Skip to main content

Day: 22 November 2011

Stringing together a business

A more alternative and yet lucrative business venture, BSc Economics student Dan Shiner runs Fallowfield’s only tennis racket restringing business. A keen tennis player himself, playing for the university and treasurer on the tennis committee, Dan set up his tennis racket re-stringing business aged 14, when a coach recommended that it would be more economical to re-string his own rackets. With racket re-stringing costing around £25 a pop, the £500 racket restringing machine and prospects of fellow tennis players also seeking to avoid the high costs of tennis clubs, seemed like a good investment.

Racket restringing is understandably a  technical process; not only in the re-string itself, but also to ensure the tension of the strings and string type is correct for that player. After a significant amount of practice on his own rackets and through learning more about the technicalities of it with a Wimbledon stringer, Dan was eventually able to get his new enterprise going, and began to spread the word to school friends and fellow tennis players.

Dan easily paid off his start-up costs within the first two years of purchasing the restringing machine. Now based in Manchester, he charges £9-£12 for restringing a racket (depending on whether the customer provides their own stringing reel). That means at least £9 profit for every racket, and hundreds of rackets being restrung per year. Already this term, Dan has restrung 26 rackets, a number which will continue to increase more rapidly as the academic year progresses. Since it is a seasonal business, his peak trading period is the beginning of the summer. Furthermore, with a strong presence in University tennis and his year’s worth of racket re-stringing practice, Dan’s customer base is particularly strong.

He commented:‘It’s all word of mouth, I get a lot of people who I’ve strung for previously coming back, we don’t play too much at uni, so I will probably break mine four or five times a year. For others, it depends on how much spin they put on and how often they play’.

It is clear that Dan is onto a sound business model, with various networks available to tap into customers. A monopoly over the Fallowfield racket restringing business and straight profits of £9 per racket (each of which which take 20 minutes to restring – making earnings of £27 per hour), enable Dan to undercut many of the big sports clubs (who usually charge £18 – £30), saving students money and earning relatively substantial profits whilst at university.

Dan explained ‘if you have had the same string in your racket for a long time then the tension usually goes, negatively impacting your game. Also, when you buy a racket, the strings already in there are strung loosely’. So, if you would like to save money on your racket restringing, e-mail Dan at [email protected]

 

Unemployed Youth, Unemployed Graduates.

One of the biggest alterations to the lives of young people in Britain has been the rise in the level of students going to university. This provides Britain with an even more skillful workforce, with intellectual bright sparks ready to achieve bigger and better things. However, the startling news is, actually, it is people under the age of 25 within society who are hit the hardest by unemployment.

Even before the economic slowdown, the number of 16 to 24 year olds unemployed has been rising continuously without interruption. Why are such young people of a fit working age finding it so difficult?

Rather than assuming this is an outcome of the recent recession, maybe youth unemployment needs to be considered as more of a long run trend. In October 2011 the Office for National Statistics estimated the unemployment total for this age range at 991,000. These figures go on to confirm that more than a third of unemployed people in the UK are under the age of 25. Latest figures released  November’s show that jobless 16 to 24-year-olds total around 1.02 million.

This is a problem which needs to be addressed by the government. Many economists support the view that countries investing in a skilful workforce are likely to be the ones who prosper. For example, it has been predicted that China will be producing more graduates than Europe and USA combined by 2020. Competition will be fierce for jobs as employers seek out the best candidates.

Almost 28 percent of graduates who left university in 2007 were still not in full-time work three and a half years later according to Higher Education Statistics Agency. However, since the recession, graduate employment has seen a slight lift in 2010. The percentage of University of Manchester alumni obtaining graduate-level jobs is above average at 71.7 percent

It is evident that a degree will put graduates in a better position to succeed and become more employable both in the long and short term. Robust graduates with a strong skill-set and a degree under their belt were well equipped enough to make it through. Yet with a lack of government support the jobs market doesn’t seem to be getting much easier whether you’re a graduate or not.

