Month: October 2017

Rowing Club takes gold at home

Written by Mia Gair on 30th October 2017. Posted in Sport.

Saturday the 14th of October saw the Manchester University Boat Club (MUBC) take to the rocky waters of Salford to battle it out at the Agecroft Head Rowing competition. The competition saw boat clubs and universities from around the Manchester area come together to compete at one of the first races of the season. With the — sort of — home advantage, the teams started in the middle of Spinningfields and raced the 3.25km race down to the Lowery in Salford.

The first boat of the day was senior woman Ruth Haigh who powered through the wind in her single taking fourth place. Followed by Oliver Collinson and Sebastian Baylis in the double who won MUBC’s first gold of the day. The senior men narrowly missed out on the gold in both the coxed four and the quad races.

Luckily, however, the senior women’s coxed fours had better luck, with Rowena Bailey, Marianne Blight, Alice Peachey, Celine Vine, and their cox Thomas O’Hanlon taking home gold. The second women’s coxed four and the senior women’s quad were also purple and proud, both coming in a close second place.

Despite the tough conditions, all of the boats made a great start to the season and year ahead. Taking home a total of seven medals across the breath of the senior squad sets up MUBC for a successful year. The club was even joined by one of its alumni Mr Richardson who represented the Alumni Club Nemesis Boat Club in the single, showing us that MUBC rows on after graduation!

The club was joined by even more members of the Alumni Boat Club on Sunday for the Nemesis training day. Whilst our competitors were resting, both the seniors and novices at MUBC we put through their paces by experienced rowers who all had MUBC in common.

Across two venues over ten crews were sent out in sculling boats, fours and eights to undergo a technical analysis from those who know it best. Novices were given the chance to cox down at our Boathouse in Sale, whilst the seniors enjoyed the sunny weather out on the open waters of Salford Quays.

Overall it was a great weekend that signalled the beginning of a winter of hard work. Pushing our squads to train harder and smarter, and get the most out of rowing and what MUBC can offer. Let’s hope we can reap what we sow and add to our Silverware collection!

‘Vivid’ Dreams and Developments

Written by Mancunion on 30th October 2017. Posted in Food & Drink.

Let’s talk about development. Developments in the food critic world, developments in the student union, and developments in east Manchester.

Marina O’Loughlin has stepped into the shoes of the late, great, AA Gill. Perhaps the most accomplished voice in food writing, AA Gill has left some sizeably large shoes to fill, but if there was ever anyone for the job it is O’Loughlin. The Guardian’s loss is The Sunday Time’s gargantuan gain.

Her first review for the Sunday Times came out on the 15th and was accompanied by a small list that contained five of her favourite restaurants, one of which was Manchester’s own Siam Smiles. The northern Thai restaurant and supermarket is indeed one of Manchester’s finest, and Thai food is what was on offer at Vivid Lounge, the subject of this week’s review, but more on that later.

So, the ground floor of the Student’s Union. Isn’t it great when a large amount of money is spent on making something distinctly worse? A source that wishes to remain anonymous has told The Mancunion that foot-traffic is down 50 per cent since the development took place.

This should come as no surprise as what was a perfectly fine cafe and an adjacent shop is now a vacuous hole of confusion and slowly served coffee. I mean, who the hell masterminded this operation? This indoor land of garden sheds pleases no one, student cafe satisfaction is at an all-time low, and the coffee drinkers of the world are on strike.

Anyway, moving on, next to Ancoats in east Manchester is a part of town called New Islington, but might also be called Ardwick, depending on when you moved there. I’d never heard of New Islington until I moved there, but it comes across as an example of a development gone right.

New Islington is one of the seven Millennium Communities Programme areas. Funding for the area was secured in 2002 and property developers Urban Splash have been at the forefront of developments. Some of the blocks of flats are nicer than others, but the renovated mills outlined by the canals are beautiful.

Sadly it doesn’t have the retail units of Ancoats. There’s a Costa and a Dominoes, but the one thing it does have is Vivid Lounge. Sounds like a shit club, but is actually cafe/restaurant bar amalgamation that serves it’s community wonderfully.

Mr Damp Sock himself joined me to try it out, sadly we went during a menu change period, thus a few items weren’t available. Damp Sock and I are trying to get our food podcast off the ground so we came back after eating and recorded ourselves talking about Vivid Lounge, here is part of that conversation transcribed:

Felix: I think the first thing is, when you look at the menu, you expect Thai food, and you realise they do breakfast.

Damp Sock (aka Joe): Yeah I know, and not Thai breakfast either.

F: Do you know what Thai breakfast is?

J: Ummm…

F: Because you’ve been to that part of the world haven’t you?

J: I have been to that part of the world, but I just ate noodles for breakfast. I don’t know that if that’s just because I was trying to get into the culture, or maybe it was just… it was just me. I feel like they have a kind of continental breakfast, where the bread’s kind of a little bit sweet.

F: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

J: And they have like… not cheese, but… lots of fruit actually.

F: Hmmm.

J: …and sweet bread.

F: Mmm hmm.

J: …and strange butter.

F: Is that for westerners or is it something they eat?

J: Erm… I would say, no, I would say a lot of people eat like fruit.

F: Either way, Vivid is trying to do a very Anglican breakfast. They have a big breakfast menu. Maybe it’s a financial thing. They don’t get much lunch trade. Dinner is popular. It’s a bar. But they need to do the breakfast thing.

J: The breakfast thing — it looked good. It’s strange having the breakfast menu next to a bunch of curries and Thai dishes.

F: It was a good menu.

RIP AA Gill.

RIP the Old Student’s Union.

149A Great Ancoats St, Manchester M4 6DH

University of Manchester suffer second defeat

Written by Sam Cooper on 30th October 2017. Posted in Sport.

Following the disappointment of their 4-0 away loss at Newcastle last week, University of Manchester’s Mens 1st team were looking to bounce back with their first home tie of the season against Liverpool John Moores. The Armitage welcomed the players along with an overcast sky, but there was no threat of actual rain.

The game started as an even contest, both teams struggling to get maintain possession, with many long balls being played forward. The first effort of the game came from Manchester’s number 8 but he could only direct it over.

The majority of Manchester’s attacking threat was coming from the number 10 who was occupying the right flank. His pace was allowing him to get in behind the Liverpool fullback, and a good cross was causing them trouble.

Number 5 was also proving an attacking outlet for Manchester. First, his long-range effort was deflected for a corner and moments later he dragged another attempt wide of the left post.

After a spell of Manchester domination, Liverpool finished the first half strongly. Creating chances through their number four and number seven. But like Manchester, these openings were more half-chances than clear goalscoring opportunities.

The half time whistle blew at 0-0 with both sides reasonably content with what they had seen.

The second half was a different affair entirely. Liverpool started with an urgency that both teams were lacking in the first period and grew into the game as it went on. The goalkeeper was forced to make a great instinctive save after Liverpool’s number ten fired a shot goal bound. The close-range effort came from near to the penalty spot and the keeper did exceptionally well to push it wide.

Manchester were finding it increasingly difficult to maintain possession as Liverpool picked up their pressing efforts. The away side were forcing Manchester into giving away the ball easily whether that was through misplaced passes on the ground or overly ambitious long ball attempts.

Liverpool’s pressure and overall second half performance were rewarded in the 70th minute as they got the game’s only goal. Their number 8 turned in the penalty box and fired his effort low into the bottom right corner. The speed of the ball from such a close proximity meant the keeper had no chance of keeping it out. The away side took the lead and you have to say it was deserved for their second-half performance.

With time running out, Liverpool marshalled the game well. Slowing down play and making it difficult for Manchester to gain any momentum in their quest for an equaliser. The travelling team saw out the final stages of the match to take three points back to Merseyside.

It was a disappointing defeat for Manchester as they find themselves bottom of the Northern 1A table. They look to bounce back on Wednesday with an away trip to Liverpool Hope.

Men need an alternative to the toxic men’s rights movement

Written by Sam Glover on 30th October 2017. Posted in Opinion.

Why is it that every advocate of so-called ‘men’s rights’ is a person with odious views who says odious things? The issues being talked about don’t seem to naturally lend themselves to people with odious views: reducing stigma around male mental health, helping boys who are struggling in school, helping men who have suffered sexual abuse, and so on.

But it might as well be one of those glib adages like Godwin’s Law or Poe’s Law, maybe something like this: every man who purports to be interested in tackling the difficulties that men face as a result of how society thinks about gender will inevitably turn out to believe and say vile things about women.

It’s odd because the reverse isn’t true at all. Women who campaign on improving women’s rights and almost always thoughtful and empathetic. The trope about radical feminists hating men has never had borne relation to reality.

It’s slightly depressing though because a movement to think about the way that society thinks about gender and how it negatively affects men could be a really helpful one. In fact, a lot of the claims that ‘Men’s Rights Activists’ make are true and important: there is a mental health crisis among men that is largely a result of the widespread belief that men should be stoic and indomitable.

