Skip to main content

Day: 4 August 2016

Fringe Preview: Novel Experiments In Living

A writer, a love interest, and a critic scale the pages of their own play as they try to discover what’s scripted and what’s not. Lose the plot with this fast-paced, mind-bending new comedy.

After Novel Experiments in Living’s success in Manchester the production is preparing to up sticks and move to Edinburgh’s Fringe festival.

Novel Experiments In Living follows some characters in a script, as they discover, to various extents, that they’re characters in a script. Canvasing the anxieties, pretentions and crippling introspection of generation Y, it asks “is it better to be handed a blank page or be trapped in a pre-assigned role? Is it possible to be original in a world saturated with ideas and influences? Is it cooler to actually like The Smiths or ironically like Abba?”

Through slick choreography scenes arrange, rearrange, and deconstruct themselves in a scattered world of typewriters, balled-up paper and plastic lobsters. Fast-paced, farcical and relentlessly funny, critics chase characters who’ve killed their authors, and love interests despair on discovering that they’re a pastiche of pop culture references.

“It’s a love story, it’s a social commentary, it’s a coming-of-age tale. (It’s pretentious, it’s confusing, it screams student theatre)”, says the promotional material. “It’s a play that writes itself. (It’s a play that critiques itself). Lose the plot with this mind bending new comedy. (Nah don’t bother, I hear Alistair McGowan’s at the fringe this year…)”

Written and directed by Rob Paterson, produced by Lily Ashton and starring Calum Pearce, Novel Experiments In Living has been described as a play “for a generation who feel defined by the culture they consume”, while Dr. David Butler, Senior Lecturer at the Martin Harris Centre for Music and Drama states that, “Novel Experiments… skilfully contrasts mature and sincere reflections upon being a young adult in the early 21st century with glorious silliness.”

If you saw Novel Experiments in Living in Manchester and enjoyed it as much as we did, why not support them? The production have a GoFundMe page which you can find here. But you don’t just have to wave goodbye to your generous donation: different amounts create different prizes.

Donating £10 will get you a special souvenir program in which you’ll be personally thanked. £25 will get you a professionally printed poster signed by the entire cast and crew. And if you’re incredibly generous, £50 will get Manchester Indie Band The Vanity Project, who supplied the soundtrack of the production, to write you a personalised song of thanks.

Be kind, dig deep and support Paterson and his team on their road to Fringe festivities.

How will this summer’s politics affect students?

To say British politics this summer has been a bit turbulent is like saying the Iraq war was possibly not the best idea, or that Pokémon Go is being played by a few people. Technically true, yes, but underselling it beyond recognition. The UK has voted to leave the European Union, the Labour Party has turned into There Will Be Blood and in the last few weeks most of our government has been thrown out and replaced. All of this will have huge implications for all sections of British society, but how will it affect students?

Firstly; Brexit. This has already had an impact on researchers, who are losing out on projects with EU countries. For instance, Sheffield Hallam’s vice chancellor, Chris Husbands, told Newsnight that on four of its twelve projects, EU partners have said they should no longer be involved, due to the lack of certainty in the UK’s future membership. For undergraduate students, however, little will change in the short-term – universities have stressed that everything will carry on as normal for the time being. Nancy Rothwell, the president and vice chancellor of the University of Manchester, in a statement shortly after the results were announced, stressed that all international students will be able to keep their current status throughout their entire studies and that EU grants and collaborations should remain the same until we have actually left the EU.

Once Brexit has been carried out though, the impact could be huge. As mentioned, funding will likely drop for research programmes – according to Full Fact, the EU provides around 15% of universities’ research budget, and so a lot of research may no longer be financially viable. In addition, tuition fees for EU students will increase from domestic to international. At the University of Manchester this will mean a rise from £9,000 a year to between £15,500 and £35,000, depending on the course. Over 27,000 EU students currently study in the UK, but the increase in fees makes it fair to assume that far less students from European countries will attend British universities in the future. This will cause a decrease in the diversity and internationalism that many UK universities have enjoyed and celebrated for decades. This will go both ways – EU exchange programmes such as Erasmus provide British students with the opportunity to study all over Europe for no extra cost beyond standard UK tuition fees. From 2008 to 2015 the number of UK students participating in Erasmus more than doubled. This massive increase will likely be put to a halt – although Norway also participates in the Erasmus scheme, it has to accept freedom of movement to do so, according to the group Universities UK. Given blocks on immigration were a huge part of the Brexit campaign, it is unlikely that the UK will do the same. Whilst there are alternative exchange programmes with many other nations across the world, these are more expensive and difficult, requiring visas and extra documentation and costs. As a last word on Brexit, it is worth noting that young people overwhelmingly voted to remain in the EU.  75 per cent of 18-24 year olds voted to remain rather than leave. This could mean growing divisions and disconnections between younger and older people. The resulting tensions and frustrations also could be damaging to wider society, where the young feel betrayed by the old, and vice-versa.

