Skip to main content

wasimaskar
5th October 2018

Parody Nobel Prizes: this year’s Ig Nobel Prize winners

Wasim Askar celebrates the research of this year’s Ig Nobel award winners: human-cannibalism, fruit flies, road rage, rollercoasters, and voodoo dolls.
Categories: ,
TLDR
Parody Nobel Prizes: this year’s Ig Nobel Prize winners
Photo: Jeff.Dlouhy @ Flickr

The 28th Annual Ig Nobel Awards took place on the 13th of September at Harvard University, awarding achievements that make people laugh — and then think.

From treating kidney stones with rollercoasters to using human saliva to clean your kitchen countertop, awards are broad and hilarious. It’s organised by the scientific magazine, Annals of Improbable Research, and is co-sponsored by the Harvard-Radcliffe Society of Physics Students, and the Harvard-Radcliffe Science Fiction Association.

This year’s winners in the Medicine category were Marc Mitchell and David Wartinger. Their research was in rollercoaster rides that attempt to hasten the passage of kidney stones. Kidney stone treatment is a problem in almost all parts of the world. After going through the Big Thunder Mountain rollercoaster in Florida Disneyland, some people experienced the passing of painful renal calculi. The study was to find the relationship between riding rollercoasters and passing kidney stones — data was actually generated to support this study.

Like ‘proper’ scientists, Mitchell and Wartinger placed a pyelocalyceal model (a model of a human urethra and kidney system) in a backpack and took it on the rollercoaster with them. It delightfully showed the same results as reported by rollercoaster enthusiasts. The positions of the kidney stones were recorded and the renal calculi were adjusted after every ride during the 2008 amusement park season.

The Nutrition prize was won by James Cole. He calculated that the caloric intake from a human-cannibalism diet is significantly lower than the caloric intake in most other traditional meat diets. Human cannibalism has always been a rarely observed and researched activity due to the fact that there are relatively few Palaeolithic cannibalism fossil sites. According to Cole, the study indicated that “pre-Homo sapiens Pleistocene hominin social structures and interactions within, and between, groups may have been far more complex than currently estimated.”

We’ve all, at one point in time, attempted to use our own spit to clean a stain off our shirts. In that spirit, the Chemistry prize was won by Aula Romão, Adília Alarcão, and the late César Viana. They measured the degree to which human saliva is a good cleaning agent for dirty surfaces. This research also has other applications in our ability to distinguish between male and female flies. When female flies fall into a glass of wine, the wine gets spoiled. This is because the female flies have Z4- 11Al pheromone. They added that Z4-11AI “plays a dual role as a social signal and food cue, not only in flies, but also in other animals.”

This year’s peace prize winners were Francisco Alonso, Cristina Esteban, Andrea Serge, Maria-Luisa Ballestar, Jaime Sanmartín, Constanza Calatayud, and Beatriz Alama. They won the award for measuring the frequency of shouts and curses during an automobile ride (otherwise known as ‘road rage’). Their research involved observing aggressive behaviour on roads and comparing data from different places. There were many factors behind the aggressive behaviour on roads such as bad driving, the stress of the driver, fatigue etc. For improving these conditions on the road, it had been proved that road safety education and campaigns could promote road safety culture among drivers.

The economics prize was won by Lindie Hanyu Liang, Douglas Brown, Huiwen Lian, Samuel Hanig, D. Lance Ferris, and Lisa Keeping, for investigating the effectiveness of using voodoo dolls to retaliate against abusive bosses.  Their research summarises that companies should not punish their subordinates for their revenge, but rather look into the causes and roots that affected the retaliation. Their research, rather than focusing only on the disadvantages of subordinate retaliation, also talks about its advantages. Subordinates who had not been allowed to retaliate felt a level of social injustice. In the study, subordinates were asked to visualise a workplace in which their bosses treated them with hostile behaviours.

Great ideas and innovations can take any form. The Ig Nobel Awards celebrate the genius in the more frivolous and fun sides of acadenuc research, and will always inspire future generations of research.


More Coverage

Why are you laughing: the science of humour

While humour is an innate part of being human, dating back to ‘primate laughter’, exactly what makes something funny is still mostly unknown

Pro-Palestine groups occupy the Roscoe Building

In what is their second occupation of a University building in the last month, Pro-Palestine groups have occupied the Roscoe Building to protest alleged University connections to Israel and its complicity in the conflict in Gaza

Night and Day Cafe’s legal battle comes to an end

The venue can still operate as long as they keep to a reduced noise capacity between 11 pm-3 am during DJ club nights

Nearly half of student gamblers are gambling more than they can afford

The majority of students (60%) had gambled in the past 12 months, although this was a decrease from last year (71%)