Skip to main content

Day: 26 November 2015

Domestic abuse call actually for a spider NOT FOR ONLINE

Australian police rushed to a New South Wales home after neighbours reported a series of female screams from a nearby house. Once officers reached the property, around 2am, they heard a male voice shouting “I’m going to kill you! Die! Die!”Worried about a potential domestic violence incident, police on the scene were surprised to find the man was alone. He had been chasing a spider around his house with a can of bug spray for several hours.

When asked about the women screaming the man became shy and replied: “Yeah sorry that was me, I really hate spiders”. Police said they left “after a long pause” and “some laughter”. One member of the force said “judging by the size of the spider, it is not a shock that the man decided to scream at it”.

Genetically modified mosquitoes may eradicate malaria NOT FOR ONLINE

Researchers at the University of California Irvine and San Diego campus have finished  engineering a new strain of malaria resistant mosquitoes.

 

A new type of genetic engineering, involving cutting out segments of mosquito DNA and replacing them with malaria resistant genes, has been used to generate the mosquitoes.

 

A technique called ‘gene driving’ has also been used. This involves inserting the resistance gene in not one, but both of the mosquito chromosomes. This ensures that the malaria resistance is passed on to all of their offspring.

 

Gene driving is incredibly efficient; the researchers believe  that malarial resistance has the potential to spread throughout the world in as little time as one summer.

 

Since the implications of releasing genetically modified animals in the wild are up in the air, the mosquitoes are being kept in a lab while their release is debated.

Trump insults disabled reporter NOT FOR ONLINE

Donald Trump is yet again in hot water after performing an imitation of a New York Times reporter with a congenital joint condition. He started his bizarre impression by stating “the poor guy, you gotta see this guy”. The Republican presidential candidate then proceeded to flail his arms and jerk uncomfortably in a mocking fashion.

Mr Trump was using an article written by Mr Kovaleski, the reporter in question, to support his claims that Muslim Americans celebrated 9/11. Kovaleski, has said “the sad part about it is, it didn’t in the slightest bit jar or surprise me that Donal Trump would do something this low-rent”. Trump has since attacked the New York Times calling it “poorly run” and the staff “dopes” on his Twitter.

Thousands of pounds stolen from Withington café Fuel

Popular Withington café bar Fuel was broken into in the early hours of Monday 23rd of November, with thieves taking a till with up to £4,000 of cash inside.

The thieves made their way in through the roof, causing devastating damage inside the café, as well as stealing cash and various other items. They then fled through the fire escape. It is thought that the theft happened between 1am and 10am on Monday.

Manager Michael Dumbabin said: “I came into work and there was stuff literally all over the place. They had come in through the ceiling and kicked the ceiling from above and then climbed down on a ladder.

“They’ve not taken that much stuff, just cash from the till.”

A police spokesperson said that Greater Manchester Police received a call about the break-in and attended. She said: “Entry was made via the roof and exited via the fire escapes. Various items were stolen, including a till.”

Michael added: “There is so much equipment that could have been taken I can’t understand why they just took cash.

“The real problem is the absolute mess they have made. We have got builders in fixing the roof so it will be back to normal as soon as possible.”

This will be good news to the many students of Fallowfield and Withington who frequent Fuel, on Wilmslow Road, for their student-friendly vegetarian fare, and weekly ‘Quiz and Chips’.

Fuel was also targeted back in July 2011, when robbers threatened staff and stole money and one employee’s iPhone. At the time, Detective Constable Chris Cox of Greater Manchester Police said: “This was clearly a very distressing experience for the members of staff, though I would stress that incidents of this nature are rare in Withington.”

If you have any information about the incident, call police on 101 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Fallout 4 – Review

Fallout 4 is the best game that Bethesda has ever made. Everything from

the world, to the gun-play, to the engrossing story, has been crafted with a punctilious attention to

detail. Despite the fact that the basic formula remains the same, Fallout 4 retains the

engrossing, addictive qualities that have made Bethesda’s games so popular in the past.

Set in a post-apocalyptic Boston, you are free to explore this vast and beautiful open world

comfortably within its first half hour—a stark contrast to Fallout 3’s extended opening sequence. I

chose to play as a female character after botching up an approximation of myself on the admittedly

advanced character creation tool. Maybe I just have a weird face. However, I found that this fitted

thematically with the overarching plot of a desperate mother looking for her lost family in a hostile

world, which gives Fallout an emotional weight not seen in many games. Whilst it starts slowly, the

story builds over time and towards the end there are some truly palm-sweating decisions to be

made. It gets that intense.

Fallout 4, Photo: Bethesda Softworks

Over the course of my journey I came to appreciate more and more the sheer time and effort that

went into the making of this huge world. Almost every aspect of Fallout 4 is a monumental step up

from its predecessor. Fallout 3.5 this is definitely not. The refined combat system is the most

significant of these. Weapons are far easier to aim and fire than previous entries, and your tools of

destruction have a realistic weight and feel to them this time around. However, traditional shooting

is only one part of the combat system. The legendary V.A.T.S. mode makes a welcome return,

allowing the user to periodically slow down time and target the various body parts of your foes. You

are rewarded with a frequently gruesome cinematic ‘kill cam’ after each of these, so be warned: This

is not a game for the squeamish. You can now choose to pull out of V.A.T.S. at any time, and also

unlike its predecessor, V.A.T.S. does not stop time but instead slows it down, which creates some

truly tense moments. The changes that have been made to the combat are so compelling that it

might be enough for those who avoided the previous games in the series, for this reason, to

reconsider this title.