The second major political event of the summer has been the battle over the Labour leadership. Whilst this may not immediately seem to be connected to students, as Labour are currently in opposition, in practice this will have a huge impact on students for many years to come. Labour is currently at something of a crossroads – New Labour is largely seen as no longer working, and so the party needs a new way forward, to shape its ideals and ambitions for the next generation or so. The positions of the current two candidates therefore could be vital for students, should Labour return to government in the next two or three elections. Corbyn has long held a pledge to abolish tuition fees completely, whilst Smith is a more unknown quantity – he voted against increasing tuition fees to £9000 a year, but has not provided any specifics beyond that. He claims to be a socialist and to agree with Corbyn on most issues, so it is possible that he backs abolishing tuition fees, or at least cutting them or not raising them further. However, without definitive comment, it is impossible to know where he stands at present. We reached out for comment, but received no reply. The other, more immediate impact on students is the weakness of a divided Labour Party, which is in no fit state to provide serious opposition to the government. Without unity, the party cannot challenge government plans to raise tuition fees above £9,000 a year, or to increase restrictions on student visas. The Conservatives have a very slim majority, and so a focussed opposition could force them to back down on these platforms. Until the leadership battle ends in September, however, the Labour Party is still both in limbo in terms of policy, and unable to provide a strong opposition to May’s new government.

The final major change in UK politics has been the resignation of Cameron, the unopposed election of May and a very different government. This new leadership will likely affect students’ lives in many different ways, but at the moment there are just two direct points of impact. One of these is the planned increase of tuition fees in line with inflation. This means that from 2017 students could be paying up to £9,250, depending on the teaching quality of the university. This could even apply to students who have already begun university, depending on their institution’s student contract. The Chairman of the Sutton Trust, Sir Peter Lampl, told the Independent that this increase in tuition fees, combined with the abolition of maintenance grants, will deter poorer students in particular from applying. He also highlighted that upon finishing university, students face debts of over £50,000, yet will still have to start repaying once they earn £21,000 a year, and that this threshold will not increase with fees. The other main plan affecting students is a renewed push to limit student visas, in order to lower immigration. Despite it recently being revealed that May’s actions as Home Secretary led to over 48,000 students being wrongly deported, the Prime Minister still believes more can be done. Potential plans currently include more steps to ensure foreign students leave as soon as they finish their degree, banning universities from advertising courses as a way for foreign students to work in the UK, and banning foreign students from taking courses seen as weaker – so-called ‘Mickey Mouse’ subjects. The combined effect of both of these seems to be to use students in order to achieve other goals – cutting immigration and reducing government spending by letting unviersities raise the funds themselves. This is unsurprising – students are not traditionally Conservative voters, so the Tories can keep their traditional support base whilst also perhaps gaining embittered Labour voters who now back UKIP – the white working class men are the least likely to go to university (only 29% go on to any form of higher education after 16, according to the Sutton Trust), and the poorest areas of the UK supported Brexit the most.

So to sum up – what can we expect the long term effects of the summer to be on students? Basically two things – university will become more expensive, and we will have far less interaction with foreign universities and their students at all levels, from exchanges to research programmes. What the future impacts will be remains to be seen, but at the moment the Conservatives are largely following Brexit in terms of limiting international movement and diversity in UK universities. Whether tuition fees continue to rise will depend on whether Labour can rally around and attempt to block the Conservatives, or get into government themselves. However Labour’s own policies and future platforms will be decided for a long time to come by the outcome of this leadership election. The summer has been dramatic, and has dropped much of the UK into a period of uncertainty, universities and students included. At the moment it looks like things will get more difficult for all involved in higher education, however it is too early to know for certain.

Festival: Bilbao BBK Live

From the top of the hills above Bilbao you get a fantastic view of the city. It’s quite easy to see why it was decided to hold the festival BBK live here on Mount Cobetas and, given this year’s stellar lineup, why hordes of punters are flocking through the gates.

