Skip to main content

Day: 15 February 2016

Humanity, corporate success and fetishism in the restaurant industry

Burger & Lobster

I believed that in the culinary world there was a truism, that it was not in the interest of anyone coveting wealth to get into the industry. To have a financially successful restaurant is a tremendously difficult thing. So Mikhail ‘Misha’ Zelman must be doing something extremely right. With a combination of innovative ideas and deep pockets—stemming from a background in commodities exchange—he opened and ran 10 steakhouses in Moscow, along with George Bukhov & David Strauss. After the success of the Goodman’s franchise, they turned their sights on London. They opened 3 more branches and with this acute knowledge of aged meat and an idea to make the luxurious affordable, came the group’s most successful chain: Burger and Lobster. In the 2014 calendar year, the company turned over £27 million, selling 22,000 lobsters per week. Thus, I begin to doubt everything I thought I knew about restaurant economics.

Burger and Lobster has been running for five years and already boasts 9 branches in London with 3 more set to open in 2016. They have additional sights in Bath, Cardiff, Kuwait, Stockholm, New York and Dubai but most importantly, Manchester as well. The company owns a stake in a lobster fishery in Canada where shipments are made everyday to Heathrow to a custom built lobster holding facility. As part of a promotional event for the fledgling Manchester branch, myself, along with other journalists and lobster enthusiasts, were invited to join a company trip to see the tanks and continue on to their Soho restaurant in Dean street.

On account of the merciless employees of the Virgin Trains syndicate–and partially my own incompetence—I missed out on the tank experience and had to join the group at the restaurant instead. But they very kindly gave me the specifics of pH balance, salt to water ratios, removal of dead lobsters and constant maintenance. All the right knowledge to put down naysayers of lobster violence. “Oh the humanity” you hear them cry, whilst eating chickens slaughtered out of sight and out of mind. I used to work in a fish restaurant and had to kill lobsters by hand almost everyday. I think every omnivore should be prepared to do this, to know where your food comes from and be human enough to kill it.

Following text instructions from a very helpful woman in the PR department, I made my way through the crowded dining room to the back. Two large tables played host to head chefs, general managers, social media executives, marketing managers and the UK operations manager. A space was made for the ‘young man’ and I sat and quaked in my Le Coq Sportif’s. I was a fraud, here amongst all these heavy-hitters I sat, a lowly critic from a student newspaper.

Before having time to plan an escape route I was inundated with cocktails adorned with sprigs of rosemary, patented sherry tonics and whipped egg whites. They were exhibiting the old cocktail menu with its new editions and I couldn’t pretend that I wasn’t impressed. We were encouraged to slap rum bitters on ourselves like cologne in some cocktail crazed ritual. Then came the lobster, in freshly baked brioche buns. The lobster roll may have been the greatest sandwich ever conceived under the canopy of heaven. I knew it had humble beginnings as a poor man’s meal, but I have recently learned that it used to be the reserve of the Canadian prison system.

Photo: Burger and Lobster

After our incredible tasters we ordered mains. The menu is stripped down, hyper-minimal and a result of Zelman’s mono-product philosophy. By having only one or two items on the menu, you never had to throw away the produce for dishes that weren’t selling—thereby keeping wastage to an absolute minimum and increasing profit margins. Both of the restaurants namesake dishes came in two formats; a classic burger, comprised of three different cuts of meat and all the relish of a post Iron Curtain Big Mac fetish. Or you could opt for the healthier version, the ‘California style’; with meat between two halves of lettuce—a nod to the omnipresent health food trend that is currently plaguing the nation. The lobster comes grilled or steamed, and I went for the former. It was great, it was exactly what I expected a lobster to taste like.

Photo: Burger and Lobster

Their restaurants operate a no reservations policy, another prolific food trend of 2015 that shows very little signs of dwindling.

The restaurant market is increasing by 2 to 3 per cent and 2,000 new restaurants per annum. Manchester is seeing the effects of this with an ever expanding food scene, and more and more London franchises are making their way up the M40. Manchester has Hawksmoor, Wahaca and now Burger and Lobster. But is the chain such a bad thing? Success is far from a dirty word in the restaurant industry, and if a company is doing well, then why shouldn’t they expand? Or do the chains push the independent outlets off of the high street? And is community making way for commodity? Either way, the Goodman Restaurants show no sign of slowing down.

 

Price ££££ (4 out of 5)

Food 4/5

Drinks 5/5

Service 4/5

Atmosphere 4/5

Value 4/5

 

Visit the Manchester branch at:

Ship Canal House, 98 King St, Manchester M2 4WU

Preview: Official launch of the Global Development Institute

On Wednesday 17th February, the University of Manchester will be officially launching the Global Development Institute (GDI).

A keynote speech on inequality and the future of global development will be given by Oxfam International Executive Director and Manchester alumna, Winnie Byanyima.

The GDI, which came into actual existence earlier this year, is the largest research and teaching institute of its kind in Europe. Its aim is to “identify and address global inequalities, creating and sharing knowledge that promotes social justice.”

The institute came as a result due to a merging between the Institute for Development Policy & Management (IDPM) and the Brooks World Poverty Institute.

According to the head of the GDI, world-renowned Professor David Hulme—the institute was a direct response to the changing nature of the international sphere: “Today we are living in an ever more globalising world; with the launch of the institute we’re recognising the incredible inter-connectedness of all of humanity.”

According to the GDI’s website: “While we’ve seen huge reductions in poverty over the last twenty years, finishing the job, let alone making the gains sustainable will require seismic changes right around the world. The University of Manchester has been at the forefront of development studies for over 60 years. With the creation of the Global Development Institute, we want to lead critical thinking, teaching and research over the next 60 years, too.”

Also, the lecture will be followed by a reception with free drinks provided.

Limited tickets are still available for the event at: eventbrite.co.uk/e/winnie-byanyima-on-inequality-global-development-institute-launch-tickets-20053624932

When and where:
Wednesday, 17 February 2016 from 17:00 to 18:30 (GMT)
University Place Lecture Theatre B, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL GB

Manchester City 1-2 Tottenham Hotspur

Goals

Harry Kane (P), 53rd minute

Kelechi Iheanacho, 73rd minute

Christian Eriksen, 83rd minute

If this game was a song: All You Need is Love – The Beatles

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

If you’re a City fan sat at home now crying into your hands at a second loss in a row—do not despair. There’s time to resolve this issue at The Etihad, and now there’s a small break for the team to gather and come out fighting again when the Premier League resumes.

This is no day to be upset; Valentine’s Day is the day of love, and love is all you need! So get out of the chair that you are slumped in, and put on a Hugh Grant Film. This is the only day of the year where it is acceptable to watch Hugh Grant.

Big moments

13th minute: Heung-Min Son has the ball in the back of the net for Spurs, but he was miles offside.

48th minute: the ball loops down into the area after a Yaya Touré shot deflects! It falls to Aguero, who has to take it first time from a great height… even he isn’t that good. The ball is still rising.

52nd minute: PENALTY. Rose crosses the ball at great speed and it hits Raheem Sterling. The ball seems to strike him on his back instead of his arm—and there will be argument as to whether he was in the area or not. Despite many replays, the decision is not 100% conclusive. Harry Kane puts away the penalty.

56th minute: Touré hits the bar from a curving free kick from around 25 yards.

65th minute: Substitution: Kelechi Iheanacho on for Fernando.

73rd minute: GOAL. Eight minute after coming on, Iheanacho finds the back of the net from a Gaël Clichy cross.

80th minute: Substitution: Erik Lamella on for Dele Alli

83rd minute: GOAL. Three minutes after coming on, Lamella shows some fancy footwork and plays through Eriksen to put the ball past Hart. Despite cries of offside from the crowd, Eriksen is clearly onside.

90+3rd minute: Pinball in the Tottenham penalty area as City try to find an equaliser. Hugo Lloris flicks the ball off the top of Otamendi’s head to save Spurs, as David Silva’s follow up is high and mighty.

Stat of the Game

Kelechi Iheanacho, Steven Naismith, Olivier Giroud and Christian Benteke are the most successful substitutes in the Premier League this season with 3 goals each.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Success in the Capital

Although it would be far off the mark to label today as a title decider, it was definitely a day you wanted your team to come out on top! With Spurs and City meeting in Manchester, and Arsenal playing Leicester down in the capital, the top four were going head to head.

