Skip to main content

charlie-spargo
24th March 2014

University prospectuses sub par says OFT

The Office of Fair Trading finds no evidence of non-competitive practices at universities, but says they urgently need to improve the quality of information that applicants receive.
Categories:
TLDR

The Office of Fair Trading has accused universities of failing to provide prospective students with enough information about their desired course, after a six-month investigation.

It has also warned that consumer protection laws may be being breached by universities hiking fees up in the middle of courses.

Chief Executive of the OFT Vivienne Dews said, “Our call for information has identified a number of issues which must be addressed if our universities are to deliver the best possible educational experience and the maximum benefit for the country.”

OFT’s report, published last week, highlighted that information such as income prospects, employment, and staff experience, was not sufficiently provided to prospective students.

It also recommended that the Competition and Markets Authority, the body that will in April succeed the OFT, launch a full inquiry into universities’ compliance with consumer law.

This comes alongside recent warnings that preventing a student from graduating due to library fines or similar debts are in breach of these laws.

The report comes after an investigation of how universities compete for applicants, and a proposal of a full examination of non-competitive practices between institutions, many of which charge the upper rate of £9,000 per year.

The OFT has “received no complaints or evidence” of price fixing or collusion, and stated that competition between universities was, overall, working well.

It also did not recommend a change to the rules that state prospective students may not apply to both Oxford and Cambridge, or to the limit of five universities on the UCAS application.

It did however, emphasise the need for transparent and accurate information from universities, to “persuade students to attend their course to secure funding.”

The OFT also raised concerns about “whether the regulatory system treats all higher education institutions in a fair and equitable manner.”

Christopher Snowdon, President of Universities UK, said it is “essential to ensure that we do not end up applying wholesale consumer protection rules to higher education in a way that undermines that [student-university] relationship.”


More Coverage

Get to know: Who is Professor Duncan Ivison?

Nancy Rothwell is stepping down – who exactly is her replacement?

Disability and ethnicity pay gaps go up, gender goes down: UoM’s 2023 pay gap analysis

The gender pay gap at the University is at its lowest since 2017. The pay gap in terms of religion, sexuality, disability, and ethnicity has also been reported on

Manchester Leftist Action member speaks out against academic suspension

A student involved with action group Manchester Leftist Action has spoken out against his suspension by the University

University round-up: Redundancies, Student Publication Association awards, and Cops off Campus

This edition’s university round-up looks at university job-cuts, national publication awards, and pro-palestine occupations