘gross indecency’ by inhabiting a particular sexuality.

Considered in the context of Fry’s petition, Wilde’s letter is beautiful and effective in achieving an aim that probably was only tacitly targeted by the author himself: Of detailing what it is like to suffer in jail for a breaking an unjust law.

A key aspect of the petition is that we pardon every man, not just those who achieved spectacular things for their country like Turing, or who were outstanding in their fields, like Wilde, but because to suffer for something that is blatantly not a crime is perhaps the worst thing a judicial system can inflict, and to pardon these men is the only way of even slightly making up for an awful wrong.

Yes, Wilde’s letter is unique, and perhaps he was the only man who was sentenced under the ‘gross indecency’ act who could write such a powerful message, but the message is universal of everyone who was imprisoned for the same reason, and serves as what I believe to be the most powerful reason why this petition must go through.

Please follow this link if you would like to sign the petition:

https://www.change.org/p/british-government-pardon-all-of-the-estimated-49-000-men-who-like-alan-turing-were-convicted-of-consenting-same-sex-relations-under-the-british-gross-indecency-law-only-repealed-in-2003-and-also-all-the-other-men-convicted-under-other-uk-anti-gay-la

YCHTT: Has Film Reviewing Gone Too Far?

Over the past few months I have come to question the relevance of film criticism in its purest form, the 500 word (or thereabouts) review. If someone is committed to watching a movie then they probably will, yet if they do place their trust in a reviewer that person will probably be found on YouTube anyway. Moreover, there are so many newspaper and blog critics out there that were you to run your any typical hatchet job or glowing endorsement through an internet plagiarism tester you’d probably discover two-hundred write ups that made the same points about the same parts of the same film. So, what has brought on this introspective examination on the value of cultural critique? Birdman, mostly.

Squawking and flapping its way into cinemas and awards ceremonies everywhere, this cunningly made one-shot (or rather very, very well-edited ONE-hundred-shot) drama has achieved global praise for its off-the-wall humour and gut-punch performances, to the point that saying anything negative about it would be as futile as ‘downvoting’ the next Age of Ultron trailer. Its Oscars are already waiting in the wings, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it. It’s not perfect, though: to use that most sinful of reviewing clichés, Birdman is not for everybody, but it is a tightly run ship which covers a lot of physical, psychological and existential material within an extremely confined setting.

One scene in Birdman really resonated with me; it made me not want to talk about the film at all – let alone review it – simply to avoid the inter-textual black hole which it would create. Main character Riggan Thomas (Michael Keaton) , in fit of jealous rage, accuses a revered theatre critic of being a coward, never ‘putting anything on the line’ and constructing an entire career out of capricious, superfluous sentences which have no higher function than to label and compare. Regardless of his crushing schizophrenia and playwright’s pretentions, Riggan has a point. It’s hard to rip yourself from the formula when writing about a film, especially one that has several Academy Awards attached to it along with 378 professional critic’s reviews roosting in its IMBd nest, a page which places it in the top 120 films of all time. What can all this mean? Probably, it means I should take a break from reviewing films.

TV Binge: Black Mirror

We’ve all heard about the potentially harmful effects that technology may have on our society an abrasively large number of times. It is, of course, something we, for the most part, choose to ignore – whether it might come from Stephen Hawking, the Amish, or an overly enthusiastic conspiracy theorist, any hellfire and brimstone warning about how technology will destroy human civilisation tends to be shrugged off with a quick chuckle and clichéd quip.

Enter Black Mirror – it’s been hailed by many as our generation’s equivalent of The Twilight Zone. Only seven episodes have been broadcast to date, and each one of them – featuring a new premise and cast each time – is an exceptionally well-crafted and disturbingly relevant look at mankind’s relationship with technology. And it’s bloody terrifying.

Comedian Charlie Brooker – the show’s creator – gives us a series of stories that truly defy classification. The show isn’t preachy enough to be called a cautionary message, yet it’s too thought provoking to simply be a high-concept sci-fi drama. It’s too bleak and tragic to be a comedy, yet possesses too much of a sneer and air of ridicule to be a full-on drama. This is part of the show’s genius. It is, by any definition, a true black mirror – a dark reflection of humanity in the digital age, both through our ironic nature and the contractions that we have thrust upon ourselves.