Arsenal beat the Midlands team 2-1 due to a last minute Danny Welbeck goal, hence opening up the league for Spurs and City to catch up to Leicester. The two North London sides came out on top in the end today, as Spurs matched Arsenal’s 2-1 score line, denting City’s hopes and the confidence of league-leaders Leicester.

Tottenham haven’t been sitting in this comfortable a position in decades, and this is the closest Arsenal have been to a genuine title surge in quite a while. Considering this, you could say The Smith’s prediction is right—there will be ‘panic on the streets of London’.

Tottenham Hotspur

Spurs fans would have been overjoyed at the prospect of sitting in the top four at this stage in the season—so just imagine how they must be feeling now, with only Leicester City above them in the league table. Their combination of speed in attack, and discipline in defence is what is keeping them up and amongst the big boys this season. The accuracy on long balls from centre back Toby Alderweireld showcased Spurs’ unpredictable nature, as they switched play often during the match, dragging City from left to right.

City are expected to come back fighting, as they have a team that are so used to the title run-in! Players like Joe Hart, Pablo Zabaleta, Vincent Kompany, Yaya Toure, David Silva and Sergio Aguero have been here many times before and won this league twice already. It is with this that we must turn our attention to Spurs, as they have the youngest side in the league. This shows an awful lot of potential for Spurs’ future and highlights that they may be title contenders for years to come, but will also put a hint of worry in the stomach of fans as they are so inexperienced.

Quote of the Presser

Manuel Pellegrini: “I think that we must continue fighting. We have to play another 36 points.”

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Fan Watch

Christian Eriksen had a fantastic 24th birthday today. He scored the winner that saw his side move up to second place in the Premier League, and the fans love him for it. The Tottenham fans held aloft a banner for Eriksen wishing him a happy birthday, and he returned the love by jumping in the crowd when he scored the winner to celebrate with them!

Squad Goals

Manuel Pellegrini was quick to stress in his post-match interview that Manchester City only have fourteen players available at the moment. This is highlighted by how young the bench was for the game against Tottenham. Bersant Celina, who made his Premier League debut last week against Leicester City, was joined by Kelechi Iheanacho, Aleix Garcia and Manu Garcia on the bench who are all teenagers. This will both excite and worry fans, but have no fear! The spine of the team are all back and now fit. Joe Hart, Vincent Kompany, Yaya Toure, David Silva and Sergio Aguero are all fit at the same time for the first time in what feels like a lifetime, and City always flourish with these five in the team. And, a flourish is exactly what they need right now.

Men of the Match

Danny Rose

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

City fans may not thank me for this, as they spent half the match booing Rose. Midway through the second half, Rose didn’t put the ball out of play after his own player was down injured, despite how the City defenders were under the impression that he would. The fans didn’t take kindly to this, but it must not be forgotten what a good game the Englishman had. It was Rose’s cross that won Tottenham the penalty in the second half, after it hit Raheem Sterling. Despite how replays show that this probably hit Sterling on his back instead of his arm, it was a wicked cross to have to defend against. Rose was a constant threat all game, up against Pablo Zabaleta on the left wing, as he had him twisting and turning all match. A hint of Rose’s desire was displayed when he jumped out to a Sterling cross in the first half, chest first! The ball rocketed at his chest and the referee had to stop the game for a moment.

Raheem Sterling

The sides were very evenly matched today, and no City player had a bad game. Raheem Sterling just edged it though in my opinion. Gaël Clichy and Vincent Kompany also had great games in a much more confident display from a City back four—despite the two goals that went past them. Sterling’s pace going forwards and ability to take on any defender is fantastic to watch, but the part of his game that was so surprising today was his defensive work-rate. Countless times Sterling was back defending and winning the ball back to start a counter-attack. Although this was in vain in the end, as City endured their second loss in a row, Sterling is showing what he’s made of and will definitely be off to the European Championships in the summer to showcase this to the world.

Does anybody want this?

It’s been an awfully long time since four teams have been in the running for the title this late in the season, as each week a different side slips up! This week it was City and Leicester—who knows who it will be next week! Nobody has any intentions of running away with the lead this season, and it will be left wide open for any team to win the coveted trophy. So go ahead and put a tenner on Aston Villa…

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Government to crack down on loan repayments

The Minister for Universities, Jo Johnson, has announced that the government will be cracking down heavily on student loan repayment evaders.

While more help will be given to those struggling with their loans, stronger measures are being introduced to pursue those who go abroad and fail to meet their repayment deadlines.

Mr. Johnson said in a written statement to the Commons: “As more loans are issued to new students each year, it is vital the repayment process is robust, convenient for borrowers, and working efficiently to ensure the sustainability of the student finance system, and value for money, for the taxpayer.

“We will act to recover loan repayments where it is clear borrowers are seeking to avoid repayment, consider the use of sanctions against borrowers who breach loan repayment terms and, if necessary, prosecute.

“This approach is fair for borrowers and good for the effective management of public money, providing value for the taxpayer and helping to ensure that the student finance system remains on a sustainable footing.”

Currently, for tuition, universities in England and Wales are allowed to charge up to £9,000 a year. While some students choose to privately fund their studies, the vast majority of students take out a standard tuition loan and varying maintenance loans from the Students Loans Company (SLC).

Those students who took out loans after 2012 start repaying their loan when their post-university salary reaches £21,000. While this level was originally set to increase with average earnings, the government has held the point at which graduates start repaying at £21,000.

As of now, if former students live and work in the UK, money for the student loan is automatically deducted from a debtor’s pay slip. However, when working abroad, payments must be made voluntarily. It is estimated that around £75 million of unpaid loans have accumulated over the last two decades from UK students going abroad.

Government officials, desperate to make savings and to balance their books, are trialling new methods of co-operation with foreign governments, similar to the piloted information sharing project between Sweden and the Netherlands.

According to the Daily Mail, the two countries share the information of over two hundred ‘missing’ debtors believed to be in each other’s countries for more effective loan repayment policing.

To increase the SLC’s ability to track down and discipline non-compliant debtors, a range of new financial penalties for those who breach the terms of their loan repayments have been proposed. One method put forward is the referral of those abusing loan repayments to credit rating agencies. Legal action will also be taken if deemed appropriate.

The Champions League is back

It’s been more than two months since the last time the Champions League anthem echoed in the ears of football lovers around the world. Fortunately, the wait is finally over, as the road to Milano—San Siro, the home of AC and Inter Milan, which will be the theatre of the 2016 final—is about to continue. In order to get to the fashion capital on the 28th May, the 16 teams that have made it through the group stage must wear their best outfits, as a series of complicated matches awaits them. While the European Clubs Association is discussing possible changes to make the competition “more attractive”, as proposed by ECA boss Karl-Heinz Rumenigge, on Tuesday night the Champions League will re-start with the first act of its traditional knockout stage.

The round of 16 will be opened by a “clash of blues”: Paris Saint-Germain against Chelsea. The game is a remake of last edition’s dramatic round of 16 where the Frenchmen knocked Mourinho’s army with a David Luiz’s goal and an extra-time Thiago Silva header, after Chelsea had taken the lead twice. PSG have already near enough secured their title hopes in their domestic league (24 points ahead of Monaco,only 39 more to play for) and are only focused to improve their poor results in Europe despite the big investments made in the last years by chairman Nasser Al-Khelaifi. However, Chelsea’s good form under Guus Hiddink could be tricky for Zlatan and his teammates. On the same day, Benfica will host Zenit, with Andre Vilas-Boas aiming to get the Russians to the quarter finals for the first time in their history.

On the following night, in Rome, it will be Zinedine Zidane’s Champions League debut as a coach. Zizou, who lifted the trophy wearing “la camiseta blanca” in 2002, is hoping to join the elite club of people who have won the CL both as a player and as a coach and, to do so, he will rely on CL top scorer Cristiano Ronaldo (11 goals so far). It could be another dramatic night for Roma, after a humiliating 6-1 defeat to Barcelona in the group stage, but the “giallorossi” seem to have changed gear with the return of Luciano Spalletti on the Stadio Olimpico’s bench. Meanwhile Gent, who unexpectedly condemned Valencia to the Europa League and knocked Lyon out of the competition, will try to surprise everyone again in a tie against Manchester United’s “killers”, Wolfsburg.

