Skip to main content

Month: March 2012

The Daughter-in-Law

D H Lawrence’s The Daughter-in-Law, named as his masterpiece, depicts a set of industrial unrest, elusive desires and flaming tensions erupting from a Nottinghamshire home. This portrayal of working class mining culture in 1912 is infused with the mother-in law, daughter-in-law relationship, stemming from Mrs Gascoigne’s rigid grasp of her son, Luther.

The opening scene invites us into Mrs Gascoigne’s home fully furnished with blue willow patterned dinnerware, exhibited within the Hoosier cabinet, a traditional cast iron stove and a homely pantry which radiated the period perfectly. A neighbour, Mrs Purdy, comes to the house with some unwelcome news: her daughter had fallen pregnant to Luther, a man who had been married to another woman, Minnie for a mere six weeks.

The following scenes expose two lovers helplessly hurt and deeply destroyed by the pregnancy. The cries of pain echo around the theatre, penetrate into your own skin and instil a shared sadness around the room. Both characters Luther and Minnie, perform at their finest when stripped bare to portray their vulnerabilities and ultimately, true love for one another.

The embedded problems continue to unwrap as Minnie expels her frustrations about their dictated lives, imposed by Luther’s mother, Mrs Gascoigne. Yet, the solemn nature of the play is at times lifted by instances of Joe Gascoigne, Luther’s brother. His witty and cheeky charm had the audience is howls of laughter which occasionally diverted the play to induce a more light-hearted temperament.

The Daughter-in-Law was at times slow to unfold with unnecessary drawn-out scenes; I did occasionally have to stop my eye from wondering around the room. However, truly raw emotions are at the epicentre of this play with actors that perform so beautifully and true. I was allured by their love and endured the pain alongside them.

Cofilmic’s Final Cut

Following Cofilmic’s launch at the end of October, the evening was another successful one for Cofilmic founder Janet Harrision. The Manchester based comedy film festival is spreading its wings and taking the short film entries around the country.

On Tuesday 21st February, Cofilmic came to The Cornerhouse as part of the Exposures festival and showcased the talented Michael Jacob (script editor; Birds of a Feather, Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps) and Anton Short (film editor/director).

The two enlightened the audience on the processes that go into editing and their tips on making a successful film. Michael Jacob’s advice at the script end of the stick:

“Writers often feel like they want the audience to know everything, the script editor identifies what needs to be there, what’s necessary, a scene needs to be one thing at a time

“Always helpful to edit and shoot more than you need so you can shape it down to what it should be.”

From Anton Short’s nice and handy slideshow:

1. Know what the film’s about (one clear line)

Idea=logline>Shoot, script, edit

Keep exposition down to a minimum while getting from one scene to another.

2. Lead with your best card

Which part of the story best sums up the film? Get hold of your audience within the first 30 seconds.

Once you’ve got the scene that explains your film, the theme, you can get rid of the rest that says the same thing.

3. Go in as late as possible, get out as early as possible

4. Say the most with the least

5. Kill your babies

Get rid of jokes for the sake of your film.

The advice is applicable outside of film production, so take-heed of those all-knowing in the industry and see if their words of wisdom can help you in your budding career.

Chen Man

Chinese artist Chen Man broke into the art world with her otherworldly photography for Vision, a Shanghai-based fashion and arts magazine. Since then she has continued to work with fashion giants such as Vogue, and has also been involved in advertising for international brands. Now, a selection of her work is on display in the Chinese Art Centre, tucked away in Manchester’s Northern Quarter.

Chen Man’s magazine covers have an ethereal feel: a model wearing a goldfish bowl set against a launching rocket, a woman with an antenna made from skyscrapers protruding from the top of her head, colours and scale subtly tweaked and distorted. The models wear crimson eye makeup and have pale skin, their hair and jawbones framed with digital embellishments that give them an alien appearance that, in combination with their confident poses, is eerily beautiful.

