Skip to main content

Day: 17 March 2017

33,062 no-shows for NHS appointments

In a Freedom of Information request made by The Mancunion, Central Manchester University Hospitals have revealed that the number of ‘Did Not Attends’ (DNAs) for the months of December 2016, January 2017 and February 2017 was 33,062 people.

10,230 of these were first DNAs, and 22,832 were reviews.

This data does not include those who cancel or reschedule appointments, but simply those who fail to turn up on the day. According to the government website, one in every ten outpatient appointments is missed each year. This is despite text message reminders being sent to patients, which have shown to decrease the number of missed appointments.

According to the NHS website, each missed hospital outpatient appointment in the year 2012/13 cost on average £108. Whilst this figure is a few years old, and the cost will most likely have risen, it can be used as a rough estimate when calculating how much has been lost to missed appointments in three months in Central Manchester University Hospitals alone. At 33,062 missed appointments, the lowest estimate of cost is in excess of £3,570,696.

Whilst some practises choose to discharge patients who fail to attend appointments on multiple occasions, there is no current fine for missed appointments, although the Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has admitted that the government would favour such charges, but that they would be difficult to impose.

In an article published on the NHS website, Beverley Bryant, Director of Digital Transformation at NHS Digital, states: “It’s important that people realise that not turning up to appointments can have a big impact on the care and treatment we are able to give other patients. It wastes Doctors’ and Nurses’ time too, which costs taxpayers money.

“Patient care is always at the top of our agenda.  That‘s why we are doing everything we can to make our service match with people’s lifestyles and the technology they use, to give more people easy access to the services they need.  We hope the public will do their bit too by making sure they attend or cancel appointments in good time. That way, everybody benefits.”

In a anonymous survey conducted by The Mancunion, 20.6 per cent of respondents admitted that they had failed to turn up to an NHS appointment without prior cancellation — this is higher than the NHS figure of 10 per cent.

When asked for an approximation of how much each missed appointment costs the NHS, the figures varied from under £10 to over £1000, with most answers falling between £20 and £70. One respondent replied “hopefully not too much or i feel bad [sic]”.

Of those who had failed to turn up to appointments, 47 per cent answered that they had simply forgotten about their appointment. 19 per cent felt too unwell to attend, and 14 per cent could no longer attend and did not know how to officially cancel their appointment. Other answers included poor mental health and problems with the booking system. One respondent explained that they “officially missed four” after getting a same-day appointment. They claimed to have been “sent to the wrong floor” four times before receiving text messages informing them that they had missed their appointment on four separate occasions.

100 per cent of people surveyed by The Mancunion thought that text message reminders for appointments were a good idea, although some people thought that they needed improvements to other aspects of the booking system.

“Yes text reminders work… but also flexible booking which allows people to arrange appointments that are practical and convenient — so they are more likely to attend” was one reply, and another respondent explained that whilst text reminders are good, they “don’t necessarily have enough informtion [sic] in them for you to get to the appointment”.

Two respondents critiqued reminders through the post as being costly and too slow.

According to the government website, text message reminders of appointments have been proven to reduce the number of DNAs, but there is “no evidence for what the reminder message should say”.

One trial proved that informing patients of the cost of missed appointments did have a positive impact on their likelihood to turn up to the appointment.

Preview: Strictly Come Manchester 2017

Manchester University’s Ballroom and Latin society are hosting a one-night-only evening of strictly sparkle magic in aid of two charities: Sign Health and Manchester Rape Crisis.

Sign Health, the deaf health charity, aims to give deaf people easier access to healthcare and information, as well as providing services which unfortunately are not supplied elsewhere.

Manchester Rape Crisis is a confidential support service run by women for women and girls who have either been raped or have experienced sexual abuse. Manchester Rape Crisis offers a number of services including free face-to-face counselling services, a telephone helpline service, and runs group work for women who have completed counselling but wish to have access to further support. The helpline also provides a signposting service for male survivors and also supplies advice to friends or family members who may be supporting a survivor.

The society’s ballroom and latin dancers have teamed up with the university’s favourite campus celebrities and have been in training ready to battle it out in order to get their hands on the infamous glitter ball. The confirmed line up is as follows:

Tamara O’Neill (Activities and Development officer)
and Rob Moorcroft

Nabeel Jogee (Manchester Medical Students’ Society President)
and Colette Lo

Joseff Edwards (voted Manchester’s most Eligible Bachelor)
and Nianqui Song

Emefa Ansah (Co-president of the Harmony Gospel Choir)
and Jordan Garbutt

Libby Biffin (Women’s Vice-Captain of Manchester Swimming Club)
and Imhotep Baptiste

Jack Hawkins (Music student)
and Grace Compton

Louise Anderson (Pharmacy President)
and Rob Brooks

Steph Hatt (Surf Society Trip Secretary)
and Asad Hussain

James Erne (Football Society)
and Ziqi Zhou

Ed Forder (Hockey Society)
and Anca Voinea

The star-studded evening can also boast a band of UK champions as judges, Strictly cocktails and a lot of fun!

Tickets can be purchased through the Students’ Union website. Seats will not be allocated beforehand so arrive early to avoid disappointment!

Top 5: Colourful songs for Holi

Holi is the Hindu festival of colours and is celebrated around the world from India to Platt Fields Park. Signifying the triumph of good over evil and the return of spring, Holi can be honoured by giving thanks for the harvest, by meeting with friends, mending broken relationships, and throwing paint at each other. In honour of the festival of colours, here are your top 5 rainbow records!

1. ‘Redbone’ – Childish Gambino

The word “redbone” is a term used in the southern United States to describe someone of a mixed-race background, and is also the name given to hounds with a reddish coat.  The song ‘Redbone’ is absolutely dripping with soul and groovy slap bass taking you all the way back to the ’70s. Alright, it’s not about the colour red, but I love this song and so should you.

 2. ‘Golden Brown’ – The Stranglers

Three years ago, I would have written that this song is what autumn would sound like if you transposed it into E minor and played it on a harpsichord. As it turns out, the song is about heroin, which is far less romantic… but it’s still a good song for waltzing to.

3. ‘Green Garden’ – Laura Mvula

If ever a song could be described as “floral”, this is it. Laura Mvula puts her beautiful, understated vocals to a track that sounds like a summer’s day in the park as she urges you to take off your shoes and walk on the green velvet.