The grandest stage, however, will be on Tuesday 23rd, when 3 out of the 4 semi-finalists of last year’s edition are going to be in action. The Emirates will be the set of “Mission Impossible 1”, where Arsenal have the almost unachievable task of stopping Barcelona from the first back-to-back of the history of the competition. Luis Enrique’s side looks unstoppable, especially at home, so Arsenal’s hopes of getting to the quarter-finals depend almost exclusively on the way Wenger’s defence will be able to block the MSN (Messi-Suarez-Neymar) in London. The other big game of the night is in Turin, where last year’s runners-up Juventus will face Bayern Munich. After a shaky start to the year, the “bianconeri” have been on fire in the last few months, collecting 17 consecutive wins. However, Bayern are one of the favourites to get into the final in Milan, and Pep Guardiola aims to put his hands on the trophy before leaving Germany for Manchester.

Guardiola’s next team, Manchester City, will close the first leg on Wednesday 24th. The Citizens have, for the first time, a realistic chance of getting to the quarter finals, having been drawn with Dinamo Kiev (in the two previous occasions they had to face Barcelona). On paper, the game with Serhiy Rebrov’s team looks easier than it might actually be, since the Ukrainians proved to be a complicated opponent for both Chelsea and Porto during the group stage, especially when it came to playing at home. The other clash of the night will see Chelsea’s target Diego Simeone and his Atletico Madrid face PSV Eindhoven, who are currently sitting at the top of the Dutch league.

The menu is rich and it could be full of surprises. Now, the time has finally come for the beloved Champions League anthem to be played loudly again. “The Championssssss!”

International students at London business school asked to leave UK

The Home Office has confirmed that over 350 foreign students at the London School of Business and Finance (LSBF) will be asked to leave the UK, after the private college had its Tier 4 sponsorship revoked. The sponsorship is a license that universities and colleges must apply for in order to enrol full-time students from outside of the European Economic Area in the UK.

The college, which is part of the for-profit education group Global University Systems has several branches in the UK, Asia and North America. It has been said that the group have breached the terms of its responsibilities in sponsoring non-EU students. LSBF later cited a “technical discussion” as the origin of the issue, revealing that the Home Office was concerned about the proportion of foreign students recruited at the college whose visa applications were later refused. According to some of the students, the Home Office have been sending out a “notice of curtailment”.

The government informed students that their documents have been revised and state that the students’ records provide no evidence of what their intentions are in the UK, whether they “have made a fresh application for entry clearance, leave to enter, or leave to remain in the United Kingdom.” The notice concludes that “the Secretary of State has therefore decided to curtail your leave to enter or remain.”

In a statement released by the rector of LSBF, Professor Mauritus van Rooijen, the next course of action for the students affected is outlined. Rooijen was “surprised and shocked” by the Home Office’s decision. He states that most of the students affected by the government’s decision are in their final year of their undergraduate degree or are enrolled in a one-year postgraduate course.

Remaining hopeful, Rooijen believes that since the students have almost come to the end of their studies, the college will be able to accelerate their teaching in order to ensure students receive their degree qualifications by the end of March. Those few students that are not in their final year of study will most likely be transferred to one of LSBF’s partner schools in Italy or France.

A statement published by the National Union of Students (NUS) revealed that the issue raised about the college having its Tier 4 sponsorship license revoked was first raised last year. Subsequently, when the NUS asked for a meeting with LSBF to discuss the future of international students at the college, there was no response. On the whole, the NUS is worried that the “options given to students at LSBF, to squash their course into a shorter time frame or to move their studies to Italy or France, are not good enough.”

Mostafa Rajaai, NUS’ International Students’ Officer, is heavily critical of the government’s role in the recent events, particularly with regard to its stance on immigration: “NUS is calling on the government to stop the unfair and unjust treatment of international students. Our research has already shown more than half of non-EU students think the government is unwelcoming towards international students.

“We believe the repeated attacks on international students are part of the government’s wider stance against immigration. NUS will continue to fight for the rights of the students who come to the UK hoping to brighten their futures and are instead met with hostility.”

Manchester’s second graphene centre gets the go ahead

Last week it was announced that Manchester City Council granted planning permission for the new Graphene Engineering Innovation Centre (GEIC). The GEIC will be the University of Manchester’s second centre dedicated to the research and application of Graphene—the thinnest material on earth. The new building will be located on the North Campus, next to Mancunian Way and Sackville Street.

The planning permission is exciting news for those involved in the University of Manchester’s ambitious vision to develop a thriving knowledge-based economy around the revolutionary 2D material in a new ‘Graphene City’.

Since its isolation by two Manchester scientists, who received the 2010 Nobel Prize in physics for their groundbreaking work, graphene has captured the attention of researchers worldwide thanks to its incredible properties. Graphene is ultra light and flexible, only one atom thick, yet is 200 times stronger than steel.

Complimented by the National Graphene Institute (NGI), the world’s leading academic facility for graphene research, and the proposed £235 million Sir Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Material Research, the GEIC will focus on industry-led development and application of graphene products. Positioned in the heart of the city, all three centres will together facilitate graphene application from basic research to finished product, truly establishing Manchester as a globally leading hub for graphene research and commercialisation.

The three centres will aid the use of graphene as a disruptive technology—to improve existing materials, and open up new markets. Current applications of graphene include membranes for water filtration, producing light but strong sporting equipment, drug delivery systems, and ultra sensitive biosensors. However with such a breadth of properties hailed by this revolutionary material, graphene has huge potential for countless applications that have yet to be explored.

Designed by world-renowned architect Rafael Viñoly, the 8,400 square metre multi-million pound research and technology facility will have top of the range equipment, and unrivalled levels of graphene expertise—ensuring the quickest possible route of development from research to market.

Martin Schröder, Vice President and Dean of Engineering and Physical Sciences, said: “This is a wonderful facility that will develop our world-leading research to new products and markets in collaboration with key industrial partners. The GEIC will be a catalyst for industry-university partnerships that will drive innovation and invention of new applications for graphene.”

Funding for the GEIC has largely been provided by Masdar, the Abu Dhabi-based renewable energy company owned by Mubadala, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s UK Research Partnership Investment Fund (UKRPIF). The centre is set to be completed by the end of 2017.

For more information on Manchester’s revolutionary 2D-material and Graphene City, visit www.graphene.manchester.ac.uk.

LSE’s Free Speech Society could face ban

A third year law student at the London School of Economics (LSE), Maurice Banjeree Palmer, has filed a motion against the newly established LSE Free Speech Society – Speakeasy, claiming that its members are “ill-informed” and “self-important”.

This news follows the recent controversy surrounding the Free Speech University Rankings conducted by Spiked magazine, in which the LSE Students’ Union falls under red in the traffic light ranking system—meaning that the university “has banned and actively censored ideas on campus.” The article further reads that LSE’s Students’ Union “collectively create a hostile environment for free speech.”

The ranking draws on past examples of the Students’ Union censoring freedom of expression. Most recently, The Beaver, LSE’s Student newspaper, has had an edition of the paper banned by its Students’ Union. Furthermore, the Union have prohibited atheist students from wearing t-shirts depicting the prophet Muhammad, suspended the men’s rugby team over sexist and homophobic flyers, and banned The Sun and The Daily Star from its shops.

In a profile of the Free Speech Society, Speakeasy published in The London Evening Standard, an introduction to some of its members behind the establishment of the society. “Our society is emerging from this growing sense of censorship that seems to be a problem on loads of campuses in universities across the country,” says Charlie Parker, President of the newly founded society. In the article, the founders described their mission to create a space for students outside of the “safe bubble at LSE,” and criticised the safe space policy for being “counter-productive.” As a closing statement, Parker adds that: “We are opposed to any form of restriction that treats students as not capable of making up their own minds.”

Criticisms raised against Speakeasy were first outlined by Palmer in an article in LSE’s student newspaper, outlining his reasons for filing a motion against the society. In the article, he uses the example of the recently published piece in The London Evening Standard about the Free Speech Society – Speakeasy to argue that the founders are only looking for more publicity rather than opening up new channels of debate at the university.

He claims that there is a clear logic behind the safe space policy in Students’ Unions and that the society Speakeasy not only disrespects this policy, but also endorses “hate speech” on campus. Palmer states that “it would be hilarious if the anti-ban society was actually banned” adding that “instead of actually doing any debating, our three musketeers have decided to set up a society in the name of debate and get their faces in the papers.”