 

Despite the strengths of the main plot, the foremost appeal of Fallout 4 is the bevy of side-quests

available for you to undertake. They are numerous, they often take you to surprising places and all

are worth your time. Due to the strength of these missions, expect to sink hundreds of hours into

this game if you’re foolish enough to try to finish everything on offer. The best part is that you

probably won’t regret it. For the more nomadic player, you may occasionally come across a

legendary enemy, which is guaranteed to reward you a weapon with a unique modifier, and you are

frequently gifted with useful loot drops through mere exploration.

 

A huge new addition is the crafting system. Every weapon you find is heavily customisable, varying

from the optic sights to the gun barrel for your weapon of choice. Previous Bethesda games had

numerous items in their worlds, but most were vendor trash. Not so with Fallout 4, since these items

can be broken down and used to customise your weapons, and provide resources for building your

own settlements. However, I eventually avoided the settlement building mechanic, since my towns

failed to provide me with the adequate resources for the time and effort required to manage their

cumbersome interface.

Fallout 4, Photo: Bethesda Softworks

Another point worth mentioning is that the enemies, despite being some of the most intelligent and

freakish foes that we’ve seen in this universe, do occasionally succumb to erratic AI weirdness. Yes,

this is a Bethesda title, and there are some minor glitches and bugs that you will see across your

adventure. Whilst nowhere near the scale of the issues plaguing Fallout: New Vegas at launch, they

are noticeable when they happen, but they are not significant enough to break your immersion. If

anything, the glitches and inconsistencies are somewhat charming by this point. No, the real super

mutant in the room is the graphics. I have played Fallout on PS4 and PC, and simply put, they’re not

that hot. Fallout is artistically beautiful, but it just falls short of that next gen WOW! factor that I was

expecting. Non-prominent character models fall flat, and in parts the lip-syncing is so poor that they

are more reminiscent of a Team America character than an actual person. However, the graphical

inconsistencies and glitches get a pass from me simply because the developers focused on what

mattered most, in modernising the Fallout formula for current gen hardware. Other than the

aforementioned settlement mechanic, the gameplay is borderline flawless, and the game remains a

consistently entertaining experience over the 30 or so hours required to beat the main storyline.

Dripping in atmosphere, and a devil in the detail, Fallout 4 is a more than worthy successor to Fallout 3,

and makes me wonder how on earth Bethesda is going to top this with their next project.

 

In my opinion, Fallout 4 is a better game than Skyrim. I know, I’m as surprised as you are. Buy it. Now.

Belated Belieber or Bieber Berater?

Despite being widely despised by the music industry and general public alike throughout his teenage years, Justin Bieber somehow managed to score the front cover of NME last week. His new album, Purpose, has unsurprisingly big expectations—with a pre-empted sales figure of 450,000 copies in its first week.

Not only does this album feature some chart-topping hits, but what’s more, Bieber seems to have taken this opportunity to humanise himself to both his fans, and the world, too. He even goes so far as to assert that he’s “not made of steel” in his song ‘I’ll Show You’. You may even start to sympathise with the unbelievable pressures, and continual abuse subjected onto this pop star—who, not so coincidentally, has a net worth of $200 million. This brings me to question whether the ‘good teen gone bad’ trend has finally come to an end for Bieber’s generation of young pop stars, or whether we have simply become immunised to their behaviour.

Although not completely unaware of Justin’s religiousness, I, for one, was surprised to learn that the meaning behind the album’s title was none other than God. One cannot help but wonder if this toned-down bad boy persona and commitment to faith is a promo stunt co-ordinated by his oddly named manager, Scooter; or an honest realisation at the atrocity of his own past behaviour.

As I listen to this album, there’s no denying that my previous flame of dislike for Bieber is gradually warming to him. His voice has finally lost its pre-pubescent whine and has consequently become rather sexy, and more appealing to the ear.

However, I cannot say that I am not mildly disappointed with Bieber. This album is clearly his attempt at showing the world that he has become a man, yet he has chosen to do this through revealing his sensitive side with a string of seemingly heartfelt ballads. Whereas I would have preferred him to have taken a leaf out of Justin Timberlake’s book, with his rite of passage album Justified, embracing his inner sexiness and thrusting it upon the world with provocative force.

Ultimately, I must admit that despite previously hating on the teen pop sensation, I have been converted to the reformed church of BELIEBERS. It must be said that the album contains multiple hits, and that makes it hard to deny that Bieber has succeeded in producing music that will even leave a Bieber hater’s feet tapping.

10th anniversary Bruntwood prize for playwriting 2015 winner announced

Out of 1,938 submissions, Wish List by Katherine Soper was declared the competition’s winner on Tuesday afternoon. The winner was announced at a glitzy ceremony attended by His Royal Highness The Earl of Wessex, which was hosted at Manchester’s Royal Exchange Theatre by Kirsty Lang.