Her work makes playful references to China as an ancient civilization, and China as a new economic power. In one picture we can see a lotus flower, an ancient Buddhist symbol, and in another the model’s hair is styled to look like Mickey Mouse ears. In ‘Young Pioneer and CCTV’, a girl looks out over the urban sprawl of Beijing, where she can see the ancient sloped roofs of the forbidden city framed by the monolithic Central China Television studio building.

Curator Ying Kwok describes Man’s work as being “about her desire to combine the modern and the traditional.”

Does she feel that the political environment in China effects Man’s work?

“I wouldn’t say that communist censorship has a great influence on her work.”

Kwok went on to explain what makes Chen Man unusual: “China is dominated by male artists, as is the whole society. But as a female figure, and being so young, it’s quite a legendary story.”

 

Bags of Attitude Exhibition

There is an eerie feel about entering the Pankhurst Centre. It is not a grand building which has been built for the purpose of holding great works of art or important historical artefacts, but a simple house, once the home of Suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst.

Today it serves as a museum and is currently showing the exhibition, Bags of Attitude, based on a project led by the artist Charlotte Newson. Along with women from the Greater Manchester area, Newson invited the general public to, ‘break a taboo’, and search through women’s handbags.

Around 40 have been designed and created by women aged 19 to 80. The bags contain various items involved in their everyday lives that demonstrate the strain that the spending cuts implemented by the government have had. The exhibition creates a very strange atmosphere, between the celebration of women with the creation of the handbags and a sense of apprehension for the future.

Many included shopping bills from the past few years, highlighting the increase in the cost of living along with headphones which enable the visitor to listen to the voices of the women involved, and the stress they have experienced.

It seems fitting that the exhibition which concerns the trials modern day life holds for women should take place in the Pankhurst Centre. Bags of Attitude offers an alternative to the statistics and opinion polls dished out on the news channels and papers, with a very personal touch, and real voices to be heard.

Album: Dry The River – Shallow Bed

Dry River
Shallow Bed
RCA Records
4 stars
Released: March 5th 2012

I’ve been a fan of London five-piece Dry The River since I saw them supporting Johnny Flynn in a horrid little bar in Dundee in June 2010.  Since then I’ve seen them live more times than I can count and have always loved them, so for me, listening to their debut album was like returning to an old friend.  Songs such as ‘Weights and Measures’ and ‘Bible Belt’ still provoke the same feelings in me that they did all those months ago.

Throughout their career they’ve been compared to Mumford & Sons an inordinate amount, perhaps the presence of a violinist, which makes them a bit folky, made people ignore the fact that the two have hardly anything in common.  Dry the River did, in fact, come together through their love of post-punk and originally started out to write that kind of music but the folk element crept in over time.  Throughout the record, the dichotomy of these two influences is plain.  The overwhelming crescendo of ‘No Rest’ moves into the whispered opening of ‘Shaker Hymns’, where the group’s talent for harmonizing is shown off to its fullest extent.

It’s on closer ‘Lion’s Den’ though where it becomes clear what really makes up the backbone of this band.  At almost 7 minutes it’s an epic piece of music, starting off very calmly before descending in to a mess of noise and distortion with vocalist Peter Liddle screaming almost inaudibly over the top of it all.  The thing that makes it so special is that the violin melody plays such a huge part until the end, it’s constantly there as a reminder of the fact that this is a band who have taken two opposite influences and brought them together into something brilliant.

Dry The River – Weights and Measures

Album: Breton – Other People’s Problems

Breton
Other People’s Problems
FatCat Records
5 stars
Released: March 26th

Though south Londoners Breton take a lot of their sonic cues from the late 90s electronica of Mezzanine-era Massive Attack, it’s fans of the Rapture, Foals and The Maccabees that will be the most pleasantly surprised. It’s dark, pulsing electronica for established fans of indie rock, but there’s more to Breton than being the next NME poster boys.

In fact, there’s a lot more. They’ve already built up quite a name for themselves with their talent as filmmakers (based in disused-bank-turned-studio BretonLABS), which now translates itself perfectly to meandering, enigmatic music videos and a reportedly stunning live show. After starting to make and perform music to accompany short films, the band’s reputation grew from their notoriety on the south London squat party scene.