 

Popping up near you

Pop-up. A phrase that until recently was used only in relevance to children’s books, jacks that come in boxes, toasters/tarts (the popping kind), and laps. But we can now reveal that ‘pop-up’ has a new meaning that is shoring the tides of the urban experience. This can mean only one thing: a trend has crested that perilous wave of mode and is riding high at the break, spouting frothy cool magic. Urban dictionary, landmark of all things ‘on’ trend, helpfully points us to one of the many meanings of ‘pop-up’ (but thanks for the lap mention): ‘A place for hipsters to eat that doesn’t stay in one place long enough to meet health code’. Unexpected, quick-fire, one-stop, one-purpose, possible health hazard – it’s all there for the discerning hipster.

Pop-ups have burned through the leisure industry: from pop-up shops, brow bars, vajazzle stations (I kid you not), cupcake stands – that’s trend piled upon trend and all for the low, low price of parting with your dollar. And finally, inevitably, the trend has trickled on down into the art world: galleries and exhibitions in unexpected or sudden locations, with no health and safety, popping like corn all over the place.

In 2009, ‘insiders’ decreed pop-ups to be the ‘buzz word’ on the London art scene. Precisely what these words mean is irrelevant, the facts are clear: a trend is born. And now, Manchester has squared up its shoulders and let loose a couple of poppers itself. In very recent weeks vacant urban spaces have been hijacked by hungry young art caterpillars to be transformed into sparkling art-filled butterflies.

Firstly, Free for Arts festival fulfilled its free brief, and filled its boots with promised spaces. It brought art to unnatural habitat such as Urban Outfitters and the unsold office space Piccadilly Place. The requirements were fulfilled; there was no air of gallery formality to the Place, just the chill of naked concrete. It’s empty, ripe for the creative picker, and best of all it’s free. This is guerrilla art squatting in its highest form.

Grabbing empty city space allows complete freedom of curation, and it creates opportunities for those outside the institution, without funding or contacts. Child’s Play, an exhibition in Piccadilly Place, was a pop-up about pop-ups – further proof that a trend has reached fruition when the fruit borne is irony. The survivalist instinct common to starving artist and nomad alike kicked in and every corner of the bare concrete bone of the building was used as part of the exhibition. But for curator, Ryan Higgins, the most significant element in creating a pop-up as forum was that it allowed the exhibition, in content, to comment on the trend of pop-ups from inside. In the same way that pop-ups may function within the contemporary art institution (as Higgins understands them) but change the landscape of that world, Child’s Play operates within both these concentric circles. Yet it is also concerned with maintaining aesthetic standards that Higgins feels are sometimes devalued by the temporality of the pop-up. The lines between institution and insurgent are clearly blurred for the viewer, and I wonder, how keenly the imbedded comments are felt for the audience.

Secondly, NOISE arts charity put its own spin on the pop-up with a two week installation in Stephenson Square at the end of October, ‘The Art of Protest’, which featured ‘masters’ such as Banksy and Gillian Wearing. A pop-up was the perfect package for the under-25s charity to present its anti-violent protest protest. Also conducive to the young, a pop-up burns just short enough to keep the attention of the short consumer-fused span of youth today.

The exhibition was in part a reaction to the violent riots earlier in the year, but uniquely it promotes protest. That is protest through non-violent channels, and specifically through art. Dissent that fuels creativity you say? Surely it’s been done. Except like the trend within a trend, The Art of Protest tackled issues that affected young people, as presented by young people, yet it was also about how these issues are articulated; and all this through a medium of exhibit that is particular to youth and how the youth are to articulate themselves in these economic and socially closed times.

Joshua Blackburn, of provokateur.com, spoke in relevance to The Art of Protest that although many say that we’ve ‘lost the art of protest’ through the constant transactions that are sought and performed by us and our immediate world, there are ever-inventive ways that people are articulating their dissent. He has kernelled the pop-up, in my eyes. Something that began as a way to surround us with more and more diverse ways that we can shop has now, irony of ironies, squeezed out of the shadows an inventive tactic that facilitates unfunded, unsanctioned projects: charities, free festivals.

