Skip to main content

Month: July 2020

Students react as United return to Champions League in final day drama

Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s Manchester United beat Leicester City in a final day drama to secure third-place in the English Premier League below champions Liverpool and their city rivals. 

After a penalty from new Portuguese signing Bruno Fernandes, and a final-kick goal from substitute Jesse Lingard, United secured a place in the Champions League. The side missed out on a shot at European gold last season after finishing sixth. 

Following the final day results, we spoke to some of Manchester’s football fans and asked what these results might mean going into next season. 

Pulkit Bharadwaj, a third-year BAEcon student and Man City fan, said: “The end of the season only had one good thing, and that was the overturn of our Champions League ban. Liverpool were really efficient, and that makes them deserved winners. 

“City didn’t play badly but struggled to kill off matches like Liverpool. I’m expecting City to make some good signings due to Liverpool’s title win and have a good run in the Champions League – I can’t wait to watch.” 

Atharva, a Biotechnology student and Manchester United fan, added: “I’m happy we’ve beaten Chelsea to the top three, but I’ll be happier when we start challenging for the top tier trophies and not the Carabao Cup.

“The gap between first, second and third is slightly unsettling, but that’s something that can be attributed to Liverpool completely steamrolling. 

“I really hope we bridge the gap between City and Liverpool in terms of overall squad quality and depth, it’s become obvious that when we want to rotate we’re very limited in quality options, especially defensively.” 

In other football news: 

  • Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City put 5 goals past relegated Norwich City in David Silva’s final game for the side
  •  Kevin De Bruyne equalled Theirry Henry’s record for assists in a single EPL season
  • Chelsea secured fourth-place and the final Champions League spot after seeing off Wolves two goals to none
  • Aston Villa survived relegation after a Jack Grealish goal won them a draw at London Stadium
  • Watford’s loss to Arsenal made them the second team to go down
  • Bournemouth’s three-one win at Goodison Park was not enough for them to survive in the Premier League 
  • Championship winners Leeds United and the runners-up West Bromwich Albion will replace them
  • The final team to be promoted will be decided in a playoff at Wembley between the 3rd to 6th placed teams

The good news for neutral football fans and Mancunians is that there are now two Manchester teams playing on the biggest footballing stage in Europe. 

With Boris Johnson saying spectators can return to stadiums in October, 2020/21, this could be another thrilling season.

Ali G and Main Library to reopen today

The University of Manchester has begun to reopen libraries and study spaces after campus was shut down following the coronavirus outbreak.

Limited in-person services will be offered from today (July 27th) in a ‘pilot phase’ aimed primarily at postgraduates.

The University’s Main Library and the Alan Gilbert Learning Commons (AGLC) will be the first to open their doors with strict health and safety rules in place. 

There will be 30 bookable study spaces available on the first floor of the AGLC – prioritised for postgraduate students working on dissertations and coursework. 

Visitors will be required to wear a face-covering at all times while inside buildings, although this will not apply to those with medical conditions. The library team has stressed that face coverings “do not replace social distancing” and urged users to maintain a 2-metre distance from anybody outside of their support bubble. 

Photo: Georgina Davidson @ The Mancunion

Study slots are available on Monday, Wednesday and Friday lasting from 10 am to 2 pm, with students also able to return books to the Main Library at these times and pick up resources through it’s Click and Collect service. 

The Library has told students they should hold on to any loans if they are coming back in the new academic year. This is to avoid crowding and ensure services are delivered to those who need them most. 

A Library announcement read: “As lockdown restrictions ease, we’re working hard to safely reopen our library sites so [students] can access our physical collections and study spaces again.” 

Some members of the library’s shelving team returned to work last week to sort books that had been returned during the lockdown.

The Library has continued to provide digital services throughout the pandemic and is now looking at how it can scale up its services safely. 

For more information, visit the University of Manchester Library’s service availability page.

Manchester and murals: Cultural resilience in the wake of ‘catastrophe’

Culture is currently a hot topic of debate globally, with vast, ever evolving plans for “task forces” across Europe to defend a disastrous streak of closures, disruptions and economic deficit across the sector.