Katherine Soper, who currently works in a perfumery on Regent Street in London, is the winner of the 10th anniversary Bruntwood Prize for Playwriting 2015—Europe’s biggest playwriting prize. She wins a prize of £16,000, and a residency at the Royal Exchange Theatre, Manchester.

Wish List is Soper’s first play, and it tells the story of Tamsin, the sole carer of her brother Dean, whose crippling OCD leaves him housebound. Now that ‘Help to Work’ has cut all his benefits, she’s taken a zero-hour contract. If she doesn’t pack faster, whilst keeping her brother on track, she’ll lose out to the next in a long line of temps, and soon they could both lose their lifelines. A sensitive and delicately powerful play about trying to survive, when every system is against you.

Currently working in a perfumery on Regent Street, Katherine has also worked in Manchester’s Harvey Nichols. She said that, “This is the best boost of writerly confidence I could imagine.” Wish List was written as her dissertation play at the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama. She also took part in Royal Court’s Writers’ Group in Autumn 2014, and developed a short play, Sundries, with the Young Friends of the Almeida earlier this year.

The competition, which runs every two years, is a unique partnership between the Royal Exchange Theatre and property company Bruntwood. The Bruntwood Prize for Playwriting is open to writers in the UK and Ireland aged 16 and over. In the award’s ten year history the Bruntwood prize has given more than £160,000 to 17 different playwrights and has also developed 16 complete productions with 28 UK theatres.

Due to the sheer mass of submissions—the second highest tally in the competition’s history—the judges decided to present an additional Judges’ award! The plays chosen were: Sound of Silence by Chloe Todd Fordham, Parliament Square by James Fritz, How My Light is Spent by Alan Harris and The Almighty Sometimes by Kendall Feaver. Chair of Bruntwood and fellow judge, Michael Oglesby said on deciding to award an extra prize: “The extraordinary strength of this year’s shortlist led us to make the unprecedented decision in our tenth year to award an extra prize to reflect the exciting ambition and unique talent that made it to the final ten.”

Writers of all levels of experience are invited to enter plays, which must be original, unperformed and unproduced. To find out more information about 2017’s competition, go here.

Jonah Lomu: A tribute

The tragic news of Jonah Lomu’s passing swept the world last Wednesday (18/11). The immense outpouring of homages to the player proved to be a measure of how loved he was. Widely regarded as one of the world’s greatest players, he accumulated 63 caps for New Zealand, scoring 37 tries in the process.

Lomu’s playing career is astonishing given his problems with illness. At 21, he was diagnosed with a rare and serious kidney condition, nephrotic syndrome. He contended with this ailment through most of his career, taking several breaks from rugby because of it. That he is considered one of the greatest, despite having a debilitating illness, illustrates how good a player he was.

Lomu broke into the New Zealand XV in 1994, aged just 19. Despite having only two caps, he was included in the squad for the 1995 World Cup, which turned out to be one of the most justified decisions in the whole of sport. Lomu set the tournament alight, wreaking havoc on several of the home nations. He scored seven tries in five matches, two against Ireland, one against Scotland and four tries in the semi-final against England. His performance against England would go down in history. It was an utter embarrassment on our part. Lomu brushed past the opposition with such ease. Lomu was a thorn in the side of England throughout his career: he played 7 times against England, winning 5, losing only once, and most importantly, scoring 8 tries.

Lomu holds the joint record for tries scored in a World Cup (15). He was equalled by Bryan Habana in this year’s tournament. However, Habana has accumulated his tries over 3 tournaments and Lomu only two: he was a prolific scorer. Despite this, he never won the World Cup.

Lomu was a rare breed. Many rugby players have one or two outstanding attributes: Lomu had everything. Firstly, he had lightning pace. Playing on the wing meant he scored many tries by simply running around the opposition. However, when faced with defenders in his path, he could utilise his mass (he weighed over 18 stone). This led to the infamous moment when Lomu bulldozed his way over England’s Mike Catt in the 1995 World Cup semi-final. Lomu’s height (6 ft 5 in) meant he remained nimble despite his weight. Combining all of this made Lomu terrifying to play against: He had so many ways of bettering you. The decision to move Lomu from a number 8 position to the wing for the 1995 World Cup was another factor in his success. No one had ever dealt with a presence like that before. Rugby in that era was a lot to do with agility, avoiding contact by finding the space. Lomu pioneered a new style of rugby: using brute force to break tackles. The fact that he had blistering pace too meant that he could excel in the traditional style of rugby.

Lomu’s impact on rugby as a whole was and will always be enormous. Having such brute force and power in the backs was innovative. It was the beginning of the progression towards modern day rugby, where size is a universal trait rather than exclusive to the forwards. He went on to be viewed as a template for success. The current Wales team perfectly exemplifies the transition from agility to brute force. The 1995 World Cup team had David Evans at centre and Ieuan Evans on the wing. They weighed 80kg and 84kg respectively. The 2015 equivalent, Jamie Roberts at centre and George North on the wing, weigh 107kg and 109kg respectively. This illustrates the transition to power and weight in rugby. The weight increase in rugby as a whole can be linked to the increase in professionalism: dietary planning and physical conditioning. However, Lomu was the template.

