Men of steel
By Ben Brown
What does TV’s newest policitcal outing have to tell us about power dressing, asks Ben Brown.
Having finished the first episode of Netflix’s new original series, House of Cards I have condensed my notes into two truths. Firstly, I am going to awkwardly crowbar a Usual Suspects reference into this article. It’s happening. And secondly, good tailoring will make you look like a country-maker.
There is an air of calculated understatement that pervades Netflix’s first foray into original programming, House of Cards. Beau Willimon’s dialogue is pithy, Eigil Bryld’s cinematography is clinical yet involving, and director David Fincher continues to find his way into my articles. Meanwhile, the master of understatement, Kevin Spacey returns to TV as the hardened veteran, Frank Underwood. In keeping with the theme of measured actions, Underwood’s wardrobe overwhelmingly communicates the idea that power is incompatible with the peppy Scout Sixteen brand of ‘fashion for the fashionable’.
graphics8.nytimes.comAs I delved into the world of Capitol Hill’s hardest hitters, it struck me how incongruous a dandy would be in this setting. Frank Underwood’s demeanour is ruthless and he has a wardrobe to match. Amongst the swathes of box-cut suits, Spacey’s tailoring is second to none. Offering just enough give, but aggressively. His use of colour is subtle, if present at all; blue and greys offset with stark white shirts constitute a wardrobe that is eminently versatile. One feels Frank Underwood could dress blindfolded and still look bombproof.
This quest for adaptable clothing prevails in the real world, where politicians do more than walk briskly down corridors and look stern. In his Vanity Fair style profile last year, Barak Obama stated, “I’m trying to pare down decisions. I don’t want to make decisions about what I’m eating or wearing. Because I have too many other decisions to make.” World leaders like Obama, Medvedev, or Boris Johnson look cool because they genuinely cannot spare the time to care. There is unequivocal ‘dopeness’ to a well-tailored navy suit and a strong pair of Allen Edmonds that secretes authority.
gq.comFinally, I would like to wrap this up the way I started it, with some truth. I still enjoy the peppy, Scout Sixteen ‘fashion for the fashionable’. As far as I’m concerned, lifestyle shots of tweed might as well be sartorial apotheosis. Secondly, House of Cards is a fantastic reunion between Spacey and Fincher and can be found on Netflix. Additionally, the show involves 100% less decapitation than Se7en the duo’s previous collaboration. So, you know, bonus. Lastly, if you want a job in the White House, the devil is in the sartorial details.
I guess I’m just trying to say, the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that a mediocre fit will get you a job in congress.
More Coverage
SS27 Copenhagen Fashion Week: Sheer beauty
As the Spring/Summer 2027 season kicks off in New York next week, the lesser known Copenhagen Fashion Week has a voice that deserves to be heard, although troubles with sustainability still prevail
Has Vinted lost its vintage?
The second-hand marketplace is now lots of people’s first choice for clothing, from your housemates to your mum. But over time, the platform has turned into a sea of re-sold fast fashion. Heidi Taylor asks a 19-year-old and a 71-year-old if that’s such a bad thing
Call it what it is: Jhumkas or vintage accessories?
The fashion industry’s ongoing erasure of Indian craftsmanship, as seen through the popularisation of the South Asian Jewellery staple: Jhumkas
Threads of Osmosis: bridging the gap between fashion and politics
Following Labrum’s A/W’26 Threads of Osmosis collection at London Fashion Week, we explore how fashion is being used as a medium for politics