He has received harsh critique after the release of his article, with comments referring to him as “childish,” “illiberal,” and “ignorant.” Further comments claim that he holds a “personal resentment” against the newly created Speakeasy, adding that he is simply jealous of the publicity the founders of the society have received in the press.

In his statement to The Mancunion, Connor Naylor, one of the founders of the society, responds to the recent controversy triggered by Palmer’s article: “We have issues a statement and written numerous articles in the LSE student newspaper, The Beaver, explaining our position, our aims and intentions, which are to challenge a climate of self-censorship on campus, to respectfully oppose policies both in LSE and in the UK generally that we feel encroach on our fundamental right to express all opinions openly.”

Students at LSE have also expressed their concern about the banning of the Free Speech Society. Saloni Malhotra, a postgraduate at LSE studying International Relations, told The Mancunion: “Although I was surprised that the LSE ranked so badly in the free speech rankings, there is a clear trend of banning societies or criticising them when they express somewhat controversial opinions. A university should be a place where students can discuss controversial issues as well as non controversial ones. Banning the free speech society would be ridiculous.”

Naylor is confident in the future of his society and tells The Mancunion about upcoming plans. “At the moment we obviously have to fight the motion proposed to the Students’ Union to have us banned, but we also have our first official event entitled ‘Should Universities Be Safe Spaces’, a panel debate co-hosted with the Politics and Forum Society on the issue of universal safe-spacing.” Furthermore, Naylor is critical of the university’s response to the recent controversies stating that “official response has been scant, with the occasional tweet or comment being all that can be accounted for. The School, [LSE] as usual, has failed to comment on the issue.”

The motion against the society is set to be debated in an LSE Students’ Union general meeting in a few weeks time. Parker and Naylor have said that they will work hard to oppose the ban at the meeting, stating that: “Speakeasy is not just a bunch of White, privileged males out to cause offence for no reason.”

UCD uncovers revenge porn Facebook group

Students of University College Dublin (UCD) were outraged after the student newspaper, The College Tribune, alleged that over 200 Agricultural Science students were involved in a ‘revenge porn’ Facebook group. In the group, members discussed girls they had had sexual relations with, posted any nude photos of the girls they had, and then encouraged each other to rate the girls using their Facebook profiles.

The allegations have led to a furious backlash from the Agricultural Science students themselves with one posting online that “as an Ag[ricultural science] lad who’s in most of the groups, I have to say we’re not all the same…Most of the guys in the group don’t even partake in what’s happening!” Ironically, the individual then went on to claim in his defence that he had “personally only sent three photos and a story or two.”

Sending nude or revealing photos of other people without their permission has been considered a crime in the United Kingdom since 2015, and the university has stated that the information will be handed over to the relevant authorities and students may face expulsion.

After the criticism came flooding in on Twitter using #UCD200, one member of the group responded to the accusations with “you can go fuck yourself you presumptuous bitch.”

The Facebook group is now being subjected to an investigation by the university, who “completely condemn this behaviour and anyone who engages in it—it is sexual violence.” President of UCD, Professor Mark Rogers, has insisted that the “primary concern is to support any vulnerable student victimised by this alleged activity.”

This is not the first time UCD agricultural scientists have been involved with a misogynistic Facebook group. Last March a group named “girls I’d shift if I was tipsy” was uncovered and the current student president, Marcus O’Halloran, was found to be an active member. Surprisingly, O’Halloran’s election campaign was centred on the promise to reduce ‘lad culture’ at UCD.

The news has come as a particularly poignant blow to author, Louise O’Neill, who has been campaigning against ‘lad culture’ at UCD. “When I first read about it, I sat in stunned silence for about ten minutes.”

O’Neill started a campaign in October that focused on consent, which obviously fell upon deaf ears in regards to the agricultural students. After receiving Facebook messages that the group was “only a bit of banter”, O’Neill has responded that “It’s never just banter. It’s never just words. These comments and these Facebook groups are the building blocks to a culture where so many women feel belittled, humiliated, sexualised without their consent, and, ultimately, unsafe.”

Assange’s ‘arbitrary detention’ gives human rights a bad name

Normally, I am a great advocate not only for the United Nations (UN), but also for human rights. Human rights are not designed to be popular, they’re designed to be the basic rights and freedoms we should all expect. The sad thing is, they end up with a bad rap and are brought into disrepute when instances like this happen:

Julian Assange—a name we all know—has been in the Ecuadorean embassy in London since June 2012 at a cost to the UK taxpayer of over £10 million. Following the decisions of the Supreme Court exhausting any blockage to extradition in 2012, Assange entered the embassy and was granted political asylum (a form of asylum not recognised by the UK). This whole situation comes from the fact that Assange is wanted on a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) issued by Sweden for several charges including rape. Assange fears that if the warrant is executed, he will be extradited by the Swedish authorities to face trial in America for his involvement with WikiLeaks after standing trial in Sweden. On 5th February 2016, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) handed down its decision that Assange has been arbitrarily detained. This decision has been the target for a barrage of derision. The national press and legal Twitterati have lampooned it. Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, has called it “ridiculous” and political satire website The Daily Mash ran the headline: “Man is being arbitrarily detained at Argos, UN rules“.

It is worthwhile to define arbitrary detention in order to assess the validity of this decision, and to see whether the derision is founded on good grounds. Article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile”.  Paragraphs 3a to 3e of the decision of WGAD provide us with five categories for determining what amounts to arbitrary detention. The group decided (on a majority of 3 – 1, with one member abstaining) that category III—the detention is arbitrary due to a non-observance of the right to a fair trial—is the most applicable in this situation.

It appears that the reasoning behind the decision of the group is that Mr Assange’s case was not reviewed after changes to the extradition law with the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act of 2014. These changes mean that courts have the power to assess whether the EAW is correct, as well as the new amendments bar extradition—where no decision has been made in regards to whether or not a person should be brought to trial. These are key issues which are applicable to this case. They are all reasonable amendments. Had the EAW been issued today, a UK court would more likely than not uphold it due to these changes.

However, there is one key factor that appears to have escaped the mind of the working group—the law does not apply retrospectively. Any cases brought after 21st July 2014 will be subject to the amendments, but cases decided before this date will not. This interpretation is supported by the construction of the statutory provisions. Yet, for some reason this seems to have not been of any concern to the working group.

The group holds the view that Assange has been arbitrarily detained on three occasions: his time in Wandsworth Prison, his subsequent ‘house arrest’, and his time in the Ecuadorean Embassy. During his time in prison, Assange was kept in isolation and the working group held that: “arbitrariness is inherent in this form of deprivation of liberty, if the individual is left outside the cloak of legal protection, including the access to legal assistance”. However, there is nothing to say that Assange did not have access to legal representation. Perhaps the working group has a definition of isolation far removed from the true realities of our present-day prison system.

The working group go on to argue that the ‘house arrest’ of Assange was also arbitrary detention. It is not uncommon in the UK to attach a residence condition to the bail of a suspected criminal pending trial. Whilst it is plain to see that this would constitute a restriction of liberty. It is definitely not arbitrary because of the judicial safeguards in place to ensure protection against the condition being overused.

The decision is laughable when considering the ‘detention’ in the embassy. The working group, it appears, have turned a blind eye to the fact that Assange has contravened his bail conditions and chosen to seek asylum in the embassy. Assange is free to leave the embassy whenever he wants. However, if Assange were to leave the embassy he would be immediately arrested. Not just because of the decisions made by the working group in terming his detention arbitrary.

The name of human rights has been tarnished by what Marina Hyde in The Guardian has said, are a group “of academics, seemingly devoid of judicial experience”. In no true sense of the word has Assange been arbitrarily detained, he has had full access to legal representation throughout his case. This sort of decision is a real problem for human rights law as it gives rise to a bad reputation. It leads people to think that human rights do more bad than good, always protecting the ‘bad guys’ and never thinking of the ‘good guys’. This is not the case, and on this occasion the working group have not given long overdue consideration to the realities of the situation.

Students encouraged to volunteer at homelessness charities

Students will be well aware of Manchester’s appalling homelessness crisis, but many will have no idea how they themselves can make a difference. Last Tuesday, the 9th of February, Amy Hinks from the Booth Centre came to the university in answer to this question, giving a well-attended talk about the charity tackling the homelessness crisis head on and discussing how students could get involved.

The Manchester Evening News reported that since 2010, the amount of homeless people in and around Manchester has increased by an estimated 600 per cent.