Lomu’s career will go down in history as one of the greatest. While there are players, and will continue to be players, that surpass him in caps and tries scored, none will have the impact that he had on the game. He shaped modern day rugby, and this is what he will be remembered for.

In other rugby news, England have appointed Eddie Jones on a 4 year contract as their new head coach, following the termination of Stuart Lancaster’s contract. Jones is England’s first ever foreign coach.

Top 5: Surrealist Sculptures

5) Alexander Calder, Mercury Fountain (1937)

Dangling above a pool of mercury, Calder’s collection of thin arches and tipping tiers was originally exhibited, opposite Picasso’s Guernica, at the 1937 World’s Fair. It was intended as a political protest over General Franco’s siege of the mercury mines in Almaden during the Civil War. Like all of Calder’s mobile works, they really resemble renaissance scientific instruments; they are avant garde astrolables or the dismantled insides of an astrological clock awkwardly put back together—his motorised sculpture, A Universe (1934), in the Tate’s exhibition, turns every 45 minutes to represent planetary movement. Part political gesture, part alchemical interplay of metals, the piece hangs above a small pool of poisonous quicksilver and is far too dangerous for anyone to take a dip or even get up close to.

4) Meret Oppenheim, Object – Le Dejeuner en fourrure (1933)

Modernist apocrypha tells us that the idea behind the famous bowl and spoon wrapped cosily in Chinese gazelle fur was the result of a quip over lunch. Picasso joked to the young Oppenheim, who went around Paris wearing homemade furry wristbands, that she could wrap anything up in pelt, and so she did. It’s been the subject of much interpretation over the years. A feminist platter symbolising the greedy style in which male artists were tucking into aspiring female artists? A satire on the macho nostalgia for primitive objects that was rife throughout period? This iconic tableware offers a host of possible meanings to feast on.

3) Max Ernst, Capricorn (1947 – 1964)

Excited by the arrival of piped water to his house in Sedona in 1949, Max Ernst began to mix the newly-arrived element with cement, car springs and milk cartons to create a hulking portrait of man, woman and child. His wife Dorothea Tanning treated this totemic group of square-shouldered king, thin queen, and baby prince like a protective grotto sculpture, a stiff assembly of “benign deities that consecrated our ‘garden’.” As regards it’s zodiac title, astrologers believe that being born under the transit of Capricorn means that you will turn out to be very ambitious, philosophical and highly suited to government. No wonder Capricorn looks so stately.

2) Giorgio de Chirico, The Archaeologists (1969)

A male and female—a pair that have the polished, featureless faces of his well-known mannequins—sit on a couch with their insides crudely on show. However, rather than coiled intestines, we see fragments of ruins, temple facades, idols and some other antique finds. The pair seem to have ingested the ancient world.

1) Salvador Dali, Lobster Telephone (1936)

Lobsters make a wonderful and rewarding sexual fetish, except of course for the crabs. Bad jokes aside, Dali does seem to have been genuinely aroused by the blushing pinks and hot reds of the steamed crustacean. At the 1939 World’s Fair, Salvador Dali staged The Dream of Venus, in which he dressed models up in a seafood fashion range, the lobster providing a erotic, surreal cover for the models’ modesty. His strange fetishisms didn’t stop there. His autobiography contains a passage on ideas for using telephones in a more creative way, including strapping them to a live turtle and ‘Edgar Allan Poe telephones with a dead rat concealed within.’

 

A student’s guide to the Christmas markets

If a whimpering sound is heard, never fear, it’s just your bank account cowering from the Christmas cheer. As anyone with a student loan can testify, the dawning of the Christmas Markets is bitter sweet.

When it comes to the Christmas Markets, timing is everything. Timing is the fundamental component to the kind of shopping experience you want to have. If you are looking to have an efficient shopping experience, with minimal collisions and minimum stress, then going during midweek is best advised. There are no crowds, no queues and, usually, no push chairs to get in your way.

Of course, if style over substance is the aim of your venture then going at peak times such as weekends is when you’ll get the most vibrant atmosphere. With stowaway taverns and mulled wine stands around every corner, just the smells alone will mask the bitterness of an empty bank account and a rainy night.

This being said, for those of the student population that are, indeed, strapped for cash and still clutching onto the hope of giving half decent Christmas presents, the time to go to the markets is late. The success rate for bartering is much higher and the rewards more worthwhile. Many store holders are eager to get rid of stock during this time and will make deals they wouldn’t usually make. Let’s face it, no one wants a Reindeer ornament after Christmas.

The debate of whether your needs are greater than others is a moral battle all students must fight and one that gets greater still during the festive season. To buy or not to buy is always the question. It’s also a question that might never get answered if you don’t keep your personal belongings within close contact. Mancunions have been advised to watch out for pickpockets this year, as there have been a number of reported thefts.

As many of the beer taverns and bistro cafes do not have an abundance of seating areas, make sure to put your leg through any bag straps and keep carrier bags within eyesight. The markets attract a lot of crowds towards the end of November and it is easy to lose not only possessions but people. If you’re thinking of going in a group, it might be helpful to wear something distinctive.

