Skip to main content

21st November 2019

UoM’s China-backed institute denies propaganda role

There are more than 500 Confucius Institutes around the world, with each one ‘serving its community’ in a unique way
UoM’s China-backed institute denies propaganda role
Photo: The Mancunion

Manchester’s Confucius Institute (CI) sits just opposite University place, between the Manchester Museum and Alliance Business School.

The institute’s main aim is to promote Chinese language and culture, with the vast majority of its activities consisting of Mandarin courses and lessons open to university students and the wider public.

There are more than 500 Confucius Institutes around the world, with each one ‘serving its community’ in a unique way, but since 2018, some US universities have been shutting their CIs down due to concerns over national security.

In February 2018, FBI Director Christopher Wray raised concerns that Chinese students in advanced research programs were stealing sensitive information and intellectual property.

These concerns have crossed the Atlantic and been echoed by the Foreign Affairs select committee. Earlier this month it published a report which found “alarming evidence” of Chinese interference on UK campuses. It highlighted the role of Confucius Institute officials in confiscating papers that mentioned Taiwan at an academic conference.

The Manchester CI was formally launched in October 2006 and is the second ever to established in the UK. It is a partnership between the University of Manchester, the Office of Chinese Language Council (Hanban) and Beijing Normal University.

A Freedom of Information request revealed that the University provides around 60 per cent of CI’s funding, Hanban provides around 23 per cent, and the rest is generated through the Institute’s services.

Photo: The Mancunion

The Mancunion asked the director of Manchester CI, Dr Deljana Iossifova, as well as other experts, whether the University faces threats to its academic integrity and freedom of expression as a result of the China-backed institute.

Dr Deljana Iossifova said that the claims CIs are “propaganda outlets” are “unsubstantiated”, adding that the “the Confucius Institute has absolutely no power to influence academic research activities or student activities whatsoever”.

She also pointed out that similar institutions exist for other countries, an example being the British Council: “The British Council administers key researcher links– funding collaborations between UK universities and universities in developing countries.”

However, some foreign policy experts argue that the purpose of CIs are to advance China’s power by improving the perception of its image.

Dr Alexander Dulkalskis, who covered the US shutdowns for the Washington Post, told The Mancunion that: “It would be naive to think that CIs do not attempt to shift the narrative about China.”

Dr Dulkalskis added that CIs are meant to present “a positive and benign image of China to foreign audiences” and thatthe emphasis on culture and language is meant to be disarming”.

On the other side of the debate, Professor Peter Gries, Director of the China Institute in Manchester, said that the limited scope of the Institute’s responsibilities is a check. 

“To a certain extent, our CI is pressured to [promote China], but the way it’s avoided too much trouble is that our CI has focused largely on apolitical activities,” he said.

Professor Gries says that the concerns about CIs in Australia and the US may not apply to the local context: “The problem that other CIs have had is when they have been allowed to move into the research space, and for example, limited the topics that could be discussed.”

The Manchester’s CI’s scope is largely limited by the agreement made between the Confucius Institute Headquarters of China and the University of Manchester upon the Institute’s founding.

In the agreement, the scope of allowed activities is limited to teaching Chinese language, training Chinese language instructors, conducting language and cultural exchange activities, and other activities that are mutually authorised by the headquarters in China and the University.

The oversight of activities is typically conducted by the Institute’s three co-directors, two from the University of Manchester and one from Beijing Normal University. These directors typically change every two to three years, and they are also subject to scrutiny by their respective institutions.

Some say that there is prejudice behind Western suspicion and speculation around foreign influence. “[These concerns] are, in my interpretation, a sort of propaganda,” says Director Iossifova. “What is happening is a sort of protectionism that is being clearly propagated by politically right-leaning bodies.”

A University of Manchester spokesperson said: “The University recognises its Confucius Institute’s work in teaching Chinese language and culture, and the important exchanges and engagement with China that it facilitates.

The University is fully committed to academic freedom and impartiality.”

More Coverage

Dirty underwear, a broken boiler and £400 in cleaning fees: a laundry list of problems with Thornley Groves

From holes in the roof to melting oven trays, students tell us about their experience renting with Thornley Groves Fallowfield and how it’s impacted their wellbeing

What have your SU execs been up to this year?

The Mancunion investigates whether each member of the 2022/23 Exec Team has fulfilled the promises in their manifesto, whilst looking into the structure of democracy at our SU more widely

350 or 44: How many students are engaging in the rent strike?

UoM Rent Strike predict up to 350 students are engaging in organised action, whilst the University ‘anecdotally’ advise only 44 student have contact with Credit Control

Students still being fined for drug possession one year after UoM announces harm reduction approach

Over a year after the University of Manchester announced a shift from zero tolerance to harm reduction £3,300 has been collected in drug possession fines