Working class boys are facing an uphill battle to do well in school, and that’s partially as a result of the way that the education system isn’t designed with their interests in mind. Men who are sexually abused do find it difficult to speak out, especially if they were abused by a woman.

But when these messages are delivered from behind an anonymous Twitter handle — that also tweets about conspiracies to poison the water supply with oestrogen as part of a plot to feminise men — they lose the force that they ought to have.

If you stumble onto a men’s rights forum online, you would be forgiven for coming away with the impression that the greatest threats to the well-being of men in the 21st Century are government initiatives to end the gender pay gap. Articles are posted with titles like ‘the gender pay gap is the most outrageous lie of the modern era’, and ‘when accounting for the choices that men and women make, women actually earn more than men for the same work’.

These articles are filled with bogus arithmetic and statistical legerdemain that, if you aren’t neurotic and vigilant about the misuse of statistics — as most of us aren’t —, you are likely to be taken in by.

Whether or not the claims made by Men’s Rights Activists about the gender pay gap are true (they aren’t), the important takeaway from these online message boards is that the people claiming to care about improving the wellbeing of men who are suffering actually aren’t interested in that at all. What they are interested in is beating down feminists and working against the rights of women, rather than promoting the interests of men.

So, I feel as though I have a duty to call upon men who don’t have odious views or do odious things to denounce the vile ‘Men’s rights movement’ and start a decent alternative. There are plenty of young men who take to online message boards to say horrible things about the women they know — as well as women they’ve never met.

Where does this anger all come from? I think it’s mainly a result of a lot of young men who are anxious about their future, who are feeling that protections are being afforded to other groups — women, ethnic minorities, transgender people, etc. — that aren’t being afforded to them.

For the most part, the vile things that they say aren’t a result of hatred, but of fear and insecurity. An alternative movement that really focused on addressing the causes of that insecurity would be useful both in helping alienated young men with their problems and reducing the appeal of extremist anti-women rhetoric.

There are some groups that are already doing valuable work in addressing the issues that men have without being bundled up with a load of bile. CALM, the campaign against living miserably, has done loads of excellent work on helping men suffering from mental illness, and of reducing the stigma for men with mental health problems.

There are also feminist groups who try and explore how the patriarchy can be detrimental to men as well as women. But I think that there’s still a lack of a real movement that is run by men, for men, to help address social issues that affect men without making women the enemy and resorting to lazy caricatures of every feminist as a pimpled, pink-haired virago.

Maybe if such a movement existed, the existing Men’s Rights Movement would shrivel up and poof out of existence like it ought to, but I won’t hold my breath.

Review: We Are Ian

Written by Georgia Carney on 30th October 2017. Posted in Theatre.

As you walk into the theatre, immediately you are bombarded with the sound of rave music combined with a flashing, neon: “We Are Ian”. Taking a seat, you are apprehensive of what is to come. 45 minutes later, dancing on the stage with your fellow audience members, it takes a moment to process the pure crazy genius that you have just encountered.

The three actresses, In Bed With My Brother’s Kat Cory, Dora Lynn, and Nora Alexander, begin the piece with a mad dance to classic bass beats, showcasing their stunning light up trainers, stopping only to listen to Ian. Represented by a glowing light bulb suspended from the ceiling, DJ Ian Taylor becomes an almost God-like figure, rhythmically pulsating with light as he speaks. His “followers” listen to his every word, as do the audience, captivated by this simple use of staging.

Following Ian’s stories, the three women take the audience on an oddly beautiful journey through the Manchester rave scene in the eyes of Ian. The best thing about this show is the way they make the audience feel involved, teaching us dance moves — specifically the hot potato and waterfall fingers —, giving us “drugs” (biscuits), hugging us, and just generally sharing the party with us.

However, there is a poignancy to the story as we begin to hear Ian cry, upset that the good times are over. Blaming Margaret Thatcher, we see video clips of her, merging with clips of workers and factories. In front of this, the three actresses continue their repetitive dance, over and over again, as the clips introduce Ronald Reagan before including images of Theresa May and Donald Trump, alluding to the idea that nothing changes politically.

All the while the women are dancing to the point of exhaustion, the audience have a genuine concern for them until they eventually collapse on the stage, physically unable to move.

The actresses have a beautiful dynamic, creating crazy, clownish characters, which an audience develops an amazing connection with. Their pure determination and energy are applaudable in themselves, without even commenting on the fantastic acting that is occurring. Cleverly choreographed, together they create a rapidly fluid piece, dragging the audience along with them.

In Bed with My Brother manage to fuse together dance with politics to create an immersive piece of theatre which highlights the lack of political change since its setting. At just 45 minutes long, this piece certainly leaves the audience begging for more.

Interview: Ian Hislop & Nick Newman

Written by Sophie Graci on 30th October 2017. Posted in Theatre.

Sophie Graci (SG): First of all, how’s it going? How was the West End run [of The Wipers Times]?

Nick Newman (NN): It exceeded our expectations. You know, you put this stuff out there and hope that people share your view that this is an interesting story. This time last year we were in a tiny little theatre outside Newbury called The Watermill, and it sold out there. You think ‘oh wow, two hundred people coming to it, that’s amazing’ and then a year later we’ve just done a week in Richmond which had eight hundred seats and that was sold out. So it’s really delighted us.

Ian Hislop (IH): It just keeps going. We thought ‘we’ve done the West End’ and the producer said ‘No, no, we’re going back out on tour, we’re going to do the big theatres.’ So we’ve been down to Cardiff and there’s Manchester and Newcastle and then Glasgow later on, so it’s quite ambitious, but it’s been fantastic so far.

NN: Our initial concern, because we were [in] such a small theatre initially was how would the set even look in a big proscenium arch theatre? Luckily almost all proscenium arch theatres are the same dimensions so you just move the wings out a little bit and there you are. It’s a challenge for the actors. We’ve gone from theatres where it’s all up and down so you’re playing to the gods and we’re now at Northern Stage, which is in Newcastle, and it’s wide. It’s a good challenge; it’s interesting how it all works in different places.

SG: Why did you decide to adapt The Wipers Times for the stage? Has it brought something to it that it didn’t have on film?

NN: We’d actually started writing it as a play before we did it as a film. We had spent so long trying to convince TV companies that this was a story worth telling and getting nowhere, so we thought ‘let’s try it as a play!’ It’s quite a theatrical story: a lot of their jokes are about music hall and characters in music halls. We were about a third of the way through [writing it as a play] when out of the blue we got a call from BBC 2 saying ‘we’re interested in this.’ So we wrote a film, but we always felt it was unfinished business.

IH: So what you’re seeing now is the result of having done a thing on the telly. People write to you once it’s been on and they tell you ‘we’ve got this, we know this story, have you looked into this?’ which meant we could put all that in the stage version. We could up the number of musical items because you can weave it into the change of scene and it makes it richer. We had a female director who basically said, ‘too many boys in it – can we have some girls now?’

SG: (laughs) Lovely!

IH: So we did what we were told! Which helped hugely actually.

NN: It broadened out the story.

IH: We found out a lot about the temperance movement and about alcohol, which is a big theme of The Wipers Times: booze really running the war, people at home trying to stop it, and our lot not being very keen on that!

NN: All those elements came in after the film, which is great [because] it made it much richer. Particularly the use of more musical numbers, because we what we’ve done is taken snatches of verse that they wrote and set them to music. They’re about silly things, about [the] company commander losing all his hair or ‘they say that love makes the world go round, it was rum that made the world go round for me last night.’ They’re little snatches of verse, but it’s using more of their words which we’re very keen to do.

SG: It seems almost like the BBC was an initial try out, and now [the play] has come back to the stage where it was intended to be.

IH: Film is very cool essentially; you don’t get a lot back from it. With theatre it changes every night, it changes from town to town. It’s the pleasure of seeing it live, you can go and sit in the back and watch the effect of what you’ve written, and then the effect of something you’ve changed, or you’ve seen it on another night and thought ‘that doesn’t work’ and put something better in.

SG: Or an actor tries something out.

IH: Absolutely, and it works, and you think ‘great!’

NN: One of the things that we really liked in the film was the noise, and the explosions and we achieved that in the film by an app where [the director] could set off different levels of bombs around the actors just to surprise them. Putting that in the theatre is fantastic. Our sound chap, Steve Mayo, has devised this amazing soundscape, which puts you in the action. Your seat shakes when these bombs go off. It makes the whole thing much more immersive.

IH: Nearly all the action is in dugouts, in small, enclosed spaces, in trenches. This is sort of built for the theatre really; you don’t need sweeping panoramas because no one saw any of that! Our lot saw the parapet and just three feet in front of them and that was the war. I think that comes over from putting it in a theatrical context.

SG: How did you come across the story?

NN: Ian came across it. He was working on a documentary about something incredibly boring…

IH: Thank you, Nick!

