Skip to main content

Month: March 2016

Album: The 1975 – I Like It When You Sleep, For You Are So Beautiful Yet So Unaware Of It

I can think of no better example of musical self-awareness than The 1975. Regardless of what you think of them, it’s undeniable that they’ve cultivated a striking public image. From the stubbornly black and white nature of their early music videos to the garish neon pink they’ve adopted for their new album, the band have always been plagued by criticism of style over substance whilst simultaneously striding to unprecedented popularity.

And it’s this self-awareness that led Matt Healy to declare that “the world needs” The 1975’s new album, and also influenced their most recent video for ‘The Sound’, which is intercut with critic’s negative comments. The four Manchester lads have always been conscious of their audience, their critics, and their place in the musical landscape, which is admirable but also has its major drawbacks.

If you thought that the word-count ruining title I like it when you sleep, for you are so beautiful yet so unaware of it was merely an indication of the album’s bloated runtime, you’d be wrong. Think of it as a demonstration of how deeply self-involved the band are with their image, to the extent that, yes indeed, this is an album of style over substance.

The music is just as glossy and glamorous sounding as before. The same clean guitars stab through a wall of sparkling keyboards, the songs still use such a baffling variety of sounds that it’s impossible to keep up with any new melodic developments, and Matt Healy’s lyrics are still centralized around the idea that if it has enough syllables, it’ll do. There’s genuinely a line on track ‘Change Of Heart’ that goes ‘you look shit and you smell a bit’, and another later on in the album which references Sainsbury’s. Maybe they’ve got a sponsorship deal going? Coming soon: The 1975 branded Pick ’n’ Mix; every sweet is pink and tastes exactly the same, just like their album.

This is not a diverse affair, the songs are repetitive, bleeding into one another to the extent where it’s difficult to pick them apart. This is the aforementioned drawback of being very conscious about your own sound. The 1975 refuse to leave their comfort zone, and whilst there’s nothing wrong with that, it feels as if a sonic blueprint is the full extent of the band’s creativity, because what really lets this album down is its lack of memorability.

The band’s debut had ear-worm hooks, ‘Chocolate’, ‘Girls’, ‘The City’, ‘Heart Out’, ‘Sex’. These tracks were attractive because of their grit, their cheekiness, their underlying uncertainty. ILIWYSFYASBYSUOI (see how ridiculous this is?) has ‘Love Me’, yes, but nothing else on here is as good as their debut, and it doesn’t set itself apart in the same way as that album did.

It’s convenient that there’s a song called ‘UGH!’ on this album, because that’s the exact sentiment I’ll use to sum up my experience of it. This may seem like an obvious and uninspired effort, but then again, if The 1975 can do it, why can’t I?

2/10

Pasha

By some miracle, on a blustery winters evening I found myself transported to a Middle Eastern paradise. Pasha is a delightful little restaurant in Withington, within easy reach of the main student area. Having been only open for nine months, Pasha is ranked as the #10 restaurant on Tripadvisor in Manchester, so I felt it would be foolish not to go and sample what it has to offer when it lies a stone’s throw from my doorstep.

Photos: Pasha

We were greeted by kind and attentive staff on arrival, and ushered to a table laid with some of the prettiest crockery I have ever seen. The room was impeccably decorated with wall hangings, candles and beautiful lampshades; heavenly smells wafted through the room, making us confident that we had come to quite a special place. As we were only two, we only ordered a few bits from the extensive mezze menu. While we eagerly anticipated the arrival of our food, we were brought olives and pickles to whet our appetite. Then came the glorious dishes we had ordered. The houmous was the silkiest one could imagine, dressed with olive oil and spices, and served with flatbreads warm from the oven to scoop it up.

An old friend of mine named halloumi made an appearance, served in fat, salty slices, lightly grilled and delicious as ever. Spinach bourek were beautifully crisp and plump filo cigars filled with spinach and heady with sweet and spicy cardamom—I’m not sure if the spicing was entirely to my taste but the textures were gorgeous. Chicken skewers from the charcoal pit were fat and juicy; flavoursome yet mildly spiced, and given a good kick by the accompanying chilli sauce which really brought them to life. The star of the show was undoubtedly the mousakah, consisting of meaty aubergines cooked in a richly spiced tomatoes, chickpeas and onions which really complimented everything else that we ate.

A wonderful pro of this restaurant is the fact that it is BYOB and doesn’t charge corkage, making it a perfect place to eat out on the cheap with your tipple of choice. My advice would be to come here with a large group of friends and order a wide breadth of items from the menu so that you can sample as much as possible for an even cheaper price. We left stuffed, but were sad to have only tried a small portion of what they had to offer. I would highly recommend this restaurant to anyone. The top class staff serve up some spectacular food, and they thoroughly deserve the high Tripadvisor standing that they have gained.

Price ££

Food 4/5

Drinks 5/5

Service 5/5

Atmosphere 5/5

Value 4/5

 

www.pasha-restaurant.com

 

 

Review: Goodnight Mister Tom

Michelle Magorian’s classic story of wartime England, adapted by playwright David Wood, arrives at The Opera House, Manchester. Having seen its debut on London’s West End in 2013, the Olivier award-winning Chichester Festival Theatre production of Goodnight Mister Tom has arrived to tug at the heart strings of the North as we follow a troubled young evacuee, William Beech, on his journey to the countryside during the build up to World War II. Our young hero finds himself placed in the care of the old local recluse, Tom Oakley; a seemingly harsh man who seeks only the company of his dog, and avoids human contact since the passing of his wife years ago. The audience watched, captivated, as old Tom transformed into Willy’s beloved Mister Tom.

The stripped back production used only the necessities to create an enchanting hold on those lucky enough to be watching. A simple set with minimal props and furniture subtly highlighted the meagre lifestyle of England living through the war. The acappella renditions ;khng talented cast. Puppetry was an ingenious portrayal of Mister Tom’s beloved canine companion, Sammy, with Elisa De Grey mastering his sound and movement to the point where you forgot there was even a puppeteer present, and saw only man’s best friend.

Mister Tom himself is played by British stage and TV regular, David Troughton. Spieling lines is an easy feat for an actor, but to be comfortable in silence is an art. He nailed it. It was like he was born to play Mister Tom. Of course, he has two bright young stars to perform with. Alex Taylor-McDowall as William Beech made the entire audience want a little evacuee to call their own, and Oliver Loades as Zach broke the hearts of every last person in that auditorium. Bright futures ahead for both child actors in this performance.

Goodnight Mister Tom at The Opera House is a must see for anyone who enjoys a touching wartime narrative, a father-son love story, or for anyone who enjoys good theatre. Simple, stunning, superb.

Dispelling the myths of feminism

Whilst the acceptance of feminism is now widespread across every university campus in Britain, you do still come across the occasional misguided individual in the Friendship Inn, convinced that feminists are out to cut their dick off. Here are some common misconceptions about feminism, debunked.

Feminists hate men

The theory here being that because feminists are so invested in fighting for equality for the female sex, that this obviously involves crushing their male counterparts to dust in the process. This is quite clearly not true, since the point of feminism is to have equality for both genders. Feminists in fact don’t hate me, they hate sexism, misogyny and the patriarchy. In Feminism is For Everybody, bell hooks rightly stated: “Masses of people think that feminism is always and only about women seeking to be equal to men. And a huge majority of these folks think feminism is anti-male. Their misunderstanding of feminist politics reflects the reality that most folks learn about feminism from patriarchal mass media.”

Feminists are hysterical

It’s centuries old, but the stereotype of women with a point to prove being hysterical refuses to die. By this logic, feminists are left with no leg to stand on when all of their highly valid points are shot down as overly dramatic. But you quite simply can’t argue with the facts that feminists have to offer. Returning to what bell hooks says: “As all advocates of feminist politics know most people do not understand sexism or if they do they think it is not a problem.” It is a rare passionate feminist who doesn’t have solid evidence to back up her emotional protestations, and facts don’t mean hysteria.