Amongst this effort, it cannot be denied that theatres, galleries, music venues and other defined cultural spaces in the UK have been off-limits for more than three months. In an open letter to the government, industry professionals have warned that if clear funding and guidelines are not given soon, the country could face “cultural catastrophe” of epic and previously unforeseen proportions.

Limitation in government activity has left these professionals in a difficult financial position, and forced them to fundraise to preserve their organisations. This will have a lasting and damaging effect on new and emergent creatives that no longer have spaces to showcase their work. 

Those in the arts believe the government’s response to the pandemic is tantamount to a man-made catastrophe: responding with sudden action but without clear and structured grounding. 

With every imaginable indoor space off-limits, there has had to be swift adaptation. 

Culture is wide-ranging. It’s dependant on time, place, production and perspective. In Manchester, the impact of cultural change has been tangible, but perhaps not in the ways you might expect. Streets, local parkland and outdoor spaces have formed a kind of semi-popular social haven and are the only way to meet friends while maintaining social distancing.

With every imaginable indoor space off-limits, there has been swift adaptation. Walking through the streets of The Northern Quarter recently, I found myself taking note of my surrounding more than ever, and what struck me was the quantity, quality and powerful realisation of the many murals.

It is no secret that Manchester’s Northern Quarter is populated by an abundant number of artworks, under various tags and often cannily commissioned. They bring a unique twist and a perceived artistic freedom to the space and can shed light on the most pressing and poignant testimonies of our time.

The central spot on Stevenson Square, previously adorned with the pop-culture faces of David Bowie and Game of Throne’s Arya Stark, has since seen a political rebirth. Popular Manchester muralist and French-born artist Akse P-19 was responsible for the most recent transformation into George Floyd – an image that is reflective of the dramatic impact and strong emotive response towards the ever-evolving Black Lives Matter movement. 

Other artworks across the square and side streets depict our city’s symbolic and steadfast assimilation with the “worker bee” – a logo and image of resilience. For all the symbolic and industrial Mancunian links, the bee is an inherent part of the ecosystem, symbolising something much more vital than manufacturing and industrious wealth.

It’s true that a bee has a hive and a home, but does it not have wings of freedom? A smattering of designs by mural artist Qubek (Russ Meehan) show their joy and vibrancy. Akin to that imagery and spirit, it seems hard to imagine a Manchester stripped of that inspiration, these framed cultural hotspots for creativity which once thrived and flourished; hopeful, creative and full of unbounded promise despite adversity.

The time to listen, learn and act has never been more vital, and it seems that an ultimatum to invest in artistic venture will soon be upon us. There are difficult decisions to make, but timing, ingenuity and progression are needed in a battle for resilience and the future of cultural endeavours. 

Perhaps our greatest challenge will be to our mindsets on culture worth and recognition, in whatever sense we can invest.

Black Lives Matter at UoM: What comes next?

Black Lives Matter is a movement that has sparked worldwide change and calls to action, influencing shifts across every company, institution, and sector. Though it started in Minneapolis, the movement’s implications are vast, and this is forcing many to reevaluate their stance towards dealing with racism, both covertly and systematically.

UK universities are no exception, and following the initial protests sparked by George Floyd’s death, the University of Manchester’s Vice President for Social Responsibility, Professor Nalin Thakkar, published a letter outlining the University’s response to the movement.

He wrote that the University has a role to play in “removing systemic inequities and speaking up for those without a voice,” and said, “we have acknowledged that there is more we can do, so we have started discussions with the Students’ Union about our next steps.”

In another statement, the University of Manchester insisted they were “not complacent” and wouldn’t accept discrimination in any form. They highlighted their ‘Report and Support’ system as a place where staff and students could raise issues.

But students have expressed disappointment at this response. Deidra Oppong Kyei, a final-year Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology student, wrote two letters to the University suggesting alternative ways to support the movement. These included making a donation to Black Lives Matter-related fund, making resources available that highlight and educate on racial inequality in the UK, and advertising BAME business schemes around campus.

Deidra called the University’s lack of engagement with these actions “heartbreaking”.

“I didn’t want to believe that the uni I loved and thought so highly of would be complicit. I thought if I told them what to do then it would be easy for them to do the right thing,” she said.

“It was really infuriating when instead of taking the opportunity to educate the 40000 students they have, the uni decided to remain neutral and release a disgusting and insulting statement. A uni that claims to be inclusive but I haven’t had a black lecturer or lab tech. For the president to refuse to make the resources available for free was really mind-boggling to me.