The Booth Centre provides a safe space, where the homeless can enjoy a hot meal, take a shower or even gain a qualification. It is open five days a week, normally from 9am until 3pm, providing breakfast and lunch for those who need it.

Rough sleepers visiting the centre can engage in activities such as gardening, handicraft, painting and cooking. Some even take these new skills to gain qualifications at the prospect of applying for work and getting off the streets. The Booth Centre boasts that this year alone, the centre has helped 459 people find temporary or permanent accommodation. The centre helps up to 300 people per week, which is an increase in numbers from previous years.

Amy Hinks, who works at the centre, informed students about the potential reasons for the increase in homelessness around Manchester: “Not every homeless person is an addict or alcoholic; we meet a lot of people who have lost their jobs or split up from partners and have no home anymore.” Hinks said that government cuts to welfare, benefits and housing have contributed massively to the crisis. Many support networks have been cut or terminated which has had a large impact, too.

The centre is funded by a compilation of donations which include council and national lottery funding, and comic relief grants. However, the announcement made last summer that Manchester City Council will have to make nearly a quarter of a billion pounds worth of cuts, means that charities like the Booth Centre are ever more reliant on fundraising from the public.

One way students can get involved is by getting sponsorship for the notorious Bogle on the 4th of March. Proudly held in collaboration with the Students’ Union and RAG, it consists of a 55-mile walk around Manchester, which was first completed in 1961 by a number of lecturers from the University of Manchester. Other upcoming events include a sponsored sleep-out on the 4th of November, so that fundraisers can experience just what life is like for the homeless in wintry Manchester.

Donations of toiletries, socks, underwear and food are all welcomed at the centre. The Booth Centre asks passersby to be kind to homeless people by greeting them and informing them about the centre in order to help people get off of the streets and back into stability. The centre is in the north of the city centre, close to the Manchester Arena.

Links to signing up for these fundraising events and more about the charity can be found on the Booth Centre website boothcentre.org.uk. Volunteering opportunities at the centre can also be found here.

Live: The Contortionist with TesseracT

Friday 5th February 2016

Manchester Academy 2

The Contortionist: 5/10

TesseracT: 9/10

If there was ever a gig that proved that performance was as every bit as important as musical talent in a live setting, then this show was the one. The Contortionist are, musically, an incredible band—I consider their 2014 album Language to be a progressive metal masterpiece, yet I couldn’t help but feel disappointed by their live show. The reason for this was obvious from the onset: there was no interaction with the audience.

The Contortionist’s frontman, Michael Lessard, seemed entirely disinterested in his audience. He looked robotic on stage, and often stared blankly across the venue and twitched at random. This made the performance as a whole, somewhat uncomfortable. The most offensive act happened during the intro to ‘Ebb and Flow’, an extended instrumental piece, where the vocalist turned his back to the crowd for about two minutes.

It is generally through the frontman that the audience is able to engage with the band, but with this one, it felt as if there was an invisible brick wall that prevented the fans from feeling connected with their performance. Songs that should have had people jumping up and down were met only with weak head-nodding.

But musically, the band was phenomenal—Lessard’s vocals sent chills down my spine during the closing track ‘The Parable’. The drummer and guitarists unleashed ridiculous polyrhythms across the board. In fact, my only complaint sonically about the show was that the vocals were mixed a little too low and tended to get lost under the thunderous instrumentation. The Contortionist is a band that puts out genuinely beautiful material on their albums, but in a live setting they just lacked any kind of connection with the crowd and made no effort to seem like they wanted to be performing at all—it felt like it wasn’t much more than a glorified rehearsal.

TesseracT, on the other hand, brought life back into the venue in spectacular fashion. Amongst the ever-growing Dent and Progressive Metal community, the British five-piece have always been an important name in the discussion as pioneers of the genre, and they live up to this reputation onstage. Opening with ‘The Phoenix’, frontman Daniel Thompkins amazed the audience with his unfathomable vocal talent, nailing and holding unbelievably high notes that, for most, would have been completely impossible outside of a studio—a feat rewarded with raucous applause and cheers.

The passion and energy Thompkins conveyed through his vocals and stage presence—in addition to the spectacular use of lighting—transformed a live show into a theatrical performance. TesseracT is a band that brought opposing elements together to form an amazing musical experience and enthralled the audience with a bewitching, Asian-influenced, clean sections, sending them into a frenzy with monstrously heavy and intricate polyrhythms.

While TesseracT’s latest album, Polaris, has its fair share of heavy grooves on tracks such as ‘Dystopia’ and ‘Hexes’, most of the mayhem was summoned forth from previous albums. ‘Deception’ and ‘The Impossible’, from their debut album One, introduced the crowd to the “djenty” chugs that have come to define the genre. The centre of the crowd expanded out into a dedicated space for the mosh pit, which only momentarily paused to appreciate the introduction of Altered State’s three-part epic ‘Of Matter’, a track that the crowd was treated to in its 14 minute entirety.

The band closed with ‘Acceptance’, a track that I feel perfectly encapsulates the beauty, intensity, and technicality of TesseracT’s music—a blend of guttural growls and gorgeous harmonies, of absurdly distorted breakdowns and delicately crafted arpeggios, of sheer technical ability and musical genius. I came away from their show genuinely upset that it was over. So if you have the opportunity to see Tesseract live then seize it; it’s an incredible experience.

Final year blues

With half of the year already behind us, we can’t help but be aware that our university life won’t last forever. The final year blues are beginning to loom. ‘Where shall I work?’ ‘Will I ever get a job?’ ‘I’m hopeless.’ These negative thoughts are common amongst us final year students, but it’s important to bear in mind that this is normal. You’re not the only one who feels like they haven’t got everything sorted. This mindset is not the way to progress, and when you stop and think about it, things aren’t always as bad as they seem.

1.     You’ve made it this far!

You’ve made it to third year. This has got to show that you’ve done something right (at least academically anyway). Keep this in mind to get you through to the end, perhaps make a couple of to-do lists and keep ticking away at it to make sure you feel like you’re winning in the race against university time.

2.     Slowly, but surely.

It may seem that things are slowing down, but you still have another half of the year to make the most out of everything. Although the workload is increasing, it’s still not too late to implement the ‘little and often’ mantra. If you start doing this now, you can use your spare time to get involved into other things. Doing this will ensure a dose of positivity everyday, and days off will be deserved.

3.     Keep the moaning to a minimum.

In order to build and maintain a positive mindset, you’ve got to take those negative feelings and tune them into productiveness. Keep the moaning to a minimum and think about what you can do, and why it is that you are worrying. Even if it’s something as little as a messy bedroom, clean it up and be done with it.

4.     Sooner rather than later.

We’ve all been there, paper due in tomorrow, presentation practise in the morning, revision cramming—but we still have time to make sure that this isn’t an issue in these last few months. If you’re doing a dissertation, a little chipping at the word count will mean that your finished piece will come around sooner than you think. Take time out everyday to do some academic work and half-an-hour to an at least an hour to take a look at the job scene. This way you’ll keep both avenues separate and you’ll feel organised.

5.     Me time.

As hard as it may feel to stay positive, sometimes a bit on me time is enough to make you feel better. Don’t get paranoid about what other people think, because no matter how social you are, everyone needs a bit of alone time. If you keep chipping away at the things you need to do, when you have a bit of time to yourself, you will not feel guilty, but more relaxed.

Good luck final years!

Top 5: Music Documentaries of the 2010s

5) Cobain: Montage of Heck

Everyone knows ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’. Everyone knows the story of Nirvana. But before watching Montage of Heck, you don’t really know the real story of Kurt Cobain. Through open access to diaries and notebooks from throughout his life, there is an intimate insight into one of the most gifted—but ultimately tortured—individuals rock music has ever seen.

 

4) There Are No Innocent Bystanders

Nowadays, you can see The Libertines performing at your local arena, but rewind to the years before 2010 happened and the prospect of the Cockney troubadours performing together was completely inconceivable. Director and long-time band photographer Roger Sargent builds up to their big reunion show at Reading Festival. He provides an insiders account of past chaotic escapades about a band who could have been a major indie force, yet they imploded under internal conflicts and drug problems.

 

3) Amy

Despite Amy Winehouse’s meteoric rise around 2006, fame and the endless media scrutiny from tabloid was certainly not for her. Amy highlights the charismatic charm and undeniable creative talent of Winehouse, making her downfall—through the toxic influences surrounding her—a deeply devastating watch.