After reaching the festival using the free non-stop shuttle bus service, we swapped our tickets for wristbands without too much queuing and entered. Thursday started with CHVRCHES who performed a strong set of their trademark synth pop. Although not suited to an open stage in the late afternoon sun, it did serve as a good warm up for the more festival ready set of M83.

The more retro electropop group enjoyed a big break after their 2011 record Hurry up, We’re Dreaming. Their latest album Junk proves they clearly haven’t been resting on their laurels. The album is full of festival bangers which were well received by a live audience. The set culminated with ‘Go!’ Performed with french singer Mai Lin complete with over the top guitar solo had the crowd dancing like madmen.

Later that evening we headed over to the Basoa dance stage to catch Joe Goddard playing an eclectic selection of house music. Tucked away under a canopy of trees, with laser arrays passing through leaves above, the outdoor dance floor made for a fantastically psychedelic setting for the rest of the festivals strong line-up of DJs.

Photo: BBK Live

Back at the main stage we joined the crowd for Arcade Fire. Despite being one of the bands I was most anticipating, a lack of sound quality and perhaps a bit of time since their last live performance made this a rather anticlimactic show. The band played their huge collection of hits with precision and energy. However it just felt like some of the showmanship and grandeur that is associated with the band and their live performances was missing.

Nevertheless the night ended on a high with a stellar performance by Hot Chip. With a huge catalogue of festival-ready hits from seven albums, and a group of musicians with seemingly endless amounts of energy, it was inconceivable that they’d ever put on a poor performance.

Friday’s highlights consisted of Grimes, Pixies, and Slaves. Despite a 15-minute power cut during Grimes’ set all three put on amazing shows, Grimes in particular fulfilled and exceeded all my expectations taken from the Editors’ show review of her Manchester gig. Taking the traditional live pop show formula of choreographed backing dancers, costumes and wind machines and then twisting in her weird and wacky artpop. Claire Boucher takes you from listening to a live show to watching theatre. The sets abstract wonderfulness peaked with Grimes rapping in Russian in place of absent guest Aristophanes on ‘SCREAM’.

Slaves was also a fantastic surprise, despite having heard their recorded work I was not prepared for the passionate performance of their abrasive yet danceable pop-punk. Aided by a great crowd stuffed into the only indoor stage at the festival this was definitely one of the highlights of the festival.

 

Sunday brought the biggest day of music. Starting with Courtney Barnett, who despite having some great recorded material to work with, failed to grab the crowd’s attention. Despite usually working well. The Australians monotonous vocals made it difficult to enjoy her clever lyrics in the blazing sun.

We headed off a little early to the Heineken stage to catch Father John Misty. Josh Tillman’s cynical rock star alter ego put on a mesmerizing show. Watching Father John Misty play is a strange experience. His subtle ridicule of the self-obsessed rock star archetype has you wondering at the fans yelling along to the lyrics, desperate to get a photo of him. Then another of his well-crafted folk rock songs come on and you’re back with the fans, oblivious again. The show climaxed with an incredible performance of Tillman’s single ‘Bored in the USA’. His intense yet comedic delivery was everything the song wanted for in a live performance. Finishing with Misty in front of the crowd, filming himself on a mobile. We left the show bewildered and buzzing to see the rest of the evenings acts.

Sunday’s first headliner was Tame Impala, and the Australian psych-rock band were a lot of fun. The crowd lapped up their collection of hits from their last two albums and still danced along to tracks from their debut. With a crazy backdrop of acid-trip visuals and front man Kevin Parker performing barefoot on a carpet it was everything you’d expect from the consistently strong band.

Foals, the second headliner of the night, proved somewhat less fun. As a big Foals fan, I was looking forward to seeing them close the festival. However perhaps due to an exhausted and slightly unengaged crowd it was only at the the end of the set that the energy really picked up. This had an evident effect on the band, with the whole thing resulting in an underwhelming performance.

Sunday evening’s real gem was sandwiched between the two headliners. Jagwar Ma’s psychedelic hits blended into a dark abrasive dance music at the indoor stage. Starting with recognizable songs from their debut album Howlin. The set ended with the crowd dancing to something I guess you could dub rock-techno. It was an incredibly energetic show, perfectly suited to the crowd and location. The band’s next album is definitely one to keep an eye on.

Photo: BBK Live

All in all the festival more than lived up to expectations from the line-up. Despite a couple of weaker sets from some of the headliners it was some of the smaller acts who really stood out. The festivals location was undeniably fantastic and if future line-ups are as strong. We will definitely be coming back!