Several of the stalls look identical and some of them even appear twice in various different locations. To prevent confusion and an angry call from your friend, wearing something easily noticed is, actually, a big time saver. No one likes to play ‘Where’s Wally?’ when there’s food around.

Thanks to extra visitors, the roads and buses are even busier during rush hour, so it may be advised to set off earlier than usual.

Don’t worry, however, your ride through curry mile into town will be rewarded. With food stalls selling hog roasts, waffles, and schnitzels, you’ll be in food coma central.

As the markets are spread out in various locations around Manchester, wear extra warm clothing. The weather is turning colder and the day will feel longer traipsing around the stalls. As already mentioned, many stalls appear twice but this does not mean they are selling goods for the same price. Make a comparison before any purchases. It could mean you can afford that beer at the end of the day. The beer that will drown your sorrows thinking about all the money you just spent.

Patriarchy vs. Matriarchy

Germaine Greer’s recent transphobic comments have pissed off many people—including myself. When asked about her ban from talking at Cardiff University in a BBC interview during October, she responded by stating “just because you lop off your dick and then wear a dress, doesn’t make you a fucking woman.” She also stated that “most women” didn’t think that post or non-operative transgender people “look like, sound like, or behave like women.”

After watching the BBC interview, while observing the media firestorm, I felt irritated at the language Greer used and disconcerted by the way in which she discussed trans issues in such a blunt, inconsiderate and uncomplex way.

I’ll take this opportunity to say that while she may assume that “most women” think they way she does, I am not one of them. Greer’s comments seem to be laden with problematic assumptions about what it is to be a woman. First and foremost, the focus of her rhetoric seemed to miss a key tenet of feminist thinking: The distinction between sex and gender, the latter being a socially constructed phenomenon rather than an absolute truth. Secondly, Greer only seemed to mention one dimension of transitioning, namely the transition from male to female rather than the other way around. From the interview it would have appeared that gender reassignment is something only men do, which of course, is not at all true.

Even more troubling is the implicit assumption behind Greer’s words that by virtue of having a vagina from birth, that somehow each and every individual woman has the same life experience, and that we all “look,” “sound” and “behave” the same way. To put it bluntly, she—whether intentionally or not—reinforced the rigid biological and gender binaries which feminism has sought to challenge. It’s a problematic assumption and is a little too reminiscent of the ‘biology as destiny’ argument.

I hate to burst bubbles, but what constitutes being a woman is far more complicated than anatomy alone. What Greer does in this interview is what so many feminists campaigned against: Society’s obsession with our genitals. Being a woman—whichever way it comes about—is complex, and we know that womanhood is subject to a myriad of other factors which shape individual experience: sex, gender, ethnicity and disability, to name just a few.

By focusing on one side of transitioning negatively, Greer overlooked the importance of how the stories of the trans community can offer another layer of complexity to how we understand our fellow human beings and the world around us. It is worth mentioning that that trans people can offer important insights for feminist analysis. What better way to understand the workings of male privilege, or constructions of masculine and feminine identities than from someone who has seen these constructions from both sides? More to the point, people who have transitioned to become a woman will, inevitably and regrettably, have to live under the same oppressive norms that women are subject to, such as sexism and sexual harassment.

In the context of transphobic comments from feminists with public platforms like Greer and Julie Bindel, who stated that she didn’t have “a problem with men disposing of their genitals, but it does not make them women,” the need to build an inclusive feminist movement which does not shout down the experiences of others becomes clear. Of course, one can argue that Greer and Bindel were excluded or censored. However, I think its worth asking if they would be outraged if a man with misogynistic views was banned from the safe space of university—would it still be a problem then? Or is misogyny somehow palatable when directed at trans woman from a cisgender woman?

I always want to value the insights of feminists who have come before me and to take seriously their lessons and contributions to the movement. I also believe that its a two-way street. It is important for Greer and Bindel to do the same: Feminists across the board should listen to and acknowledge the voices which have been so routinely stifled and marginalised. They should also not try to reinforce the criteria of womanhood as something defined by biology alone.

Most significantly, Greer has a platform. Of course, Greer is known to have an appetite for the controversial. However, an appetite for the controversial doesn’t mean that we should take such comments lightly. While her statements did not explicitly endorse alienation or violence, they implied that the trans community did not belong and could not belong in the feminist camp. Her words stigmatised the trans community, and that is something as a feminist that I will not condone.

Safe spaces are few and far between, and university is one of them. This kind of rhetoric, whether intended or not runs the risk of legitimising bigotry and ostracising trans people by making them outsiders. To reduce a community to a product of their sexual organs alone is to demean, degrade and to belittle. The trans community is campaigning for the same thing which feminists do: safe spaces, bodily autonomy and the right to choose your own destiny, regardless of your sexual organs.

Debunking the myths of veganism

1) Aren’t humans meant to eat meat?

That we are meant to do so is not at all true. The human body is designed for a plant-based diet. (You know those canines of yours? Compare them to those of true omnivores). During the Neolithic period plants were what we survived off: It was only during the mini Ice Age that our species was forced to eat meat to survive – yet this was a habit we never stopped. We are omnivores, but only in a habitual sense. Humans have adapted so that we can digest cooked meats, not so that we are meant to. So the question is—should we?