Named after the father of surrealism, Andre Breton, and with frontman Roman Rappak’s compulsive recording and mixing of anything and everything that grabs his attention, the band have set their compositional targets pretty high. That’s not to mention the recording of the album in Sigur Ros’ own studio in Rekyavik, and subsequent full orchestration by German composer Haushka.

So far, it’s all pretty impressive, and gratifyingly, Other People’s Problems pays up. It’s deceptively complex and the ubiquitous thick, cinematic strings add a rare tension and depth to what could all too easily be dismissed as plain old indie electronica. In fact, the album’s weakest points are those in which this influence is over-indulged. There’s always a danger to a band like this taking themselves too seriously but Breton get away with it through sheer talent and artistic sensibility. Overall, it’s expansive and rewarding, and whatever your initial reaction, will be well worth your while.

Download: ‘Interference’

Breton – Interference

Classic album: Sex Pistols – Never Mind The Bollocks…

Sex Pistols
Never Mind The Bollocks, Here’s The Sex Pistols
Virgin Records
Released: 1977

Thirty five years ago this year, with one specific track ‘God Save the Queen’ to coincide with the Queen’s silver jubilee, The Sex Pistols’ only album was released. It may have only been their debut but the generation it spoke for showed why it was an instant classic and helped boost the careers of John “Johnny Rotten” Lydon and the late Sid Vicious.

The album’s vile, fluorescent yellow and pink sleeve made it instantly recognisable amongst any record collection and the controversy surrounding the release of an album with “bollocks” in the title helped increase the advertising and popularity of this vinyl.

The most controversial track on the album is ‘God Save the Queen’ and is probably the most well-known Sex Pistols track. The song claims that the Queen has a “fascist regime” and that England has “no future”. Even though it reached number 1 in the charts, the BBC refused to give the number 1 spot to the Sex Pistols, instead giving it to Rod Stewart’s ‘I Don’t Want to Talk About It’, generating even more publicity and controversy.

Three other infamous tracks from Never Mind The Bollocks… include album opener ‘Holidays in the Sun’, ‘Pretty Vacant’ and ‘Anarchy in the U.K’ with the latter being the only single released before EMI famously dropped the group, with the lyrical content reflecting the issues of the time that extremely concerned the youth.

Never Mind the Bollocks… is widely recognised by critics as one of, if not,  the most influential punk album of all time which has been used as an inspiration for many that followed, including bands like Nirvana. There have been numerous reunions of the Sex Pistols, possibly hypocritical of what they originally wrote about, but the album will always remain a classic as it spoke for an entire generation.

Opinion: The Vaccines

Hypocrite! That’s what you might shout if you came across my review of The Vaccines Academy gig last year. To tell you the truth, I was reasonably impressed. The band were polished, tight, charismatic and played their hits the goddamn best they could. However, that doesn’t stop me from thinking the people who like them are fools. I review gigs based on the band and if they perform to the best of their ability, but you can do that and still be crap. I’m sure One Direction’s tour will be flawless as long as the roadie knows where the play button is.

The problem for me is, well, The Ramones. The Vaccines riffs are very ‘influenced’, to put it kindly. Their album is full of memorable melodies but who can go wrong with 4 chord rock? Listening to the platinum selling debut, What Did You Expect From the Vaccines?, I can’t help but slowly drift into unconsciousness as the album drifts through predictable riff after predictable riff. Perhaps my biggest gripe is with the monumentally terrible lyrics in ‘Post Break Up Sex’ which just leaves me empty inside. There seems to be no let up – the music has no imagination and the same can be said for the lyrics. Take ‘If You Wanna’ for example. Any bets on how long it took them to come up with that?

Yes, bands sound like other bands, you can’t get away from that. But The Vaccines are no cure to the musical stagnation in the indie scene; instead they put me on a flight straight to a Swiss clinic. Most songs can be traced back to The Ramones – ‘The KKK Took My Baby Away’ is as near as makes no difference to ‘Post Break Up Sex’ and ‘Norgaard’ is unashamedly ‘Blitzkreig Bop’ in disguise.