 

2) George Harrison: Living in the Material World

Take one look at the films of Martin Scorsese and it’s clear he resonates with a passion for music. The legendary director documents the life of arguably the most under-appreciated Beatle in George Harrison—putting his work in the band on a pedestal. More importantly, however, are the scenes devoted to his life outside of the Fab Four with his spirituality and good nature being focused upon. Three-and-a-half hours isn’t long enough.

 

1) Searching for Sugar Man

This is one of those films where the story will repeat over in your mind. Rodríguez was unknown in the US and UK, whilst in South Africa, he was as big as Dylan or Elvis. Living under the apartheid-era regime, the emotive, anti-establishment songs by Rodríguez offered hope to many. But still nobody knew anything about him other than the myths—until some fans search for answers. One of the greatest ever music documentaries.

What’s it all about, Chinese astrology?

February 8th 2016 was the end of the Sheep’s cycle and marked the start of the Year of the Fire Monkey, which, for some, will prove to be faster paced and more dramatic than the slow and emotional Year of the Sheep. Here’s a brief summary of the Chinese zodiac:

 

Rat

Photo: Lily Cheung

Jan. 28, 1960 – Feb. 14, 1961
Feb. 15, 1972 – Feb. 2, 1973
Feb. 2, 1984 – Feb. 19, 1985
Feb. 19, 1996 – Feb. 6, 1997
Feb. 6, 2008 – Jan. 25, 2009
Jan. 25, 2020 – Feb. 11, 2021

Cunning creatures. Rat people are adaptable, smart and outgoing. Rats don’t like confrontation however, and are known to be quite timid and picky so they are quite hard to get to know. Rats are best drawn to people born year of the Dragon and Monkey as well as the Rabbit. Rats are not so great with Horse and Rooster.

Famous people born Year of the Rat:
Grace Jones, Marlon Brando, Antonio Banderas, Gwyneth Paltrow, Eminem, Busta Rhymes.

 

Ox

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 15, 1961 – Feb. 4, 1962
Feb. 3, 1973 – Jan. 22, 1974
Feb. 20, 1985 – Feb. 8, 1986
Feb. 7, 1997 – Jan. 27, 1998
Jan. 26, 2009 – Feb. 13, 2010
Feb. 11, 2021 – Jan.31, 2022

Ox people are hardworking, patient, and determined people. They are quiet workaholics with a talent for leadership. Because of their tendency for thinking before doing, they can be stubborn, silent and distant. It’s a good idea to keep an Ox around for advice during the Year of the Fire Monkey as they are dependable and provide great insight. Most compatible with Snake, Rooster and Monkey, and least compatible are Goat, Dragon, and Horse.

Famous people born Year of the Ox:
Lana Del Rey, Kristen Wiig, Barack Obama, Charlie Chaplin, Meryl Streep, Paul Newman.

 

Tiger

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 5, 1962 – Jan. 24, 1963
Jan. 23, 1974 – Feb. 10, 1975
Feb. 9, 1986 – Jan. 28, 1987
Jan. 28, 1998 – Feb. 15, 1999
Feb. 14, 2010 – Feb. 2, 2011
Feb. 1, 2022 –Jan. 21, 2023

Bold, brave and energetic, Tigers love a challenge and a fight. They are independent, open and confident people who like adventure. They can be stubborn, irritable and impetuous—especially when people stand in their way. Though they are likeable to most others, they are best with Horse, Dog and Pig. Monkey, Snake, Ox and other Tiger people are least compatible with this sign.

Famous people born Year of the Tiger:
Marilyn Monroe, Lady Gaga, Eartha Kitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, Hugh Hefner, Drake.

 

Rabbit

Photo: Lily Cheung

Jan. 25, 1963 – Feb. 12, 1964
Feb. 11, 1975 – Jan. 30, 1976
Jan. 29, 1987 – Feb. 16, 1988
Feb. 16, 1999 – Feb. 4, 2000
Feb. 3, 2011 – Jan. 22, 2012
Jan. 22, 2023 – Feb. 9, 2024

Sensitive and modest. Those born in Rabbit are kind people who are quiet, elegant and gentle. They do have a tendency to daydream and get lost in reality because of their amorous nature, and this can make them quite distant with others when this is pointed out. Best friends are Sheep, Pig and Dog. Best to avoid Snake and Rooster.

Famous people born Year of the Rabbit:
M.I.A, Johnny Depp, Angelina Jolie, Whitney Houston, Brad Pitt, Quentin Tarantino.

 

Dragon

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 13, 1964 – Feb. 1, 1965
Jan. 31, 1976 – Feb. 17, 1977
Feb. 17, 1988 – Feb. 5, 1989
Feb. 5, 2000 – Jan. 23, 2001
Jan. 23, 2012 – Feb. 9, 2013
Feb. 10, 2024 – Jan. 25, 2025

Dragons know how to make a decision and stick with it. They’re ambitious and inspiring to others but like Rabbit, there is a tendency of being unrealistic which results in fiery and intolerant behaviour. There is also tendency of being stingy, Dragon people do not like to spend money. They do not get a long with Dog, Sheep and Ox but are great with Rat, Monkey and Snake.

Famous people born Year of the Dragon:
Grimes, Bruce Lee, Andy Warhol, Rihanna, Russell Crowe, Reese Witherspoon.

 

Snake

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 2, 1965 – Jan. 20, 1966
Feb. 18, 1977 – Feb. 6, 1978
Feb. 6, 1989 – Jan. 26, 1990
Jan. 24, 2001 – Feb. 11, 2002
Feb. 10, 2013 – Jan. 30, 2014
Jan. 29, 2025 – Feb. 16, 2026

Charming, sensitive and intuitive. Snake people are intelligent and have a knack for wisdom. They don’t have a lot of friends and it may be hard to get to know them because they are secretive and often keep their feelings locked up inside. Best friends for Snake are fellow Ox and Rooster. Avoid Pig.

Famous people born Year of the Snake:
Grace Kelly, Mohammed Ali, Courtney Love, Jeremy Kyle, Audrey Hepburn, Bob Dylan.

 

Horse

Photo: Lily Cheung

Jan. 21, 1966 – Feb. 8, 1967
Feb. 7, 1978 – Jan. 27, 1979
Jan. 27, 1990 – Feb. 14, 1991
Feb. 12, 2002 – Jan. 31, 2003
Jan. 31, 2014 – Feb. 18, 2015
Feb. 17, 2026 – Feb. 5, 2027

Friendly and popular, Horse people have the gift of the gab. They are active people with high energy and a unique sense of humour. They do however, have the tendency to be self-centred and quite insecure, and often seek reassurance from others. Best friends are Tiger, Dog and Sheep. Avoid Rat at all costs.

Famous people born Year of the Horse:
Jimi Hendrix, Jennifer Lawrence, Mike Tyson, Salma Hayek, John Legend, James Franco.

 

Sheep

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 9, 1967 – Jan. 29, 1968
Jan. 28, 1979 – Feb. 15, 1980
Feb. 15, 1991 – Feb. 3, 1992
Feb. 1, 2003 – Jan. 21, 2004
Feb. 19, 2015 – Feb. 7, 2016
Feb. 6, 2027 – Jan. 25, 2028

Calm, thoughtful and romantic. Sheep people are often lone and creative thinkers. Sheep people are the best to ask for when it comes to emotional advice because of their frankness and honesty. They get along best with Rabbit, Pig, Horse and Monkey. Avoid Ox, Dragon, Snake and Dog.

Famous people born Year of the Sheep:
Kurt Cobain, Azealia Banks, Tyler the Creator, Mick Jagger, Julia Roberts, Nicole Kidman.

 

Monkey

Photo: Lily Cheung

Jan. 30, 1968 – Feb. 16, 1969
Feb. 16, 1980 – Feb. 4, 1981
Feb. 4, 1992 – Jan. 22, 1993
Jan. 22, 2004 – Feb. 8, 2005
Feb. 8,2016 – Jan. 27, 2017
Jan. 26, 2028 – Feb. 12, 2029

Monkey people like to entertain, socialise and have great wit, but they also have a tendency to get bored easily. When the year is of your correlating zodiac, it is found that luck won’t be as great as other years, so it is common to wear red for good luck. Best friends include Rat and Dragon. Conflicts with Dog and Rooster, but avoid Tiger.