2) What is actually wrong with farming animals?

Veganism is about compassion to all living creatures. It entails are perspective where animals are no longer seen as products, but as living beings with their own self interest, much like us. Thus, the moral argument is that we should not be using animals for meat, eggs and dairy products because it is simply not necessary to do so; our bodies do not need these things for any reason but satisfaction of the palate. Arguably then, the disgusting treatment towards animals farmed for food—pumped full with growth hormones and placed in torturous conditions, from the moment of their birth to the moment they are prepared for the dinner plate—is entirely unjustifiable.

3) But what about health? Is it true that vegans are nutritionally deficient?

That is entirely false; in truth vegans are often so much healthier, due to removing cholesterol entirely from their diet and eating a more balanced and varied range of foods. Every nutrient can be sourced in plants. Even vitamin B12 can be found in bacteria existing in the soil.

4) Where do vegans get their protein then?

Protein is often cited as a necessary reason for humans to consume meat. However, it’s surprising how abundant the nutrient is—from brown bread and broccoli to beans and legumes, most people end up getting too much, without even trying. Many of the world’s top athletes and body builders are vegan. Billy Simmonds, who won Mr Natural Universe in 2009 is a vegan body builder and the cyclist David Smith who is a Paralympic and World Championship Gold medallist, thrives off of an entirely vegan diet.

5) But surely we can still eat meat if it can be done more humanely?

Undeniably it is better to treat an animal well prior to killing them, but that doesn’t make the act of killing moral. The same goes for any circumstance: Treating someone to a candlelit dinner before murdering them does not make the murder a moral act, and never could absolve the horror of the crime. For whoever is experiencing it, death will not be a pleasant or most likely desired experience, which means one thing: It can never be humane.

6) So what about plants which are living organisms too?

Plants are living, yes, but they are not sentient. If I chop a carrot at the dinner table, no one will think anything of it; if I slit a chicken’s throat people will be enraged: Plants do not have the same neurological structures as animals and they therefore feel no pain or even awareness of their existence. In contrast, all animals, including us, share one crucial thing: our capacity to feel pleasure and our capacity to suffer.

7) However, we bring these animals into existence. Without us they would have no life anyway!

This is certainly a truth; yet by bringing a being into existence we do not have rights over their life to treat them as we wish and use them in whatever manner we desire. In fact, the opposite is arguably true, if we have brought someone into existence, we have an obligation to provide an adequate life for them. We would not, for instance, have a baby without considering the baby’s future, nor would we have the right to force that person to live their life for the purposes we wish in future. Is it even morally right for us to forcefully bring these animals into existence in the first place?

8) But what about the animals already alive? If everyone became vegan, what would happen to them, and the economy as a whole?

Realistically, everyone will not turn vegan overnight. The process would occur gradually. Over 56 billion animals are bred and slaughtered for meat, eggs and diary annually, an abominably large figure.  As consumption reduces, so too will production; hence, as economic trade in these areas reduces, trade in crop production and in the production of meat substitutes will increase, complementing the shift. Because of this, there is no evidence to suggest that a global shift to veganism would be at all damaging for the economy.

The more people that gradually stop eating meat, the fewer animals will be brought into an existence of suffering, which will be good for the environment and humanity as a whole.

9) The environment? Humanity? How does veganism help these exactly?

Food aid programs like World Food Programme and Action Against Hunger deliver largely vegetarian and vegan food to those whom they support because it is the most efficient and sustainable thing to produce and procure. Instead of farming crops to then feed animals which we farm to eat, we can simply farm crops and eat them straight away, using much less land and much less energy.

In 2010 the UN Environment Programme released a report stating: “A global shift towards a vegan diet is vital to save the world from hunger, fuel poverty and the worst impacts of climate change.”

Why? Because the meat industry is the second largest cause of climate change globally, preceding even transport and infrastructure! The emissions produced through the production of meat are just so vast. Vegans make a break in the cycle, helping to alleviate famine as well as the impacts of climate change. Plus cows produce a lot of methane through… well, you know.

10) That might be convincing, but don’t vegans make a lot of sacrifices (cake, chocolate etc.) that limit their diets? Plus, meat is just so delicious!

Know that for any meal that you can think of, there is a vegan version, from cake (hundreds of them! And plenty of chocolates are definitely vegan!), to a korma or a burger (try V Revolution in the Northern Quarter!). And the ingredients used are not as peculiar as you might think, too. They’re just not what we might all be used to; vegan cooking is perhaps some of the most diverse, delicious and interesting cooking that exists!

11) How much difference can the actions of one person really make though?

PETA ran a study in which they concluded that every vegan saves the lives of approximately 100 living beings annually—that means 100 creatures that don’t have to endure the torture of being used for meat, eggs and dairy products. The actions of one person matter more than you might think!

12) Why not just be vegetarian?

Vegetarianism is a massively positive change in a person’s lifestyle, which can be fantastic as a transition from a meat-based to a plant-based diet. Unfortunately though, by consuming diary or eggs we still participate in the suffering of animals and contribute to the industry’s effect on the environment and impacts on world hunger.