There is just one crucial difference: The Ramones have attitude and passion and don’t rely on shit loads of reverb to make them sound interesting.

Live: Benjamin Francis Leftwich @ Academy 2

Benjamin Francis Leftwich
Academy 2
23rd February
2 ½ stars

It was a busy night in The Academy as I breathed in to allow for an army of cap (complete with sticker) clad people past on their way for the MOBO tour. I, however, had a more serene task at hand, ignoring the pounding grime from above to enter the lulled setting of Academy 2.

Opening was Salford’s own Ren Harvieu who carefully made her way on stage aided by the use of a crutch having recently recovered from a near-paralysing injury. Despite the frail appearance, her smoky voice resounded strongly with a depth that matched her heavily pencilled eyes. A simple ensemble helped shine a musical spotlight on Harvieu, who in turn drew the attention of the audience, with tracks like ‘Crying’ and the Carole King-esque ‘Through The Night’ particularly standing out.

For the evening’s main billing, Leftwich had assembled himself an identikit band of sensitive types, all of whom sported Lego man hair do’s and an expression somewhere between sex face and intense bowel discomfort, conjuring up a kind of squinty eyed grimace that one would normally associate with serial masturbators.

Aesthetics aside though, the gig failed to hit second gear. The crowd was restless with chatter throughout and the songs lacked the momentum or variation to keep even those most diligent purveyors of mediocrity, Athlete, entertained for a night. By the end of the set, I was ready to go and bang on ‘Wires’ accompanied by a Pinot Grigio blush just to edge things up a bit.

As good as Leftwich may sound when his hushed tones are sound tracking your M&S meal for two, a live performer he is not. Lacking in presence and without a uniquely individual voice, he was easily upstaged by the powerful vocals of Ren Harvieu who looks set for big things.

Benjamin Francis Leftwich – Pictures
Ren Harvieu – Through The Night

Live: Grouplove @ Ruby Lounge

GroupLove
Ruby Lounge
6th February
4 Stars

Sunday night at The Ruby Lounge opened with a low-key set from Two Wounded Birds, who profess a throwback west coast American rock sound. Two Wounded Birds got their big break when Jonathan Pierce of The Drums refused to go on the NME’s Radar Tour unless these guys were supporting. Having seen the band before, I would conclude that while their sound has since gotten stronger, their energy on stage was lacking.

GroupLove took the stage next and made up for any zeal missing previously from the night. The band is a visual bonanza, jumping and bouncing around the stage during every second of every song. An eclectic mix of personalities, their guitarist sported a cowboy hat and handlebar moustache, making him an easy substitution for a member of Crosby, Stills, and Nash while their bassist with long blonde locks looked like he just stepped off the California coast. The crowd went crazy for ‘Colours’ and ‘Tongue Tied’, and the band pushed through with an explosive version of ‘Slow’ despite difficulty with their earpieces.

Vocalist/guitarist Christian Zucconi took the time to have a quick chat afterwards about how the band, who met randomly in Greece one summer, has taken off. His explanation? Australian radio station Triple J started pushing their music on air and since that time they’ve been asked to do major festivals like Coachella and Bonnaroo. As good as their album, Never Trust a Happy Song, is, live is definitely the way to see this band.

That said, GroupLove put on a great show and are the quintessential American indie rock band. If their night at Ruby Lounge was any indication of the summer ahead, it’s going to be wild one.

Grouplove – Colours (live)

Speak now, or forever hold your peace

I often pause to consider how thankful I am to live in a country where the relationship between the religious and non-religious is largely amicable. Unlike in America, where contentious issues such as birth control and school prayers flare up with alarming regularity and undying vim, in Britain we enjoy a discourse between pious killjoys and faithless heretics that is largely peaceful.