NN: He came back and said ‘have you ever heard of this?’ He showed me a copy and neither of us had heard of it at all. If you find something nobody’s heard of or forgotten you feel a bit excited that you’re onto something.

IH: It’s such a brilliant story I couldn’t believe no one else knew it. It’s so unlikely: they go into the ruins looking for salvage, there’s a fully working printer. The sergeant in their troop used to work on Fleet Street. They were both engineers – they weren’t journalists, they hadn’t written before – and they thought, ‘oh we’ll set up a satirical trench paper.’ It’s quite a strange thing to decide to do, and they were brilliant at it. We didn’t think ‘oh this is quite quaint’ or ‘this is amusing old-fashioned humour.’ This is rude, modern – I feel, in tone – and funny. I mean really funny, not pretend.

SG: I like [the paper’s unofficial catchphrase] ‘are we being as offensive as we might be?’

NN: It’s brilliant, and the high command didn’t get it! Our chaps fell on that with glee.

IH: They repeated it endlessly. It became their running joke – ‘Are we being offensive enough?’ ‘I don’t know, we should be more offensive. Let’s be more offensive.’

SG: Why do you think satire in particular appeals to people in politically trying times?

IH: I think firstly it’s a release mechanism. It is a sort of great British tradition in that we do tend to say ‘well, one way of fighting this is to laugh at it’ and it has traditionally been for our democracy a very effective way of keeping people honest, by fear of ridicule.

NN: You’ve got in Jeeves and Wooster stories the fascist Roderick Spode: it’s not the black shirts, it’s the black shorts. Men walking around in black shorts are silly.

IH: It was incredibly effective. People were scared of [Oswald] Mosley and then Wodehouse creates a movement of grown men wandering around in black shorts. It is that thing of refusing to be scared and humour allows you to display that. I think what appeals about the satirical response to things is that it’s a robust response.

NN: The spirit is the same today: how do we respond to Trump? We try to make fun of him.

IH: He hates it. Half his tweets are comments on how unfunny Saturday Night Live is. They must be so thrilled.

NN: Last year we did a Private Eye cover before the election saying ‘Vote Trump’ and we had this great picture of Trump just pointing at his head looking completely bonkers and saying ‘it’s a no-brainer.’ Trump saw that and re-tweeted it and sa[id] ‘British media get behind me.’ It was so pleasing that he just didn’t get the joke.

IH: He didn’t have a clue. We couldn’t have written it, it was just so good, and that gives you small amounts of pleasure ’cause you think, ‘well, alright, that’s a response.’

NN: There’s an irony there as well as given about how much Trump goes on about fake news and here is a bit complete fake news that he hasn’t spotted!

SG: You guys have known each other for a very long time, how do you keep a working relationship fresh and keep things bouncing off each other?

NN: I buy Ian flowers and chocolates… show him how much I love him.

IH: That really is fake news! (laughs)

NN: The writing projects where we’ve got three months to write a script don’t happen very often, so when it does happen we’re very pleased to do it. We’ve got a film that we’ve got to write coming up and I think we’re both really looking forward to it because we know now where it’s going to go and we’re very behind it.

On a weekly basis, we have, say, three writing sessions together a fortnight for Private Eye. That’s always good fun, ‘cause they’re not very intense. We spend a few hours churning out ideas. One of the great things about having known each other for so long [is] there’s no embarrassment or awkwardness if one or the other doesn’t think the idea’s working. You just say ‘I don’t think that works’ and we move on to the next one.

IH: Writing with someone is great in terms of not only sort of bouncing stuff off [each other] but also being able to edit very quickly by saying ‘That’s not very funny Nick.’

NN: We’re sort of editing each other all the time. I think makes it a slightly quicker process. You sort of feel if both of us like it now we think it’s probably ok and then if somebody else doesn’t like it they’re idiots obviously. (laughs)

IH: You’re not defending your patch as it were. If there are two of you you’ve gone into it and you’ve compromised and agreed already. I think that is very helpful.

NN: Writing’s bloody hard anyway, but because I draw cartoons thinking of a complete sort of little scenario, the punch line is what it’s all about. Whereas when you’re writing a script there are so many avenues you can go down, and that’s where it’s so it’s just great collaborating with somebody.

IH: Also because Nick’s a cartoonist he’s got a very strong idea of what it looks like, and I’m much more wordy. It means Nick can say ‘that’s very elegant and very well phrased, but quite dull,’ and that helps a lot.

SG: Do you have any advice for student writers, cartoonists, and satirists?

NN: Do it, really! That’s the only thing you can do is do something and send it off and get rejected. Don’t be hurt by the rejection because the best cartoonists in the world probably get a one in ten hit rate.

IH: On the journalistic front, I would really recommend the postgrad courses. They are fantastic for making contacts, and they’re very good on placements. Apart from that, just send stuff in. All editors pretend they’re not desperate, but they are!

NN: There’s a very classic Private Eye cartoon, which was attributed to Peter Cook, which is of somebody saying ‘I’m writing a book’ and the other person saying ‘Neither am I’ and that is the truth about most people who say they’re writers.

IH: If you actually do it, there’s no substitute!

The Wipers Times plays at The Opera House from October 31st-November 4th. Tickets can be purchased from here.

Live: The ‘Honey G’ Show

Written by Elizabeth Gibson on 30th October 2017. Posted in Music.

Manchester Academy 3

The 10th of October 2017

Before attending Honey G’s first ever headline show, I was curious about the demographic it would attract. During her time on X Factor, many of her fans were children who enjoyed her larger-than-life persona and knack for making rap classics lighter and sillier.

However, Honey has often declared herself to be a true urban artist more interested in creating straight rap than crossover material. I was therefore intrigued as to how she would balance humour for the kids’ entertainment and serious stuff for her own musical fulfilment.

The crowd turned out to be pretty diverse, with a range of ages and, yes, lots of families. We were kept waiting for Honey to arrive due to lengthy technical issues — forgivable, what with this being her first gig, but frustrating nonetheless. At last, the familiar figure bobbed onto the stage in her shiny tracksuit and shades, and plunged into “The Honey G Show”.

The hit did a good job of setting the night’s tone: energetic, rather odd, but undeniably enjoyable. The balance of fun songs and edgier ones felt about right, though there were a few moments that had parents gasping — one sudden vulgar line made even me choke on my drink. Still, fine-tuning her tone is something Honey has time to work on.

As the show progressed it became clear that the technical hitches were going nowhere. We frequently had to wait for backing tracks to kick in, or Honey would demand that a song is started fresh. She also dashed offstage twice for costume changes, progressing from a gold tracksuit to a blue tracksuit to a silver tracksuit. While this was a novelty, it might have been one better left for a future show, considering tonight’s had already suffered such disruption.

Fortunately, Honey G can work a crowd. She had the kids hollering along to her call-and-response, and was able to improvise without hesitation when things didn’t go to plan technically. She has a rare charisma and warmth. The image pushed by many X Factor viewers of some naïve fool with delusions of grandeur has been swiftly erased from my mind and, I imagine, many others’.

Whether or not her character is real, Anna Gilford is clearly a very smart lady who knows exactly what she is doing, and this gig showed she has an audience for it. I’m very curious to see what she will do next.

7/10

“Mixed heritage is a great asset” – Mabel at Neighbourhood Festival: Interview

Written by Jack Greeney on 30th October 2017. Posted in Music.

I clambered aboard a tour bus in early October to meet rising R&B star Mabel McVey before her show at Manchester’s Neighbourhood Festival. The singer is set to perform at Gorilla this evening, a date which comes right in the middle of a headline tour.

“It’s a different vibe right now,” she says of the festival, “there’s a really good energy, a cool lineup”. Whilst she’s here she’s making time to go see her friend Zak Abel perform, as well as Dan Caplin. It’s her first ever show in Manchester, somewhere she says she’s “really excited to be performing”.

Mabel, still very young, is racking up the play counts online: her biggest hit, ‘Finders Keepers’, an ephemeral, intensely catchy single about no-strings sex, is currently ranking 12 million plays on Spotify, and counting.

How much attention does she give to that kind of thing? “It’s motivating: it’s a good feeling, good feedback”, she says. But it’s clear too that they’re not everything, not overly useful. She’s keen to avoid complacency. “At the same time, it’s not good to just sit back and watch play counts, is it”.

So what of live performance? Mabel is an artist who has gradually grown into the performance side of things: it’s gone from her most nervous aspect of being a singer to her favourite, her most confident. She’s looking to continue that in good stride later today, at the intimate venue under the Manchester railway tracks.

So far on her tour, she’s been to Birmingham, London and Bristol — “all really fun” —, and she’s set to set to get through Paris and London again by the end of the next week. This all feels like it’s building up to the hotly anticipated release of her mixtape, Ivy to Roses, due to be released the week after. She’s clearly excited for that — and why shouldn’t she be? It’s an exciting time.

