Skip to main content

Day: 4 November 2016

The Living Wage: Taking Action on Poverty Pay

Last Monday, the University of Manchester’s Students’ Union was fortunate enough to host the announcement of the new Living Wage (outside London). Entitled “The Living Wage: Taking Action on Poverty Pay,” the morning included a range of speakers, the announcement of the new Living Wage and variety of workshops.

Whilst the Living Wage has increased this year by 20 pence to £8.45, the case for Greater Manchester to pay the living wage remains especially clear. Wages have fallen faster than the UK average since 2009 and A New Economy report revealed that the number of people paid less than the Living Wage rose from 21.7 per cent of employees in 2013, to 24 per cent by the end of 2015. The need for such a campaign is ever more pertinent.

The University of Manchester Living Wage campaign is working to lobby the University to become LivingWage Accredited. Accreditation will ensure an ongoing commitment to keeping UoM staff above the poverty line. This move will solidify the University of Manchester’s position as a force for good in Greater Manchester.

With social responsibility embedded as one of the Universities three core values (alongside teaching and research) one would expect our University to be Living Wage accredited. With the £1 billion masterplan in place it could seem surprising that the University have not considered lifting the wages of its lowest paid staff to a fair wage.

If our university is investing more in its buildings than its people, we have serious cause for concern. One of the successes of last year’s campaign was getting UMC ltd., the university’s wholly owned subsidiary, to bring its wages in line with the Living Wage rate at the time. However the University is yet to examine the pay of all its workers (including Student Ambassadors) or commit to accreditation.

The University of Manchester Living Wage Campaign has just opened applications for a new committee (and new members as always). We will be holding an info meeting in Activities Space of the SU on Thursday 10th November followed by elections on Thursday 17th November.

You do not need to have been involved in this campaign before, just keen to secure a fair wage for those working at the University. Monday morning’s event kick started #LivingWageWeek with great excitement; attendees left feeling empowered to continue the fight for fair pay. However there is still a way to go. The living wage really does change people’s lives, and we are excited to have you involved!

Manchester Media Group presents: Check Your Exec

The first Manchester Media Group (MMG) event of this academic year will be hosted in Academy 2 on the 7th November at 6pm. Students are being given a rare face-to-face opportunity to grill all members of Students’ Union’s Executive Team on a variety of issues.

The Executive Team consist of the General Secretary (Naa Acquah), Diversity Officer (Ilyas Nagdee), Womens’ Officer (Jenni Smyth), Community Officer (Saffa Mir), Education Officer (Emma Atkins), Wellbeing Officer (Izzy Gurbuz), Campaigns and Citizenship Officer (Sorcha Floyd), and Activities and Development Officer (Tamara O’Neill).

The evening will play out as a Question-Time style event, which will undoubtedly lead to healthy debate and answer all the burning questions that students have for the executive team.

Following the success of last year’s Mancunion Live event, MMG are looking forward to giving the student body a clear way to direct their concerns and criticisms or, put their praise and questions towards the Executive Team.

Last year’s Mancunion Live was a political event, with representatives from several political societies taking questions, whereas Check Your Exec promises to address a wider range of issues.

The floor will be open to questions from students on topics ranging from free speech, mental health and academic success to direct questions regarding the actions of the Student Union.

The whole event will be live-blogged and filmed by FuseTV, with footage becoming available on their YouTube Channel following the evening. Everyone is also encouraged to live-tweet the event using the hashtag #CheckYourExec, as the best Tweets may be featured in an article after the event.

In order to secure your place at the Check Your Exec, please email a question for the Executive Team to [email protected] before the event this Monday.

United Player Ratings: Manchester United vs Manchester City

While Manchester United hosting Manchester City in the EFL Cup has not been as hyped up as the Premiere League encounter, this fixture will always carry a heavy load.

The two clashes could not be more different. Before the Derby last month, United and City had both won all of their previous games. This time, the Manchester sides have been labelled as going through “crisis” periods.

United have been inconsistent, the latest dip being torn to bits by Chelsea at the weekend. City had not won a game in five matches and Pep Guardiola’s famous philosophy has been poked holes in by the English press.

