A protest was held last week at the University of Manchester to raise awareness of Israeli Apartheid Week.
The week-long series of events is aimed at co-ordinating the activities of BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions of Israel) societies across global universities.
In addition to the march, awareness of exactly how BDS works will be encouraged, in addition to a visit from Andrew Feinstein, a founding member of the African National Congress and anti-arms activist.
The protest centred on American machinery company, that has supplied the Israeli army with special equipment, designed to destroy Palestinian homes.
According to BDS, the University’s total investment currently stands at close to £482,400 – they also claim the University holds shares of over £2.3 million in Allianz, a drones supplier.
BDS have further claimed that the University has neglected its ‘Social Responsibility’ commitment, with research undertaken at the Graphene Institute reportedly linked to the arms industry.
The organisation has further highlighted that students may unaware of how their institution’s investments indirectly see the student body become complicit in ethically-questionable practices.
The University of Manchester’s BDS chair, Emilia Micunovic emphasised that students should understand exactly how their fees are used.
”As students, we do not want our tuition fees invested in war and apartheid, and we should have the right to a voice in our institutions’ investment and partnership policies.”
Ben Freeman, the President of Manchester Jewish Society, took a different angle on the week’s proceedings, arguing that an unhealthy discourse on Israeli policy could be encouraged.
“Israel Apartheid Week does nothing to promote healthy discussion on campus of the legitimate ways in which Israeli government policy can and should be criticised, but instead it perpetuates an echo chamber culture that breeds hateful and dogmatic prejudice against the worlds only Jewish state.”
A University of Manchester spokesperson said: “The investment manager reported back to the University that Caterpillar’s stance continues to be that it does not have the practical ability or the legal right to determine how its products are used after they are sold and that it does not have plans to boycott sales to any country that is not sanctioned by the international community.
“The investment manager discussed management’s approach to improving human rights, striving to be a leader in corporate responsibility and working towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.”