4. ‘How Big, How Blue, How Beautiful’ – Florence and the Machine

The eponymous track from the long awaited third studio album from Florence Welch is by no means my favourite, but it’s difficult to not appreciate the lush orchestral arrangement that surges and recedes like waves in the ocean. However, it was not the blue of the sea that inspired Welch, but the blue of the endless Californian sky.

5. ‘Violet Hill’ – Coldplay

Violet Hill was Coldplay’s first attempt at writing a protest song. Chris Martin said that the lines “carnival of idiots” and “a fox became God” alluded to Fox News. I’m sure that if “Violet Hill” were released in 2017, a certain president would have a lot to tweet about on the matter.

Academics plea for the government to protect EU citizen’s rights

The heads of 35 Oxford colleges have issued a plea to the government, warning that foreign European Union citizens must have their right to stay in the UK guaranteed after Brexit.

In a letter to The Times, they stated that institutions like Oxford will experience “enormous damage” if valuable academic staff decide to leave, and that the impact on academia would have “reverberations across the UK”.

The letter, which also received the signature of Oxford Vice Chancellor Louise Richardson, disputes the government’s current stance on EU citizen rights as insufficient.

It states that “our EU colleagues are not reassured by the government. Some are worried, some are desperate, and some are already making plans to leave”. The fear of uncertainty is the overriding theme of the letter, which also added that “others do not know, however longstanding their work and residence, whether their children will be able to remain in the UK”.

The plea on March 13th came before a key Commons vote on the House of Lords’ amendment to the Article 50 bill, following the government’s two defeats in the Lords.

The Lords objected to the government not guaranteeing EU citizen rights, and not promising Parliament the right to vote on whatever exit deal is reached with the EU in the future.

The letter hopes to put pressure on a handful of Tory MPs contemplating backing the amendment. An unnamed pro-EU MP told The Times they were persuaded by Theresa May’s white paper that EU citizen rights were a key priority.

Manchester History lecturer Dr Christian Goeschel said that “the government’s refusal to guarantee the rights of EU citizens in Britain is very frustrating, mean-spirited and counter-productive”.

Sharing a common viewpoint to the Oxford academics, he said that “without the tens of thousands of highly qualified EU nationals, the British university system will undoubtedly decline”.

He condemned the British government’s “use of the EU citizens in the UK as bargaining chips”, and deplored “the forces of xenophobia, parochialism and isolationism” that are “dominating the political discourse” in the UK.

An anonymous Manchester Politics student said: “It’s a great idea that Oxford is lobbying the government to protect the rights of EU citizens. The University of Manchester should also consider this approach as well.”

A fifth of UK academics are from the EU, whilst over 22,800 EU citizens are currently working in Russell Group universities. A University and College Union survey found that three-quarters of EU academics were “more likely to consider leaving” following the Brexit vote.

Students continue fight for divestment ahead of Finance Committee decision

The university’s newly formed People and Planet society have taken a number of actions in support of the UK’s rapidly growing fossil fuel divestment movement since September, including holding protests ahead of the Finance Committee meetings, persistently emailing the Board of Governors, and meeting with the President of the university, Dame Nancy Rothwell, to ask her opinions on the movement.

As yet, they have had no commitment to their request for full divestment, other than remarks that they will “review the issue in the coming months”.

On Wednesday the students staged their biggest protest yet, which consisted of a march around the main campus, decorating the Whitworth gates with biodegradable orange balloons (the colour of the divestment movement) and speeches given in support.

Speakers included Seb Leaper, one of the campaign’s student leaders, and Dave Durant, one of the leaders of the movement at King’s College London. Kings committed to full divestment by 2022 last week, following six months of action and culminating in a 14-day hunger strike from one of their PhD students.

Sorcha Floyd, the Campaigns and Citizenship Exec Officer at the University of Manchester Students’ Union said: “One of the main reasons to hold the protest was to get the word out, to educate our students about what divestment is and why it’s so important, and we definitely achieved that today.”

British universities currently have £5.2 billion invested in fossil fuel companies. Over a quarter of UK universities have made commitments to divest from fossil fuels, including Glasgow, SOAS, Edinburgh, and Manchester Metropolitan. Most recently, the University of Bristol made a commitment to partially divest by 2018.

One of the campaigners, Callum Tyler, said after the protest: “We know the Board of Governors have the issue of Divestment on their agenda, and although we hope that they will make the right decision given our efforts, this protest has only strengthened our campaign, and I hope they all know that we will not stop until we get full divestment.”

The University of Manchester had no comment.

Holi curfews placed on female students in Delhi

Earlier this week, The Guardian reported on a curfew placed on female students in Delhi during the celebration of Holi.

Holi, an iconic Hindu festival (also known as the ‘festival of colour’ or ‘festival of love’), is well known for the practice. The spraying of colours on crowds of people dressed in white has been taken up across the world.
The spring festival, however, was off-limits to two women’s dormitories at the University of Delhi.

A memo released by Delhi University International Student House for Women, cited by The Guardian and The Independent, stated: “Residents and female guests will not be allowed to leave or enter the premises from 9 PM on March 12 till 6 PM on March 13. No late night permission will be granted on March 12 and those desirous of playing Holi should go outside the residential block within the hostel premises.”

The statement claimed the restriction would be in “the interests of the residents”. Women celebrating have previously complained about the inappropriate touching and examples of sexual assault that are commonplace amidst the large crowds.

Sabika Abbas Naqvi, the president of Delhi’s student hostels union expressed to The Guardian: “The idea of consent does not exist during Holi.” Nevertheless, Naqvi, as well as students across the region, spoke out against the removal of women from the public sphere. In a report by The Washington Post, political science graduate Utsa Sarmin said, “the city will become safe not by having fewer women in public spaces after dark, but by having more women. When will they get it?”

The curfew during the internationally-celebrated festival reached news across the world. However, curfews as early as 6.30pm have been placed on many female students across India for the last few years.
The curfews which prevent many young women from enhancing their student experience are claimed to be saving them from sexual assault. However, in an article by Prachi Dupta in Cosmopolitan, she says these curfews “perpetuates a ‘blame the victim’ mentality in a society where incidents of sexual assault are on the rise”.