Another thing that fills her with enthusiasm is an album that’s in the works and out next year. She’s been back and forward between London and L.A. to produce it, whilst keeping herself in an “always-writing mentality”.

This is a person for whom moving around has been a constant theme throughout life, having grown up variously between Malaga, Stockholm, and London. I ask her what advantages this unique aspect about her has on her music. “Where you are is always great influence”, she says. “Mixed heritage is a great asset”.

Her one-place-then-the-next upbringing is not the only point of her childhood often brought up under interview. Mabel is also the daughter of a singer-songwriter, Neneh Cherry, and a record producer, Cameron McVey.

I ask her if a family well-esteemed in the music industry helped or hindered her in her own career: “both”, she definitively states. Obviously, music was always going to be apart of her life growing up. Her parents continued on and had her playing the piano from age 5. “Work and family are kept very separate,” she says of home, “but it’s good to have support from people who’ve been there”.

When she was younger, Mabel ran a Swedish style blog: after I mention this we talk about the importance of image. To Mabel, visuals are important — she’s “super visual” — but at the same time they’re just “another piece to the puzzle” that makes up the whole package.

Fashion is another form of expression to her: but not the most crucial aspect when it comes to music. What is, however, is storytelling. It’s definitely the strong point of her music: evocative lyrics that tie together to form a strong narrative.

That’s what she’s aiming for with her singles, her mixtapes, and her album. But it’s also what she’s here to do at the festival later this evening. For Mabel, storytelling is an essential part of music.

Mabel strikes as a figure whose rising ascendancy and status in the music industry is only set to continue in that same direction. In equal measure, this album in the works will be a hotly anticipated one if the singles, mixtapes and live performances continue on in the same pathway she looks to have forged for herself.

University of Manchester professor in ‘sexist’ twitter row

Written by Cameron Broome on 27th October 2017. Posted in News.

A University of Manchester professor has been accused of sexism after tweeting about waking up next to the University of Cambridge’s Students’ Union Women’s Officer.

The tweet has since been deleted but screenshots show that it was sent at 7:30PM on the 25th of October to Lola Olufemi by Robin Marshall, University of Manchester Professor of Physics and Biology.

It read: “Imagine what it must feel like to wake up in the morning and realise you are @CUSUWO [Lola Olufemi] OR worse waking up to realise you’re lying next to her.”

Lola Olufemi has recently led a call for the University of Cambridge English Literature department to “decolonise” its curriculum by introducing more non-white male authors and authors from the Global South to its reading lists.

The tweet caused a backlash on Twitter, with one user calling the professor “a sexist arse.”

But you couldn’t manage that. Indeed, sexual insult was the first thing you went for. Which rather suggests you are a sexist arse.
— Nearly Legal (@nearlylegal) October 25, 2017

In addition to the tweet sent out on the 25th of October, the professor has sent out other controversial tweets including one which read: “If you do not like facts and you are PC, LGBTIDK, vegan,flat earthist or whatever do not read this thread. Nor am I interested in yr thinks” followed by a threat in which he said “… please shut the fuck up. You really piss me off”, attacking “parents of Ch.”

https://twitter.com/TheProfRobin/status/890992603809927168

https://twitter.com/TheProfRobin/status/890993566545326081

https://twitter.com/TheProfRobin/status/890994430370619392

When asked for comment, the University of Manchester said “the academic in question has since made a full and unreserved public apology for the inappropriate comments and any offence caused.”

He also also liked several controversial tweets, one of which read, “White men see: something beautiful to cherish & protect. Muslim men see: something to hate, violate, & desecrate. Stand by our men.” alongside a photo of a male and female on a bike.

https://twitter.com/CarolynEmerick/status/913239831936946182

Some more controversial tweets that the Professor has liked include one which read: ” Has anyone ever seen Jews in Europe marching in the streets, demanding to force Jewish law? England wake up you have a serious problem” and another that said “The war against the Nazis was over in just a few years. We were smarter then.”

https://twitter.com/EngageTheRebels/status/893311852683427842?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthetab.com%2Fuk%2Fmanchester%2F2017%2F10%2F26%2Fexclusive-university-of-manchester-professor-comes-under-fire-for-sexist-tweet-30411

A University spokesman said: “The University of Manchester would like to make it clear that we have a zero tolerance approach to any form of bullying and harassment.

“We are aware of this issue and, after looking into it, found the comments were made by a former member of staff who holds Professor Emeritus status.”

Live: Loyle Carner

Written by Calum Pinder on 27th October 2017. Posted in Music.

Thursday the 12th of October

O2 Ritz

This year Benjamin Coyle-Larner a.k.a Loyle Carner put his first album out. After generating a significant fan-base from the few singles he released prior to Yesterday’s Gone he visited Manchester for a number of small shows. Now with a debut album and a Mercury nomination under his belt, he returns to Manchester to pack out the O2 Ritz.

Loyle Carner’s family-oriented brand of confessional hip-hop is reflected in the staging at the Ritz. A lamp illuminates the decks from where Carner’s longtime friend and producer Rebel Kleff provides the beats. An armchair sits off-centre next to a whiskey cabinet and potted plants are dotted around.

The effect that you’ve entered Loyle Carner’s London home seems at odds with the fifteen hundred yelling fans as Carner walks onstage. Nevertheless, as the show gets underway it’s hard not to feel a sense of familiarity with the grinning 23-year-old. His continuous bantering with the crowd and genuine warmth are infectious and are reciprocated by an attentive and eager crowd.

Loyle Carner works his way through the material from Yesterday’s Gone as Rebel Kleff lays down simple yet groove filled beats. There’s nothing too complicated about the production but that simplicity works well mixed with Carner’s intelligent lyricism and energetic delivery. In the absence of layers upon layers of instrumentation what remains is stripped back hip-hop that’s refreshing and fun.

If there’s any major issue with the show it’s the lack of material. With only one album to his name, Carner doesn’t have much variety in the tracks he plays. However, with stories and jokes woven between tracks it never becomes too noticeable and on ‘Damselfly’ Tom Misch’s rich backing vocals provide a welcome change of pace.

On ‘No Worries’, Rebel Kleff emerges from his corner to join Carner on stage. Although he doesn’t detract from the performance his flow is a little too similar to Loyle’s to make his rapping feel necessary. However, consistent with the album version Loyle Carner ends the track in fantastic fashion with a brilliant freestyle.

The show closes with Carner and Kleff jumping across the stage and the crowd singing along to ‘NO CD’. The two walk offstage and the crowd begins to filter out. It’s certain that Loyle Carner has celebrated great success this year and it’s easy to see he deserves it.

With his abundant supply of enthusiasm and energy, it is clear Carner won’t be showing any signs of slowing down. It will be exciting to see where the next year takes him. Hopefully, back up to Manchester.

7/10

Album: And So I Watch You From Afar – The Endless Shimmering

Written by Callum Lunn on 26th October 2017. Posted in Music.

Belfast-based band And So I Watch You From Afar have unfalteringly released a new album every two years since their debut, And So I Watch You From Afar, in 2009. During this time, their innovative instrumental blend of more intense, sweeping, post-rock and melodic, yet technically complex math-rock has granted them a sizeable cult following.

Distinctly lacking from this album are any vocals at all — while the band are primarily instrumental in nature, tracks such as ‘Redesigned a Million Times’ from 2015’s Heirs featured muffled, distorted vocals, using them as yet another layer to add to their incredibly complex, yet expertly crafted sound. This sound, however, is not gone. Replaced by their earlier style of complex guitar melodies interspersed with crunchy, powerful riffs, I don’t think anything is lost.

The band do a great job of building up tension on tracks like ‘Dying Giants’, the song slowly building up with increasing intensity until brilliantly timed breakdowns – almost like a cliff-hanger in a book or film, one has to keep on listening to see how it ends. They don’t drag on for too long, however, so it’s never quite stressful to listen.

The third track, ‘Terrors of Pleasure’, reminds me very much of a Battles piece, the rapid muted guitar riffs, drum sections you can’t help but tap your feet to, and an altogether upbeat feel that communicates certain feelings completely without the need for any words. Similarly, on tracks like ‘Mullally’, it feels like the guitars are doing the talking, and voices would just muddy and hide some of the great guitar interplay between guitarists Rory Friers and Tony Wright.

A wholly enjoyable listening experience from start to finish, this album would serve as a great introduction to post-rock; though that is not to say it is simple. The varied feel of the tracks, ranging from the lighter, more upbeat opening track ‘Three Triangles’, to the darker, cinematic stylings on closing track ‘Chrysalism’, provide a brilliant show of what the band is capable of, without ever overwhelming the listener. This album has a huge amount of replay value; the complexity of the album means one can listen to this album several times, without feeling like one has.

All in all, And So I Watch You From Afar have once again do what they do best – catchy, upbeat, post-rock, and I would absolutely recommend this album to absolutely anyone.

9/10

Halloween Picks 2017

Written by Jamie McEvoy on 26th October 2017. Posted in Film.