Mourinho needed to get a result on Wednesday, having not picked up three points against any of the big Premiere League sides, and you could see that in his team selection. An almost completely first choice starting eleven was fielded against the Sky Blues’ rotated side. The two seemed evenly matched throughout the first half, but after the break, United came out of the blocks with purpose and intensity and were rewarded with a well taken goal by Mata.

United could have got more, but chances were missed, Ibrahimovic completely fluffing an opportunity to double United’s lead from five yards out. As City looked for an equaliser by throwing on Sterling and Aguero, Mourinho shifted Herrera back alongside Carrick and United absorbed every threat posed to them.

 

Player Ratings

De Gea: 6

Did not have to make any sort of meaningful contribution. Came out to collect some of City’s over-hit through balls but that was the most stressful his night got.

Valencia: 8

@Wikimedia Commons

Another brilliant performance from the Ecuadorian. Stifled Nolito (who is incredibly entertaining to watch when frustrated) and Sterling when the Spaniard was replaced. Linked up really well with Mata, Herrera and Rashford offensively too. Valencia’s highlight was when he fooled Clichy, the Old Trafford crowd and everyone who has ever watched him play by cutting inside and producing a peach of a cross with his left foot. Mourinho really does know how to work miracles if he can get Valencia to produce anything decent with his left foot.

Blind: 6

Played as the right sided central defender for the first time in his career and did look a bit lost when in possession, having to look to play the ball out to the right rather than the left. Gave away the ball dangerously towards the end of the first half and was lucky not to be punished. Read the game well enough but was not seriously troubled by City’s misfiring forwards, who looked short of confidence and out of ideas.

Rojo: 7

One of the Argentine’s best performances in a United shirt in recent memory. At left back, Rojo needs to be creative and comfortable in possession, two things that he is not. At centre half, where the Argentine played against City, Rojo is a classic “no nonsense” defender; winning headers and making clearances like he has been doing it since his mother’s womb. Not a perfect performance, but with Bailly’s two month lay-off, this was a good basis on which Rojo can grow.
Shaw: 6

Struggled, surprisingly, against Jesus Navas. You would have thought that the youngster knew that the City left winger is almost exclusively a right footed player. Strangely, then, Shaw was beaten time and time again by the Spaniard when he dropped his shoulder and went outside the youngster. Two of City’s best chances in the first half came from Navas crosses, which is Shaw’s fault for not stopping them. Got forward well and linked play with Rashford. Is likely to see much more first team football now that he is match fit and that Blind has moved to centre back to cover for Bailly’s injury.

 

Carrick: 7

Played a statesman-like performance, shielding the back four admirably and made United so much calmer when in possession. Flanked by the buzzing Herrera and Pogba, Carrick ran the game with very little fuss. Was a little bit fortunate to not give away a penalty for a foul on Aleix Garcia in the first half, but apart from that, a very smooth night for the experienced Geordie.

 

Herrera: 9

Like a terrier, Herrera hustled and bustled City’s defence all evening and completely destroyed any sense of rhythm the Sky Blues could muster. Played in a box-to-box role instead of a holding midfielder and was the best player on the pitch. Interception, tackles, through balls, dribbles; the Spaniard had the lot. His one-twos with Mata were the footballing highlights of the evening as he and his compatriot lent the ball to each other whilst dancing up the pitch. His blocking off of Fernando for Mata’s goal was especially clever and just goes to show how underused Herrera was under Van Gaal.

 

Pogba: 7

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

A better game than against Chelsea, but still below what you would expect from a man of his quality. Played some very insightful passes to dissect City’s defence but was dispossessed easily consistently. Had a much better second half, hitting the bar after a good counter-attack and threw out some of his showboating when the result was all but certain. His touch seems to let him down too often which is strange for a player who is renowned for his technical ability and dribbling.

 

Mata: 8

Took up the “false-winger” role which Van Gaal coined for Mata last season, and played really well. Drifted inside and had good passing combinations with Herrera, Pogba and Valencia. Helped out defensively too, doubling up with Valencia to stop Sterling/Nolito/Sane from penetrating United’s right flank. Took his goal very coolly, tucking his finish near post with a significant amount of power. Subbed off in the 73rd minute for Schneiderlin and was given a standing ovation by the Old Trafford faithful.

 

Rashford: 7

Had another very solid performance against a good side. Did not have as much success as he normally does in his one-v-ones but worked hard at breaking down City’s right flank all evening. Put in a peach of a cross only for Ibrahimović to completely miss the ball when 5 yards away from the goal. Hobbled off in the final ten minutes but hopefully has not done any serious damage to those golden legs of his.