Many have asked who the curfews really benefit, particularly, as reported by PRI, the curfews are “so strict that some wardens don’t even let women inside even if the women are a few minutes late… which arguably puts her at risk of being attacked.”

Student-led female empowerment groups Pinjra Tod and Break the Cage have vocalised their opposition to the discriminatory curfews, staging protests, late-night marches and signature campaigns. These groups formed, as reported in PRI, after the “prominent Jamia Millia university here in New Delhi announced last month that it would no longer allow its women residents to stay out till 10pm twice a month anymore.”

These groups, alongside the Delhi Commission of Women, claimed the curfews were an example of gender discrimination present across universities in Delhi. Alongside an open letter raising their concerns, the partnership launched an online petition and Facebook page in protest of the restrictions, reaching nearly 1,500 signatures.

So far, the campaigns have seen little success in changing the curfews, despite having now gained worldwide attention. India’s minister for women sparked outrage on International Women’s Day after saying female students need curfews to protect them from their own “hormonal outbursts”.

As Agence France Presse reported, Manekha Gandhi said: “You can make it [the curfew] six, seven or eight, that depends on college to college but it really is for your own safety”.

In solidarity with women living in a rape culture, the University of Manchester, alongside many education institutions across the world, host the march and celebration Reclaim The Night.

A summer of art in Manchester

With Easter fast approaching, and the end of this semester in sight, it won’t be long before the dawning of a long, hot summer. Granted, sun is unlikely in this rain-burdened city, but that doesn’t mean there’s nothing to look forward to in Manchester over the summer months. Of all the upcoming art works that have been announced across Manchester, there are three that are particularly exciting.

MIF17: True Faith at Manchester Art Gallery, 30 June–3 September 2017

Lead exhibition of Manchester’s International Festival 2017, True Faith is a collection of works by some of the world’s most notable artists. The exhibition surrounds the ongoing relevance of the Manchester based bands New Order and Joy Division by displaying a plethora of art inspired by their work.

Curated by Matthew Higgs and Jon Savage with archivist Johan Kugelberg, True Faith is centred on four decades’ worth of extraordinary contemporary works from contemporary artists such as Julian Schnabel, Jeremy Deller, Liam Gillick, Mark Leckey, Martin Boyce and Slater B Bradley, all directly inspired by the two groups.

Also featuring Peter Saville’s seminal cover designs, plus performance films, music videos and posters from the likes of John Baldessari, Barbara Kruger, Lawrence Weiner, Jonathan Demme, Robert Longo and Kathryn Bigelow, True Faith provides a unique perspective on these two most iconic and influential Manchester bands.

IRIS at The Lowry, 26 May – 16 July 2017

For a limited time only, audiences at The Lowry will have the opportunity to experience an unusual and innovative art installation. The venue’s Lyric Theatre will be taken over by a visually stunning feast of light, sound, colour and technology from UK artists Marshmallow Laser Feast.

This unique digital art installation will only be available before select theatre performances. Created using the latest in robotic and laser technology, IRIS promises to be an experience unlike anything we’ve previously encountered.

No End to Enderby at The Whitworth Art Gallery, 30 June – 17 September 2017

To mark the 100th birthday of Manchester-born Anthony Burgess this year, artist Stephen Sutcliffe and theatre director Graham Eatough collaborate to explore the writer’s series of Enderby novels in a new film, No End to Enderby.

This ambitious commission draws together Graham Eatough’s ongoing exploration of theatricality in the creation of meaning in contemporary culture with Stephen Sutcliffe’s interest in British literary and popular culture of the 1960s and 70s and his preoccupation with the self-doubt of the artist.

A summer of new Game of Thrones and amazing new art? We are spoiled.

Protesting: What’s the point?

In the last year, the world has seen a revolutionary outburst of demonstrations unleashed across the planet, as thousands have taken to the streets to march in solidarity for an abundance of causes taken from the front-page news.

With the ‘power of the people’ culture in full swing world-wide, there have been marches ranging from Trump activists to triumphant independent women. One time protesters are coming out of their shell to march in a show of solidarity and whilst this is undoubtedly a positive show of strength, people are beginning to wonder whether any real progress is being made. What happens once the glittering façade of united people, signs and shouting come to an end?

Whether it be Snapchats of glammed up girl gangs dancing down the street in outlandish outfits, the social media campaigns of high-profile ‘it’ girls, from Suki Waterhouse or Vanessa Hudgens, promoting their efforts on-line, or circulated images of the South London clique holding up signs reading ‘pussy power’, you cannot help but wonder what real benefits these marches are producing. Is it that they merely serve, as many people believe, to satisfy a short-term pick-me-up by making individuals feel like they are contributing to the resolve of damaging societal issues?

Alternatively, there are those who attend in the hope that these changes will happen overnight. Anyone who attends a march, against for example the Trump Muslim ban or gender inequality, and expects to see change as of the very next day, maybe doesn’t appreciate the otherwise effective ambitions that can be achieved.

Despite instances, such as the original women’s march on Versailles, which involved women taking direct and physical action to force the king to listen to the peoples’ demands, the women’s marches of today remain almost entirely symbolic. Although there is real desire to gain the attention of high-powered people and force them to listen to our requirements, it is unlikely to take immediate effect at either 10 Downing Street or The White House. Instead, a public organised exhibition will have to do for now, in the hope of being heard by such figures of power from the other side of their protective walls.

There is currently a wide diversity of protests happening around the U.K. In February, for example, masked animal rights activists at London Fashion Week played the sound of high-pitched rabbit screams being skinned alive right down Regents Street. In another case, one of London’s most prestigious nightclubs Fabric has successfully been granted a new license, following the #saveourculture campaign that was plastered across social media platforms. Next up were the anti-Trump rallies uniting millions across the globe, as thousands flocked to protest the president’s imminent visit to London, and most recently the ‘Reclaim The Night’ march against sexual violence, which saw thousands take to the street across the U.K. But what happens after these protests?

“I worry about this often”, Sara Khan admitted, a part-time BME (black and minority ethnic) officer, a treasurer of the feminist collective and a BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) activist, who has witnessed and helped organise plenty of rallies and events within the societies. “It’s hard not to be concerned when you want so badly to make a difference, but ultimately I do believe that change will come, slowly but surely, even if I’m not around to see it. You have to believe that, and keep reaffirming that belief.”