This time of the year, it’s a great excuse to sit down and embrace the horror cinematic genre. Every year, studios release a new batch of terrifying, gory and spine-chilling movies to coincide with the festivities. This year sees the latest unnecessary sequel in the Saw series, and the Groundhog Day-esque Happy Death Day hitting the big screen.

However, online or on shop shelves, there is a whole world of ghoulish horror flicks for viewers to bite their nails, hide behind pillows, or laugh along to. Here is a selection of films outside the usual Halloween suspects such as Scream, Hocus Pocus and A Nightmare on Elm Street…

Rosemary’s Baby (1968)

Touted by many as not only one of the greatest horror films of all time, but one of the best films ever, Roman Polanski’s psychological horror is a true classic. Inspiration from Rosemary’s Baby can be found in a whole host of horrors since, a recent example being Darren Arronofsky’s Mother!

Mia Farrow and John Cassavetes play a married couple: Rosemary and Guy Woodhouse, who, after moving into a new New York City apartment, become friendly with an elderly couple next door, the Castavets. However, as John grows closer to their neighbours, Rosemary begins to suspect something sinister is afoot, especially after the Castavets discover she is with child.

A claustrophobic, suspenseful masterpiece by Polanski, Rosemary’s Baby is embroiled with themes of Satanism and paranoia. Devoid of jump scares, but brimming in slowly-brewing terror.

Donnie Darko (2001)

Donnie Darko is a science-fiction/drama in which Jake Gylenhaal’s eponymous teenager starts seeing apparitions of a man in a ghastly rabbit costume who calls himself ‘Frank’. Following a plane accident after which a jet engine falls through the Darko household into Donnie’s room, the adolescent begins to see more and more of Frank, who starts to weave a tale of time travel and apocalyptic destruction. The young protagonist believes Frank’s stories, yet his psychotherapist played by Katharine Ross puts Donnie’s hallucinations down to schizophrenia.

The film sees the influence of the monstrous Frank grab hold of Donnie’s conscience more and more, as those close to Donnie attempt to prevent him from going down the dark path the sinister rabbit appears to be luring him down. Mind-boggling yet still grounded enough to be dubbed ‘cult’, Donnie Darko is a dark tale of the troubles of youth and the incomprehensible paranormal.

Grave Encounters (2011)

Grave Encounters flew under the radar upon release – in fact, it was not released theatrically here in the UK. However, following viral interest — the trailer has amassed over 30 million views — the Canadian horror film was made available on various online streaming sites and was given a worldwide DVD release, in 2012.

Grave Encounters is a found footage film which provides video evidence why a famous, fictional ghost-hunting TV series was suddenly cancelled, and what happened to the cast. The crew, led by host Lance Preston, investigate a mental asylum, expecting the same farcical nonsense as with all their previous ventures. However, much to their horror and surprise, they realise their scepticism was perhaps misplaced, and that the ghoulish lies they were going to fabricate were perhaps dangerously true.

Despite belonging to a genre which has arguably died, thanks to the ever-returning Paranormal Activity series and the infuriating Blair Witch sequel, Grave Encounters is pleasantly terrifying, and spawned a weaker yet equally scary sequel.

Black Sheep (2006)

Shaun of the Dead meets its woolly Aardman counterpart in this hilarious New Zealand zom-com about carnivorous sheep. Lead character Henry, suffering from a phobia of sheep due to a childhood trauma, returns to his family farm in New Zealand, just in time for an outbreak of blood-thirsty, ovine monsters. A ridiculous romp which somehow is still more believable than B-movie monstrosities such as Sharknado (2013) or Dinocroc vs Supergator (2010), Black Sheep is a hidden gem which is will have you bleeting with laughter and terror.

The Babadook (2014)

Across the Tasman Sea, Black Sheep’s Aussie neighbours have created an absolute treat. Sweeping up awards in its home nation, as well as in New York and from Empire, this directorial debut from Jennifer Kent is haunting and terrifying. It is a tale about a widowed mother Amelia, and her six year old son Samuel, the former plagued by her child’s obsession with an imaginary monster called the Babadook. However, as Amelia struggles to dispel her son’s unearthly fantasy, a dark and malicious presence begins to terrorise the mother and son.

The Babadook is oppressively tense, and is a sheer nightmare of a film. As much a meditation on grief and depression as a monster movie, this Australian production is one of the most intelligent and powerful horrors of the 21st century, maybe even of all time. The bogeyman which Kent has conjured up here is bursting with originality and is viciously malignant, and the nursery rhyme-esque tale which plunges him into the characters’ lives will stay in your head way past the closing credits.

Is there life on Vase?

Written by Arthur Salisbury on 26th October 2017. Posted in Sport.

By the time I’d got home I was knackered. Heavy rain, heavy eyelids, and with heavy heart I hereby report West Didsbury & Chorlton’s run in the FA Vase is at an end. Out in the first round proper for the fourth time in five years, but who can blame them? After all, they were playing the world champions.

Supporters of West Auckland Town will be sighing in dreary recognition at that sentence. He couldn’t even go a paragraph without mentioning it. I’d enthusiastically told the famous West Auckland story to my girlfriend on the way to the match. It lost its sheen, for us both, the third time we overheard our fellow attendees regale each other with the ripping yarn they already knew. Well, I’m back in the league world now. So here it is:

Sir Thomas Lipton, of Lipton tea fame, was a jolly old Scottish Victorian entrepreneur, a sports enthusiast, and philanthropist who, in 1909, established the Sir Thomas Lipton Trophy. Representatives of Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and England were invited to take part. It’s unclear why West Auckland, then as now a small village team in County Durham, were invited to represent English football. A very tenuous legend has it that the club benefited from an initials-based mix-up and that Woolwich Arsenal were meant to have been sent. This is very probably not true but I’ll be damned if I’m leaving it out.

West Auckland went on to win the 1909 trophy, and two years later were invited back. In 1911 they beat Zürich in the semi-finals and in the final met Juventus. They took them to the cleaners, and, as 6-1 winners and two-time champions were allowed to keep the trophy, which they subsequently pawned. The trophy was returned to the club in 1960 after the village raised the funds, but it was nicked in 1994 and never recovered. In 2009, Juventus sent their under-20s to West Auckland and won 7-1, meaning that, in terms of head-to-head, Juventus are now as good as West Auckland.

To the present day and more pressing concerns with the FA Vase. What tremendous fun the FA Vase is. It’s my one opportunity to patronise clubs even smaller than mine. The Vase is better loved than the Trophy but it has a serious design flaw, and that is the dominance of Northern League clubs. Eight of the last nine finals have been won by a team from the Northern League, which is the strongest league at Step 5 (consensus is that the Essex Senior League is the weakest).

Still, West Didsbury would’ve fancied themselves in with a chance to reach the second round proper for the first time in their history. They beat AFC Blackpool and Stockport Town to get here and have had a very decent start to the season in the North West Counties Premier. But, I have to say, what a terrible game of football that was. Our brothers over the Atlantic might have mocked heartily our small-fry storm but it certainly made watching a bad football match more tedious than usual.

In fact, I remember nothing of the first half, nothing beyond the guilt and shame familiar to all supporters when they’ve brought someone along with them. It was not end-to-end stuff, nor was it fought in midfield. It wasn’t really fought anywhere. The ball was here and then there and then there, seemingly random movement with no pattern like the quantum movements of an electron. Nathan Fisher put West Auckland in front on 49 minutes, offside contentious but played to the whistle. Didsbury were a bit tireder and a bit smaller, and perhaps on a sunny day they could’ve made a match of it. But football is much harder in such conditions. The Vase is a great leveller; the rain is not.

Two goals in three minutes prematurely swelled the bar. A defeat to West Auckland Town, finalists at Wembley in 2012 and 2014, is nothing to be too disheartened about. Seasons come, seasons go, but the Northern League conundrum lives eternal.

DM17 Film Season: Frankenstein & Bride of Frankenstein

Written by Jamie McEvoy on 26th October 2017. Posted in Film.

In collaboration with the Manchester Gothic Festival, The Dancehouse hosted a double bill screening of 1931’s Frankenstein and 1935’s Bride of Frankenstein, both directed by English filmmaker James Whale, and starring the iconic Boris Karloff. The screening, held in the beautiful Dancehouse theatre, was preceded by a talk by Sir Christopher Frayling about the history of Mary Shelley’s timeless story. He also gave a brief overview of the evolution of the cinematic adaptations, from the 1910 Edison motion picture, to Kenneth Brannagh’s 1994 version.

A re-imagination of Shelley’s creation, Karloff’s monster in Frankenstein has shaped the way we see the character today. Dwight Frye’s hunchbacked lab assistant, Fritz, is the inspiration for minions and sidekicks across hundreds of novels and on-screen productions since, and Colin Clive as Henry Frankenstein arguably lays down the foundations for the generic mad professor trope which is a staple of so many science fiction and horror pieces.