“The way the uni handled the situation has been extremely poor, insulting and hurtful. I’ve had people contact me both students and alumni that have been telling me about their own experiences of racism at the uni some from years ago showing that the uni hasn’t done anything to improve racial discrimination.”

Another student, who chose to stay anonymous, said that they felt a lot of the University’s response was “performative activism”.

“There is a huge pay gap between white [employees] and their respective BAME colleagues. Before the University even bother responding to BLM they should start treating their own BAME employees properly and address their own racism. Why doesn’t the university hire more BAME people?”

Speaking about ways the University could take action, another anonymous student said that they felt changes had to start with the admissions process.

“I’m graduating MPhys this year, and in four years I’ve not had a single black lecturer. In my year there was a handful of black students … when I look around the physics building it’s predominantly white. Their system of selecting who gets offered places at the university is not suitable for everyone.

“If black students are more likely to come from underprivileged schools than white students, then offers should be changed to reflect this. Entry requirements for physics at Manchester are insanely high. If you come from an underprivileged school it’s almost unattainable.

“A friend of mine told me about this scheme at the University of Birmingham called A2B, where depending on eligibility you can get the offer dropped by two grades.

“I think Manchester should look at something like this – and if they do already then I’d want to know why it isn’t publicised more? Because I haven’t heard of such a scheme.”

The University of Manchester currently offers a similar scheme called the Manchester Access Programme. But the scheme is aimed at widening local participation and only accepts students from Greater Manchester.

Speaking to The Mancunion last month about Black Lives Matter at UoM, Professor April McMahon, Vice President of Teaching, Learning and Students, said it was “a major concern” for the University.

McMahon said: “As a white person, I can’t feel that experience that our colleagues who are POC are feeling, but I can say I’ll stand alongside and I’ll commit to trying to make this a better University that takes those issues of equality even more seriously than we have.”

She said that she had met with the Students’ Union to discuss practical steps that could be taken, including looking at a more inclusive curriculum and assessment methods.

“That includes issues about decolonisation, for instance, but actually looking at a more inclusive mode of assessment is also about making sure that we look after students that have all kinds of protected characteristics,” she added.

“So yes this is about ethnicity, but it’s also about disability and it’s also about gender, and we must be really cautious that we are not prioritising students with some characteristics unconsciously over others. The more we can hear people’s stories and experiences and try and understand them, that’s just vital for us.”

Professor McMahon also said the University was working with community partners to try and tackle racism outside of campus.

“There’s a big piece of work going on with the Directorate of Student Experience to work consistently with Greater Manchester … that’s partly about policing and other services, it’s partly about resident’s groups.”

She also highlighted the University’s incident reporting system, Report and Support, which has come under fire recently for not recording racist incidents as separate from other types of harassment.

“When [Report and Support] was launched, it had a lot of national coverage for how good it was, how inclusive and how encouraging. I think, a couple of years down the track, lots of people have forgotten that we’ve got it, and we need to do a bit of revitalisation there, to say well we do have this system, is it still fit for purpose, is it working in the right kind of way, is everything as connected as it should be, are confident that action is always taken on the back of reports?

“These are exactly the things that we need to be looking at. Now, we may need to accelerate that because of the recent protests, but its work that is already underway.”

A spokesperson for the University of Manchester said they are “transparent” about the ethnicity pay gap at the university, and “are working with colleagues within the University to develop existing, and identify new, actions to close the pay gap.”

UoM plans Zoom pause after half a million meetings

Manchester University staff have been told to postpone non-essential online meetings and recharge their batteries after spending a combined 70 million minutes in Zoom calls over lockdown.

The University said employees should “take the opportunity to reduce their meeting commitments” for the next fortnight and use the time to learn something new and maintain wellbeing following a “challenging year”.

At least 500,000 Zoom meetings have taken place across the university since March, totalling over 70 million minutes. These figures are thought to include online meetings for all purposes such as virtual open days and student office hours.

In addition to the two-week ‘meeting light’ period, staff were granted an additional day of paid leave in recognition of their “exceptional efforts during these challenging times”.