Famous people born Year of the Monkey:
Drew Barrymore, Miley Cyrus, Elizabeth Taylor, Tom Hanks, Will Smith, Macaulay Culkin.

 

Rooster

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 17, 1969 – Feb.5, 1970
Feb. 5, 1981 – Jan.24, 1982
Jan. 23, 1993 – Feb.9, 1994
Feb. 9, 2005 – Jan. 28, 2006
Jan. 28, 2017 – Feb. 15, 2018
Feb. 13, 2029 – Feb. 2, 2030

Perfectionists at heart, Roosters are critical and can be considered nit-picky because they are so observant. Quite vain, they like to brag and love attention. Talkative, outspoken and quite humorous, Roosters are capable people who are warm-hearted and just want to be loved. Best friends are Ox and Snake. Avoid Rabbit.

Famous people born Year of the Rooster:
Justin Timberlake, Debbie Harry, Alan Rickman, Gwen Stefani, Britney Spears, David Lynch.

 

Dog

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 6, 1970 – Jan. 26, 1971
Jan. 25, 1982 – Feb. 12, 1983
Feb. 10, 1994 – Jan. 30, 1995
Jan. 29, 2006 – Feb. 17, 2007
Feb. 16 ,2018 – Feb. 4, 2019
Feb. 3, 2030 – Jan. 22, 2031

Loyal, sincere and responsible. Dog individuals are sensitive and emotional, with the tendency to pessimism because they worry a lot. They are however, good friends to have because they are so loyal and loving to the ones they care about. Good allies for Dog are Tiger, Horse and Rabbit. Bad ones: Dragon.

Famous people born Year of the Dog:
Madonna, David Bowie, Michael Jackson, Cher, Prince, Nicki Minaj.

 

Pig

Photo: Lily Cheung

Feb. 8, 1959 – Jan. 27, 1960
Jan. 27, 1971 – Feb. 24, 1972
Feb. 13, 1983 – Feb. 1, 1984
Jan. 31, 1995 – Feb. 18, 1996
Feb. 18, 2007 – Feb. 6, 2008
Feb. 5, 2019 – Jan. 24, 2020
Jan. 23, 2031 – Feb. 10, 2032

Honest, reliable and trustworthy. Pigs also have a tendency to be naïve and too trusting to a fault. Pigs know how to have a good time and enjoy the good things in life and that often makes them appear self-indulgent and lazy. But they’re not! Best with Sheep, Rabbit and Tiger. Not great at all with Snake.

Famous people born Year of the Pig:
Snoop Dogg, Rick James, Winona Ryder, 50 Cent, Amy Winehouse, Jean Harlow.

Like Western astrology, not all signs will cater to you precisely. Other aspects to look at are the element of the year you were born, the hour (your ascendant), day and month (generally found to be your Western astrology counterpart).

What’s in my makeup bag?

The ten minutes that it takes me to apply my makeup in the morning is often my favourite ten minutes of the day. I love to experiment with new products and new techniques, and create a masterpiece worth screaming about (if I do say so myself). I’ve switched up my makeup bag over the last two months, indulging in a few new products as well as rediscovering some old favourites. Here is a whilstle-stop of my beauty regime:

Base: The first thing that I reach for in my makeup bag is my foundation. This product is a newbie to my collection, but it is an instant winner. I buff L’Oréal Paris’ True Match foundation in the shade ‘Creamy Beige’ into my face with a Real Techniques face brush. I spend a good minute or two doing this as I always find that the longer I spend on my foundation, the better my makeup looks as a whole. I then apply my Maybelline Age Rewind Eraser Eye Concealer in the shade ‘Nude’ under my eyes and around my T-zone. With a bare face, the corners of my nose always light up like a beacon, so I take special care to conceal, conceal, and conceal. I then finish off my base with a dab of L’Oréal Paris Infallible Powder across my face, setting my base for the rest of the day.

Colour: It’s all well and good having even and matte effect skin, but I still look fatigued without a bit of colour to my face. My blusher of choice at the moment is Max Factor’s Creme Puff Blush in the shade ‘Nude Mauve’. For anybody lusting after Hourglass’s range of magnificent blushers, Max Factor’s Creme Puff Blushers are the perfect dupe. The Hourglass shade ‘Mood Exposure’ in specific is fairly representative of the blush that I sweep across my face every day. It gives an uplifted look to my cheeks, without adding too much shimmer that I turn into a walking and talking disco ball. Contouring is not really my thing, and so this is a step that I leave out of my makeup routine. A good highlighter, however, is a necessity, and I have been recently reaching for Rimmel London’s Good To Glow Highlighter in the shade ‘Piccadilly Glow’. It is a liquid highlighter and so a little goes a long way. Added to the top of my cheekbones, it adds that extra bit of shine to my face.

Eyes: I like to keep my eyes nice and simple by only using one product, and it’s a game changer: mascara. Like contour, I’ve never been one for eyeshadow or eyeliner, but a good mascara can change your entire look. My holy grail mascara, without a shadow of a doubt, would have to be Maybelline’s Lash Sensational Last Multiplying Mascara. It magically transforms my lashes from being unseen to can’t be missed, and gives me all the volume that I need.

Lips: Before applying any lipstick, I always make sure to use Burt’s Bees Honey Lip Balm. It takes my dry, winter lips and breathes new life into them. Some days, this is enough to complete my look, but more often than not, you can see me reaching for at least one of two lipsticks. On a nude day, I will apply MAC’s lipstick in ‘Syrup’; the perfect ‘my lips but better’ shade. It has a fairly good lasting power and complements any outfit. If I’m feeling a bit more sassy, however, a red lip is an absolute must. My favourite red in my collection is definitely Maybelline’s Colour Sensational Creamy Matte Lipstick in the shade ‘Siren in Scarlet’. With a matte finish, it simply does not budge! It doesn’t matter how much food and drink passes my lips, that lipstick ain’t going nowhere, sistah. It’s definitely a must-have for anyone who loves to rock a classic red lip.

Review: Point Break

Out of the recent spate of unnecessary remakes comes Point Break, based on the successful 1991 classic starring Keanu Reeves. Whilst there were certainly very few people desperate for a remake, the fundamental issue with this version was that it abandons all that was great about the original and remodelled the story into a glossy spectacle with no compelling substance behind it.

Cocky protagonist Jonny Utah, played by Luke Bracey, is an ex-motorcross legend, turned FBI agent. Through an investigation into bank robberies, Utah teams up with eco-warrior Bohdi (Edgar Ramirez) who together, jet set across the globe on a spiritual journey. This represented the most elaborate and dangerous undercover mission ever attempted by an FBI agent as each stop involved increasingly perilous stunts—which included base jumping, snow-boarding and vertiginous rock climbing. Bohdi and his team claim that, by undertaking this spiritual journey, they will be at one with the planet—which came across as utterly ridiculous due to the hugely unconvincing performances across the board, and that will leave you praying it’s all one big wind up.

The film’s opening explains how Utah ended up in the FBI due to his tragic past, and his extreme sports knowledge and abilities allow him to uncover a possible link between recent crimes, leading him to pass off as a fellow extreme sports enthusiast once undercover. Whilst this opening section was entertaining, the entire film was derailed because of the following irrelevant and self-indulgent sequences that destroyed any kind of attachment to the unfolding events about to happen. For example, an investigation into a surfing phenomenon turned into a lavish boat party that was wildly insulting to any viewer who were not here to watch deleted scenes of Entourage; and it was clearly a cheap gimmick aimed at impressionable teenagers. Not long after, Utah is involved in an underground scrap that seemed massively out of place and resulted in the film to completely lose its focus.

After this early muddle, the story progressed through a number of spectacular set pieces, which were suitably exciting and realistic due to the use of practical effects, and included one vertigo inducing showdown that was surprisingly tense. But these set pieces were undermined by the absence of any real characterisation to lead up to any sense of consequence or tension. This issue could not be overstated. Utah and Bohdi showed no emotion throughout and barely gave scraps of compelling dialogue necessary to humanise them. As a result it was impossible to know which side Utah was on while he strayed between FBI agent and spiritual adrenaline junkie; as he permanently resembled a difficult teenager other than reflecting any complicated emotions. The supporting cast were equally uninteresting: Ray Winston was given little to do as European field agent Pappas, and Delroy Lindo’s Instructor Hall was embarrassingly clichéd as Utah’s gruff FBI commanding officer.