Events of recent weeks appear to have soured this happy accord, however, as the two sides have come into conflict over the role of religion in today’s society. Following a judicial ruling which outlawed the saying of prayers before the meetings of Bideford council, the issue exploded as Conservative Party co-Chair Baroness Warsi launched a blistering attack on what she saw as a rise in ‘militant secularism’, making comparisons between the efforts of secularist campaigners and the brutal rule of totalitarian regimes. Writing in the Daily Telegraph, she advocated an increased role for religion in society, arguing that faith should have “a place at the table” – although she was quick to deny that she was calling for a theocracy.

Warsi’s comments are hyperbolic and her use of totalitarian imagery is trite and unhelpful. She should be lambasted for using language that drags up what can laughably be called a ‘debate’ between two sides that differ on their very perception of reality. Attempts to truly understand each other’s viewpoint are patronising at best; argument between the religious and the faithless is entirely fruitless. Quite frankly, I’m surprised anyone can be bothered.

Instead, allow me to offer a suggestion on the contemporary role of religion in an increasingly secular society that I hope can please both sides. Particularly at a time when Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition is flakier than a communion wafer, religious leaders can play a vital role in ensuring the plurality of power in our democracy. When politicians fail to propose effective alternatives to government policy, as our system demands, we must look elsewhere for sources of inspiration. By writing challenging newspaper articles, giving considered television interviews and thoughtfully commenting on the zeitgeist, Britain’s religious leaders are perfectly placed to fulfil this role.

The fact that they retain legitimacy due to tradition, despite their unelected nature, means that they can advance alternative arguments or opinions which might, at times, fly in the face of the public mood. Certainly, sexist or homophobic diatribes should be shot down with vigour, but in the interests of holding our government to account religious leaders should be encouraged to comment on matters of government whether supportive or otherwise. To disempower influential people of faith would cause us to relinquish a unique source of authority that could not be easily replaced.

Hopefully, this is a position which can be endorsed unanimously, both by the secular and religious communities. An acceptance that religious leaders of all faiths should be given a voice would not only avoid petit squabbling over who should be saying what and when, but it might re-establish religion as a vital tool in the armoury of our democracy.

The Fallowfield Fast Food Phenomenon

Usually a journey back from a heavy night out involves making a stop at a takeaway before venturing back home, but why is it always from the same place?

Students around the country – and in Fallowfield in particular – show an unbreakable loyalty to the people that provide their greasy food after a night out; it’s a devotion resembling that of a football fan towards their respective clubs.  No one walks around wearing a Kebab King pizza with Paz’s name printed on the back but it is not out of the question.

This loyalty is a phenomenon that can’t easily be changed.  When McDonalds in Fallowfield made the decision to stay open it looked like the big nightly revenues of smaller establishments would fall victim to a McDonald’s monopoly, yet not even the might of a Fortune 500 company was enough to cut the chords between students and their beloved fast food joint.

Most of the student population will prefer a Big Mac over a distinctly average tasting quarter pounder from one of the other take-outs when sober but McDonalds mysteriously drops down the pecking order of places to eat when intoxicated.  Is that because food from all the other places tastes so good after a bottle of vodka or is McDonalds just not greasy enough to satisfy our drunken cravings?

Can this consumer devotion be explained from a business perspective? Most businesses gain loyalty through the use of promotions.  Some restaurants like to offer loyalty cards that reward frequent eaters but none of the fast food places have adopted such marketing schemes and yet they keep hold of their equal share of customers for the duration of their degrees.

Price competition is not common either, presumably due to the difficulty to undercut the competition when the general price level for post night out fast food is already so low.  Offering kebab on chips for ten pence less will make little difference to most people, especially students too drunk to register the price.  Pricing strategy appears to be just as fruitless as marketing strategies.

This could mean that Dixie chicken and its competitors may in fact explain an elementary economic model.  With a large number of businesses all selling near identical products at identical prices to hungry drunken students who all want cheap food , the Fallowfield late night fast food market is arguably proof that perfect competition exists after all.  Alcohol and kebabs are the answer to an economic mystery.