The University said staff could use the additional time to watch ‘wellbeing lectures’ to unwind and launched ‘self-development’ platforms to help them “learn something new”.

The move is in line with a focus on increasing staff wellbeing as more staff work from home.

A post on the university’s staff system read: “We’d like to remind colleagues to take the opportunity to reduce their meetings commitments in the weeks beginning 27th of July and 3rd of August.

“In recognition of the exceptional efforts being made by our staff during these challenging times, an additional day of paid leave has been granted on Friday, 24th July.

“In the following two weeks, we are encouraging staff to postpone non-essential online meetings or calls that are planned during this time.

“We have a huge range of resources available if you’d like to maximise this time to learn something new, or maintain your wellbeing.”

Staff have been working from home since March, when face-to-face teaching was halted following the coronavirus outbreak.

It’s believed University and Students’ Union staff will continue working from home until the 1st of September with a phased return at the beginning of the academic year.

UoM VP: blended learning ‘totally’ worth £9250

The University has insisted that its shift to blended learning is “totally” worth the full tuition fee, as it gears up for a new approach following the coronavirus outbreak.  

In an exclusive interview with The Mancunion last month, April McMahon, Vice President for Teaching, Learning and Students, said that blended learning presented opportunities for a better learning experience than usual face-to-face teaching.

Blended learning combines online materials with traditional ‘place-based’ classroom methods. If the guidance allows, the University wants to get students into the classroom for tutorials in September. 

But as the need for social distancing renders even the largest of lecture halls out of bounds, all lectures will be delivered online.

When asked if the University could still justify charging full tuition fees, MacMahon said: “Totally. We’re following government guidance on this, we’re absolutely committed to this being a high-quality experience for students. 

“This is not an online product .. that we’re producing and selling, it’s something that is designed to be blended and have an on-campus component. 

“That’s what we’re working towards – to have that really vibrant, innovative mix of on-campus and online [learning].”

Danielle George, Associate Dean for Teaching and Learning, who is in charge of preparing the University for blended learning, added that blended learning would ensure students still got face to face engagement with tutors while having access to all the necessary resources. 

George said blended learning was not a “reduction in the provision” of teaching but in fact better than the current system. 

And McMahon went on to say that students who try online and blended options report a better learning experience.

She said: “We know we can do this in Manchester, we’ve got a great track record. And actually, although nobody wants a global pandemic – and we certainly don’t want the impact it’s having on our communities, and our staff and our students – it does give us an opportunity to really accelerate offering those blended options to more students.” 

She said blended learning could help with student confidence, and means some are more likely to ask questions and engage through video conferencing software. 

But students remain split on the shift, with some questioning the viability of the new system.

Reece Ritchie, a second-year economics and politics and politics student, told The Mancunion he wasn’t optimistic. 

He said: “I feel like blended learning in September is only going to hinder me in figuring out where the gaps in my knowledge lie from first year.” 

However, some students were feeling more positive.

Elle Delilah, a second-year English Literature and Drama student, said: “My course doesn’t [usually] give access to lecture podcasts, which we will now be having. 

“For me personally, I need time to listen and make notes and the speed [of] lectures often leaves me feeling quite defeated because I don’t have time to listen, understand and write.” 

During the interview, MacMahon and George were also asked whether smaller classroom sizes due to social distancing could lead to greater workloads for staff. 

MacMahon said decisions on staffing were made at faculty level, but that staff may have to take on extra work.  

She said: “Everybody’s concerned because we don’t know what exactly the situation is going to be for next year. 

“We know that there’s a lot of students who still want to come to Manchester but we don’t know if they’ll be able to come. 

“If those students come, then the money situation is better, and if the money situation is better we don’t need to worry about the staff because most of our funding that goes into teaching and learning comes directly from student fees. 

“We’re being honest and giving as much time as possible to staff for preparation … there may be a few cases where we might need to double up on some things. 

But MacMahon added that Manchester’s technology meant cohorts could be joined up both online and in classrooms as part of blended learning, potentially easing the burden on staff.

Naya Rivera brought so much ‘Glee’ to our lives

It is the news that we were expecting but dreading: after five days of searching, the body of actress and activist Naya Rivera has been found. She is the third ‘Glee’ cast-member to die in her thirties, following Cory Monteith’s overdose and Mark Salling’s suicide.