However, for Lauren McCourt, one of the organisers with Manchester Student SUTR, (Stand Up to Racism) this does not seem to be such an issue. “We don’t worry about what happens next because there are so many of us that have been doing this for such a long time. We’re going to carry on organising meetings and demonstrating and campaigning out on the streets.” In fact, McCourt sees the new faces at the demonstrations as a positive. “These protests were overwhelmingly made up of people who had never been to a single demonstration before in their life, which has actually given us a lot of confidence.”

Khan spoke about the lack of people attending the events in comparison to the social media levels of interest and the one-time protesters. “Often, people don’t actually show up to these rallies and protest even though they say they will, leaving just a handful of dedicated activists. You often see the same faces at a lot of events, the new ones appear once and then you don’t see them again.”

The inflow of the selfie at marches is another feature that demonstrators have been embracing, broadcasting images across social media channels to show their followers where they are and what they are doing. Khan spoke of individuals that attend the protests for the wrong reasons. “It’s just a selfie opportunity for some people, I’ve seen people take photos with placards and not even take part in the rest of the protest!” Khan believes that the reasons why one-time protesters attend marches, who have had no previous involvement with any politics varies: “A lot of people are cynical, or don’t have enough time possibly because of socio-economic pressures. It frustrates me, but I can understand it.”

“There will obviously be people at these demonstrations and in these organisations whose politics I disagree with in some way”, McCourt continued. “There will inevitably be people who disagree with my politics but what’s important is that we’re coming together to fight racism, especially in our current political climate.”

Despite all this, it is not just people going to protests for the Insta-worthy selfies that are going for the wrong reasons, and Khan believes for many it is not a malicious act and is in fact more unconscious. “A lot of people think that something is magically going to change after a protest, I think that’s the issue. They’re angry and they’ll express it this one time, but they aren’t willing to acknowledge that there needs to be a sustained proactive, not reactive approach to things.”

Ijeoma Oluo, a US writer and ‘internet yeller’ who has had her work on feminism and social injustice featured in The Guardian, posted an interesting interpretation on the promotion of peaceful protests for the Trump Muslim ban on her blog. As women promoted the non-violence of the marches, she questioned how they define violence? “Millions of white women can freely walk down the street without fear, high-fiving cops who wouldn’t hesitate to pepper spray black and brown faces begging for nothing less than their lives.”

Meanwhile, Khan spoke of how she has changed her own personal approach to more of an educational one, particularly focusing on representation and empowerment of marginalised people: “I find many people from marginalised backgrounds are already conscious of these things and that things don’t change overnight. Historically, the most oppressed folk are often the most vocal, working class women, trans-people of colour and women of colour.”

Although there appears to be a negative perception about the wrong people with the wrong values attending these marches, Khan assured me that these aren’t the only people and it is not just about numbers. “The small numbers shouldn’t be too disheartening, it is generally done step-by-step, you attract one or two people at a time and build your movement gradually. Sometimes momentum does diminish, but usually the process is two steps forward and only one step back.”

There has been a backlash about protests being described as angry exhibitions of misdirection, with no successful achievement, but Khan disagrees. “Protests are about making noise, of course protests don’t achieve anything alone and there needs to be a coordinated, sustained effort to make a change.” The more people who understand the need for protesting and the reasons behind it, the more benefits will be achieved. “Petitions, discussions, personal lobbying all work together with protests”, not protests alone.

“Protests are a great way of getting people together and sending a message but we know that there is much more that needs to be done”, Lauren McCourt discussed. “I think most of us in these groups see protests as only the beginning. They’re a great way of pulling new people into the movement.”

Without a focus and a clear target to be achieved, these high profile and heart-warming spectacles can become an ineffective feel good charade, benefiting only the participants by making them feel like they have somehow helped fix a complex issue overnight.

So it is those protests and societies with a sure goal of what they set out to do which have success in making a noise and getting noticed by slowly making change.

There may always be the self-absorbed individual who attends a march once, to get that ‘selfie’ and reach their targeted 100 likes, and we cannot ignore the colour and gender segregation that is still present in the marches, yet those at the core of protesting still have faith.

“Protests are still important”, Khan concluded “but people’s social consciousness needs to change if we want them to be proactive”.

The Good, the Bad and the Irrelevant?

Over the last decade there has been a gradual increase in the criticism of professional football punditry. There is undoubtedly a much higher demand for top level analysis from each match, but are the viewers getting this? We took a look at some of the best and worst pundits television has to offer.

A recent documentary on Sky — ‘Gary Neville: The Pundit’ — showed how much hard work and dedication the ex-Utd full back puts in to delivering exceptional analysis of games, key moments and individual players. The same goes for Liverpool legend Jamie Carragher; Neville and Carragher were once bitter rivals, but now they come together brilliantly on Monday Night Football (MNF).

The MNF cast have arguably revolutionised punditry: they watch as many games as possible to draw out the most interesting talking points from the week’s features. We asked thirty football fans who they believed to be the best pundits on television, twenty-seven said either Gary Neville, Jamie Carragher or Thierry Henry — all working for Sky. One of the best features is that they answer questions that the public have put forward on Twitter.

However, Sky’s Soccer Saturday is not quite the perfect example of sufficient punditry; it’s more like some middle-aged blokes sat round a table shouting at a match. That isn’t for television — they could do that at the pub. Each week Paul Merson puts forward his predictions for the upcoming Premier League fixtures. More often than not he gets them horrifically wrong. Although he endured a long playing career, Merson still shouldn’t get paid to make such horrendous predictions. He should stick to being a pundit and spend more time thinking about presenting logical viewpoints.

Graeme Souness was a serious player in his day and does, for the most part, come up with some very good suggestions. But at times you can’t help be feel that his views are now outdated. A few weeks ago he said that Manchester City should sign Franz Beckenbauer. Stoke should sign Pele, Everton should sign Diego Maradona and Accrington Stanley should sign Johan Cruyff. To be honest Graeme, Pep Guardiola will probably not pick up the phone anytime soon and persuade the 71-year-old retired German footballing hero to sign a five-year deal. Comments like this may have been acceptable a few years back, but now the punditry bar has been set too high for irrelevance like this.

