Skip to main content

chrisglover
17th November 2017

EA temporarily disables all microtransactions in Battlefront II

Players can currently only progress with gameplay
Categories:
TLDR

In a surprising development, EA has temporarily removed microtransactions in Star Wars: Battlefront II, after days of tumultuous criticism from fans, and just hours before the game’s release.

“We hear you loud and clear, so we’re turning off all in-game purchases,” writes Oskar Gabrielson, general manager of Battlefront II in the second blog post on EA’s site in 3 days. “We will now spend more time listening, adjusting, balancing and tuning.

“This means that the option to purchase crystals in the game is now offline, and all progression will be earned through gameplay. The ability to purchase crystals in-game will become available at a later date, only after we’ve made changes to the game. We’ll share more details as we work through this.”

Some players are excited by the ostensible victory for consumers over a microtransaction model which many criticised as exploitative. Before the change, it was possible to spend real currency on crystals, which could in turn be exchanged for loot boxes containing player bonuses such as reduced ability cool-downs and increased range. As these give paying players a tangible advantage over others, Battlefront II attracted widespread criticism for being a ‘pay-to-win’ experience.

However, not all are convinced by EA’s apparent token of good faith: many players have taken to Reddit to label the move as nothing more than PR manipulation. They argue that EA is simply endeavouring to turn public opinion in their favour for long enough to sell copies of the game, in a damage-limitation strategy Redditors are calling ‘outdating the outrage’.

It will be interesting to see whether EA will indeed return to an anti-consumer payment model after the hiatus, or if they will prove the cynics wrong by using the break to implement meaningful change.


More Coverage

So, uh, who exactly is the Borderlands film for?

Look, we all know that video game adaptations have had a rough history, but nobody really wanted this, right?

Celebrities just can’t rescue bad games

The failure of the Alone in the Dark remake proves that star power isn’t necessarily enough to resuscitate an already-dead game

Are we finally in the age of the video game ‘auteur’?

Originally a term created to apply to the film industry, the games industry has finally developed far enough to the point where we have multiple well-recognisable auteur figures in the mainstream – but is that all?

Killer obsession: Ranking the Dead by Daylight killers by dateability

Spending Valentine’s Day alone? Why not let yourself be wooed by Behaviour Interactive’s most eligible bachelors and bachelorettes, splattered affectingly in the blood of their victims?