Rivera rented a boat with her four-year-old son, Josey, but hours later, Josey was found alone. Josey told authorities that after going swimming, his mother helped him on to the boat before disappearing beneath the water.

Lake Piru is known for its sudden whirlpools and undercurrents that not even somebody like Naya, a good swimmer who called Piru her “sanctuary”, could survive. It appears that Rivera had the chance to save herself or her son, and she of course chose to save her son. She sacrificed herself so that her child could live. She died a hero.

Rivera was a part of many of our childhoods. After starring as a child actress in shows such as ‘The Royal Family’, she had her breakthrough role as the icy Santana Lopez in Glee, a supporting character who was soon upgraded to a series regular due to her popularity with fans. She received numerous awards and nominations and critical acclaim for this role.

Santana is a teenage Latina coming to terms with her sexuality. Countless people were inspired by Rivera’s portrayal of Santana, and many have claimed that she “saved” them.

Rivera herself never labelled her sexuality, but she dedicated much of her life to fighting for the LGBTQIA+ community and other marginalised groups. I only ever watched a bit of Glee, but I loved Santana. Her cover of Fleetwood Mac’s ‘Songbird’ is one of the best covers I have ever heard. I love Fleetwood Mac, but I had never heard this song before. Rivera brought a vulnerability to it that was not as present in the original. In the show, she sang it to the girl she was in love with. Her performance was raw, emotional and cathartic.

Her best performance on Glee was arguably her cover of The Band Perry’s ‘If I Die Young,’ which she sang as a tribute for the late Cory Monteith (whose character, Finn, was killed off after his death). It is one of the most heart-wrenching scenes I have ever seen, in part because it was not just acting: Santana was mourning Finn, whilst Naya was mourning Cory.

The lyrics of the song are particularly chilling, with Rivera singing about dying young and asking people to ‘sink me in the river’. What’s more, Rivera’s body was found on the seventh anniversary of Monteith’s death. We can hope that the two of them, who were extremely close, have been reunited in another life, with Rivera watching her son grow into the beautiful young man she was raising him to be.

I also saw Rivera as Blanca in the criminally underrated Devious Maids, a show about Latina maids from the creator of Desperate Housewives. Whilst the show sounds like stereotypical tosh, it masterfully played with conventions and oozed Latina power. Rivera only starred in one season, and her character had an untimely death, but she was one of the most memorable characters of the series, simply because of Rivera’s brilliant portrayal.

She went on to star in the TV series Step Up, based on the ‘Step Up’ film series, where she sang a beautiful cover of ‘Amazing Grace’. The lyric ‘I once was lost, but now I am found’ is given a new meaning: at least now, her family have some closure and can grieve properly.

Rivera was incredibly beautiful, talented and kind-hearted, and she should have been gracing our screens for decades to come, the triple-threat that she was. She should have gone on to star in blockbusters and finally release an album. She should have watched her adorable son grow into a smart young man.

But we cannot dwell on what could have been. Instead, let’s celebrate the incredible life that she lived. Let’s think about how many souls she saved with her portrayal of a lesbian Latina and her championing of LGBTQIA+ rights. Let us watch her performance of Madonna’s ‘La Isla Bonita’ with the incredible Ricky Martin, a fellow Puerto Rican who she dreamed of working with. Let us pray for her family and her son. Let Josey know that his mother is a legend, and she was loved.

In ‘If I Die Young,’ Naya sang: ‘What I never did is done’. They say it’s not as hard to die when you know that you have lived, and whilst Naya had so much living and loving left in her – oh, how she lived.

Que en paz descanse, buerica. Te quiero.

The government needs to do more to eradicate medical prejudices against the LGBT+ community in the UK

Last month, I gave blood for the first time. I chose to do this since, in the midst of the Coronavirus pandemic, it seemed like a small thing that I could do to help people. June was also Pride Month, and the experience led me to thinking about the strict rules which still make giving blood extremely difficult for gay and bisexual men.

The ban on gay and bisexual men donating blood was originally put in place in response to the rise of HIV in the 1980s and has since been changed so that men can give blood if they have been abstinent from sex with other men for three months.  According to the NHS Give Blood website, this rule applies regardless of whether they are in a stable relationship or use condoms.