Feminism is only beneficial for women

Feminism helps both men and women as it works to achieve a more realistic version of masculinity for men. There is a strong feminist focus on ending cycles of abuse in the marital home that are thought to stem from supressed male emotions. A study in 1981 called The Unintended Victims of Marital Violence, found that “Male children who witness the abuse of mothers by fathers are more likely to become men who batter in adulthood than those male children from homes free of violence.” By embracing a more equal society, the hyperbolized figure of masculinity is defunct.

While not exhaustive, these are some of the most general misconceptions about feminism. Next time you get irritated at Lena Dunham or Caitlin Moran’s latest tweet and are about to try and take down feminism in one fell swoop, bear these in mind.

South Africa throw a spanner into the works of England’s World T20 preparation

England’s men were humbled by a rampant South African side who whitewashed the tourists in the T20 series 2-0. In the final regular tour Twenty20 International series before the World T20 they displayed the same aggressive style that has been the trademark of Eoin Morgan’s captaincy, but they were simply outplayed by stronger opposition. While elements of bad luck did affect both England matches, South Africa showed more consistency and played out both games superbly. England’s women fared much better, beating the Proteas 2-1 and cementing their place as a firm favourite to regain the title they won at Lord’s in 2009.

The men’s first match was certainly a more encouraging affair for Eoin Morgan’s team, with the game going down to the final ball. Although Reece Topley will certainly look back at his failure to run out Kyle Abbot and wonder what might have been, England as a whole performed well at Newlands in a game that was far from a thrashing. Taking South Africa to the edge of defeat looked like the continuation of a run of good T20 form that had seen Morgan’s men remain undefeated since May 2014.

In contrast, England were trounced at the Wanderers in match number 2 and must be bitterly disappointed that they let a game that was well within their grasp go away from them so quickly. Lancashire’s Jos Buttler showed his superior class in the game by smashing a 40-ball 54 and put England in a strong position to take the game away from the Proteas at 157-4. However, the loss of Morgan soon after wards—in the unluckiest of fashions—precipitated a spectacular batting collapse, and England finished on 171 all out just three overs after Morgan fell. South Africa then proceeded to successfully chase the score set by England in just 14.4 overs and with the loss of just one wicket.

As far as England’s chances of success at the World T20 goes, the men’s team is still strong and there are match winners there. Jos Buttler, Adil Rashid and skipper Eoin Morgan have proved themselves as one day specialists, with Buttler fetching £385,000 in the IPL auction and Rashid the top wicket-taker in the Big Bash League group stages. They have also proved that they can play to the death in big games, beating Australia by 6 runs in Cardiff last year and India by 3 runs the year before.

The coaching pedigree behind the England side is the best in the world, Head Coach Trevor Bayliss has won all the major franchise cricket trophies in the world. Big Bash and Champions League wins with the Sydney Sixers and an IPL with Kolkata Knight Riders—along with a World Cup final with Sri Lanka in 2011—shows the white-ball knowhow guiding the squad through the World T20 is second-to-none and gives this England team a little something extra that could be the difference that wins the title in India.

However, they must bounce back quickly in the warm up matches if they are to have the momentum to win what would be England’s first major championship since the 2010 World T20. Within two days, England have gone from being undefeated in two years to being on the end of a whitewash in the first series of the year, which will be a massive blow to their confidence. The scale of the collapse and the failure to adapt to a sudden change in game situation will be concerning, but it will feel well within the grasp of this squad.

On a more positive note, England’s women will go to India with much more confidence, having comfortably defeated South Africa 2-1. Sarah Taylor impressed with a third consecutive fifty and joined Charlotte Edwards in the exclusive club of women to score 2000 career runs in Twenty20 internationals, and is now behind Edwards in second on the all-time list of run scorers in the format. That meant that England consolidated their second place in the ICC team rankings and go into the tournament as the favourites to topple world number 1 side Australia in India.

Andrew Strauss’s new regime at the ECB will be tested for the first time since the Ashes, and consistency will be key to whether either England side can vindicate his approach of allowing both sides to play expansive and exciting cricket.

England Men start their campaign on March 16th against the West Indies and England Women against Bangladesh on March 17th.

Role Models in sport

The revelations coming out of the Adam Johnson trial have been shocking. The footballer is currently undergoing a trial for four counts of underage sexual activity; he has pleaded guilty to two of these counts. The details coming out of the court room paint a sickening picture. One can only hope that the justice system adequately punishes him for his misconduct.

The crimes committed by Johnson stand as a gross abuse of his esteemed position in society, utilising his fame, and subsequent power, to satisfy his perverted desires. He is the stark opposite of a role model. Despite this, the vast majority of sportspeople live reputable lives, aware of their elevated position. Instances such as Johnson’s are infrequent. However, they continue to crop up.

It is generally accepted that sportspeople should be role models in society; there is a greater emphasis on and a greater requirement of sportspeople to live respectably. This greater emphasis results from the intense scrutiny and attention, as well as the position of power and influence, which comes with being a professional in sport. This principle has been heightened in the social media age, where people’s lives can be monitored even more precisely.

Sportspeople are marvelled for their ability; people want to imitate them. As result, their actions outside of sport can also be open to imitation also. Wrongdoings can appear permissible if enacted by someone who has influence over others. All this puts emphasis on top sportspeople being models of reputable living in society.

There is a tension at the centre of the role model debate. I often feel it is forgotten that sportspeople are still people, and that people make mistakes. Not for a minute am I attempting to rationalise actions such as Johnson’s: they are unlawful and wrong. However, the intense scrutiny that sportspeople live under means that even the slightest misdemeanours are elevated to massive heights. For example, the footballer Raheem Sterling was videoed, and then photographed, using the legal high laughing gas last year. This is an activity that many people of Sterling’s age (now 21) engage in. While it is thought there are dangers in using laughing gas, it is not illegal. Sterling was merely participating in something popular with his age group. However, it was perceived that Sterling was not taking his position as a top sportsperson into account. In using laughing gas, he was promoting it; in doing so, he was deemed a bad role model.

I can sympathise with the intense scrutiny that sportspeople live under. However, this sympathy is finite. The modern-day sportsperson will undoubtedly be aware of the demands of the job. They know they will constantly be under the spotlight; they will know that even the smallest transgression will tarnish the perception of them. However, the intense scrutiny sportspeople are subjected to is constraining. I can understand why certain ‘forbidden fruits’ seem very appealing, especially at the young age that many people turn professional these days.

While the majority of sportspeople respect the esteemed position they hold, stories of transgressions continue to crop up. So, how can sporting role models be encouraged? I will focus on two ways in which I think good actions can be inspired.

Initially, the culture in a specific sport can be improved, where players are models of respect and decency. This would promote better action. Rugby Union is renowned for its respectful culture. In rugby, respect towards the referees is paramount. Any abuse or questioning of a referee is punished with a sin bin, or a sending off in extreme scenarios, and the captains of each team are the only players allowed to have significant conversation with them. Moreover, despite the ferocious nature of the sport, in rugby the players have deep respect for each other; it is traditional for each team to clap the opposition off the pitch after each game. This respectful attitude is heavily encouraged at a grassroots level too, meaning that the culture is embedded right through the spectrum of the sport.

Football, on the other hand, is renowned for disrespectful nature. Premier League games are characterised by players surrounding and questioning referees after the making of a decision. The attitude the players have for each other is improving, the multicultural nature of club football meaning that players of the same nationality will often play against each other. However, poor conduct amongst the players is still present.

The problem is that, at a grassroots level, footballers observe this behaviour and replicate it. Disrespect is engrained as the culture of football. The FA have attempted to address the issue: in amateur football, disrespect towards another player often results in a yellow card, and subsequent fine, for the player in question. However, ultimately the culture within the English football pyramid will not improve until the culture in the Premier League does. Rugby has shown the model for success: make the top league reputable then attempt to improve the rest. Amateur players will be more respectful if their favourite players are.