Michael Owen has been torn to shreds on social media for some of his stupid viewpoints. He once came out with the statement, “When they [Manchester City] don’t score, they hardly ever win.” If you haven’t looked at this article, you probably haven’t read it. Come on Michael, have you ever heard of team winning that hasn’t scored? More recently the former Ballon d’Or winner said: “To stay in the game, you have to stay in game.” It’s actually a miracle that BT Sport, the television channel he works for, don’t pick him up on making such idiotic remarks.

Robbie Savage is a pundit we all love to hate. It’s virtually impossible to watch or listen to a match that doesn’t have his input. He sits there with that absurd quiff looking like an overgrown cockatoo, and says things just to create controversy which sometimes detracts from the proper analysis of the match which he should be discussing. People claim that “he has good charisma” and yes he does, but dolphins have good charisma — it doesn’t mean that we want to hear their views on a football match. Savage spent the majority of his career at Leicester City (when they were bad) and Derby County, not exactly an advert of the most prestigious football teams this country has to offer. Savage proclaiming himself an ‘expert’ is a bit like someone suggesting that they’re the leader of the Green Party for speaking to a hedge.

Match of the Day has been gracing our screens for over fifty years now. Gary Lineker is brilliant at what he does, asking the best questions about the matches in the hope of receiving some good answers: everyone likes Lineker. It’s his colleagues who let the crisp-loving presenter down. Danny Murphy, arguably the most boring man to ever have existed in the world, definitely puts a lot of effort into his analysis, but the way he presents it is so mundane. Instead of counting sheep to get to sleep, listen to Danny Murphy talking about a 0-0 draw between Stoke and Hull.

It’s obvious that punditry does have its faults. It brings a lot of good for the sport on the whole, but pundits should make sure what they are saying is relevant and meaningful in order to avoid mass criticism, especially from the exceptional pundits in The Mancunion office.

Preview: Sex Week 2017

Sex Week 2017 is here from Monday 20th – Friday 24th March. The Students’ Union will be hosting a variety of events, organised by student-led group Sexpression, to help engage students in sex education and empowerment.

Sexpression believes providing students with the sources to learn about sex, whether it be through a pub quiz or a sexual pleasure workshop, is key in creating an all-inclusive and safe culture around sex. So, what has the week got to offer?

Monday 20th March

Painful Periods: What is Endometriosis? 5-6pm, Room 2

Sex-Themed Pub Quiz 6pm, Union Bar

If the title alone doesn’t entice you, then maybe the £50 bar tab up for grabs will!

Tuesday 21st March

LGBT + Issues in Healthcare 6-7pm, Room 8
Action for Trans Health and the LGBT Foundation discuss LGBT + issues in healthcare, barriers to access and best practice for healthcare professionals. Certificates provided!

Sexual Pleasure Workshop 6-7:30pm, Room 2
What is sexual pleasure? Following the success of the past 2 years, Ali Hanbury from the Proud Trust is back! Note: Self-Defining Women only.

Wednesday 22nd March

Biphoria Stall 12-4pm, Students’ Union Foyer

Sexpression STD Testing Stall 1-5pm, Students’ Union Foyer
Living with HIV 5pm, Room 2
Hear from a volunteer from George House Trust about their experience living with HIV. Certificates provided.

Friday 24th March

Sex Work During Austerity 12:30 -2pm, Academy 3
Our panel event included speakers from Ugly Mugs (a national organisation seeking greater access to justice for sex workers), English Collective of Prostitutes (self-help organisation of sex workers campaigning for decriminalisation of prostitution, worker rights and safety), a representative from the

Sex Workers Open University and John Goldring, Liz Cain and Adam Westall (academics from Manchester Metropolitan University, authors of ‘An Exploratory study of the growth of online male sex work in Manchester)’.

Leek and Parsley Roast Chicken

Oven at 200˚
Serves 6-8
Takes 2 hours to make

Ingredients
15g parsley (or dill)
75g soft butter (microwave for 10 seconds at a time if needed until soft)
Whole chicken, weighing about 2kg
1 lemon
500g new potatoes
4-5 leeks
4tbsp vermouth
400ml chicken stock
4tbsp crème fraîche

Method
Wash and roughly chop the parsley. Set half aside and mix the other half with the butter.
Place the chicken (take out any giblets first) in a very large roasting tin — the leeks and potatoes will go around it — and carefully lift up the skin on the breasts. Place half the butter under the skin and push it as far down the breasts and legs as possible. Smear the rest of the butter on top of the skin. Squeeze the lemon over the chicken before chucking the halves into the cavity along with a few stalks of parsley. Generously season the bird.
Cook in the oven for 20 minutes.
As the chicken begins to cook, slice the potatoes into rounds a centimetre thick and the leeks 4 centimetres in length (having topped and tailed them, don’t forget to wash the leeks to get rid of any soil).

Bring the chicken out of the oven and scatter around the potatoes and leeks. Pour in the vermouth and stock.
Return to oven and reduce temperature to 180˚. Cook for a further hour.
Remove from the oven and check that it’s cooked through (not pink, clear juices. If you want to get technical then an internal temperature of 70˚ is required).

Place the chicken on a plate to rest whilst you prepare the sauce. Either surround the chicken with the leeks and potatoes or place them in a separate bowl and cover with foil to keep warm.
If your roasting tray can go on the hob then leave the liquid in it, otherwise transfer to a pan. Add the crème fraîche and whisk over a low heat until incorporated (mine split it can easily be whisked back together) and bubble until the sauce has reduced to about half the amount.

Get everything together to serve and tuck in!

Leftover roast chicken and pea risotto

This risotto is perfect for a Monday evening as it uses those leftover bits of roast chicken that should never go to waste. See our recent recipe for your Sunday roast.

Cooking time: 1 hour

Ingredients:

3 tbsp olive oil

2 banana shallots chopped

1 clove of garlic diced

300g Arborio rice

150ml of dry white wine

1.5 litres of chicken stock (ideally from boiling left over chicken carcass or simply from a stock cube or packet)

300g of cooked roast chicken

150g of frozen peas

Parmesan

Sea salt

Black pepper

Method:

Heat the olive oil in a large pan and add the chopped shallots. Fry for 5 minutes or until the shallots are becoming soft and see-through. Add the diced garlic and fry for a further 1 minute.

Add the Arborio risotto rice and stir until the rice is covered in oil and begins to turn slightly see-through.

Add the wine and ensure it cooks off.

Add a splash of stock and stir the risotto mix until it has absorbed all of the liquid. Continue by repeating this action until almost all of the stock has been used and the rice is softened.