It is this adaptation and modification of Shelley’s characters, along with the superbly handcrafted Gothic visuals, which makes Frankenstein arguably the most significant horror film ever made. The scale of the sets used for Frankenstein’s castle is astounding, with indisputable inspiration from Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927) in the young scientist’s laboratory.

The Bride of Frankenstein was Whale’s attempt at extending Shelley’s story, taking elements from a subplot in the original novel, and transforming it into an immediate sequel. Karloff returned to reprise his role, and Elsa Lanchester was enlisted to play yet another iconic role, albeit brief: the titular ‘Bride’.

A rare example of a sequel held in higher regard than its predecessor, Bride of Frankenstein (a title which, as pointed out by Frayling, suggests that the films’ distributors had the similar problem as many have, in confusing the scientist Frankenstein for the monster) gives Karloff’s monster much more screen time, and deservedly so. He cuts a tragic, alienated figure, whose only desire is to have a friend. The sinister Dr Pretorius, played in brilliant camp fashion by Ernest Thesiger, grants him this wish, in creating a bride for the monster.

To see these two films resurrected on the big screen at The Dancehouse was a true pleasure, in a surrounding not too dissimilar to that which would have hosted the original releases of both classics. Whale’s films have provided a multitude of iconic scenes and characters, from which images have resonated and have been paid homage to for nearly a century in the world of cinema.

Despite the vast array of remakes and reboots which have been emerged, and which will continue to be churned out (Javier Bardem will attempt to fill Karloff’s monstrous shoes in Universal’s upcoming adaptation), these 30s masterpieces are not only definitive Frankenstein, but definitive horror.

Sir Christopher Frayling’s Frankenstein – The First 200 Years is available now, and Universal Studios’ remake of the Bride of Frankenstein, starring Javier Bardem as the monster, will be released February 2019.

United Carabounce back after their loss at Huddersfield

Written by James Gill on 26th October 2017. Posted in Sport.

In the pre-match interview, United manager Jose Mourinho made it clear that his side wouldn’t come to this match with the same attitude as the one at the weekend. He will be hoping that the Red Devils can bounce back from the result and a win against struggling Swansea may be just what they need to rebuild spirits.

Unsurprisingly, Mourinho names a drastically changed side from the one that lost to Huddersfield. Romero replaces De Gea in goal. Darmian, Lindelof, Smaling and Blind make up the back four. Tuanzebe and Herrera sit just in front, with Lingard, McTominay and Martial creating a pace fuelled attacking midfield. Rashford starts instead of Lukaku.

Tame is the word to describe the opening couple of minutes. The only player who catches the eye is Rashford, sprinting to close down Swansea players. No one can question his attitude, always running himself into the ground, the same can’t be said of the rest of the team, though.

Any accusations that Paul Clement’s side weren’t compact enough in their loss at Leicester at the weekend will be quickly forgotten as Swansea get bodies behind the ball at a startling pace. Not only that but they are organised going forward.

A poor back pass almost give Swansea an opportunity to embarrass United again. If not for a cheeky flick by Romero they would have been in. As good as it looked he definitely shouldn’t be taking chances like that and defenders shouldn’t be putting him in that position.

With 15 minutes gone Swansea look the better side. They are having less of the ball but they make the most of it when they do, looking genuinely threatening. Lindelof’s demeanour reminds me of Pogba’s last season, a player who’s hefty price tag has affected their mentality. Every mistake he makes looks like a product of nervousness. The only solution to this is coaching and playing games but there aren’t a huge amount of these ‘irrelevant’ games.

United show how they can cut apart teams out of nothing. The ball is passed into Rashford who deftly flicks the balls through to Lingard with acres of space to run into. With only the keeper to beat he finesses the ball into the bottom right hand corner to make it 1-0. Even though they are now in the lead they still look lethargic.

Swansea came so close to levelling it up, but it is Daley Blind who almost scored the goal. The Dutchman completely misjudged his header and luckily for him the ball rolls just round the post.

Substitutions due to injury are never a good thing regardless of who you support. Swansea’s Martin Olsson chases a ball but a twang in his hamstring causes him to start hobbling, Kyle Naughton comes on to replace. At the same time, Rangel gets a yellow card for accumulation.

Former Hull City player Sam Clucas has a good opportunity to equalise just before the half time whistle blows. Like Lingard earlier he tries to pass it into the corner, but unlike Lingard earlier the shot goes just wide.

At half time Manchester United do not look any better than in the game against Benfica or Liverpool or Huddersfield. There is no excitement or passion — it’s like watching an England game. Most of the passes go sideways with players nervous to try any risky passing and if they have any doubt the ball goes straight back to Romero. At least Joe Hart isn’t in goal.

Swansea seem slightly surprised by the sudden energy United are playing with, resorting to cynical fouls. At the same time, Lukaku starts warming up on the sidelines, the game won’t get any easier when the substitutes comes on.

Darmian charges down the right hand side and whips in a beautiful cross. Lingard gets his head onto it and knocks it in for 2-0. When the ball comes to him it is by no means a certain goal, Lingard had a lot to do to get it on target let alone beat the keeper. Scoring three or four goals is vital in restoring confidence ahead of the game at against Spurs at the weekend.

This second goal seems to have brought back the Manchester United from the start of the season. They look utterly dominant holding possession for minutes at a time, exactly what Mourinho will want to take away from the game.

There is a double substitution for United as Rashford and Herrera come off for Lukaku and Matic. After a few games without a goal, Lukaku will be looking to get his name on the scoresheet once more.

It seems like this is just limiting the amount of goals they concede. For Swansea, who are racking up the yellow cards. They aren’t playing badly by any means, they are just getting outplayed in every area of the pitch.

The first United yellow card goes to Axel Tuanzebe. Jordan Ayew just beats the youngster to the ball and gets clattered into. A few minutes before he also missed an open goal from two yards. In his defence he wouldn’t have expected to get it but even if the goal was twice as high it would still have gone over.

Daley Blind gets a yellow card for a bad foul giving Swansea a free kick in a dangerous position. As the ball goes into the box there is an appeal for a penalty as a player seems to get pushed to the ground but the referee isn’t interested.

Good news for United fans as Luke Shaw gets a bit of play time in the last five minutes replacing Anthony Martial. Shaw was voted the best left back in a combined Liverpool and United eleven when the two teams met despite not playing a minute.

In the dying moments of the game my will to live is meeting the same fate. Neither team seems interested in touching the ball. One of the very last moments sees Swansea having a shot from point blank range but a reaction save from Romero keeps the clean sheet. I would take that initial statement back but my god that was painful to watch.

Mourinho will be happy as his side is coming away from Old Trafford with exactly what they needed, confidence. They will certainly need it as they face Tottenham at the weekend, a side that swept Liverpool away with a comfortable 4-1 win.

Weinstein’s last pillar

Written by Maddie Rodbert on 26th October 2017. Posted in Fashion & Beauty.

Unless you have been living under a rather large rock, you will recognise the name Harvey Weinstein that has dominated media reports in recent weeks. Weinstein is a big shot Hollywood film producer (Lord of the Rings, The King’s Speech, Pulp Fiction) who has recently come under fire for a long list of sexual assault claims from multiple women in various areas of the media. Weinstein’s success rests on quite a few pillars, in particular using the fashion industry to support him as well as launch his soon-to-be-ex wife’s brand, Marchesa.

Whilst the red carpet is frequently dominated by Marchesa outfits, Weinstein has also produced shows like Project Runway and has worked closely with Anna Wintour on various charity projects. But after the massive backlash against him, how has the fashion industry responded? And what will happen to the brand he helped create?

As of now, the answer seems pretty clear. Anna Wintour, Vogue’s editor in chief and director of publisher Condé Nast, made an official statement to Style only a week after the news broke in the New York Times: “Behaviour like this is appalling and unacceptable. I feel horrible about what these women have experienced and admire their bravery in coming forward…we all have a part to play in creating safe environments where everybody can be free to work without fear.”

Top fashion designer Tom Ford has also stood against Weinstein, despite the fact that it was Weinstein who produced Ford’s biographical film: “What Harvey has done is shocking, indefensible and disturbing on many levels.”

Models Cara Delevigne and Heidi Klum have both claimed they have been abused by him on various occasions, as well as Italian model Ambra Battilana Gutierrez who was the first to come forward with evidence against the producer.

However, the fashion industry has not been a united front. In a televised interview with the Daily Mail, Donna Karan claimed it is “how women are dressing” and “what they’re asking” by presenting themselves in a certain way that is the source of the problem. This statement drew a huge amount of backlash, to which she has responded that the quotes were taken out of context and hopes no one believes she thinks sexual harassment is excusable in any context, however it is still the source of much controversy.

However, the question remains: what will happen to Marchesa without his backing?