On top of this, despite the fact that the cow from which milk comes may not be killed, her calves that are born every few months to cause her to lactate, will be for veal. Of course, she will also be killed for beef after a few years, when she is too weary from producing milk like a machine. Furthermore, for every chicken laying eggs for us now, there was a male chick’s life that was thrown away because he was perceived to be unnecessary and uneconomic to keep alive when he cannot produce eggs for the industry himself, which will be his sister’s only purpose of existence. It is hard to know which is worse actually, living out two or three meagre years to manufacture eggs at an unnatural rate for someone else to eat, or being disposed of before you are even a week old.

13) Isn’t it difficult to eat in restaurants as a vegan though? Especially while abroad?

Though it may not be a case of going into any restaurant and ordering food, you can travel anywhere in the world and continue to thrive on a vegan diet. Awareness globally is increasing, more options are becoming available in restaurants everywhere and staff are willing to change what’s on the menu slightly to suit your needs too. Chefs will often even enjoy the challenge of whipping up something a bit different for you also. All it takes is the confidence to ask.

14) Not everyone can become a vegan though, can they?

Making the change to an entirely plant based diet is a big decision, but one which is suitable for anyone, whatever your dietary requirements. Remember that this can be done gradually too; even one less meal a week with meat in it is a positive change. And a switch to vegetarianism can make a great transition period; but remember that for every day you continue to consume these products, more animals are suffering.

The Vegan Society’s 30-day vegan pledge is a great way to get started or find out more with tips, recipes and advice.

If you have any further questions regarding veganism, contact me on [email protected].

A short but not so sweet stay with Steve and his idiosyncracies

Hmm, a free stay in the Sierra Nevada of southern Spain in exchange for some harmless gardening in the summer sun, who could say nay? Being the gullible weakling that I am, I certainly couldn’t. Famed for its natural beauty, the single photograph used to personify the scene of Steve’s permaculture project certainly added to the allure of the national park.

A website popular among young travellers, Workaway is wonderful in many ways. ‘Hosts’ advertise work with which they need a hand, from childcare to language help; from hostel to bar work, they specify how many hours are expected in exchange for certain forms of remuneration. If I remember correctly, my terms were 5 – 6 hours of daily work in exchange for free board and food.

Steve had mentioned in his description that ‘board’ denoted camping, and camping essentially meant he was providing me with a generous spot of land in which I could put my (non-existent) tent. With bashful naivety and in light of my shrinking funds, I tracked down an all-purpose Chinese supermarket in Granada, where I’d been staying, and, obviously, chose the 7€ ‘beach shelter’ over the 30€ tent. I figured that if it got really nippy, good ol’ Steve would surely let me spend a night in the big house. Fatal. Error.

Nearing the end of a four-hour bus journey where correspondence with Steve had died a pitiful death hours earlier—in spite of my frantic emails and rinsing of roaming data, there was still no getting through to the man. So I clambered off the bus at the last stop, the final passenger, whipping out my one Spanish word at the non-Anglophone bus driver (another source of considerable pain during the journey).

At first it seemed I was alone amidst the mountains until a bespectacled, skinny dude with a beard popped his head round the side of the bus. “Are you Astrid?” Grady, as it turned out, together with his girlfriend Lucy, had been instructed that, “the German girl should arrive around 10 or 5.” Firstly, I’m not German; secondly, this meant the poor sods had propped up deckchairs at the top of the farm in sight of the bus stop and had been sitting there ever since because, yes, I arrived at 5pm, the same and only time I had ever said that I was arriving.

First question “Do you have a tent and warm clothing?” Nay to both, my friends, but I do have a wind shelter! It’s yellow. They then proceeded to fill me in on the man himself and the farm that incidentally turned out to be not a farm at all but a ruin: As in a crumbly old house from the stone ages, which Steve had paid money for ten years ago but that was still crumbly.

This is because the middle-aged man from Cambridge insisted on restoring the building using rocks and clay, a method that undeniably stayed true to the structure’s (it is deserving of no other word) vintage origins, but one that also happened to neglect the reality of a 6am start to dig mud from the ground, mix it with water (fancying this ‘cement’) and find rocks to suit his whims and visions. “Hmm bit small don’t you think?” or “no Astrid, I said turnip shaped! That’s more like a parsnip! Har har!” Not funny Steve, just annoying. Your parsnip rock was heavy and now I am bleeding, it was the last in a long string of incorrect rock shapes and we’ve been up for close to five hours now, the wall is just one stone bigger while you, dear Steve, are one day older.

This traumatic process was, however, secondary to what was quite possibly the most scarring sleep of my life. Sadly, Steve had resolved that the day of my arrival would be the perfect opportunity to visit his (contestable) girlfriend in Granada. He also decided to delay his homecoming until 1am rather than the agreed 7pm because by his reasoning that he couldn’t load the car, it was raining so hard (which raises the question—umbrella?!). To make matters worse, trusting no one, Steve had of course chained and padlocked the pantry, so we had no food for the night. This, along with the farm’s distinct lack of electricity, meant that I was shown to my tent thing with a grumbling stomach and a mobile phone devoid of battery life.