As an anthology show, each episode treats us to a new setting to experience Brooker’s pessimistic outlook on life. The scenarios give us an assortment of twisted ways in which our obsessions with gadgets could develop, from devices that make us never forget anything to machines that allow us to artificially communicate with our recently deceased friends and relatives. The most recent episode – a Christmas special rather ironically titled White Christmas – throws us into a world where people can ‘block’ one another in real life and create artificial replicas of their consciousness to perform menial tasks at home. And yet, despite all the emphasis being placed on technology, Black Mirror remains at heart a story about the humanity of the situation. One could easily interpret Black Mirror as being more misanthropic than technophobic, showing us how depraved we humans can be in our innovations.

Despite having a mere handful of episodes under its belt, Black Mirror is one of the greatest works of modern television. If you’re in the mood for losing your faith in humanity (or for reinforcing your already non-existent faith in humanity), then it’s the show for you. It’s no horror story per se, but I have absolutely no hesitation in saying that Black Mirror is one of the scariest things I’ve ever seen. By the end, you’ll be asking yourself if that smartphone you got for Christmas was such a great present after all.

The first two seasons of Black Mirror are available to watch on Netflix and 4oD. The Christmas Special, White Christmas, is also on 4oD. Plans for a third season have been announced, but any details about it – including airdates – are yet to be revealed.

Classic Review: Paths of Glory

‘There is no such thing as shellshock!’ This line, obstinately spat from the mouth of George Macready’s coldly belligerent General Mireau, rings unnervingly through the duration of Kubrick’s uncompromisingly bleak depiction of the French military in 1916. With the troops’ advancement and the generals’ tactics in states of miserable stasis, the men and boys of mainland Europe dig themselves into miles of trenches, zigzagging through the abject horror of a continent razed by war. As the sombre voiceover in the film’s opening sequence informs us, the remaining soldiers measure their progress not by the mile, but by the hundreds of feet.

Mireau’s dismissal of the psychosis suffered by the filthy private presented to him during a supposedly morale boosting inspection of a company relentlessly plagued by the whistle and boom of enemy ordinance fully encapsulates the ignorance and adopted impunity of the French top brass during the most stagnant period of the Great War. Burdened with the impossible task of seizing and holding a pivotal German stronghold dubbed ‘the Anthill’, Mireau eschews all doubt of victory and demands allegiance from the remains of his battered troops, threatening the ultimate consequence for those bold enough to choose mutiny over the glory of France.

In the face of this merciless injustice is the defiant Colonel Dax, played by the film’s lone star Kirk Douglas. His fee accounted for 30% of the budget and the film owes much to his portrayal of an officer still clinging to valour. The levelling thousand yard star he conjures as Dax performs his officer’s rounds makes for film’s most iconic scene; the weight of his charge realised in a hollow-eyed march, his gaze passing the defeated faces of rows of men doomed for a suicidal charge into a hell of wire and bullets, beautifully tracked by Kubrick’s trademark innovative camerawork. The muted procession is unwaveringly balanced, despite the film preceding the Steadicam by more than a decade. Through Douglas we glimpse the film’s central conflict. In war, what’s really more valuable; the life of one man or the fear of a hundred?

Adapting the story from Humphrey Cobb’s 1935 novel, Kubrick sought to produce the ultimate anti-war film, and was so successful in translating both the savagery of the trenches and the callousness of the generals that the film was banned in nations the world over for years after its release, the unbridled cruelty of the officers deemed an attempt to discredit the very notion of military. Regardless of your views on remembrance poppies or the role of modern military, the reality of the First World War was one of utter devastation. A hundred years since its outset, for us the trauma of civilisation’s first industrial conflict will forever remain unfamiliar. However, this film and its desolate fields of monochrome mud, broken men wincing under shell-fire and rage-inducing officers dining beneath ornate baroque tapestries – all meticulously and intimately framed by the 20th century’s most demanding filmmaker – make for a tragic and enthralling journey into a realm of terror and sorrow.