Add the chicken, peas and remaining splash of stock and stir thoroughly until the peas are cooked and the chicken is hot through.

Remove the pan from the heat and grate in the desired amount of parmesan.

Serve and season with a pinch of salt and pepper.

Malala Yousafzai wins conditional Oxford PPE offer

Malala Yousafzai, global girls’ education campaigner has received a conditional offer, of AAA, to study PPE at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford from 2017.

Yousafzai confirmed her plans at the Association of School and College Lecturers annual conference earlier this month: “I have applied to study PPE so for the next three years I will be studying that. But other than that I want to stay focussed on my Malala Fund work.”

Her charity has invested in schools in Lebanon and Jordan refugee camps, who are at risk for early marriage, and enrolled more girls in remote areas in Pakistani secondary schools. It has also invested in an establishment of information technology and life skills for girls in Nairobi’s slums.

Malala rose to prominence writing a blog and giving speeches at her father’s school detailing and campaigning for education under Taliban rule. The New York Times brought her international recognition and unfortunately a murder attempt on the 9th October 2012.

Since then she has campaigned for education and won numerous prestigious awards, including the United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights, the Mother Teresa Award and the youngest laureate of the Nobel Peace Prize. Moreover, she has founded a charity, ‘Malala’s Fund’, written a book, and a film has been written about her endeavours.

Malala gained 6A*s and 4A’s in August 2015 in her GCSE’s and sat A-Levels in History, Maths, Religious Studies and Geography at Edgbaston High School in Birmingham.

She went through the rigorous Oxford process and was invited to the college in December for an interview. She remarked afterwards: “It was the hardest interview of my life. I just get scared when I think of the interview.”

Yousafzai had also applied to the London School of Economics (LSE), Durham and Warwick universities. The entry requirement to study PPE at Oxford is three As, making this a favourable destination, whereas the other institutions all require an A* and two As.

On several occasions, she has expressed interest in returning to politics in Pakistan, and specifically as the Prime Minister.

Oxford’s PPE degree has produced heads of states globally, with alumni featuring presidents, politicians and international heads of states including former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan.

Newfound popularity for President Bush

The popularity of former US President George W. Bush appears to be recovering. After publishing a book of his paintings of military veterans, which quickly became a bestseller, Bush appeared as a guest on the Ellen DeGeneres Show in early March.

The president and host DeGeneres discussed incredibly lighthearted and jovial topics: Bush’s amusing, photographed struggles to put on a rain poncho; his widely reported friendship with former First Lady Michelle Obama; and even wider popular culture, featuring a demonstration of the ‘dabbing’ dance move.

The TV appearance ignited online discussion about Bush like wildfire, with many drawing contrasts between this new fresh and friendly elder statesman-like figure to the outwardly fierce and ruthlessly contrary current US President Donald Trump. “Dear George W. Bush, Please come back”, wrote one Twitter user. Others appear to agree.

Upon closer inspection this contrast does not appear to be so clear. Liberals who would support a Bush presidency but disparage Trump most likely come from a very particular and rather unconscious standpoint on politics: that is, politics not as a means of improving people’s lives, but as a venue to signal one’s own social and moral superiority.

This standpoint values the image of political respect, civility and good nature, however shallow, above almost all else — including policy and actions. Bush and Trump vary greatly in presidential rhetoric: Bush spoke out against Islamophobia at a speech in a Mosque after 9/11, while Trump brashly demonises Muslims worldwide as possible terrorist threats to America. However, in presidential actions, the two presidents show a largely similar treatment of these same people: from Bush and his murderous Iraq War, and from Trump and his discriminatory travel bans.

At this point, the American centrist position on the matter appears to be that: yes, Bush may be responsible for the deaths of a million Iraqis, but at least he usually wore a tie, was polite, and respected the solemnity of the office that allowed him to do so. In reality, however, there is no value to this hollow projection of respect for the office of the US presidency if its power is utilised in such a fashion which seriously harms millions upon millions of people.

What is more, as much as it caters to news reports and a positive public impression, there is no worth to be found in this outward guise of honest service, decorum, and good nature, if the actions of this very same person are completely the opposite: warmongering, oil-thirsty, and murderous.

In what nightmare of a future must we reside in today if President Bush is now a beloved public figure? He is the man who, along with Tony Blair, manipulated media to draw public support for the Iraq War, paving the way for the post-truth politics of Brexit and Trump himself. He is the man who used 9/11 as a mandate to deport millions of people from America’s borders in order to rally a country behind an anti-immigrant Republican Party. He is the man who pretended to search for WMDs in the Oval Office as a gag for the Correspondent’s Dinner. To come to the conclusion that Bush was in any way a more morally sound and respectable president than Trump is currently, one must ignore a mountain of corpses Bush left behind.

Bush brutalised the very same people Trump is brutalising today. The civil war he created still kills hundreds on a weekly basis. He may smile and laugh on TV with celebrities, he may appear friendly and warm-hearted, but judge him by his actions and not his projected personality and one will arrive at an entirely different conclusion.

Trump is continuing Bush’s legacy with his Islamophobic actions against Muslims today, it only appears differently because of how open and outspoken he is on the issue. Trump may be the first president to shout about it himself, but as the victims of decades of US foreign policy will tell you, this treatment of Muslims is no radical change. It is merely another rung upwards.

In order to truly resist the Trump presidency today, liberals must judge politicians not on their words but their actions. Value judgements based on surface image and rhetoric will only lead to further collusion with those such as Bush who lay out dangerous frameworks for future presidents like Trump to take advantage of.

This is a particularly difficult task to accomplish in a two-party state, where the only truly viable party other than Republicans are the Democrats: who have in recent decades favoured the ‘third way’ positions Clintons and Obama.

The rightwards shift of the Democrats to the centre not only allows Republicans to move even further rightwards themselves, but also no longer wins Democrats elections: as demonstrated well by Hillary Clinton last year. Instead, a real opposition is needed.

Support for left wing policies of tolerance and acceptance continues to grow in America today as the ideological dichotomy widens, leaving fewer and fewer in the middle ground. These people need to be engaged and represented.

There can be no real bipartisan effort to oppose Trump. For any kind of success to come about as a result of the end of the Trump administration, whether in eight years, four years or sooner, Bush and people of his kind must be shunned, rejected, and opposed as vehemently as Trump himself.

