Skip to main content

29th November 2019

“Every billionaire is a policy failure”

Tallulah Brennan argues that the billionaire class should not exist and stands in the way of human flourishing
“Every billionaire is a policy failure”
Photo: Chris O @ Wikimedia commons

“I don’t think anyone in this country should be a billionaire.” These are the words of Labour MP Lloyd Russel Moyle, appearing on the Emma Barnett Show a few weeks ago.

“You are painting all billionaires as offshore, morally base individuals” was Barnett’s defence of the billionaire class.

For some context: BP successfully pressed the Trump government to overturn laws passed by the Obama administration, which will result in the equivalent of the release of another 50m tonnes of CO2. The likes of Prince Harry and Leonardo DiCaprio (self-proclaimed environmental activists) arrived to Google’s climate breakdown meeting in 114 private jets and a fleet of mega yachts. Of course, these facts are all the more anger-inducing when we consider that it is the rich who will be able to buy their way out of the climate crisis. “It’s working-class communities that suffer the worst pollution and the worst air quality… who will lose their jobs as resources run dry”, Jeremy Corbyn noted recently.

The poorest 20% of people in England lost an average of 11% of their incomes as a result of austerity, compared with zero losses for the top fifth of households. Britain has more than 150 billionaires. It also has 14 million people living in poverty – 4 million of whom are in work.

Billionaires – the most productive capitalists – often arguably make their money through exploitation. About 13 million US children are living below the poverty line, while more tax cuts are made for the rich.

The rich continue to live far beyond their means, as the poorest in society are told they must live within their means, often working at minimum wage for multi-million pound businesses while their CEOs award themselves huge annual bonuses. The staggering wealth gap even in the US, one of the richest countries in the world, is easy to see; hookworm, ‘the disease of extreme poverty’, is now rampant in Alabama for example, whilst in comparison Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos earns more every sixty seconds than a typical US household does in eighteen months.

I believe the existence of billionaires stands in the way of human flourishing and now the reality of climate change has been made clear. Particularly as there is evidence that wealth suppresses empathy and that the higher your income, the more damage your lifestyle will inflict on the planet.

A recent tweet from Bernie Sanders read, “The billionaire class are scared. They should be.” Bernie Sanders’ wealth tax , if implemented, would cut the total net worth of America’s billionaire class in half in 15 years, closing the wealth gap and raising $4.35 trillion in the process.

At the Scottish Labour Party Conference, Jeremy Corbyn announced: “We need to reduce our net emissions to zero by 2050 at the latest. It’s not just an ecological priority – it’s a socialist priority too.” The super-rich got a lucky lot in life, and the rest of the population got unlucky. Finally, we have politicians that understand this.

We should celebrate this rhetoric being at the forefront of two once-in-a-lifetime elections. Later in the interview, Russel-Moyle asked: “Are you on the side of…the billionaires or are you on the side of normal working people?” This is the question of the upcoming general election, the question of the US presidential election and ultimately, it is the question of our survival.

More Coverage

The post-diss bliss…or is it?

The promise of post-dissertation freedom was quickly squashed by essay deadline demands, and the desire to do anything but re-open my laptop is taking over

200 years of the University of Manchester… celebrating white male alumni

As the University of Manchester prepares its bicentenary celebrations, it’s time to address the less-celebrated alumni, and question why these individuals have received less attention

Why are we still talking about ‘women who have it all’?

The ‘women who have it all’ narrative is alive and kicking in 2024, but instead of being empowering, it’s a patriarchal trope designed to pit one against another

Stick or twist: Why do students choose to stay in the south of Greater Manchester?

The universities along Oxford Road churn their students into Manchester city centre, and south of the city. As students turn into graduates, why do we disregard North Manchester and stay in the same southern areas?