Another way of inspiring sportspeople to be role models is through direct encouragement. For example, the NFL has a yearly award, known as the Walter Payton Man of the Year award, for volunteer/charity work within a player’s community. Through the means of an award, the League encourages all players to commit to charitable and benevolent action in their communities, and in the process be role models. The use of awards to encourage charitable action is definitely something that should be implemented in other sports. The NFL now has a culture where players are driven to do good things in their communities.

Whether they like it or not, sportspeople have a unique requirement to live reputably. This can be as little as getting on with your job and staying out of trouble. While the influx of money and status can distort the moral compass, there are ways in which better role models can be encouraged.

United In Crisis

After a 2-1 defeat away to Sunderland left them 12 points behind Leicester City, 10 behind Tottenham and Arsenal and 6 behind fourth-placed Manchester City, Louis Van Gaal conceded that Manchester United’s best chance of reaching next season’s Champions League would be by winning the Europa League. That made the 2-1 defeat to Midtjylland, a side who had not played a competitive match for two months beforehand, in the first leg of their last-32 Europa League tie even more abysmal, and Van Gaal’s time as manager even more damning.

To be fair to the Dutchman, he achieved what was expected of him last season, but rather than the improvement anticipated after another large outlay in the summer, United have regressed; there were doubts about United’s style of play last season, but those murmurs of discontent have only grown louder this season.

Despite possessing the joint third-best defensive record in the league, United have scored only 33 goals in 26 Premier League matches, a stark contrast to the attacking brio seen during Alex Ferguson’s reign. Yes there have been significant injury problems – David De Gea’s injury in the warm-up only compounding the misery of that match against Midtjylland – but the players seem stifled and disinterested with Van Gaal’s philosophy.

The problems at United, however, are not just confined to on the field, but off it as well, as they have been since Ferguson and the chief executive, David Gill, left the club. Ferguson was succeeded by David Moyes seemingly based on his recommendation alone, despite the fact that the only trophy Moyes had won up until that point was the Football League Second Division (now League One) title with Preston in the 1999-00 season.

Moyes’ and Ed Woodward’s (Gill’s successor) first transfer window proved presciently shambolic. United pursued Marouane Fellaini throughout the summer, paying £27.5 million for him in a deadline-day deal. But Fellaini’s contract had contained a £23.5 million release clause that had expired during that same transfer window. After comfortably winning the title in Ferguson’s last season in charge, Fellaini was United’s only significant purchase, a tactic which spectacularly backfired, as shown by Chelsea this season.

Since then United have spent lavishly on players in a bid to seriously contend for trophies once again; Woodward, in particular, has been keen to legitimise his appointment. Among others, Angel Di Maria, Juan Mata, Ander Herrera, Luke Shaw, Anthony Martial, Morgan Schneiderlin, Bastian Schweinsteiger, Radamel Falcao and Memphis Depay have all moved to United, but performances and results have not improved drastically with them.

The transfer strategy has lacked a clear plan, with, from the outside, some signings made on the basis of attracting headlines as opposed to strengthening the team. Mata’s best position is central and off the striker, which is where Wayne Rooney likes to play; Herrera was wanted by Moyes, who had been sacked before Herrera joined the club, yet Van Gaal has only started him sporadically. While a traumatic attempted burglary exacerbated Di Maria’s desire to leave Manchester, Van Gaal did not find a way to incorporate him into the first team. Watching Di Maria return to form at PSG this season is particularly galling and an indictment of Van Gaal.

As for Woodward, United continue to gain new sponsors and improved commercial deals, but the running of the football side of United with him in charge has been at times laughable and his transfer record poor. Discounting the Community Shield, United have not won a trophy since Ferguson left, and continued poor performance, even for a club as popular worldwide as United, will affect the club’s ability to attract sponsors. In addition, unlike Moyes, Van Gaal was Woodward’s choice, and it will reflect badly on him should the Dutchman be sacked.

United’s academy is also under scrutiny. The Class of ’92 were highly successful and contained some genuinely world-class players. In the 24 years since then, however, the academy has produced some decent Premier League players, e.g. Danny Welbeck and Wes Brown, at best. Nicky Butt is the new head of the academy, but Brian McClair, Butt’s predecessor, announced he was leaving in February 2015, and vacated his role in May. That indicates the lack of emphasis placed on the academy currently, especially in comparison with the likes of Chelsea, Manchester City and Everton. That negligence has affected results; Paul McGuinness left his position in charge of the under-18s this month, with United eleventh in a twelve-team division.

Should Van Gaal leave before next season, his potential replacements are not without concerns, especially as the next manager will probably have to significantly restructure the squad once again. Rumours about Jose Mourinho replacing Van Gaal have been incessant since Chelsea sacked him. The Portuguese manager has had a trophy-laden managerial career and, in terms of results, will maximise the squad’s potential. But he has rarely developed young players, which is not a criticism that can be labelled at Van Gaal, and has so far left clubs after a few seasons. He is likely to solve United’s on-field issues in the short term, but will he provide long-term stability at a club that desperately needs it?

Ryan Giggs, on the other hand, is unproven as a manager. The fact that he is Van Gaal’s assistant suggests that Giggs has either agreed with LVG’s methods or been unable to convince Van Gaal enough to change his tactics. Either way it suggests that Giggs is not yet ready to take on a job of this magnitude at a world-renowned club in need of a strong and able manager.

Overall, United’s problems both off and on the field since Ferguson left the club are not mutually exclusive. United lack a strong footballing structure (sporting directors etc.) that the likes of Bayern Munich – whose executives shepherd the club through managerial and squad changes, and thus ensure the continued success of the club – possess. This means that when a talismanic figure, such as Ferguson, leaves, United enter a period of uncertainty that affects performances and is difficult to rectify, as has been shown over the past three seasons. For United to remain at the top of world football, strong, decisive leadership is needed at an executive and managerial level.

The Student Survey misses the point

Recently I received a letter in the post, and it doesn’t stop there. I tore it open and read the title heading the first page: ‘The National Student Survey 2016’. Finally, I thought, a chance for me to have my say! I read on and noticed that ‘have your say’ was in the opening line. It was a promising start, but this was somewhat undercut by the fact that they had actually put inverted commas around ‘have your say’. I wondered if perhaps this was the draft version of the letter that had been sent around the office as a joke and then sent to us by accident. It was as though there were so many empty clichés on the first page that some had taken to waving at me to get my attention.

Nevertheless, I was just so excited about having my say, whether it was intertextual or not, that I turned to the survey itself and browsed through the points. Down the page was a list of statements to which you could express a range of nuanced responses, all the way from violent disagreement to ecstatic and partly spiritual concurrence. For those of the participants who were just in it for the experience, you were also offered the response ‘neither agree nor disagree’.

Number 18 caught my eye, as the statement offered read: “I have been able to access specialised equipment, facilities, or rooms when I needed to.” Well, it is true, I have accessed a fair few rooms in my time. Many tell me it is one of my defining features—there goes ol’ Elliott “The Room Accessor” Mills, accessing rooms when he needs to, they say. Don’t even try stopping him from accessing a necessary room, they reiterate in partial italics.

To be fair though, and fairness is key, the statement did get me questioning just how much special equipment I had been offered over my three years of studying English Literature. Not much! In fact I wouldn’t say any of the gear I’ve been given at university was all that special. Someone had to be blamed for this, and it certainly wasn’t going to be me. I crossed the ‘Definitely disagree’ box and with pencil added in “with an undue sense of self-entitlement”, to strengthen my case. Hopefully, in just redress, at least one member of staff would lose their job.

Jobs, I think, are the main concern for the structuring of university, as this survey suggests the future of university experience is more based around the acquisition of qualifications for the benefit of future employment, rather than the enjoyment of an area of study in itself. One of the opening points in the survey asks us whether the “staff have made the subject interesting”. This seems to suggest that it would be strange to find the subject interesting anyway. That notion is compounded by the fact that the largest section in the survey relates to ‘Assessment and feedback’ and wants to know whether the student has been told assessment criteria, been marked fairly, and has received a no-win-no-fee 2.1 guarantee.