 

Ibrahimović: 6

An evening of brilliant flicks and nightmare touches. Like the other standout United star, Pogba, Zlatan had a hit-and-miss game… literally. Hit a very tame free kick into the wall from a good position in the first half and missed a clear cut opportunity to double United’s lead in the second half. However, the big Swede’s build up play was very good; he played a beautiful through ball for Rashford in the first half which the youngster did not capitalise on, he teed up Pogba to hit the post and grabbed the assist for Mata’s goal. While his shooting boots seem to be missing, Ibra is still a (currently) a useful member to the first team squad.

 

Subs

Schneiderlin: N/A

Brought on for Juan Mata to sure up United defensively and did exactly that. Broke up City’s attacks and played smart passes to keep the ball rather than just lumping it up field. With rotation, the Frenchman is likely to get into the team more often if Mourinho continues to play a 4-3-3/4-1-4-1 formation like he did on Wednesday night.

 

Lingard: N/A

Replaced Rashford in the final ten minutes and his running helped reduce City’s chances of grabbing an equaliser. Is likely to start at the weekend against Burnley.

United Players Ratings: Chelsea vs Manchester United

The pre-match build up for Chelsea vs Manchester United revolved around Jose Mourinho and his affiliation with both sides. Unfortunately for United, the match itself hinged on Mourinho as well, but it was his poor preparation which drew the limelight. While the men in red had more possession, shots, tackles, corners, a higher pass accuracy and a higher aerial win percentage than Chelsea they still managed to come away with a humiliating 4-0 loss. How did this happen?

Mourinho’s line-up is partly to blame. Sticking Ander Herrera in the holding midfield role (alone) allowed the Spaniard to be completely overrun by Chelsea’s fluid attacking movement. Marouane Fellaini, who was paired with Paul Pogba in a more advance midfield role, was ineffectual at building attacks and his partner struggled to impose himself on the game. With all of Mourinho’s talk of not celebrating if his current team scored against his former, he clearly gambled on a more attacking United side than against Liverpool, with a swap from two holding midfielders to one. The gamble did not pay off.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Conte, at the end of the day, had done his homework and stifled any attacking menace that Untied posed. Marcus Rashford and Jessie Lingard were pinned back too deep to be threatening by Chelsea’s wing-back system, which, in turn, left Zlatan Ibrahimović isolated up front. When the Reds did manage to get numbers up the pitch, the former Italian international coach pulled a ‘Mourinho’ on Mourinho: deep, organised defending with numbers behind the ball forced United to take pot-shots from range, which Courtois dealt with comfortably.

In this kind of form against the top teams (one point from fixtures against Manchester City, Liverpool and Chelsea in the league) United are looking at a real tough battle for Champions League qualification, let alone the title which seemed a hopeful, yet realistic, aim at the beginning of the campaign. With the visit of Manchester City in the EFL Cup on Wednesday, things are not going to get any simpler for Mourinho’s men.

Player Ratings

De Gea: 5

If De Gea was a standard top-division goalkeeper, he could have avoided blame for almost all of the goals. Unfortunately for the Spaniard on this occasion, De Gea is up there with the best goalkeepers in the world and so has to take a meagre portion of the blame pie when he lets four goals drift into his net. Rushed out erratically in the first thirty seconds to allow Pedro the opportunity dance around him and pass the ball into the empty net. Could not have done anything for Cahill’s goal, but he has pulled off saves from similar chances to the ones which Hazard and Kanté scored from before.

Valencia: 6

One of the only players in Red to leave the pitch with a sliver of dignity. United’s most threatening player in attack, consistently beating his man and putting good crosses into the box which Ibrahimović and Rashford did not capitalise on. Did well to deal with Hazard for the majority of the game and minimalised Marcos Alonso’s attacking threat too.

Bailly: 6

Had a reasonably solid game and was tasked with man-marking Costa out of the game, which the Ivorian achieved successfully. Picked up a yellow card for a silly challenge on Costa and, with his manic style of defending, looked in danger of picking up a red. Unfortunately, the best performing summer acquisition hobbled off in the second half and is thought to have damaged his knee ligaments, meaning Bailly is likely to be out for approximately two months. With the recent performances from Chris Smalling, this could be a serious blow in Mourinho’s chances of turning results around.

