Skip to main content

david-brierley
25th September 2014

The LGBT World and Religion—Friends or Foes?

David Brierley has written us a short piece on whether or not the LGBT community can coexist with religion without issue.
Categories:
TLDR

At the age of thirteen I recall being a die-hard atheist, dismissing thousands of years of religious belief in overly generalised statements. I’d like to say five years of maturation has quenched that somewhat.

I used to think that people who fell into the LGBT spectrum were, by birth, at odds with the mainstream religions of the world—that homophobia was a product of religious fundamentalism. And yet, I have met gay Christians and homophobic atheists.

But, we must accept that no matter the personal faiths of those we meet, the doctrine of many world religions—especially those of the Abrahamic faiths, have little good to say of LGBT people. I have known fundamentalist Christians who are accepting of minority sexual groups—but even they seemed constantly concerned for the wellbeing of those who fell outside the heteronormative majority. Is it therefore possible to balance an adherence to scripture and an acceptance of LGBT people?

I am not a religious person, and my study of the Abrahamic texts is biased at best, but I believe it is possible to balance these. It is entirely possible to be a devout person of faith, and a tolerant and open-minded person; to say the two are mutually exclusive is itself close-minded.

Fundamentalism and extremism are not the same thing—and the news reports of the actions of Islamic State should not be seen as anything but individuals twisting doctrine. I, for example, do not think you have to become close to hospitalization to have a good time—but I’m not going to go preaching about that because, quite simply, it doesn’t bother me.

This is the distinction between disagreement and intolerance. We are all fundamentalist about something. It could be as trivial as the best Pringle flavour, or as comprehensive as animal rights. Even if you believe something is ungodly, that doesn’t force you to be an enemy of its people, or treat them with disdain.

Similarly, just because someone has disagreed with something that defines you, doesn’t automatically make them your enemy. Intolerant attitudes towards a part of a human being, a part that makes up a tiny proportion of a multifaceted human being is wrong. Intolerant beliefs and hatred towards a person because they disagreed or act otherwise should never be seen as the same.


More Coverage

Main Library Musings – Rant column #3

Edition three of the Opinion section’s rant column, Main Library Musings, sees three emotional trajectories: a complaint about the weather, a love letter to a bacon barm, and an ode to the best study space in the Main Library

Navigating the Rwanda bill: Why student voices matter

The youth vote has a track record of opposition to stringent and dangerous immigration law. It must therefore be galvanised in opposition to the Rwanda bill, which is threatening the human rights of vulnerable people and presents the worst of executive dominance

If Labour wants to regain trust, they must stick to their reformist roots

While heeding the lessons of Tory failure and chaos, Keir Starmer must grasp the reins of a chaos-driven Parliament and lead it through the ideals of progress and reform

Main Library Musings – Rant column #2

Edition #2 of the Opinion section’s rant column. Fuelled by sweaty palms and jabbing fingers on our keyboards, we lament three issues facing students: the library, buses, and supermarkets