The vajazzles continue. The North has caught on to the trend, like a small European country where the music is a decade old and the suits are shiny. Does this mean the wave has broken, the microwave has pinged and the corn has popped, that it’s downhill and downmarket pound pop-ups from here on in? Anything can now be turned into a selling opportunity, especially something new. But like the Art of Protest’s idealistic exuberance, if pop-ups empower some creative side-stepping, allowing those with something to say somewhere to say it, then I say get noise-y.

Read on for pop-up dab-hands, NOISE’s, experiences of the ‘catch it will you can’ phenomenon:
Why did NOISEfestival.com decide to run the Art of Protest exhibition in the form of a pop-up?
The ‘Art of Protest’ exhibition was an extension of the NOISElab.co.uk, the biggest pop-up project in the country, that we ran throughout 2010 (Nov 2009 – Nov 2010) as a ‘Free Arts Enterprise university’ in a store, on Manchester’s Market Street. The location was one of the busiest shopping miles in Europe, so it gave young people a really accessible way to network with their creative idols such as Jon Burgerman, Virus Syndicate, Pete Fowler, and Pure Evil, who shared their expert advice and experience of how to carve out a successful career in the creative industries.
The economic climate is making life very challenging for young people. With cuts to much needed initiatives to help them get employment, continue education or provide short-term paid work placements. By offering space to young people, the NOISE Charity is providing a positive response and space to have their say.
Following on from the success of NOISELAB, we thought that the best way to get maximum impact and exposure for the Art of Protest exhibition was for us to stage it as a pop-up showcase in a high street shop window. The exhibition’s location in Stevenson Square, in the city’s Northern Quarter was actually where a lot of the riot activity took place in August this year. We wanted to show how creative protests can have lasting impact and gain media attention, without resorting to violence.

Do you think the popularity of the trend stems from economic reasons?
At the time when the recession was having a devastating impact on the UK high-street, we wanted to re-animate the high street. Each month the NOISELAB windows were re-worked to display the work of young creatives.

Does it appeal to a younger audience? Or perhaps allow for a more creative approach to an exhibition, from the organisational point of view?
Because our pop-up projects have all been in high street locations, it’s helped us to attract audiences from all ages from a range of diverse backgrounds.
Pop Up projects give organisers and public more flexibility, and more importantly the possibility of doing creative things where usually there is little of that sort of stuff going on.
In addition, because of [the pop-up’s] high street location we had to think about getting people in the shop without intimidating those who were not our target audience, but I think we struck a good balance, attracting over 42,000 visitors in over 6 months.

And finally, was the use of pop-up a success from your perspective?
NOISELAB was a resounding success, as the flexibility of the space made it adaptable and multifunctional space, often programmed by young people themselves. The temporary nature gave the space a, ‘catch it while you can’ exclusivity, making those involved feel like they were part of something really unique and worthwhile. When we announced that the space was closing, we were really pleased that the Lab’s regulars started an online petition to keep the space open. It received over 750 signatures in one week. We were pretty overwhelmed with the response.
With the Art of Protest exhibition, the charity was showing young people the best protest art that had gone before and setting the challenge for young people to do something equal or better.

We are now launching the ‘Re-Masters – Art of Protest’ project nationally, for emerging creatives from across the country can produce their own protest-art, taking inspiration from iconic protest art from the last 50 years (Stella Vine, Gillian Wearing, imagery from John and Yoko’s Bed-in..etc).
More information and the brief can be found on our NOISE Art of Protest page here www.NOISEfestival.com/Protest

Commentary: It will never be easy to find a graduate job again

There’s no doubt that times are hard for British graduates. Business recruitment is low, leaving scores of graduates fighting over every coveted position.

The most commonly blamed factor is the recession, which is preventing businesses from expansion and thus causing higher graduate unemployment.

But this is not the whole story. Key to the question of graduate employment is the fact that since the early years of this decade the UK has experienced a continued rise in over-qualification levels.

This is where somebody holds educational qualifications in excess of those required for their job or entirely unrelated to it.

The reason for this is clear: there are more graduates than there are graduate jobs.

Prior to the expansion of higher education it was simple: a small number of students went to university and then stepped into suitable graduate jobs.