The National Student Survey tell us that they are “giving students a powerful collective voice to help shape the future of both their course and their university or college”, but it just so happens that the voice mostly talks about how they’re not interested in their course and how they are only there because they want to earn a qualification for the purposes of future employability. It’s not an evil voice, but it’s not an interesting voice either: It talks over-aggressively at waiters. It says ‘dividend’ quite often. The shape of this future university is already just about in view, predetermined rather than open for moulding. It is as though there is a giraffe-shaped balloon and we are told that we can contribute to its future shape by how much air we would like to blow into it. Similar to a balloon, this survey seems innocuous and is carried by a fair amount of hot air.

I will admit that the imagery and the concepts didn’t quite align there. I’m not sure why the balloon was shaped like a giraffe nor why it then turned into a hot air balloon. I suppose I don’t fully have control over my literary and rhetorical devices because the staff didn’t make the subject interesting enough.

I remember the phrase ‘Homeric simile’ from second year because the lecturer did a joke about The Simpsons. After that joke the topic was no longer interesting. Then The Simpsons didn’t even come up in the exam. I guess that means the lecturer didn’t give me enough academic support. I guess that means they should get rid of that lecturer.

Abuse: It’s time to re-evaluate

As a generation, we like to believe that we are progressive. We look back to the bad things that happened historically with pursed lips and frowning foreheads, comfortable in the knowledge that nowadays, we are firm supporters of tolerance and humanity. But how can we justify that belief when human beings are still being subjected to abuse at the hands of other human beings, getting away with it, every single day? The media has been set alight this week with reports of the legal battle between Kesha and music producer Dr Luke, who is accused of sexual and physical assault against the 29-year-old ‘Tik Tok’ singer. On February 19th 2016, Judge Shirley Kornreich denied Kesha’s request for a preliminary injunction (which would have allowed a temporary break from her contract with the Sony label Kemosabe Records) prompting the young artist to break down into tears in the courtroom. Unsurprisingly, the reaction of the singer and the court’s decision have sparked mass debate amongst Kesha fans and critics alike.

Back in October of 2014, a lawsuit was filed against Lukasz Sebastian Gottwald (Dr Luke) claiming that he subjected Kesha to several instances of sexual, physical, emotional and substance abuse which began back in 2005, when the singer was just 18. Although the producer forcibly denied the accusations, claiming that they are part of a smear campaign to disrepute him, Kesha sought to legally break free of the contract that tethers her to his record label. However, in court Judge Kornreich reportedly stated that she saw no reason to “take the extraordinary measure of granting an injunction” and branded the contract as “typical for the industry”. It was also brought into question that music giant Sony had offered Kesha the opportunity to work with a different producer if she was unhappy, however her lawyers quickly voiced the singer’s concern that her music would not be promoted as heavily if she refused to work with Dr Luke, one of their biggest moneymakers.

Judge Kornreich justified her decision by asserting that “[her] instinct [was] to do the commercially reasonable thing”. But since when did being “commercially reasonable” gain the power to trump basic human rights? Yes, contract law is extremely binding and carries a lot of legal weight, but this obvious dismissal to a young woman’s claim of serious physical assault stands as a prime example of one of the major societal problems of today. We just don’t take abuse seriously. Why on earth are we living in a world where business contracts are given precedent over the right for people to feel safe in their own environment? Nobody deserves to be abused. Nobody has the right to be an abuser, no matter how high up the business ladder they are. What Kesha is going through is a very public example of why 75 per cent of people in the UK (and 68 per cent in the United States) choose to not inform the authorities following an experience of sexual assault. It’s heartbreaking to fully comprehend just how many women (and, of course, men) are out there struggling with the belief that nobody would take them seriously if they tried to report the crimes they had been subjected to. It took 50 separate accusations before Bill Cosby faced any criminal charges, so imagine how it feels to be just one person. In that position, why even consider opening up such emotional wounds when there’s little hope that you will get any justice?

In the days subsequent to the court case, it has become increasingly clear just how deeply these issues have resonated amongst the public, with thousands of people taking to Twitter to show their support for Kesha by retweeting the hashtag #FreeKesha. This included celebrities such as fellow musician Demi Lovato, who tweted that it was “frustrating to see women come forward with their past only to be shot down, not believed and disrespected for their bravery in taking action”. Kesha herself also chose to speak out, tweeting a picture, professing: “HOPE is the only thing stronger than FEAR”, along with a caption expressing a dignified thanks to all of those who had shown their support.

We as women are encouraged to stand up against abuse, but this is a clear illustration of what happens to so many of those who do. OK, so Kesha is a celebrity and chooses to live life in the public eye, and yes, she sometimes wears outlandish outfits and dances provocatively in her music videos. But does that make her any less of a woman? Of a human being? The answer is a definitive no. If one thing has become clear in the midst of this situation it’s that we as a people need to re-evaluate how we deal with cases of abuse, because the way things are at the moment is simply unacceptable. And in the ongoing case of Kesha and Dr Luke? Well, all we can hope for is that the humanity of America’s judicial system isn’t completely dead.

Last Week in Film

A life-sized Oscar statuette created by the street artist Plastic Jesus was placed on Hollywood Boulevard at the section which will be closed at the awards. This does not sound fascinating or newsworthy at first, but the statuette is on all fours snorting two lines of cocaine from the ground. According to the artist, it is an homage to the death of Philip Seymour Hoffman who passed away weeks earlier because of a heroin overdose and a commentary on Hollywood culture. It is supposed to draw attention to Hollywood’s buried problem of drug abuse which is ignored until someone newsworthy dies.

The Vietnamese producer and director Phi Phi Anh Nguyen created the world’s first vertical feature film Arbitrary Fairytales. With a length of 83 minutes, the absurdist film was designed to topple cinematic conventions by shooting entirely with a rotated camera. The plot revolves around a dying teenager who challenges death to help him solve a case of a serial killer. The existentialist murder film shows the progress of the case by using a chaptered recollection of memories. The film is not completed yet and looks for funding on Kickstarter. A link to the campaign and the trailer can be found here.

Game of Thrones does not only break records anymore, but apparently the TV series also boosts the economy in Northern Ireland. According to the film agency Northern Ireland Screen, the HBO fantasy drama had contributed £110 million to the local economy. It is filmed at the at the Titanic Studios in Belfast, and many other locations across Northern Ireland. Those locations have become tourist attractions; especially due to the Game of Thrones tour attracting visitors from all over the world. Due to the economic success of the show, Belfast City Council have approved a plan for a studio thought to be worth up to £14 million.

Jeremy Clarkson finally came to his senses and apologised to the former Top Gear producer Oisin Tymon whom he had infamously punched last March. Oisin Tymon is expected to obtain over £100,000 from the BBC and Jeremy Clarkson after settling his racial discrimination and personal injury claim. He was punched and called a “lazy, Irish c**t” by Clarkson after he told him that he could not order a steak after a long day of filming.

Operation Masturbation

Having been asked to write a piece for feminism week in the Lifestyle section, I found myself in that state dreaded by journalists and authors alike: Writer’s block.

Being blocked is frustrating. You know there’s something you need to do, you know there’s something you can do, but for whatever reason, it just ain’t happening. Why was I blocked? A lack of motivation perhaps, a lack of inspiration, food for thought. Maybe I doubted my ability to produce anything. What I needed to do was to calm down, forget about the end point of finishing the article itself, and take baby steps. Play around with it, slowly undress my ideas onto a blank page without the urgency to come to the climax.

I thought about the deadline, issued on Monday and I had until Thursday. What was the rush? I had loads of time. I could write a little bit every day if I wanted, write it all in one go, or simply let the mood take me away without any kind of plan. The latter was my favourite. Besides, the act of writing wasn’t going to go away, it wasn’t like this was my only chance. As with anything, practice makes perfect. The first time may not be successful, but to succeed we can keep trying and only get better.