The website states that the reasoning behind this is that men who have sex with other men are at higher risk of passing on certain infections. However, all blood donations are thoroughly screened to test for infections, regardless of who they come from. When I went to donate, the only question about my sexual history I remember being asked is whether I had knowingly slept with a man who had slept with other men. This means that even if I had had unprotected sex with thirty random straight men the week before donating, I would still be allowed to give blood, whereas a man who has been in a monogamous relationship with another man for twenty years would not be able to donate if they had not been sexually abstinent for three months. Because of these archaic measures, many completely healthy people are prevented from giving blood and unnecessary lives are lost.

Steps to eradicate prejudice against gay and bisexual men when selecting those eligible to give blood are being made. In 2018, the UK government chose to shorten the period in which gay men have to be sexually abstinent before giving blood from twelve months to three months. Moreover, the UK’s leading gay rights charity Stonewall is campaigning for ‘individualised risk assessment’ so that gay and bisexual men are not automatically excluded from giving blood. A steering group FAIR (For the Assessment of Individualised Risk ) was created at the beginning of 2019 at the request of the Department of Health and Social Care to explore whether there is sufficient evidence to change the current blood donor selection policy to individualised risk assessment. This group includes representatives from the four UK blood services, LGBT+ groups, medical and scientific experts and patient and donor representatives, and despite delays due to the coronavirus pandemic, hopes to report its findings before the end of 2020. This is positive news for the LGBT+ community in their continuing fight for equality.

Conversion therapy is another example of the medical prejudices faced by the LGBT+ community. Conversion therapy is a means of treatment or psychotherapy which aims to change a person’s sexual orientation or suppress their gender identity. This practice is harmful and can be extremely damaging for those who endure it. All major UK therapy professional bodies and the NHS disagree with it on logical, ethical and moral grounds – however, is not illegal in the UK.

According to Stonewall’s 2015 unhealthy attitudes report, ten per cent of health and care staff have witnessed colleagues expressing the belief that lesbian, gay and bi people can be ‘cured’ of their sexual orientation. Additionally, a 2009 survey of over 1300 accredited mental health professionals found that more than 200 of them had offered some sort of conversion therapy, thus further highlighting the implicit homophobia which still exists in the medical world. In 2018, the UK government promised to ban this practice, calling it “abuse of the worst kind” – however, two years later, no progress has been made. A petition to end the practice has been signed by more than 100,000 individuals, highlighting the magnitude of people who want to make the practice illegal and also meaning that the issue will again have to be debated in parliament, which will hopefully be the push the government needs to fulfil their promise.

Three years ago, then-Prime Minister Theresa May vowed to demedicalise the process for changing gender stating that “being trans is not an illness and should not be treated as such”. Currently, transgender people are required to have two medical checks, be diagnosed with gender dysphoria and prove that they have lived in their chosen gender for two years in order to obtain a gender identity certificate. Subsequently, the government held a consultation regarding the reformation of the Gender Recognition Act. Over 100,000 people responded, and it is understood that people were overwhelmingly in favour of allowing trans people the right to declare their own identity in order to obtain a gender recognition certificate.

However, the government have since decided to scrap the results since they believe they were skewed by a large proportion of the votes being generated by trans rights groups. This is a devastating blow to the transgender community. Newly appointed chief executive of Stonewall Nancy Kelley told The Guardian: I don’t know if they government is stoking a culture war. But they’re certainly not reassuring the trans community that they will make positive steps and the trans community is incredibly stressed and worried.”

On the 1st of June 2020, Boris Johnson and many other MPs sent out tweets to commemorate the start of Pride Month and to celebrate the LGBT+ community. Although these were nice sentiments, they were also riddled with hypocrisy. Not only has the government not done enough to tackle medical prejudices against the LGBT+ community, the Prime Minister himself has been openly homophobic on a number of occasions, for example when he referred to gay people as “tank topped bum boys”.

Instead of posting meaningless gestures on social media, the government needs to focus on improving the lives of the millions of people who are part of the LGBT+ community in the UK.  Although we have come a long way from the legalisation of homosexuality in the UK in 1967, there is still so much more that needs to be done in order to completely eradicate prejudice in both the health care sector, and throughout all sectors of the UK.