Live: Michael Kiwanuka @ Ruby Lounge

20th February 2012

Ruby Lounge

5/10

If you know anything about Michael Kiwanuka, then you probably started reading this review wondering how many words would go by before there was mention of the BBC’s ‘Sound of 2012’. In this case, it’s thirty. Given the list’s formidable alumni – past winners include commercial heavyweights Adele, Ellie Goulding, Jessie J and 50 Cent – it’s little wonder that Kiwanuka, this year’s victor, has become the focus of intense media scrutiny.

Opening proceedings at the Ruby Lounge are The Staves, a trio of Watford sisters who themselves have experienced no shortage of acclaim, from providing backing vocals for Tom Jones to being headhunted by illustrious producers Glyn and Ethan Johns. Their involvement with those producers is just one reason why comparisons with Laura Marling are inevitable; their ability to conjure the spirit of folk music from both sides of the Atlantic is impressive and the outrageously charming three-part harmonies bode well for their imminent debut record.

Speaking of debut records, tonight provides the crowd with a first listen to material from Kiwanuka’s forthcoming Home Again. They mark an expansion on the sound that made his name, on a number of singles on fellow Londoner Ben Lovett’s label – Lovett being better known as one of Mumford’s Sons. Kiwanuka’s performance tonight veers between the brilliant – ‘I’m Getting Ready’ is a devastatingly soulful effort that recalls a mellower Al Green – and the bland, with a mid-set lull raising questions about album filler that won’t be answered until the record’s release. In terms of raw talent, there’s a strong case for Kiwanuka’s emergence on top of the BBC heap – his voice tonight is consistently impressive and occasionally breathtaking in its soulfulness – but it’s hard to wonder whether the artists he saw off might’ve had something  more groundbreaking to offer than ‘soulful singer-songwriter’.

Michael Kiwanuka – I’m Getting Ready (Later with Jools Holland)

Classic album: The Jimi Hendrix Experience – Electric Ladyland

Electric Ladyland
The Jimi Hendrix Experience
Reprise
Released: 1968

Electric Ladyland was the third and last album by the Jimi Hendrix Experience which had to follow up two other huge albums – 1967’s Are You Experienced? and Axis Bold as Love – both of which have become timeless classics. But while Electric Ladyland may only be known by some for its controversial original pressing sleeve, featuring numerous naked women, the album as a whole was completely different to Hendrix & co’s previous releases.

From the opening track ‘…And The Gods Made Love’, the album gives the impression it will not be the same as its predecessors as it kicks in with a heavier sound. The album also features covers of both Bob Dylan’s ‘All Along the Watchtower’ and Earl King’s ‘Come On (Let the Good Times Roll)’.

Arguably, the most well-known song on the album, and of Hendrix’s back catalogue, is ‘Voodoo Child (Slight Return)’ (now more commonly known as the only Voodoo Chile), instantly recognisable by its extensive use of wah-wah guitar work. However, this track can easily be confused with another track by The Jimi Hendrix Experience named ‘Voodoo Chile’,  also featured on Electric Ladyland, which was a fifteen minute long jam and became the basis for the classic ‘Voodoo Child’.

This album has come to be a key influence for any and all heavy music that followed it and helped to prove that Jimi Hendrix, while an amazing songwriter and guitarist (even better than Clapton), was simply a genius. It is undeniably one of the greatest “heavy” albums of all time and one of the few albums you must listen to, no matter what you’re into.

The Jimi Hendrix Experience – Gypsy Eyes

Blue Skies Thinking?

Last month has seen the eight year bidding war to supply India with fighter jets culminating in India choosing the French company Dassault’s Rafale over the British, German, Italian, and Spanish built Eurofighter Typhoon. The deal is for 126 fighter jets and is worth up to $20biliion. It is the most important defence decision of the last 12 months.