There’s nothing embarrassing about feeling pent up; nothing to be ashamed of. It happens to everyone, and some may be more open about it than others. One thing is for sure: We shouldn’t shame those who have something to release, we should encourage and help them to channel their inner spirit out, bring them to life by giving hope, empowerment and sisterly advice. This empowerment is for everyone. Whether you feel like trying is like hitting a brick wall, and you have come to a stage of acceptance and that it’s not for you, or whether you feel that you have no problem with this issue and you don’t need the help—it’s important to be aware that everyone is different and the conversation is worth having between trusted friends.

Make time for yourself, for your personal creativity. Try to connect the ideas of your brain with your fingers. This output is an important part of human nature and a valuable form of meditation. If you find yourself over-thinking whilst trying to remain in the moment, you could always try chanting the acronym of this title: ॐ, or “Om”.

Spirituality is an ancient thing, the body is designed to facilitate its own pleasure through the power of the mind and the fingertips. This past time is as valuable to your happiness and wellbeing as sleeping, eating and keeping clean.

Take it slow, take it easy. Light some candles if you like, have a bath. Let the mind relax and forget about the impending objective of the activity. Do some stretches, loosen up and let your hands do the magic.
Everyone can do it. Everyone can let their creativity rush. Don’t give up, you have it in you. Just release the pressure, take it slow and make the experience an enjoyable one.

Oh look, it’s the end of the article. I made time, I did it, there was no pressure. And oh, does it feel good.

Brexit would create ‘a huge problem’ for HE in Europe, warn academics

The UK leaving the European Union (EU) will damage both European and UK universities’ research capabilities, according to senior figures in higher education on the continent.

Horst Hippler, President of the German higher education association, Hochschulrektorenkonferenz (HRK), has come out in support of the advocacy body Universities UK, who are promoting a vote to stay in the EU. Hippler, whose organisation represents over 96 per cent of the students in the EU’s most populous nation, has told Times Higher Education: “To have Britain no longer belonging to the EU would be a disaster for international research in Europe.”

Hippler went on to say, “we have this problem already with Switzerland,” referring to the country’s difficulties after a 2014 referendum against mass migration challenged previous freedom-of-movement agreements with the EU. This in turn harmed scientific collaboration possibilities with member countries and affected the availability of research funding received from European bodies. Student mobility was also affected, with Switzerland being officially removed from the Erasmus+ program.

Dr Mike Galsworthy, Programme Director of the campaign group Scientists for EU, called Switzerland “a clear precedent that should serve as an antidote to over-complacency and sense of entitlement.” He disagrees with the idea that the UK would definitely still have the same amount of access and financial benefits from outside of the European Union. Hippler agrees, saying that the split would be “a huge problem, because research and science is always international.”

Many are arguing that a Brexit would put unnecessary obstacles in the way of research progress, in terms of both funds and collaboration. George Walkden, a lecturer whose research into the history of Germanic Languages requires collaboration with universities on the continent, says a Brexit would have “dangerous implications for collaboration.” He also worries about the availability of research funds for linguistic research, much of which currently comes from the EU or bodies linked to the EU. The UK currently receives £1.2 billion a year from European research funding.

Another problem that may be more pressing for students is the possible loss of the Erasmus+ program, which allows students to study at some of Europe’s best universities as part of their education here in the UK. Sam Muldoon, a third year Linguistics student, stressed that without the financial support of the European Union and Erasmus grants she would not have been able to take the opportunity to study in Germany for 6 months. She told The Mancunion that “it’s sad that other people might not get the chance because they can’t afford it.”

Not everyone is pleased that universities are taking part in the debate over the referendum, which will take place on the 23rd of June. Paul Nuttall, a former lecturer at Liverpool Hope University and member of the UK Independence Party (UKIP), has stated that the education sector should not “embroil itself” in the debate at all.

Anti-EU politician Daniel Hannan, agreed, saying: “The EU pays 1,500 academics. It is difficult to make a man understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” He also suggested the UK could possibly still participate in European research programmes like the €77 billion Horizon 2020 initiative, which includes non-EU countries Iceland and Norway.

Photo courtesy of speedpropertybuyers.co.uk.

Students against fossil fuel divestment win debate

In the light of significant student outrage at the news that the University of Manchester was investing £40 million in fossil fuel companies, the Manchester Debating Union (MDU) hosted an event on the topic. They asked the student body whether they would want the university to divest from the oil and gas industry.

An initial straw poll showed that most present were undecided or felt they did not know enough about it to form an educated opinion. However, at the end of the debate the opposition won with a 16 per cent increase in votes  in their favour.

Speakers for the proposition were Professor Kevin Anderson of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change and Dr Carl Death, a Senior Lecturer in Political Economy at the University of Manchester.

The opposition included Professor Johnathon Redfern and Dr Peter Backus, Chair of Petroleum Geoscience and Lecturer in Economics at University of Manchester respectively. Professor Anderson was the first to speak for the proposition, and focussed on how climate change may not seem like much of a change to the Northern Hemisphere (the primary users of fossils fuels) but to poorer countries, climate change could soon equal death.

He said: “We are more concerned about our powerful cars, our large overheated homes, our frequent flyer miles and double door refrigerators than we are about poor people in those climatically troubled parts of the world that are already struggling to eat.”

For the opposition, the first speaker was Professor Redfern, who declared that he thought “that this issue is too serious… to be hijacked by emotive words.” His argument came from a predominantly financial perspective and told the crowd that “we will have no money to tackle climate change without a stable economy” that fossil fuel giants help support.

Next up for the opposition was Dr Death, who argued that it was not about bankrupting oil and gas companies, but about the message that the university wants to send. He pointed out that “most progressive gains in world history have been achieved by social movements.”

Mr. Backus spoke last, bringing a humorous voice to the debate. He suggested that disapproving University of Manchester’s investment in fossil fuels was like “blaming Greggs because your husband is fat.” As an economist, he joked that he of course thought the solution to this problem was tax, but he also touched on the stigma that fossil fuel companies face.

This topical debate was a fringe event for JustFest 2016, the University of Manchester’s Social Justice Festival that will be taking place from Wednesday 9th March. The festival aims to encourage students to challenge today’s injustices, ranging from humanitarian relief and refugee support to mental health stigmas.

A spokesperson for the MDU pointed out that the event was important for providing a public forum for student’s voices to be heard on an issue that the University of Manchester is currently debating. The University of Manchester’s ties to the oil and gas industry have remained a highly controversial topic for several years now.

Just last year, an investigation by the Manchester Fossil Free Campaign revealed that the university invests almost £40 million in fossil fuels through pension funds and shares.

In a further surprise to activists of social responsibility at the University of Manchester, a giant of climate change campaigning, Greenpeace, found that the university has taken nearly as much money from fossil fuel companies as they invest. £28 million in funding has been received since 2010.

In conversation with Qaisra Shahraz

I am first struck by Qaisra Shahraz’s undeniable warmth. She smiles at me as if we have known each other our whole lives. Shahraz is wildly successful as an author, an education specialist, and stands firmly as an activist for community cohesion and women’s rights. This Friday, she is speaking at the People’s History Museum on a panel which is part of the ‘Wonder Women’ answering the question: ‘What are you chaining yourself to the railings for? A discussion on Modern Feminism’, and she will be talking about violence against women. She seems to carry an air of social responsibility in everything she does.

Shahraz currently is published in almost every literary field: she has published several novels, ‘The Holy Woman’, ‘Typhoon’, ‘Revolt’; an abundance of short stories, ‘A Pair of Jeans & other stories’; essays, articles, and scripts. One of her published books ‘A Pair of Jeans’ is currently being taught in German schools. Over the last twenty years, they have accumulated a variety of awards and critical acclaim. She has worked in the field of education as a quality manager, teacher trainer and inspector for Ofsted. She is currently a trustee of the Manchester Multi-Faith Centre, the Vice-Chair of Faith Network for Manchester, and an Executive Member of the Muslim-Jewish Forum. She migrated to England from Pakistan at the age of 9 and is an alumunus of The University of Manchester.