Despite the issues of originality, it had Keanu Reeves’ spirited Utah, and it was full of emotion and excitement. Here, there is little to get invested into as the characters were simply dull. Bohdi and his tree-hugging gang’s behaviour were so strange and hard to believe that it wouldn’t have been a surprising development to discover that they weren’t human at all.

Point Break should serve as a warning that remodelling an action film with a shiny new cover and more extravagant action means nothing; if by doing so, the soul of the original is removed. Charmless at best and deeply insulting at worst, Point Break was a predictably troubling development at a time when classic films were being remade at an increasing rate.

2/5

Top 5 Anti-Valentine’s Day Songs

Do you, like every other singleton in the country, think Valentine’s Day is a commercial construct designed to sell greetings cards to idiots? Of course you do, and that’s the ONLY reason you hate it, right? Well fear not, crank up these five tracks to ease your achy-breaky heart.

 

Happyness – ‘It’s On You’ [Happyness EP, 2013]

As joyous a song as the band’s name suggests, Happyness’ debut EP is a fantastic collection of shoegaze anthems. To hell with the blues, you don’t need anyone else to enjoy this gem.

Photo Credit: Happyness – EP

 

Foo Fighters – ‘Cheer Up, Boys (Your Makeup Is Running)’ (Echoes, Silence, Patience & Grace, 2007)

Thematically appropriate title? Check. Bouncy energetic rock and roll? Check. Dave Grohl howling encouraging lyrics? Triple Check. Crank up this under-appreciated belter.

Photo Credit: Foo Fighters

 

Yuksek – ‘Always On The Run’ (Living on The Edge Of Time, 2011)

For those longing for a little electro flavor, try Yuksek; the charming, plinky piano part atop this powerful pumping beat is a recipe for instant smiley faces.

Photo Credit: Yuksek

 

Regina Spektor – ‘No Surprises’ (Single, 2010)

Of course a Radiohead song was gonna make this list, however, in a slight twist, we’re prescribing this incredibly beautiful cover by the one and only Regina Spektor. Tissues ready?

Photo credit: Regina Spektor

 

Josh Rouse – ‘1972’ (1972, 2003)

Alright look, if you REALLY have to cry your eyes out this February 14th, at least do it with the most soothing voice of the last few decades singing to you. Good ol’ Rouse.

Photo credit: Josh Rouse

Craving & Saving: Cult Beauty Classics

Lusting after high-end makeup that you can’t afford? Me too. However, drugstore brands are getting better and better at ripping off our favourite brands at just a fraction of the price; bad news for the brands, but great news for us. Here are a couple of matches I have recently found that are a little more purse-friendly than the high-end brands.

 

Sleek Rose Gold Blush vs. NARS Orgasm Blusher

This one is no secret. Sleek do some amazing dupes for NARS blushers, the best one being their Rose Gold blush as a dupe for NARS’ coveted blush in Orgasm. Orgasm was one of the first ever shades I purchased when venturing into high-end blushers and it’s been a firm favourite ever since. However, Sleek is offering exactly the same. Both have a lovely peachy-pink shimmery shade that gives your cheeks a beautiful glow, and they’re also both incredibly pigmented so a little goes a long way. Even the matte black packaging is identical. Not only is it a fraction of the price, you also get nearly double the product. For £23 you get just 4.8g of blush with NARS—Sleek give you a cool 8g for just £4.49. It’s a no-brainer, really.

Saving: £18.51

Craving: £23. Photo: NARS Cosmetics Saving: £4.49. Photo: Sleek

 

Essence Make Me Brow vs. Benefit Gimme Brow

Benefit’s Gimme Brow is a product that I’ve been wanting to try for a long time. It looks like the ideal ‘do your brows in 30 seconds whilst running out the door’ kind of deal. However, at £18.50 for what is essentially a mascara for your brows, I’ve skipped buying it in favour of cheaper alternatives. My favourite find so far has been Essence’s Make Me Brow. Not only does it have a really small brush—just like the Benefit one—it also has very similar packaging. The tiny brush makes it ideal for getting a precise look, whereas bigger brushes can sometimes leave your brows looking messier than before you had even started. The colour pay off is also pretty good which means you can quite easily do your brows in 30 seconds whilst running out of the door. The best part is that Essence’s Make Me Brow costs just £2.50 compared to Benefit’s £18.50. You can also get Essence in Wilkinsons, so it’s super easy to get hold of.

Saving: £16.

Craving: £18.50. Photo: Boots Saving: £2.50. Photo: Wilkinsons

 

Maybelline Colour Tattoos vs. Chanel Illusion D’ombre

Cream eyeshadows are the go-to for a quick eye look that appears like you’ve spent a lot more time on your makeup than you actually have. A quick sweep and blend with your finger, and you’re done. The holy grail of the cream eyeshadow world has to be the Chanel Illusion D’ombre. They’re all absolutely stunning. Nevertheless, Maybelline put up a rather good fight with their Colour Tattoos. Whilst the names aren’t quite as exotic as the ones from Chanel, and the packaging isn’t half as pretty, some of the colours are a pretty good match. Maybelline’s Pomegranate Punk holds a striking resemblance to Chanel’s Ebloui, a beautiful shimmery cranberry shade. Illusoire from Chanel also looks like it is a great match for Maybelline’s On and On Bronze—a lovely shimmery golden bronze colour. Chanel’s Illusion D’ombre is a jaw-dropping £25 and the Maybelline Colour Tattoos are more purse-friendly at only £4.99.

Saving: £20.01.

Craving: £25. Photo: Chanel Saving: £4.99. Photo: Boots

 

NYX Slim Lip Liner in Mauve vs. MAC Lip Liner in Whirl

Ahh, the lusted after shade from MAC that’s often sold out at every counter. This shade was thrusted into the limelight after Kylie Jenner brought back the 90’s nude lip and made us all crave those pinky-brown shades we once loved. Whilst the colours aren’t for everyone (it looks horrendous on me), it is still a really pretty colour. NYX have an almost identical shade in the form of their Slim Lip Liner in Mauve; it even offers the sleek, black packaging that MAC has. Whilst the pictures below aren’t the same colour, a quick Google of some swatches will show you just how similar they really are. Boots have recently started stocking NYX in store and the one on Market Street has a huge counter—but sadly this lip liner is a little harder to find, as they don’t seem to sell it. However, it is available online on sites like Amazon and The Beauty Store, and is well worth an order if you’re after saving a little cash on a really popular colour! MAC’s lip liner retails at £12.50 whereas the NYX one can be found on The Beauty Store for £4.

Saving: £8.50

Craving: £12.50. Photo: MAC Cosmetics Saving: £4. Photo: The Beauty Store

Total Saving: £63.02.

Even more of a reason to treat yourself!

 

Interview: Georgia Adams

Georgia Adams enjoyed directing short film One to Ten, produced by the University of Manchester’s Filmmaking Society; as well as another film called Hostage. One to Ten is a superhero film where everyone has a power. Reuben and his friends—along with their unique abilities—embark on a quest for vengeance against a rival gang.

Georgia Adams completely fell in love with the story and immediately knew that she had to work on it. “Plus, Taiyo [Yoshida, the writer] had created some strong female characters which I thought was great too.” She initially applied for assistant director but because she was so keen, the role of the director was given to her.

It was, at times, difficult for Georgia to bring her vision across since there were a few contradictory ideas flying about when it came to the production of the film, so compromises had to be made.

There are always tricky parts and challenges on a film set, Georgia agreed that it was not always easy, expressing that: “All warehouse scenes were extremely difficult to film. It was freezing, chaotic, and we were juggling a massive camera whilst trying to choreograph a semi-realistic fight sequence.”

She does not think that it is always possible for everything to run smoothly on set, but they were all working really well together as a crew, “They even put up with me during my mad moments!” She added.

She has had a few director jobs before, but this was the largest. Being slightly overwhelmed by the amount of responsibility she had on set, she found the whole process pretty daunting. “Honestly though, waking up at 5am to stand in a freezing cold warehouse all day was really worth it and I had such a great time on set.”

She really hopes to do more directing in the future and would like to enrol into a film school after university to see where it takes her. The Filmmaking Society is planning on entering the film into a short film competition and two new scripts have been selected for the new semester.

More videos and a behind-the-scenes trailer of One to Ten can be found on the society’s official YouTube channel.