‘So what does India want with all those big expensive toys anyway’ I hear you say. Good question! Well, apart from the obvious: that fighter jets are fun and exciting, India has two longstanding best enemies to protect herself from. Pakistan to the West with a fleet of ‘retro’ American built F-16s and China to the North with home–grown Chengdu J-10 combat aircraft. So India’s choice of aircraft would be based on more than matching China and Pakistan’s air capabilities.

India had several options. She could have gone the route of Pakistan and buy from the Americans (Boeing’s F/A-18 Super Hornet or Lockheed Martin’s F-16 Super Viper were likely options). But after Pakistan’s realisation that all their jets came with a surprise gift of ……, it’s not so unexpected that they passed up that option. Alternatively, since China’s jet is a spin-off of the Russian craft, it would make sense to buy from them; however for some unknown reason India also eliminated the Russians from the competition quite early on. So the two remaining options were the Typhoon and Rafale.

By most accounts the Eurofighter is better than the Rafale. For a start, the Typhoon is much newer (the Rafale is the same generation as Pakistan’s F-16s). And trade links also make it seem the likelier choice. So how did the French do it? It’s argued that the deciding factor was that Rafale was cheaper by up to 10%. Other theories suggest that Sarkozy might have, in true French style, bartered and haggled a deal and thrown in bargain civil nuclear energy to clinch it. Alternatively, perhaps, (shock horror!) they chose the Rafale because it is the better jet. The recent intervention in Libya presented the perfect opportunity for arms dealers to show off their wares to the Indians. So perhaps the display persuaded India of the merits of Rafale’s strength in air-to-ground attacks over the Eurofighter’s better air-to-air combat capabilities.

So what can we draw from this? Well firstly, if India was dissuaded by Typhoon’s relatively clumsy air-to-ground performance then it hints at the type of defence demands they predict experiencing in the future, and it would also shape the type of future campaigns they would be willing to embark upon too. Perhaps, indicating India’s perception of a stronger threat from Pakistan than China. Secondly, we could conclude that the 10% price difference was what swayed India, or, alternatively, that India’s concern was not with the immediate price, but in fact to start a bidding war between Dassault and BAE/EADS to receive the most competitive price for both. On the other hand, the fact that India whittled down the choice to two 4th generation jets when 5th generation stealth fighters such as Russian Pak-Fa or the American F-35 and F-22 were available might also tell us something (although even for all the oil in Saudi Arabia I couldn’t tell you what).

The office of US defence manufacturer Lockheed Martin used to house a gigantic map of America which showed how, for every single congressional district in America, their company’s actions influenced that area in some significant way. India’s fighter jet choice has the same effect, but on a global scale.

For instance, as we know; every cat has a mat and every military aircraft has an aircraft carrier, or so the saying goes. What I mean by this sadly oft forgotten maxim is that the choice made by India’s air force will also have knock on effects on the choices made by their Navy. Fighter jets require aircraft carriers to be tailor engineered for compatibility. India’s choice of the Rafale aircraft means it’s likely that they might also buy a French Thales aircraft carrier. BAE are building carriers for the Royal Navy, at the time of the Defence Review last year there was some discussion as to their eventual owners, the Indian decision ends all speculation, once built these will remain here but what flies from them is still anyone’s best guess.

Not receiving the Indian fighter jet deal, and therefore also missing out on an aircraft carrier deal and in a time of Europe-wide defence cuts, we are likely, as a result, to see large swathes of Job losses in the defence manufacturing sector in UK. Even before the India deal was known, in September last year BAE announced plans to cut 3,000 jobs in their military aircraft division. Not only would these job losses have a destructive effect on economic prosperity, but it would have a devastating effect on the UK manufacturing base and in turn a ruinous effect on our sovereignty and defensive capabilities.  For once we have lost our capacity to manufacture weapons independently of other countries, we lose that capacity permanently.

It would seem odd that the Government would be willing to leave matters like this, if the French can offer nuclear treats to India why could we not build a third Carrier designed for Naval Eurofighters and make the price too attractive to refuse?  Once you have built the first two Carriers the cost of running the system a third time would be a fraction of the initial outlay. Just thinking aloud, which seems preferable to not thinking at all.