Georgina Chapman is the co-founder of the brand, which produces high-end dresses and outfits to celebrities, particularly for high-status events. Soon after the brand first launched over a decade ago, the New York Times published an article noting that Marchesa had “a short walk to the red carpet” in 2005, which was around the time Weinstein and Chapman began to date. Gossip claims that Weinstein showed his support for the brand by coercing the celebrities he worked with to wear the brand at events, which has since been proven true by those who wore the designs.

It doesn’t seem surprising, considering many of the actresses that wore the brand have also made claims against Weinstein, including the likes of Jennifer Lawrence and Gwyneth Paltrow. Despite Chapman announcing her split from Weinstein, the likelihood is people will not want to associate with the brand at all because of the connotations that come with it. The jewellery brand Helzberg has already backed out of a brand deal, while an anonymous retailer has predicted many stores will stop stocking Marchesa. Weinstein’s success was key to bridging the gap between the pillars of fashion and film, so it is unclear how well the brand will do now since the fall of his last pillar in the fashion industry.

The best shops in the Northern Quarter

Written by Sophie Walsh on 26th October 2017. Posted in Fashion & Beauty.

Winter is coming. That means one thing: white walkers new clothes. But where do you go if you want to avoid the usual high street garb and don’t want to run into a hearty overdraft? Manchester’s Northern Quarter — known for its lively bars and music venues that have housed world renowned DJ’s, a la mode cafes and restaurants, and of course its sea of vintage shops — is your best bet.

It hasn’t always been a mecca of the young and edgy though. At the beginning of the 18th century, Oldham Street was described as a ‘muddy lane’ surrounded by ‘wild hedgerows’ (not much has changed on a Friday night). At the dawn of the industrial revolution, however, the site slowly became urbanised and by the Victorian era the area was known for its markets and, most predominantly, its pet shops.

By my grandmother’s time, evening dances in jazz clubs (her favourite, Band on the Wall is still going) as well as shopping became the norm. It was after the regeneration of Manchester however in the 1990’s that the Northern Quarter as a distinct area came about, with low rents attracting alternative, independent shops. It has drawn in all categories of edgy young things: your northern ‘we have an indie band, it’s a bit like the arctic monkeys’ lads, buzz-cut techno enthusiasts, parker wearing Oasis wannabes, and of course students with that hoarse 30-a-day home counties rasp.

There is something for everybody as you shall learn as I run through the best shops that Manchester’s Northern Quarter has to offer.

Cow

This is the best place to go for those who want to get their hands on designer labels at a second-hand price (wear and tear expected). Find Ralph Lauren, Burberry and Dickies to name a few. What I most like about the shop is that items are hand-picked from across the country with a focus on current trends. This therefore offers an alternative to the high street that often in its bid to keep up with fast fashion produces low quality goods as well as the fact you run the risk of matching everyone else; with Cow you know the items are unique. The focus on trends also gets away from the usual mass of wavy shirts, windbreakers, and Levi 501’s you find in every other vintage shop, creating that generic ‘thrift shop’ look.

Affleck’s Palace

Not technically one shop, but rather a multi-storey market selling vintage and alternative clothing. It also boasts a fancy-dress shop, piercing parlour, tattoo studio, café, Barbour’s, poster shop, and many other stalls. I can particularly recommend Kustom Korner, a printing stall that will print anything you want (within reason) for a cheap price, on a wide range of t-shirts, tote bags etc. Affleck’s is ideal for fresher’s who after the first month of uni want to ‘fallow-up’ their look, a re-invention if you will, so that come Christmas break friends from home can gasp at the new and alternative you. Walk in wearing skinny-jeans and Stan Smiths and strut out to ‘Smells like teen spirit’ in loose fit cords and 80’s Docs.

Vintage Kilo sale

Recently, there has been an emergence of pop-up shops selling vintage garments for £15 a kilo of clothing. It is a bit like finding a needle in a haystack. Some of it is cr*p let’s be honest, but you can find some real gems and most of the fun is to be had in rummaging through the heaps. Keep your eyes peeled on Facebook as there are always postings of new kilo events going on around the city, particularly in the Northern Quarter.

Carhartt WIP

Okay. I’m going to hedge a bet. You only go on ticketed nights out, if it hasn’t got a bar code it’s not worth it. Your tinder bio reads ‘London/Manchester. Techno and chill?’. 95 per cent chance you own a skateboard, struggle to ride it, but looks damn good tucked under an arm around campus. Your Instagram only features film camera images. You dabbled in DJ’ing second year. Caps or nothing. If you fit the description, you will definitely splash out on a Carhartt anorak for £220. I don’t blame you, they sell some good quality stuff. Where else would you get that bum bag from you will wear cross body ‘ironically’?

Alfred E Mutter Ltd

I have to give this a cheeky mention. In the nineteenth century, my grandfather x2 came over from Germany following the Franco-Prussian war to make a new start in England. Arriving in Manchester, he established a jewellers shop on Thomas Street along with his son Alfred. It is one of the oldest shops to survive in the Northern Quarter and is still run by a branch of the family today. This is what makes the Northern Quarter so unique, the variation of businesses, from the old to the new, all sharing the same space.

Review: Geostorm

Written by James Gill on 26th October 2017. Posted in Film.

Geostorm is an abomination. It’s almost as if the ageing and out of touch head of a cable television channel such as Syfy or 5* became tired watching young talent after young talent get their scripts green lit. Deciding he could do better, he takes a week holiday to ‘let the creative juices flow’. When finished he is blinded by illusions of grandeur, thinking his script is far too good for television. He then abuses his position and friends within the industry and gets this mess of a movie made. That overzealous executive is Dean Devlin.

Dean Devlin, previously involved in such award nominated works such as 1998’s Godzilla and 2016’s Independence Day: Resurgence. Those nominations were in fact for Golden Raspberry’s and Geostorm can expect a clean sweep at the next year’s ceremony. Using his own production company, Electric Entertainment, Devlin managed to convince Warner Bros. and Skydance to both come onboard, a ruse that will surely rock both to their core. I fail to grasp how anyone at those respected companies could sit through the final cut of this film and sign off.

There was a big, red warning sign for those involved to pull the plug in the form of abysmal test screenings, but rather than cut their losses they chose to reshoot certain portions in an attempt to improve. That’s why Gerard Buttler suddenly loses his bulging muscles, only to regain them in the next scene, flip flopping as the film progresses. Despite these reshoots, there were still several baffling scenes, for example when a business man in Dubai breathes a huge sigh of relief that a tsunami didn’t cause the Burj Khalifa to collapse, only for the camera to cut back and show the towering building on a 45 degree angle.

What I find most astonishing though is the ludicrous $120 million budget, given the fact that this is essentially four episodes of a low quality tv show masquerading itself as a high quality tv show with one famous actor and some poor CGI. Judging by the shoddiness of those computerised images, Butler must have commanded a large percentage of the budget. It is evident from the start that he only came to set to collect the pay check and go home. To say that he phoned it in would frankly be an insult to all those that do phone it in like Al Pacino in almost everything this last decade.

In the pre-production period it seems the answer to any potential shooting issues or concerns was ‘let’s just green screen it’. Even scenes that take place on Earth outside of a courthouse were green screened, because directing more than three people at once was too overwhelming for Devlin. The only scenes that didn’t look fake were inside the kitchen of our protagonist Jake Lawson (Gerard Butler), but even then upon a second viewing I’m quite sure I’d find something out of place.

With global warming bringing catastrophic weather events all over the world killing millions, Lawson leads 18 nations to create ‘Dutch Boy’, a net of satellites covering the Earth to control the weather by changing pressure, temperature etc. From here it’s just crossing off the boxes in your generic disaster action movie bingo card. Blatantly obvious bad guy? Check. Countdown to end of the world? Check. Copy and paste soundtrack? Check.

The only thing that’s missing is the disaster. Cinema goers who chose to go see this movie to see colossal destruction have been sold a false bill of goods. Geostorm doesn’t have a geostorm. Instead we get teased with some ironic weather events such as a heatwave in Moscow or a tsunami in Dubai. The whole appeal of a film like this or 2012 is not for good acting or plot but for damage on a worldwide scale. Without that, well, what’s the point?

Another look at the Balfour Declaration

Written by Lawrence Rosenberg on 26th October 2017. Posted in Opinion.

Our university has come under criticism over the decision to host a ceremony, organised by Manchester’s Jewish community, commemorating the controversial Balfour Declaration. Some students have called this private event ‘totally disrespectful’ to Palestinian students — while others have gone so far as to describe it as a ‘celebration’ of human suffering.

In November 1917, one century ago, Lord Arthur Balfour penned a letter to a leader of Britain’s Jewish community, pledging that the British government would support a ‘National Home’ for the Jewish people in the former Ottoman province of Palestine.

At the time, Europe’s Jewish community was persecuted: socially isolated and living in dire material and political circumstances.

Support for a so-called ‘Jewish National Home’ was applauded by European Jewry as an unprecedented humanitarian gesture — it promised a safe refuge in the historic homeland of the Jews, where Jewish people could be free to express their culture and practice their religious beliefs, without fear or repercussion.