Tracks of the Week: 20th March

‘Chanel’ – Frank Ocean

Thankfully out of step with his previous four-year wait for new music, ‘Chanel’ is Frank Ocean’s most explicit comment on sexuality since his ‘coming out’ of sorts in a blog post back in 2012. It’s an exploration of duality over the characteristically forward-thinking production that would’ve fit comfortably on last year’s Blonde. It also gets bonus points for featuring the best fashion logo based-double entendre you’re likely to hear for a while.

‘3WW’ – Alt-J

A left-field lead single from Alt-J’s forthcoming album RELAXER, ‘3WW’ sees Alt-J leaning on some of their more electronic influences and hints at an album that plays up to its subtleties every bit as much as its predecessor. It takes its time, but following the trend of their previous album openers, the pay-off is worth the wait. With guest vocals from Ellie Rowsell (of Wolf Alice fame) the track goes from a fidgety electronic groove to a sublime duet over soft string arrangements and deep, sizzling synths.

‘Lavender (Nightfall Remix)’ – BadBadNotGood ft. Kaytranada & Snoop Dogg

Snoop attracted attention from the orange nightmare and Tweeter-In-Chief himself this week by releasing this remix alongside a video showing him pretend to shoot a familiarly-fashioned clown by the name of “Ronald Krump”. Snoop Dogg adds a nice menacing touch to the sticky groove of this already great collaboration. It’s everything political rap should be in 2017 and if you-know-who’s calling for “Jail time!” you’re probably doing something right.

Burnham announces Graduate Retention Plan

Andy Burnham announced on Wednesday at the launch of his manifesto that if elected as Greater Manchester mayor he will implement a “Graduate Retention Plan” as part of his housing policy. The MP for Leigh has promised to provide cheaper housing and start-up opportunities for graduates from Greater Manchester universities.

Mr Burnham stressed that “young people are at the heart of this manifesto”, and while the policy is not outlined in the manifesto itself, he did announce it in his speech.

In an interview after the event for The Mancunion and Fuse TV, he said: “We want to retain more of the people in the city who study here […] it’s been the case in the past, on graduation, some people may have tried to stay and then eventually drift away because maybe they can’t find the job that works for them.”

Specifically the policy will offer more rent-to-own housing and subsidised start-up spaces within the city, and Mr Burnham hopes this will encourage more graduates to choose to stay in Manchester.

The announcement was made at the Burnham campaign’s manifesto launch at the Sharp Project in Newton Heath.

Along with announcing the retention plan, the manifesto also praised the Reclaim the Night movement, and Mr Burnham promised to include the Greater Manchester universities in the effort to preserve Manchester’s place as “the Silicon Valley of Europe”.

The event included a 45 minute speech by Mr Burnham, and an introduction from the founder of the Sharp Project and former Creative Director of the 2002 Commonwealth Games Susan Woodward OBE.

The Sharp Project in Newton Heath, where the event took place, Photo: Matt Wynne

The manifesto is the first to be announced by any of the mayoral candidates, with much of its content being crowd-sourced. Titled “Our Manifesto for Greater Manchester”, each page includes quotes from different Greater Manchester residents — six of whom were invited to speak before the main speech.

Along with policies aimed at young people, Mr Burnham also focused on his planned reforms to health and social care. The Greater Manchester Mayor will be the first “Metro Mayor” to have health policy devolved to it, and he made it a central plank of his speech.

At one point, he produced a rota for a migrant care worker working for a private care company, given to the team during the consultation for the manifesto. It showed a weekend rota that began at 07:30 and ended at 00:20 the next day, with 48 house visits, one of which only lasted two minutes, with the next working day starting at 03:20. Mr Burnham added: “If that doesn’t bring a sense of utter despair to us all then really I don’t know what should.”

Conservative candidate and Trafford Council Leader Sean Anstee is the next to announce his fully policy platform, on Monday the 20th of March, and the mayoral election will take place on the 4th of May. Jane Brophy of the Liberal Democrats, Shneur Odze of UKIP and Will Patterson of the Green Party are also standing for Mayor.

All the information on the election can be found at the GM Elects website. The deadline for registering to vote is April 13th.

Oxford University to offer summer schools for white working class boys

Oxford University has launched a campaign to offer summer schools exclusively to white British working class boys. Theresa May drew attention to the issue claiming these boys were “less likely than anybody else in Britain to go to university”.

The Sutton Trust, a scheme offering opportunities to minority groups in the UK, provides those from less fortunate backgrounds the chance to visit and experience life at Oxford University.

The Sutton Trust released figures, as printed in The Telegraph, state: “White British boys who are eligible for free school meals achieve the lowest GCSE grades of any major ethnic group, with only a quarter (24 per cent) gaining at least five A* to C grades including English and Maths.”

With a third (32 per cent) of British white females progressing onto higher education, white British boys have become the lowest-performing ethnic group.  The figures also revealed only 45 per cent of white British students progress onto university.

The statistics were published following claims that whilst other universities showed an increase in state school attendees, Oxford University saw a drop in accepting admissions from working class students.

Professor Les Edbon, administrator of Fair Access to Higher Education, issued a statement: “It is crucial that universities keep looking for new and innovative ways to work with the most under-represented groups in higher education to make sure that everyone with the talent to progress at university has an equal chance to do so, whatever their background.”

Oxford University has offered summer schools targeted at BME teenagers for the past 17 years and has the intention of working with more under-represented groups, not only boosting admissions to the university but also helping unprivileged students recognise their potential.

Dr Samina Khan, Oxford University’s director of undergraduate admissions and outreach, “hopes that we can help students realise their potential and encourage high-achieving students from white British socio-economically disadvantaged areas to aim for top universities such as Oxford”.

The summer schools will offer students a week to learn about law, ancient history, medical sciences and computer science, developing their knowledge learned at A-Level and encouraging them to explore what Oxford University and higher education have to offer.

Student found unconscious in Richmond Park halls dies

A University of Manchester student was found unconscious on Monday 13th of March. Emergency services were called to Richmond Park halls on Whitworth Lane in Fallowfield in the early hours of Monday morning.

Although initially believing the student passed away in the flat, police confirmed he was found unconscious in the halls and later died in hospital.