Smalling: 2

With Halloween coming up, I might revisit this performance for creative influence on ‘horror’ costumes. An absolute nightmare does not even do it justice. Can legitimately be blamed for all four goals: 1 =could have intercepted Alonso’s route-one lump but shirked responsibility and left De Gea exposed; 2 = lost Cahill at a corner to give him eight lightyears of space to blast the ball home; 3 = bamboozled by Hazard before the Belgian finished nicely; 4 = bamboozled by Kanté (yes, Kanté) to rub salt into the wounds.

Blind: 3

Another one who had a shocker. Was caught the wrong side of Pedro in the opening thirty seconds for the first goal and almost gifted him a second when he was dispossessed by the Spaniard, only for De Gea to save. Won zero tackles and was torn to bits by Pedro and Moses. There was a distinct lack of forward passes from the Dutchman who is normally so important at restarting United’s attacks from deep. Although Luke Shaw did not look like he had done enough against Fenerbahçe to warrant himself a place in the starting XI, Blind seems to have done him a favour with this performance.

Herrera: 6

The only player who really tried to get United’s heart beating again. Tireless running and some good forward passes but was completely overwhelmed as United’s sole holding midfielder. Tried to do too many things at once and was given very little protection from Pogba and Fellaini. Needs to sit alongside an accomplished defensive-minded midfielder if the Spaniard is going to excel. Still managed to make more tackles than anyone else on the pitch but it was not enough as the Reds’ back four was still horribly exposed.

Fellaini: 4

@Wikimedia Commons

A truly awful game from the Belgian and a big fall back to reality after a few commendable performances this season. The Belgian’s lack of pace left Herrera to deal with Chelsea’s counter-attacks by himself and his creativity going forward was almost non-existent. Fellaini is normally included in the team to ruff up the defence and add aerial presence; to sum up his game, Fellaini won zero headers. Hauled off at half time for the less technically-inept Mata.

Lingard: 6

Only came away with an above 5 rating for not doing anything wrong rather than doing anything spectacular, as is often the case with Lingard. Did well to cover the hapless Blind with his defensive work rate and tried his best to link attacks in the final third, but to no avail. Forced Courtois into good saves in either half. Taken off for Martial’s directness in the 65th minute.

Pogba: 5

Another poor performance which will be remembered by the cynical English press for much longer than his brilliant display against Fenerbahçe. Lost possession too easily and too often and failed to add the creative flair to United which they so desperately lacked. For his price tag, the Frenchman was poor. That being said, he did make himself known physically, putting in four tackles and winning aerials against an aggressive Chelsea midfield. Did not provide adequate cover for Herrera when paired with him in the second half.

Rashford: 5

The poorest performance from the young star to date, but not entirely his fault. Was pushed to an almost right wing-back position to deal with the attacking threat of Alonso and Hazard which meant that his qualities were supressed. Moved to partner Zlatan up front in the second half but failed to add any spark to United’s lethargic play. A few bright moments showed that it was not an entirely fraudulent performance.

Ibrahimović: 4

The worst of the bunch of recent rubbish performances from the big Swede. Missed a very good opportunity to equalise in the opening ten minutes and grab a consolation at the end, apart from that, failed to have any sort of presence at all. Dropped deep too often which congested the area outside the opposition’s box with Pogba, Lingard and Mata (when he was on) all contesting for space.

 

Subs

@Wikimedia Commons

Mata: 5

Came on for Fellaini at half time and improved United offensively but offered little to United defensively on the right flank. Was caught in no-man’s-land for the third goal but did redeem himself slightly for setting up Ibrahimović on a plate in the 80th minute only for the Swede to fluff the chance.

Rojo: 5

Replaced the injured Bailly to the dismay of United fans. With almost his first touch he gifted Chelsea a golden opportunity from a counter. Struck a solid long-range effort which drew a good save from Courtois. It is not very heart-warming for United fans now that the Argentinian error-a-game player is first choice backup at centre half with Bailly’s injury.

Martial: 5

Replaced Lingard for the final 25 minutes but had very little impact on the game. He, like the majority of talent in the red half of Manchester, is not pulling his weight so far this campaign.