When Grady left, I was forced to use a lighter to pin up my beach sarong to cover the exposed side using hair slides, the cardboard the tent had come in made for a mattress and my trainers a pillow. Piling on all my layers (it being summer, layers meant an array of strap tops and two bikinis) I prepared for the coldest night of my life. That night, temperatures plummeted to eight degrees and, I kid you not, there was a storm with thunder and lightning, so inevitably the sarong blew off in the middle of the night. The blizzard was literally hitting my bare face whilst pins and needles paralysed the rest of my body, for three American apparel crop tops designed for size zero models do not go down a treat with blood circulation.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, the night was interspersed with wails from Steve’s cats. I say Steve’s cats, but these were wildcats that he had pinned down long enough to tie fraying bits of string around their necks and tether them to poles in the pantry which, us being barred entry to, meant their incarceration had reached new levels of bleak, having not seen daylight, water, or food since their owner’s romantic escapade.

Live: Katzenjammer

Katzenjammer

15th October 2015

Manchester Academy 2

8/10
Entering the Academy on Sunday night, I had no idea what to expect. What I’d heard about Katzenjammer’s live sets had got me curious, but I wasn’t prepared for the sheer energy and fun that the Norwegian four-piece brought to the stage.

The night started with a solo performance by Jasper Malone. Usually playing with his band Jasper in the Company of Others, he had been called to replace the previous support act a week before the concert, hence his lack of Company. Despite this, Jasper played a well selected set of songs that, along with his light-hearted stage presence, made a great warm up for Katzenjammer.

Katzenjammer exploded onstage with ‘Rock-Paper-Scissors’, a joyous, energetic song from their second album A Kiss Before You Go. From then, the audience was hooked. For the next two hours Katzenjammer whirled through songs with staggering energy. With twenty instruments onstage with them and instrument changes between every song, the stage looked like a game of musical chairs.

The variety of instruments played by each member didn’t seem to affect their ability to perform either, the band’s ten years of experience was clear from tight tempo changes and well-coordinated call and responses scattered throughout the night.

Vocally, Marianne Sveen stole the show, despite all four members singing on different songs, Sveen’s voice couldn’t be matched. From powerful renditions of The Clash and The Beatles to guttural growls on ‘Hey Ho (On the Devil’s back)’, Sveen never faltered.

The setlist consisted of a good mix from Katzenjammer’s three albums. The energy only slacked for a few songs from the band’s most recent album Rockland, songs that do not quite do justice to the band’s wild and energetic style. However, given the energy pervading the rest of the night, you couldn’t begrudge the band one or two breathers.

Katzenjammer closed by performing an encore of ‘Ain’t No Thang’, a bonus track from their debut album Le Pop, taking breaks in dancing around the set to perform solos on various instruments, ending, of course, with a kazoo.

Katzenjammer’s weird and wonderful energy makes them a sight to behold live, and as I left The Academy wearing the same mad grin as the rest of the crowd, I understood what all the fuss had been about.

10 reasons why the gender pay gap matters to you

  1. Women are being paid less than men despite working in the same offices on the same jobs. Research shows that female bosses work for ‘free’ for two hours a day, getting paid almost a quarter less than men in the same positions. Would you agree to work a ten hour shift but get paid for eight? Of course not.
  2. The gender pay gap begins as soon as you graduate. According to the Higher Education Statistics Agency, the average graduate salary for male graduates is £2,000 higher than that for female counterparts.
  3. Women in management are both under-represented and under-paid. The CMI/XPertHR survey found that 67 per cent of entry-level jobs in management are done by women, yet they make up only 29 per cent of company directors in management roles… and even when they do reach those roles, they earn on average 11 per cent less than their male counterparts.
  4. The gender pay gap is present in most fields. If management is sounding a bit grim now, you could enter the wonderful world of architecture, where women can earn up to 25 per cent less than their male counterparts. Or even more lucrative, finance, where the pay gap can be as high as 40 per cent.
  5. Even winning the Hunger Games won’t help you with gender equality—Jennifer Laurence was paid significantly less than her male co-stars in American Hustle despite having a major role in the film.
  6. The pay gap is an international problem. According to Eurostat, there’s only Poland and Italy in all of Europe in which women get paid more than men. The UK does not look great in comparison, and in fact, South East England has one of the largest pay gaps within the continent.
  7. The World Economic Forum believes it will take 118 years to close the pay gap, so David Cameron’s claims to put an end to the gender pay gap by the next generation don’t sound too feasible. His plan of requiring companies with over 250 employees to publish the pay gap in their workplaces is a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t force businesses to act upon them.
  8. The gender pay gap appears to be decreasing, but not necessarily because women are being paid more. Although the Office for National Statistics found the gender pay gap this year (9.4 per cent) is the lowest compared to previous years, it’s suggested to be due to men’s wages decreasing rather than women’s increasing. No one wins there.
  9. The reasons behind the gender pay gap are problematic. They range from straight-up gender discrimination to the ‘motherhood penalty’, which is the disadvantage women face when it comes to pay and career advancement after having a child. In contrast, men appear to benefit from a ‘fatherhood bonus’, which is a double standard if there ever was one.
  10. It influences people’s views on a woman’s worth unintentionally. A 2012 study found that participants assigned lower starting salaries to women than men even though they were presented with CVs with identical content but just female or male names.