Yet to opponents of next month’s event, Balfour’s declaration was the beginning of a process that should never have begun. To them, the Balfour declaration was a product of imperialism which directly caused decades of Palestinian suffering. In essence, without the creation of a Jewish National Home — the State of Israel — there would be no Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Commemorating the Balfour Declaration is not about celebrating the imperialism of the previous century. The original Balfour Declaration, and the ultimate creation of a refuge the Jewish people in the wake of the Holocaust, never aimed to inflict suffering. It was created to stop suffering. It was created to put an end to nearly two millennia of Jewish persecution.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a tragedy. Palestinians have undoubtedly suffered. Israelis have also suffered. But to end this conflict, both sides must learn to live with one another — and understand each other’s narratives. It is futile to look back at the past — or even try to reverse history.

The Balfour Declaration — for all that it was — happened. Israelis now have a state – and it’s now time for Palestinians to have theirs too.

But this isn’t going to happen by protesting a private ceremony. The only way to peace is for both sides to recognise the other side’s existence; for both sides to sit down together, and to see how we can finally end suffering for all.

The new MASH Mobile

Written by Kirstie O'Mahony on 26th October 2017. Posted in Features.

The streets around Piccadilly station during the day are bustling with business people, football fans, and people dragging suitcases. Come nightfall however, you’re more likely to find people selling sex.

Manchester’s streets are cold pretty much all year round, and when your job entails you patrolling the pavement for hours on end, in can become insufferable. Many women in the industry live in poverty, and may not be able to afford to restock their condoms mid-shift, or to buy some food when they get hungry.

This is where Manchester Action on Street Health (MASH) comes in. Since 1991 they’ve been providing support to women in Manchester who work in the sex industry. At that time their services provided women with “condoms and clean injecting equipment together with advice and information and referrals into other services.” They “operated in the heart of the beat and late at night.”

This much is still true, but in 2010 they opened their drop-in centre on Fairfield Street, right in the middle of Manchester’s busiest area for sex work. Helen Clayton, MASH’s Fundraising and Marketing Coordinator, told me that “it’s a fully holistic support service; women can come in and get support with whatever their needs are right there and then so be that housing, if they need help with an addiction or mental health issues, or if they need to talk to someone about debts, or they’re being coerced by somebody, or they just want to come in for a brew or something to eat and drink in a safe space.”

However, the area in which it resides is changing rapidly, in a way that Helen fears will push lots of the women away.

“[The area around Fairfield Street] is becoming much more gentrified… the women are dispersing.” Helen has told me in the past that new, more expensive flats and businesses in the area, and the redevelopment of the Mayfield depo, might intimidate the women and make them less likely to want to work there.

Also, at the moment the businesses in the area around the drop-in are ones that usually shut at around five or six, but there are plans underway for lots more restaurants to open up, which will mean people will be in the area until much later at night, further discouraging the women MASH work with from doing business there.

Caroline Leavy, MASH’s Homelessness and Outreach worker, told me that other factors have contributed to women in Manchester doing sex work further afield. She explained that after the tent camps erupted in Mancehster and homelessness reached epic proportions in the city, many sex workers started to mingle with them and then start begging themselves. Given that there are more people in the city centre to give them change, this will have contributed to women moving farther and farther away from Fairfield Street.

This spurred the introduction of the MASH Mobile Drop-In. What used to be tea served out the back of a red van is now a new and comfortable camper van with an oven, electric stove, and a comfortable sofa seating area for women to relax in if they’re ever in need of a “safe space.”

I chatted to Helen and Caroline inside the van itself, which was brand new and had a gorgeous interior. It was extremely homely, made more so by the hot chocolate I was offered (and graciously accepted).

Whilst I was there, two women actually came by (Helen told me later that they were expecting a busy night). They were more than happy to meet with me and chat to me about the service, but preferred to remain unnamed. The second woman I met got a hot chocolate, some condoms, and a rape alarm. Caroline double-checked to see if the torch was working on it, and the woman thanked her, adding “you really need it when you’re in the bushes.”

Photo: Kirstie O’Mahony

I asked her what she thought of the new MASH Mobile (pronounced in my mind similarly to the BatMobile) and she gushed at how comfortable it was. She went on to say that other sex workers she knows describe it as “a god-send”, and that it’s nice to know there’s someone “floating about” that’s there for you when you need them.

It’s not just English women that MASH come into contact with though: “the other reason why we think [the MASH Mobile] will make a big difference is that we’ve seen a big increase in the proportion of Eastern European women [that are sex working in Manchester]. They’re much more difficult for us to reach because there’s a cultural and language barrier.”

In order to tackle that barrier they now have an interpreter who travels with them on the MASH Mobile. They rise in Eastern European women sex working in Manchester has been reported on extensively by the Manchester Evening News, who found that often they work in pop-up brothels all over the city.

The demographics within the sex industry are many, and it might not surprise you that students are one of them. In 2015 an Liverpool University student wrote in The Tab of her experience as a student sex worker, first of all working for an agency whose manager once took her to practice shooting his AK47 in the woods, to opening her own online escorting business. It’s a tempting industry for those students who struggle daily to afford to study.

The Student Sex Worker Project found that 5 per cent of students they surveyed had partaken in some form of sex work. In 2016 the NUS conducted research that found that 67 per cent of student sex workers that responded went into the industry to cover living expenses (such as electricity bills and groceries) and 53 per cent did so in order to pay their rent.

I asked Helen what they can do to support Manchester-based students in the industry, and she pointed out that they don’t see many students on a day-to-day basis, either because “they don’t want to come to the area”, or because they simply don’t want to tell them that they’re a student.

She added that quite a lot of students would opt to do webcam or phone work rather than roam the streets at night, which would mean they’d be less likely to come to the drop-in for some of the usual services that other women may request. They wanted to make it abundantly clear however that their services stretch beyond street sex workers, and that if students need support “then we can go to them, and we don’t have to take this big van!”

Although, if you are a student sex worker, and you do want to ask MASH for support, I would highly recommend that you request they bring the van. It’s comfortable, safe, and most importantly, Caroline makes a mean hot chocolate. What more could you want?

Get to know: Who is Professor Duncan Ivison?

Disability and ethnicity pay gaps go up, gender goes ...

Manchester Leftist Action member speaks out against a...

Manchester’s continuing problem with inaccessib...

From Our Correspondent: Uncovering Berlin’s les...

Thread Therapy: In conversation with UoM’s Fash...

If Labour wants to regain trust, they must stick to t...

Main Library Musings – Rant column #2

My life has been failing the Bechdel test – and...

Why are you laughing: The science of humour

In conversation with The Lion King’s Head of Ma...

AI learns its first words (and helps explain how huma...

Fallowfield’s 18.35%: Why are students not voting?

“They decided they didn’t want a Nightline any longer...

Spot checks on international students attendance set ...

The new generation of F1 drivers: Wasted potential?

Tyrants cruise to playoff victory against Stirling Cl...

Memories of the game: A look back at favourite sporti...

Manchester Leftist Action member speaks out against academic suspension

Houseplant heaven: The best plants to brighten up your student home

Why is everybody obsessed with minimalism?

How to have a routine when you have so few contact hours

Brunch at Santé: A slice of sun

Giving ‘Too Good To Go’ a go!

Cooking a week of TikTok recipes on a student budget

Springleaf Podcast: James Acaster’s new audio adventure

My year abroad, the visa process, and getting lost in translation

Getting involved: Volunteering at the Booth Centre

Celebrity style guide #7: Lewis Hamilton

What the Croc? Pringles x Crocs and other crazy collabs

3D nails: Achieving new heights in beauty

Houseplant heaven: The best plants to brighten up your student home

Vampire Weekend: Indie experimenters push the boundar...

DIIV live in Manchester: Shoegaze stars promise enlig...

Khruangbin’s LP, A LA SALA: Slight shifts make all th...

The problem with publishing

Spotify vs Audible: The battle for audiobook dominance

Why I don’t regret buying a Kindle

40 Years of the Future: Painting abstract exhibition ...

Review: Please Feel Free to Ignore My Work by David H...

Making Manchester #1: Anna Marsden

Hedda review: A misguided imitation of Ibsen’s ...

My Beautiful Laundrette review: Nationalism, racial t...

Come From Away press launch: A community show for Chr...

Live Review: Caroline Polachek at Albert Hall

My formative film: A love letter to Notting Hill

SCALA!!! co-director Jane Giles on audiences, program...

Chungking Express: Intoxicating youthful cinema | UoM...

Taskmaster: Why it’s so good and where to begin

The fourth season curse: Why do TV shows get worse af...

Drive to Survive season 6: Get strapped in for more F...

Hades 2 is bringing sexyback

So, uh, who exactly is the Borderlands film for?

Celebrities just can’t rescue bad games

My formative film: A love letter to Notting Hill

Month: October 2017