These people tended to earn more – the ‘graduate dividend’ – and so when Labour came to power in 1997 they looked at opening up this advantage to more people.

But when they decided to set a target of 50 percent of school-leavers going to university, they wrongly assumed that the market would keep up.

Instead, an increasing number of graduates are leaving university to find that the glittering professional career they were promised simply isn’t available.

As a result many graduates have to take jobs for which they are over-qualified. As well as being disappointing for the graduate, this has a terrible effect on school-leavers.

Those jobs that did not used to require a degree are now so flush with applications that they raise the bar. This forces students to put themselves through three years of debt-fuelled university in order to get exactly the same job they could have walked into before.

The labour market has been flooded by graduates now, and short of a massive reduction in university places it will never be comfortably easy to find a graduate job again. If you want one, prepare to fight for it.

Can’t find a graduate job? It’s ten times easier to get on TV 



Matt Rose has just spent a week learning to make pumpkin cannelloni, not an easy dish considering the most extravagant thing he’s cooked to date was served with a side of potato smileys.

He may have exaggerated his cooking skills when applying for MasterChef Live, an arena-style food exhibition put on by the people behind the television show, but he’s been doing everything he can to get his face about recently.

In the end Matt put aside the newly-bought pasta maker and instead tried his hand at risotto when he appeared last Saturday.

Matt’s clearly no foodie, so what is he is up to then?

Earlier this year he graduated from the University of Surrey with a first in English Literature and is struggling to find a job.

He’s not the only one – this year, the total number of unemployed 16-24 year olds reached a record high of 991,000.

But he hasn’t been applying exclusively for jobs.  When he’s not busy handing out CVs and filling in forms, Matt is applying to be a contestant for just about every TV show on the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 that wants applicants from the general public.

“Game show applications are so interesting – the Deal or No Deal one has you writing poems about the banker and so forth – that job applications seem too boring to consider by comparison.”

In the months since he graduated, Matt has been asked to just one job interview, for a sales job in London, which he unfortunately didn’t get.

“I struggled because unlike the other applicants I have no sales experience”, he says, “I think it’s tricky to get a job as an English degree tends to fall through the cracks of what employers are looking for.”

He has, however, appeared on several television shows.

Earlier this month he was in Manchester recording an episode of the seminal Channel 4 quiz show Countdown. He crashed and burned: having stormed the phone interview, Matt just struggled to put points on the board in the studio.

Before that he assembled a crack team to challenge five of the country’s most esteemed quiz show champions on BBC2’s Eggheads.

“Being on Eggheads was surreal. I botched an easy question, saying Kate Middleton was married at St Paul’s instead of Westminster Abbey, doing that terrible thing where you have the right answer and then talk yourself out of it. If it wasn’t for that, I might have won 20 grand.”

Other recent television appearances include providing a soundbite on The Joy of Teen Sex, proclaiming to the world, “My friend – who shall remain nameless – once said that going down on a girl in the morning is a bit like pulling apart a cheese toasty.” Nice.

The most recent figures from the Association of Graduate Recruiters show that companies will receive an average of 83 applications per graduate vacancy. In contrast, the producer of Countdown estimates that there are roughly 8.5 applicants per place on the show, so it’s not really surprising that Matt is managing to get his face on television with ease, but struggling to find an employer.

It might be common practice to pay your rent by getting a job and working the nine-to-five, but the potential earnings for a professional quizzer are substantial. So, has all of this television work translated into a profit?

“I haven’t made any money from shows yet”, he says, “I’ve just had travel expenses paid, so I’m essentially getting free mini-breaks around the UK, which has been nice.”

Winning enough to make being a quiz show contestant a viable career choice is clearly tough, but even a single appearance on Deal or No Deal or The Million Pound Drop could make all of the effort worthwhile.

Unfortunately, the high demand for places on these flagship programs with big cash prizes makes them extremely difficult to get on to.

Luckily, generating a one-off windfall is not Matt’s only concern.

As well as broadening his knowledge of trivia considerably and finally learning to cook to an acceptable standard, he’s benefited from experiencing how TV is created behind the scenes.