YM: Have you always felt the urge to write?

QS: Absolutely, from the age of 14—I don’t know where the urge to write came from. I was a migrant child trying to master the English language. By the age of 19 I was published in ‘She’ magazine and took up creative writing. Writing has always been in the background for me though, due to my career in education. Half the time I used to forget that I write. It’s only in the last few years that I’ve seen myself as a ‘proper’ writer. Now I’m more focused and tuned into the writing world. There wasn’t much money in writing so I earnt my money from my education work.

YM: Do you ever write in Urdu?

QS: No. I consider English as my first language and can express myself better in it and thus have always written in English. However, the books have been translated into several languages—including Urdu—and it’s a pleasure to read that language. I wish I could read Mandarin, as ‘The Holy Woman’ has just come out in that language.
YM: What made you put an Urdu glossary in Revolt?
QS: I deliberately used words and terms from the Muslim world and the Urdu language to give people who know the language a special familiarity and equally to remind people who don’t recognise the words that they are in a new and different culture but can still empathise with the characters.

YM: Something I think you do expertly is to rapidly humanise your characters, which is particularly poignant in the current social climate towards Muslims and even particularly towards Pakistan. What has been the reaction?

QS: Many people commented on my first novel ‘The Holy Woman’, set in five countries, that I had opened up a new world to them. In my novels including ‘Typhoon’ I wanted readers to go on an imaginative journey to Pakistan, to access the world I knew as a child. Funnily, I even had one person marvel and say to me, ‘Do you really have so much marble in Pakistan? I didn’t realise that some people are so rich in Pakistan.’ It’s an eye-opener, to show Pakistan as a country of contrast—through my wealthy and humbler characters. For me, all my characters are of equal importance, no matter what class they belong to and I have deep affection for them, especially some of the servants like Begum and Massi Fiza in ‘Revolt’. As a British writer living in the UK I’m very much into equality! I don’t think any writers living in Pakistan would write like this because my viewpoint regarding servants is so different.

I discuss a lot of controversial topics and issues, including rape in ‘Typhoon’ and domestic violence in my TV drama serial. In ‘The Holy Woman’ I want to reach out to a non-Muslim audience to raise awareness about the Muslim world, including about the veil, ‘hijab’. I wanted to debunk the myth that Muslim women are oppressed and forced to wear the ‘hijab’. In fact as my heroine says she’s been freed from female vanity by covering up. For me it’s an equality issue too. Women have a right to wear what they want. One can’t impose one’s ideas on others.

YM: Do you value literature as a vessel for social change?

QS: Absolutely. I use literature, from short stories, novels and drama serials to raise awareness about different social and cultural issues especially relating to gender issues, for example. I am actively and strongly against the epidemic of violence against women, which I am speaking about at the People’s History Museum this Friday.

Currently I’m using my story ‘A Pair of Jeans’ taught in German schools for A Level literature text as a platform to reach out to thousands of students and teachers and build cultural bridges. I openly discuss issues like migration, Islamophobia, integration and my multiple identities, as a British, Muslim woman of Pakistani origin. I say to them that all of my identities are equally important to me. With so much negativity and hatred channelled towards Muslims it’s my opportunity to raise awareness of Islamophobia and show that Islam stands for peace, and Muslims are law-abiding citizens.

However, the monstrous group Daesh, Isis, are criminals, with an evil ideology, that millions of Muslims do not relate or adhere to. I do recognise that there is a problem with radicalisation and we need to all collectively deal with it, without demonising the whole Muslim community at large. It is everyone’s responsibility in a socially developed country like Britain to challenge radicalisation. Similarly not to ignore the fact that there has been a rise in hate-crime, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and racism.
In my writing I also draw on injustice which I have seen and things I feel strongly about—I have been to Auschwitz and written about the horror of the Holocaust in a story called ‘ Train to Krakow’. I have also been to Palestine and seen firsthand the plight of the Palestinians. I have just come back from Bosnia, as part of a women delegation ‘Remembering Srebrenica’. I am still traumatised by the experience. I have learnt about the horrors of the genocide of over 8000 men and young boys killed and women raped. I hope to write a story about this.

I don’t take my position as a British woman for granted—it’s a privilege indeed. In Britain we have freedom, so many opportunities and above all access to good education. I am aware, however, that there are women around the world who cannot even write their name. As someone who works in education, literacy and education is very important for me. For it’s a passport to a better life. I say to people, that one woman’s ability to write her name for the first time is equivalent to another woman’s PhD. That sense of achievement.

YM: Does this link to your inter-faith work?

QS: As a trustee of the Manchester Multi-Faith Centre, the Vice-Chair of Faith Network 4 Manchester (FN4M), also an executive member of the Muslim-Jewish Forum, inter-faith work is very important to me to promote peace, particularly in these troubled times. I’m committed to promoting community cohesion and getting rid of divisions, celebrating our commonality and universal values. We do this also through a police community initiative, ‘We Stand Together’, that I am involved in. We want people to learn about each other’s cultures and religious beliefs. As advocates of peace and harmony we want to challenge any religion or politic-based conflict.

I am committed to promoting better relationships between the Jewish and Muslim community in Manchester, for example through our work in schools. I visited several schools for the ‘Twinning’ sessions where Muslim and Jewish pupils celebrated peace by holding banners saying ‘We Refuse to Be Enemies’ & ‘Spread Hummus Not Hate’ . The Faith Network 4 Manchester brings together Muslims, Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus, Bahais, Humanists. We want to be as inclusive as possible and would welcome whoever else wants to join us! That would include of course university students.

In November we had an event at The University of Manchester and at MMU held at the chaplaincy, Peter House, where eight students representing different faiths promoted messages of peace and tolerance. My personal view is this: Yes, we are comfortable in our world, our own faith and have individual beliefs but we need to step out of our own boxes and learn to respect other faiths and the views of those who have none. We are planning to hold a similar event this year, to be held hopefully in the Students’ Union. We would love to welcome as many students of all backgrounds to our function.

YM: What do you think about Prevent?

QS: I have mixed views on this. I know, as a parent and educationist, our primary concern is the safeguarding of the children and youth, however it has to be done responsibly. It also worries me, as the Muslim community feels it’s under the radar. That case of that young boy who was suspected after his teacher mistook his description, ‘terraced house’ for ‘terrorist house’ is absolutely ridiculous. We don’t want to create a culture of witch-hunting and paranoia, where people are afraid to speak up and feel marginalised.

YM: Yes, that’s what the extremists want—they want British society to fail don’t they?

QS: Exactly! That’s why community cohesion is so important. We have to show those bent on dividing us that they’re wrong. One thing I am so afraid of is intolerance and people with tunnel vision. These extremist groups are intolerant. We need to be not just tolerant of others, but to celebrate our diversity in society. I always say, ‘We have a right to be different but absolutely must integrate’. We have to retain our diversity and values but that doesn’t mean that we all can’t live together peacefully and follow the rules and customs of the host country.

YM: What are your views on freedom of speech?

QS: It’s extremely important to me as a human being, living in a free society. As a writer, lover of books and a citizen of a developed nation like Britain I am always in favour of freedom of speech but not the abuse of free speech. There is a fine line however. Over the years I have been dismayed by a lot of double standards it seems in the use of freedom of speech. Where some one has an intent to deliberately mock, ridicule and to satirise others in the name of freedom of speech, I think that is abominable and needs to be challenged.

YM: Zadie Smith said that finding an identity is the easy way out. A lot of young people in Britain who are prone to radicalisation are said to suffer ‘crises’. What do you think about identity?