The University’s Residential Life Advisors have visited all students residing in Richmond Park. In total, over 500 students are housed in Poplar Court and Willow Court in these halls, and a full counselling service has been offered to anyone affected by this tragedy.

A University of Manchester spokesperson stated: “We are saddened to confirm the death of a 22-year-old student.”

They added that staff are providing support for the student’s family and fellow students.

A student, who wishes to remain anonymous, told The Mancunion: “I didn’t know the student but his passing has affected everyone here in Richmond Park. Our thoughts are with his family and friends. The university have been offering us a lot of support, which we are thankful for.”

A statement was released by Greater Manchester Police: “Shortly before 12.45am on Monday, March 13, police were called by the ambulance service to halls of residence on Whitworth Lane in Fallowfield.

“Officers attended and discovered a man in his 20s who was unconscious.

“He was taken to hospital, but sadly died. The man’s family have been informed and his death is not being treated as suspicious.”

Officers have not revealed the identity of the student, and the circumstances surrounding his death have not been released. However, the police are not treating this case as suspicious.

The university has urged anyone affected to contact the University of Manchester Counselling Service.

Sarah Littlejohn, Head of the Counselling Service, said: “We offer a very wide range of resources to help students protect and support their mental health and wellbeing.”

You can find more information on the Counselling Service website.

Alternatively, you can contact the Samaritans who are available 24 hours a day to provide confidential emotional support by calling 116 123.

Brexit and Indyref2 leaves the future of EU students in Scotland unclear

There is much dispute over the effect Brexit will have on Scottish universities. Scottish universities will be able to raise tuition fees for non-UK EU students, which could increase income, and provide more tuition-free places for Scottish students.

In a speech at the SNP conference in October 2016, the Deputy First Minister, John Swinney said tuitions fees would not be introduced for current students in Scottish education and those applying for entry to the 2017/18 academic year. Scottish Parliament may face a cost of up to £60 million as Brexit is planned to take place before current non-UK EU students have completed their degree courses.

Swinney has not guaranteed non-UK EU students will qualify for visas that enable them to stay for their entire degree. It remains unclear if this will change as Brexit negotiations progress and whether future EU students will have the option to study free of charge in Scotland.

 

Abolition of tuition fees for Scottish students, under EU regulation, was extended to non-UK EU students under European anti-discrimination laws. Students from the rest of the UK were exempt from this as they are within a single state; English, Welsh and Irish students pay £9000 to attend Scottish universities.

In order to provide tuition-free education to Scottish and EU students, the number of free places was capped. The Scottish Funding Council funds 125,000 places across Scottish universities.

Increasing numbers of European students are filling places at Scottish universities, enticed by free tuition at some of the world’s best institutions. The number of EU students in Scottish Higher Education has almost doubled since the 2006-7 academic year to 13,312 in 2014-15. This leaves fewer spaces for Scottish students and increasing competition between applicants.

Almost 20 per cent of Scottish students did not receive an offer from a Scottish university in 2014. Overall rates of offers to Scottish students were the lowest among nationalities applying with only 54 per cent of their applications being accepted.

In a speech early last week Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland, outlined her proposal for a second referendum to be held on Scottish Independence before Brexit finalises, between 2018 and spring 2019. Westminster Parliament’s timeline for Brexit shows it due to being at the end of this month and complete in March 2019.

A day later Sturgeon issued a statement contradicting this decision, claiming a Scottish referendum may have to take place after March 2019. This was possibly in response to Theresa May’s public rejection of a referendum before Brexit talks finish.

Recent polls from the Scottish Social Attitudes Survey (SSAS) show 72 per cent of 16-24-year-olds in favour of remaining part of the UK. In the 2014 referendum, the nationwide results were a 55:45 split in against independence, indicating a reluctance to leave the EU.

May claimed that Scotland will leave the EU “no matter what” in parliament late last week. As the Prime Minister and First Minister continue to discuss and debate Brexit and a second referendum, the future of Scottish and European students in the UK remains unclear.

Smear test ‘not needed for lesbian women’?

A survey of lesbian and transgender women in the North-West, carried out by the University of Salford, revealed that 37 per cent were told that they did not require a cervical screening due to their sexual orientation.

This is despite cervical cancer charities and research stating that all women eligible, regardless of sexual orientation, should go for regular screenings. This misinformation has led to around half of eligible lesbian and bisexual women having never been screened.

Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust told the BBC: “As HPV can be transmitted through skin-to-skin contact in the genital area, gay women are equally at risk of contracting HPV and experiencing abnormal cervical changes and, thus, should always attend when invited for cervical screening.”

LGBT charities have expressed that this is not the only problem that the LGBT community face in healthcare. 36 per cent of lesbian and bisexual women say that their GP has assumed they were heterosexual, according to a survey.

A woman is eligible for cervical screenings when she reaches the age of 25, when a test should be done every 3 years until 65, and where tests are done every 5 years. The smear test checks for abnormal cells in the cervix. Most of the time these cells will not lead to cancer, but in some cases they will be removed to prevent them developing in this way.

At the moment, smear tests are only offered to women above the age of 25, as research shows that women under this age are more likely to have abnormal cells that are harmless and will return to normality on their own. However, stories of young deaths due to cervical cancers, such as that of 19-year-old Sophie Jones in 2014, have lead to petitions to lower the age that women are offered the test.

First year Psychology student Courtney Levy thinks the age women are eligible for cervical screening should be lowered, saying “maybe not recommending the test for young people, but if a woman has come into contact, either directly through a partner, or through someone who came into direct contact with HPV, then she should be able to request and receive cervical screening to rule out transmission.”

Jess Kirby, a senior health information manager at Cancer Research UK, has said that lowering the age that the smear test is offered will cause more worry than needed. The increased likelihood of harmless but abnormal cells in younger women could result in unnecessary further treatment that can have severe side effects.

Instead, Cancer Research UK feel there are other ways the screening programme could be improved. Research has shown that testing HPV is more likely to prevent cervical cancer than current smear tests. Although HPV testing is now used as a secondary test, Cancer Research UK argue that using it as the initial test would be more beneficial.

The NHS and Cancer Research UK emphasise that, regardless of your age, if you experience any of these symptoms: abnormal bleeding, pain or abnormal discharge, you should talk to your doctor.

The LGBT society has been contacted for a statement but did not respond by our print deadline.