“Aside from the money I am quite interested to see how the whole TV process works; having spent hours of every day watching the same afternoon game shows, it’s quite surreal and exciting to actually be in the very studios I’ve spent so many hours watching, gregariously chatting with the presenters and so forth.”

So what is he going to do next?

“I’m not sure yet, although I’ve heard that the auditions for the next series of Big Brother are opening soon.”

Maybe most are better off sticking with more conventional income sources, but with more than one in five young people out of work, perhaps it’s not surprising that some are searching for novel ways to accumulate wealth.

Trying to win your living on quiz shows might seem a bit off the wall, but there are plenty of more reliable opportunities worth considering: starting a business, building a website, becoming an investor, or generating income from creative work are all options with a great deal of potential.

The general outlook is pretty bleak for young graduates at the moment, but with creative flare and a bit of ambition, you may not have to rely on the congested jobs market.

If you pull it off you’ll probably wind up happier and more fulfilled; it has to beat working an office job.

Henry Hill’s commentary: It will never be easy to find a graduate job again

PHD student creates life saving app

A former soldier has developed an app which could save the lives of burns victims, both in combat and in hospitals around the world.

Chris Seaton, formerly a captain in the Royal Army Medical Corps and now a PhD student studying Computer Science at The University of Manchester, created the iPhone and iPad application after seeing the horrific injuries burns caused to fellow soldiers.

Seaton, who carried out the research alongside Mr Rowan Pritchard Jones and Professor Paul McArthur, plastic surgeons at St Helens and Knowsley NHS Trust and academics at the University of Liverpool, won a £5,000 prize at the NHS North West Health Innovation and Education Cluster Excellence in Innovation Awards 2011 this month for his work on the app.

Critical to the chances of survival after a burns injury is taking on the correct amount of fluids. Traditionally, doctors will have to make a quick series of pen and paper calculations to assess the ideal amount.

The margin for error on doing this is high, and is also time consuming.

“For soldiers fighting on the front line, the traditional way of assessing burns victims is difficult; particularly when they’re underfire,” Mr Seaton told The Mancunion. The app – called Mersey Burns – allows for exact and rapid calculations.

On a touchscreen phone, the user simply colours in the sufferer’s burnt area on a computer model of a torso, adds in the person’s age and weight (estimated if not exactly known), and the precise amounts of fluids are instantly calculated.

Tests the research team carried out showed the iPhone app reduced errors made by pen and paper by a third.

Mr Seaton confirmed to The Mancuion that he and his fellow researchers intended to spend their £5,000 prize on legal costs as they look to make the app available on the App Store.

Chris Seaton was in the army for four years and was a captain in the army Medical core, and was keen to develop the research after seeing horrific burns injuries sustained by fellow soldiers.

He said that great things could be achieved if computer scientists like him collaborated with those in the medical profession.

“There is great possibility for creating really innovative technology by pairing up small touch screen devices with medicine,” he said.

“Even simple ideas can make a big difference and all it takes is a doctor getting together with a computer scientist to make it a reality.”

Higher education chairman warns against ‘consumer culture’

Michael Farthing, chairman of the 1994 group for higher education at research-intensive universities, has warned against universities treating students as ‘consumers’.

The 1994 Group is a higher education group for research-intensive universities and aims to promote excellence in research and teaching.

The chairman criticised the government’s recent plans to improve higher education in England. He said that there has been too much focus on undergraduates and a ‘lack of attention’ towards postgraduate students and research.

Farthing, who is also vice chancellor of Sussex University, said in a recent speech, “we cannot fall into the trap of reducing higher education to a set of simple transactions. Universities are so much more than warehouses that sell of-the-shelf qualifications, and students are more than consumers purchasing degrees”.

The government’s White Paper has proposed an option for the higher education system to be driven by competition and market forces.

To encourage more competition on price between universities, the government has allocated 20,000 undergraduate places for courses with tuition fees below £7,500.

This business-like course of action is the reason why academics such as Farthing have expressed fears about the change in higher education. He said, “we need to talk about the student experience less in terms of transactions and more in terms of relationships. Universities are communities where people come together to create and share knowledge”.