QS: There are two questions to be addressed here. Regarding radicalisation, it has been shown at all the training I’ve been to recently with different examples of people who get radicalised and manifest extremist ideologies, a member of the IRA in Ireland, a white supremacist in America, and a member of Al-Muhajiroun, all of them have suffered crises of some sort in their lives. Moreover, young girls who have joined ISIS are mere school girls and the most vulnerable because of their age! They are lured by being presented with glorified life. The process of brainwashing and grooming to join the extremist groups has been made easier partly, I believe, by modern technology. The unsupervised use of social media through laptops and smartphones have enabled easy access to vulnerable people being easily targeted. When I was a young girl, we had none of this technology. For instance when I used the phone at home everyone around me could hear what I was saying. Parents in current times find it difficult to keep track of what their children are doing online and who is talking to them. It’s really worrying.

Personally, I grew with multiple identities and I was fascinated by it. I could step from one world into another. Outside I would wear jeans, inside I was wearing Salwar Kamees. Outside I’d eat fish and chips and sandwiches and at home I’d eat salan and roti. Outside I’d speak English and at home I’d speak Urdu or Punjabi. It was wonderful! It was seamless for me. I didn’t even think about it. For some other young people, I saw they struggled at times, trying to straddle two worlds and identities. I knew the boundaries of each of my identities but I was also free in every way I wanted to be. I value my Pakistani heritage; it has enriched me in every way as a person and also provided me with marvellous material to write about. My three novels are set in Pakistan. My other siblings were born here so they don’t have the same connection with Pakistan as I have. I know my Muslim identity will always be strong but above all I am British and a Mancunian—for I have lived here for almost all my life. I am sitting here in my former university!

YM: Lastly, do you have any advice for young writers?

QS: Firstly, write all the time! Keep writing. Join a writing group because it really helps and don’t be too sensitive to criticism. You are still perfecting your craft. I’d also say consider having another career apart from writing which you can draw influence from and also make money. I love working in education. You can make a lot of money as a journalist but often you don’t have time to be anything else but a journalist. You must also write about themes you know and care about—you will always do these better. Research your material well, as I am having to do for a novel set in Morocco.

Qaisra Shahraz will be doing a reading and question panel at the University of Manchester Creative Writing Society this Friday at 6pm in Room 11 of the Students’ Union.

Review: Revolt

I rarely relish reading novels the way I relished reading Revolt. Set both in Gulistan, a fictional village in Pakistan, and in England, Revolt is a thoroughly humanising and engrossing story of honour, guilt, pride, sacrifice, and love. I found it particularly poignant to read, as someone who has always felt detached from my Pakistani heritage, because it gives an enlightening insight into a world which is so often misrepresented and warped in mainstream depictions.

The best thing about Revolt is how it makes you see why people think the way they do and makes you sometimes love and hate the characters in equal measure. It’s a testament to the way we are as humans—we can love each other despite our imperfections and despite the fact we hold grudges, and often the people we hurt the most are the ones we love the most. Whether Shahraz is dealing with unrequited love or the perils of pride, she opens up the humanity in all her characters and in the process she debunks preconceptions and destroys assumptions.

Qaisra Shahraz expertly humanises people who are too often dehumanised—women, servants, people of colour, and often all three combined. She inspires empathy through stunning characterisation of people of different races, different social backgrounds, and with different hopes for the future but all ultimately united in their humanity. She shows how we all have a choice and sometimes we are the victims of consequences which were outside of our control. This is not to forget that our own actions can make people suffer without us ever knowing. I’m aware this sounds all sounds very abstract but I don’t want to give too much away. Shahraz’s writing not only gives a voice to the voiceless but it unashamedly tackles uncomfortable issues which need to be thought about critically—now more than ever.

A personal favourite feature of Revolt is the glossary of Urdu words at the back. This gives the novel an edge and highlights the musicality of Urdu as a language. I recognised a few words, my favourite being ‘laddoo’, which are ball-shaped South Asian sweets which are delicious but terrible for you. My mum has also been known to refer to my cats as ‘laddoos’, as their weight gain is often visible. What I’m trying to get at here is that the versatility of Urdu as a language never ceases to impress me but Shahraz, who writes in English as it is her first language, manages to convey the depth of emotion which Urdu brings in the same way with English.

Although I’m aware that this novel particularly resonates with me, I think anyone who has experienced trouble with the idea of ‘identity’ or is interested in reading something truly refreshing and enlightening will really enjoy reading Revolt. Shahraz has spoken about how her writing is a vessel for social change and these novels have the power to change damaging perceptions while being really entertaining to read. Her first novel The Holy Woman, and its sequel Typhoon, are both also highly-acclaimed and deal with love, family politics, religion, deceit, and guilt.

Qaisra Shahraz is doing a reading at The University of Manchester on 11th March.

Manchester City 4-0 Aston Villa

Goals

Yaya Touré, 47th minute

Sergio Agüero, 49th minute

Sergio Agüero, 61st minute

Raheem Sterling, 65th minute

If this game was a song…

Writing’s on the Wall – Sam Smith

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

The Oscar-winning song at the last Academy Awards is apt for City’s performance, as it seemed from the early minutes that the goals were definitely going to come—the writing was truly on the wall. However, in the first half it felt very much more like Leonardo Di Caprio’s wait for an Oscar, as City squandered most those chances. Alas, class prevailed in the second half and four City goals appeared!

Big moments

10th minute: Fernandinho lofted an exquisite ball into the box, giving Aguero the opportunity to showcase his world-class ability. The Argentinian expertly controlled the ball and followed up with a touch and shot at close-range that somehow Brad Guzan managed to tip onto the crossbar.

13th minute: Gaël Clichy had another great performance, highlighted by his fantastic cross in the first half putting it on a plate for Wilfried Bony. Unfortunately Bony couldn’t convert this into a goal—possibly due to his lack of match fitness.

23rd minute: Aguero and Bony combine in the box playing between the defence, for Aguero to release a surprisingly powerful shot. Guzan up to the job.

25th minute: This was Villa’s only chance of a goal in the match really, as Jordan Ayew managed to pull off a great shot after a game of pinball in the City box. England’s number one, Joe Hart, was a match for the shot.

47th minute: GOAL. Aguero finds himself on the wing and feeds Silva in the box. The Spaniard resisted the crowd’s pleas for him to shoot, as he sets up Toure to score via a deflection.

49th minute: GOAL. Just like buses, you wait all day for one—and then two come at once! Bony played a through ball up to Aguero, which was just too short to reach the Argentinian, but Micah Richards slides in to whack the ball against Aguero’s leg and lift it over Brad Guzan.

61st minute: Substitution: Raheem Sterling ON. Wilfried Bony OFF.

65th minute: GOAL. It took the Englishman four minutes to score, as he tapped in after Silva played the ball across goal. Highlights won’t do this one justice, as City demonstrated incredible team play in the lead-up, passing the ball in and around the box for a few minutes. Sterling will be glad to bounce back after the Liverpool fans hurled abuse at him in the midweek clash between the two sides.

69th minute: Substitution: Kelechi Iheanacho ON. David Silva OFF.

71st minute: PENALTY MISS. It took Kelechi two minutes less than Sterling to have an impact from the bench, as he was played in by a lovely Sterling ball to be tripped by Ciaran Clark. Aguero, however, missed the chance for his hat-trick, striking the post.

Stat of the Game

Yaya Toure’s goal was his 49th in five seasons—more than any other Premier League midfielder.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Belief?

Prior to the game, Manuel Pellegrini stated that his team will need to win 9 of the next 11 games in order to win the Premier League trophy again, which seems a fair assessment and nothing too far out of City’s means. In previous years when City have won the league, they have always done so after falling behind—whether it be to Liverpool or Manchester United. Now, however, City aren’t just battling against one side, they are up against four: Leicester, Tottenham, Arsenal, and even Manchester United.

City, arguably, have the best players in their squad compared to these other teams, despite how it is lacking in depth—so there is no reason really that City cannot claw this back. City won their second Premier League title while fans famously promoted the campaign “#TOGETHER” on Twitter, Facebook and round the stadium on a match day; if City are to win it, they will definitely need the fans. Do they believe? Well the fans brandished two new banners before the game stating “#CMON CITY’ and “We <3 City,” and they were in fine voice when the Capital One Cup was paraded at the start of the game, so the signs are good that they are believing! Although I have a strong hatred for any use of a hashtag outside of cyber space, it’s these reactions that Vincent Kompany & co will need.