34 universities and 167 further education colleges have made applications for almost 36,000 places.

The allocation of these places will be announced next year and could see places move from universities and into further education colleges.

do not use

Michael Farthing, chairman of the 1994 group for higher education at research-intensive universities, has warned against

Michael Farthing, chairman of the 1994 group for higher education

universities treating students as ‘consumers’.

The 1994 Group is a higher education group for research-intensive universities and aims to promote excellence in research and teaching.

The chairman criticised the government’s recent plans to improve higher education in England. He said that there has been too much focus on undergraduates and a ‘lack of attention’ towards postgraduate students and research.

Farthing, who is also vice chancellor of Sussex University, said in a recent speech, “we cannot fall into the trap of reducing higher education to a set of simple transactions. Universities are so much more than warehouses that sell of-the-shelf qualifications, and students are more than consumers purchasing degrees”.

The government’s White Paper has proposed an option for the higher education system to be driven by competition and market forces.

To encourage more competition on price between universities, the government has allocated 20,000 undergraduate places for courses with tuition fees below £7,500.

This business-like course of action is the reason why academics such as Farthing have expressed fears about the change in higher education. He said, “we need to talk about the student experience less in terms of transactions and more in terms of relationships. Universities are communities where people come together to create and share knowledge”.

34 universities and 167 further education colleges have made applications for almost 36,000 places.

The allocation of these places will be announced next year and could see places move from universities and into further education colleges.

Escape modern anxiety: wash yourself, you ribald filth

We’ve all been there; the awkward moment when your existence is suddenly dominated by some form of electronic communication medium as you find yourself waiting around for various combinations of the following:

• A phone call (on your iPhone) post-job interview; your bank balance would just look so sexy all the way back to zero.
• A comment on something pretentious / quasi-witty / inane you posted on Facebook that proves you’re still acceptable on the internet.
• A text from that special someone that doesn’t suggest last night was a horribly hideous mistake.
• An email from your tutor answering all your last-minute essay crises queries / concerns / general lunatic ravings (because, hi, the deadline’s today).
• A tweet from your current intellectual idol – come on, @SalmanRushdie, let’s talk Clarissa and Courtney Love! #LiteraryKinderwhoreSmackdowns

As a form of remedy, I suggest the following: take a long shower. No, really. It’s ostensibly simple, yet most effective. Enforced time offline! Revel in your novel cleanliness!

Now, the most important preparation is to invest in the appropriate supplies:

For girls: Soap & Glory™ Higher Shower™ Pamper Pack, £20.

I’m a big fan of any brand that’s built their empire on puns (“Glow Job” facial moisturiser, anyone?), and this gift set contains the following products in full-size form:

• Clean Girls™ Shower Gel; a creamy body wash infused with notes of bergamot, blackcurrant, magnolia, freesia, vanilla and musk
• The Daily Smooth™ Body Butter; nourishes dry skin intensely with rosehip seed oil and cocoa butter.
• Mist You Madly™ Spray; a floral body spray for post-shower activity.
• Shower Puff for all your lathering needs.
• Shower Cap for Calpol chic.

As a delightful addition, try Soap & Glory The Breakfast Scrub™ Body Exfoliator, £9.95 for super-smooth skin via oat, shea butter and sugar.

For guys: Bath House Spanish Fig Men’s Shower Gift Box, £28.

For ultimate manly shower relaxation, try this kit containing:

• Spanish Fig Wash bar
• Spanish Fig Hair and Body Wash
• Spanish Fig Deodorant
• Nail brush
• Cotton flannel

All products are infused with – you guessed it – Spanish fig, in addition to nutmeg punctuated with clove and a heady base of sandalwood, cedar and patchouli.

So, now you’ve got the goods, step in and savour the steam. As a finishing touch, blast some suitably anthemic background music. Sing your troubles away! I recommend the Glee Christmas album.

Finally, when you head back to your room only to find that, still, nobody cares, rinse and repeat.

Column: Baby, Baby, Baby… Ohh Wait, Maybe Not.

If you’ve been on Twitter over the last month, you’ve probably noticed what some twelve year old girls believe is the biggest news story since a massive explosion happened in space some billions of years ago. Fresh-faced little girl impersonator Justin Bieber has allegedly fathered a child. Yes, if twenty year old Mariah Yeater is telling the truth, then Justin Bieber has broken the hearts of millions of deluded teenage girls and not been quite as ‘pure’ as he would lead you to believe. The timing of this is impeccable, coming mere days after NME reported the dropping of his balls, which signals not only the dive in credibility of the publication but also the depressing depths of humanity’s fall for caring.

 

The encounter between Yeater and Bieber is said to have happened eleven months ago backstage at one of Biebers gigs, or mass stupidity rallies as I like to think of them. The alleged ‘thirty second liason’ is said to have taken place in a toilet, which if true makes four month old Tristyn the worst thing ever produced in a toilet. Not only that, but by US law it would make Mariah Yeater a statutory rapist. Obviously Bieber denies that this ever happened, but then again he claims to have talent and a soul. It’s hard to know who is telling the truth here as both fall into a category of relentlessly untrustworthy people. Mariah Yeater is a fan of Justin Bieber (or a Belieber) and Justin Bieber is Justin Bieber. That may very well be settled by the time you read this, with paternity tests being rolled out as we speak, but what won’t be over is the sheer tenacity of the venomous hatred being levelled at Yeater by other Beliebers.

 

In a severely worrying and malicious turn of events, Beliebers have taken to the web and focussed every ounce of their being into hounding Yeater. Anti-Yeater Facebook groups are popping up at a steady rate, Twitter has gone berserk and they’re even directly threatening her on her own Facebook. Now, she may very well be making the whole thing up to get attention and even if she isn’t, she’s using her own child as a gateway into the public eye so either way, she does seem pretty vacuous, but there’s something more than a little depressing to me about the masses reaction. Now, I know the majority of the hate is coming from girls who’ve barely hit puberty and as such still have a lot to learn about the world, but where the hell did they learn that it was OK to relentlessly bully and threaten death on somebody just because of their own unreciprocated love for an empty shell of a man.

 

Remember back to earlier in the year when Rebecca Black released ‘Friday’. She faced an onslaught from half the world for what amounts to taking advantage of a chance to be a star. Now as ill-judged as that was, she didn’t deserve the torrent of abuse she received. There was one group of people however who stood by her and they were the Beliebers. At the time they seemed to be the only ones acting with any degree of perspective and rationality, openly telling the world to grow up, which coming from a twelve year old is a cracking insult. But given hindsight, it all seems a little hollow. The truth is, nobody comes out of this situation looking anything but terrible, especially you and me. I mean look at us; we’re giving this shit the time of day.

 

Album: Turbowolf – Turbowolf

Turbowolf

Turbowolf

Hassle Records

3/5

After several short EP’s and relentless touring, it’s no surprise that Turbowolf are treating their long overdue self titled debut release like the second coming of Jesus. Add to that the hyping of the 11/11/11 release and you would be forgiven for thinking this album is going to be responsible for the end of the world.

Keyboards. That’s the first thing that hit’s you about this album. Left and right massive, monolithic, organesque keyboards smack you in the face. Whilst that might sound a little overbearing, it’s woven skilfully into racing guitars and snarling vocals. There’s also always a feeling throughout that Turbowolf are merely a couple of steps from breaking out into hardcore, something that lies mainly in the pace of most of the songs.

Speaking of specific songs, after a short introduction, ‘Ancient Snake’, which is possibly the best song on the album hits. A real toe stomper, showcasing Chris Georgiadis’ vocals all held together with subtle drumwork. ‘A Rose For The Crows’ is also in with a shout of track of the album. With a crunching intro that makes you sit up and take notice and a chorus which is perhaps the most melodic part of the entire album, the song only gets better with a haunting breakdown with those keyboards again ringing out into the air.

Though there is not a particularly bad song on the album, what is missing is the live energy of the band. There’s little on the album that gives the sense of quite how manic these songs are when played live and that’s a shame. If the energy had been there this would be a great album, as it stands it’s merely a good one. Simply, it doesn’t do them justice.