Aston Villa

Villa only really fashioned one chance in the game, and only began to exert any pressure in the final ten minutes of the game. City were good, but it was the lack of threat from Villa that saw this game end in a heavy defeat. Teams have escaped before—just look at Leicester last season. Nigel Pearson managed to steer the midlands club from the very bottom of the league, and now Claudio Renieri has them sitting pretty at the top. This isn’t my way of telling you that Aston Villa can win the league next season; it’s my way of asking Villa why they have given up?

Photo: Aston Villa of yesteryear Dagur Brynjólfsson @Flickr

When you assess Villa’s squad, it’s not one that would achieve European football, but it is definitely not a team fit for the Championship. The experience of ex-Blues Micah Richards and Joleon Lescott at the back should be a successful partnership, and Jordan Ayew and Rudy Gestede look like shrewd buys on paper. Villa are an ever-present team in the Premier League, and their club is enriched in history. For instance, Villa Park used to hold Cup Finals, and they’re a team with league titles going back years! It will be a sad day if they go down—and by that I mean, it will be a sad day when they go down. The fans blame owner Randy Lerner (whose name sounds like that of a 80s porno headmaster) for the demise, as they chant for his exit each game. Whatever the problem is, I for one hope it is resolved and the Villains get back into the Premier League in two seasons time.

Fan Watch

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

City fans sang to the Aston Villa fans: “Joleon Lescott, he’s won more than you” as the Brummy centre-back got a warm welcome at his old stomping ground, along with Micah Richards and Scott Sinclair.

Man of the Match

Sergio Aguero

Aguero was back up to his usual tricks in this game, demonstrating his unique talent. You could throw Aguero into a swimming pool of alligators, and he’d still manage to dribble his way out of there. The ball wouldn’t even float—that’s how good he is. In this game he gave the whole Aston Villa team a torrid time, and bagged two goals in the process. His low centre of gravity meant that he could still show strength up against the tall strong Villa players and pick up one of his easiest Man of the Match awards to date. Aguero had three or four chances in the first half that he didn’t convert, such as when his 1-2 with Bony hoodwinked the entire Villa defence and he pulled off a powerful shot from the tightest of angles. Eventually the Argentinian got his goals and was unlucky not to come out with more. Aguero? More like Swaguero (I’m sorry).

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Otamendi’s Improvement

Nicolás Otamendi had another good game at centre-back, as it has become evident that he is a much better player alongside Vincent Kompany. Otamendi has played well all season, however occasionally has shown naivety to the Premier League style of defending, (as is expected in his first season) as he is quick to go to ground on an attacker instead of standing his ground. He’s obviously good enough to learn this and become one of the best in the league, and the last couple of weeks have shown evidence of him improving in this sense. Furthermore, he’s showing an attacking presence too! This may have some of you on the edge of your seat as he bombs forward, but in this match he did it to great effect and was never caught on the break due to his surprisingly quick feet. One thing’s for certain, if City are going to go on and win this league with a run of games, they will need a solid centre-back pairing.

Hold on to your hats boys and girls, this Premier League title run-in is going to be a bumpy ride.

Preview: India Week 2016

The third annual India Week, a week that celebrates the essence of being Indian, is back from the 7th to the 13th March.

With a wide variety of events, The Indian Society of Manchester hopes to spread Indian culture to anyone who wishes to connect or re-connect with the cultural riches of the subcontinent. It will also allow students (Indians and non-Indians alike) the opportunity to experience a small fragment of the Indian way of life.

This year, the society will be raising funds for the charity organisation Pratham, an organisation whose mission is to improve the quality of education in India and to ensure that all children in India are not only attending school but thriving. Pratham UK has already raised more than £5 million since 2003.

The week will kick off with an free and incredible India Inaugural Night, taking place on 7th March from 6pm onwards in Academy 1. The evening will be charged with energy, dancing, music, and loads of exciting performances, as well as a mystery guest! There will also be a quiz night in St. Peter’s Chaplaincy at 6:30pm.

Photo: Indian Society of Manchester

One of the most exciting events will be the celebration of Holi, the festival of colours, at the Gita Bhavan Hindu Temple from 1:30pm until 5pm on the 9th of March. Coloured powders will be provided at student prices, and this celebration will be accompanied by a DJ playing Bollywood hits.

The next two days will concentrate on fundraising, with a surprise event and a games night on 11th March from 5pm on at Al Qaza. If you had not had enough of games, the Carnival of Sports at Armitage at 11pm will bring the child out of you with games such as bubble football, three-legged race, and the lemon race.

The week closes with the Grand Indian Ball at Sheridan Suite on 13th March from 6pm onwards. The society promises an enchanting evening of glittering performances with a fire show, a spectacular array of awards, and gourmet Indian delicacies.

Watch the India Week teaser here and consider donating to Pratham on India Week’s Just Giving website.

Photo: Indian Society of Manchester

 

Q&A: Kölsch

We’re looking forward to your set at SIDEXSIDE. You play back to back with Joris Voorn a lot. Can you tell me why you like playing together, and how this relationship came about?
Joris and I have known each other for years. We are really close friends, and we have spent hours talking about music that we love and inspire us. From these talks, one day, we decided it would be fun to try a Back2Back set. It worked out really great, as we compliment each other very well. Since then we have been doing it, maybe 3 times a year. It’s always something I look forward too.

As a DJ, you play sets all over the world. What is your favourite country to play?
I don’t have a favourite country, every place has something magical and special to focus on. For instance, French people have an incredible energy level, they just go nuts from the moment they enter the club.  German crowds are very cultured, and I can get away with playing some very experimental records. English people love melodies, so they’re a match made in heaven for me.

What do you think makes the perfect party for you to DJ at?
Open-minded people, and a killer system. That’s all I need.

You’ve released two studio albums, and I love how expansive and melodic they are. Do you think you will release a third album? If so, what direction do you see the album going in? Are there any new sounds that excite you?
I’m actually slowly working on it. I’m trying to take it in a very musical direction, and experiment more with live musicians. It’s super exciting. The concept is already done, but I’m working on the structure.

What inspires your music? Does being on tour and visiting new places inspire you at all?
Of course it does. I love producing on Airplanes; it always feels like I’m part of the future, producing music for the future. It’s also a great time to focus, and really spend hours on pouring emotions into my music.

When I listen to your albums, it feels like I am on musical journey, do you spend a long time thinking about the structure and feel of each album?
Every album I’ve done, I’ve spent a lot of time on the concept, and the execution. It’s super important for me that it is a good listening experience. I’m very happy you noticed.

With so much music available on the internet, it feels like dance music has quite a throwaway culture? Do you agree with this, or are the albums you release going against this trend?
I feel the problem with the throwaway culture also stems from a lot of producers themselves. If you bang out thirty tracks a year that mainly consist of loops and white noise, how can you expect anyone to invest in your work. I am convinced, if you spend time and focus your money and energy towards producing the absolutely best you can, people will respond to it and support your work. I can say that I have probably around 30 tracks in my vault, that I have decided not to release. They were not good enough. My audience only deserves the best of me.

Is the underground culture that influenced your music the same as what it once was? 
The beauty of culture is that it is ever-changing. It’s just as beautiful that inspiration is also ever-changing.

How do split your time between writing new music and going on tour? Which do you prefer? 
I feel they belong together. There is no touring without the producing, and there is no producing without the touring. I really love days in my studio where I can finish off and mix songs I’m working on. But also, performing and interacting with the audience is an absolute pleasure.

Kölsch perform back to back with Joris Voorn as part of SIDEXSIDE at London’s Tobacco Dock on Saturday April 2nd. Our preview of the event can be read here.

Last remaining tickets are available at bit.ly/SIDEXSIDE