Manchester overcome gritty Salford in tough encounter

Manchester came across tough opposition in the form of local rivals Salford as they looked to continue their fine league form. With Manchester sitting on top of the table and Salford rooted to the bottom, a spectator could be forgiven for expecting an easy victory for the talented Manchester side. However, Salford produced a resolute performance to keep Manchester on their toes right up to the final whistle.
It was a clear and cool afternoon at the Armitage Centre as the teams stepped out to commence play. The home side started the brighter, passing the ball quickly and confidently. Manchester’s captain Olivia Thackray was quick to impose herself on the game, playing an inviting ball through to winger Nat Robinson, whose teasing cross was initially spilled by the Salford keeper before being eventually cleared. Manchester continued to grow into the game, as Chloe Tomlinson beat the offside trap on the right flank to play in another testing cross, Robinson firing just wide at the back post. Thackray continued to weave play together in the centre of the park, winning a free-kick around twenty-five yards from goal. Her floated effort from the set play was clutched gratefully by Salford’s number one. Manchester’s early dominance resulted in a breakthrough after around ten minutes. Thackray broke free in midfield and split the Salford defence with a well executed through ball. Nat Robinson bore down on goal and Salford’s keeper could only palm her well struck effort into the bottom left corner.
Following the opening goal, Manchester continued to exert control. The midfield trio of Thackray, Robinson and Tomlinson was causing problems for the Salford defence, while lone striker Jess Casey used her aerial ability and close control to spearhead Manchester’s attacks. Good footwork from Chloe Tomlinson carved out another opportunity but her low effort from the corner of the eighteen yard box was saved comfortably. Another chance fell to Thackray but her strike was just wide to the right of Salford’s goal. It was on the half hour mark that Manchester made their continued ascendancy count, as a missed header in the Salford defence fell fortuitously for Casey. The Manchester striker powered through, and was justly awarded a penalty for a shirt tug from the opposing centre-back. Nat Robinson stepped up to take the spot kick, hoping to net her second of the game. She gave the keeper no chance, firing low into the left corner; Manchester had doubled their advantage and looked in unstoppable form.
Salford mustered their first clear cut chances towards the end of the first half. A sliced effort forced the first save from Manchester keeper Beth Evans, who then had to be alert to pounce on the rebound. Just a few minutes later, Salford earned the first corner of the match. The floated cross required a combination of Manchester’s centre-back partnership Kirsten Morris and Francesca Self to clear. The whistle blew for half time, with Manchester having displayed both attacking prowess and defensive capability to earn a 2-0 lead. However, though Salford were yet to really threaten, the tie was far from won.
Manchester created the first opening of the second half, though Thackray’s shot was claimed easily by Salford’s keeper. Tenacious work from Lucy Spring in midfield earned another free-kick in a dangerous position but once again Salford’s goalie was equal to it. Despite these early opportunities, Salford had emerged for the second forty-five as a much more determined force and began working the ball in a way that they hadn’t previously. A cross from the left broke through Manchester’s resilient backline and resulted in a free header glanced over the bar. Salford really should have scored, but their confidence had received a much-needed boost. Almost immediately, another trying cross required a header from Morris to clear. Salford’s increasingly attacking mentality opened the game up, and Manchester responded with attacks of their own. A poor goal-kick from Salford’s newly-introduced substitute goalkeeper allowed Tomlinson to play in yet another cross, Casey cutting back to Thackray whose effort grazed the crossbar as it went over.
With twenty minutes of the second half played, another goal felt imminent; and it also seemed that it could be a crucial one. It was Salford who claimed it, closing the deficit in scrappy style. The taxing wing play of Salford’s team was again involved, as Beth Evans couldn’t quite grasp a deep cross from the right flank. The ball squirmed free and Francesca Self was forced to clear a goalbound strike off the line, only to see a Salford striker to prod the rebound home. Suddenly, Manchester’s lead seemed precarious and Salford looked to seize on the momentum they had generated.
Playing to their strengths, Salford continued to pepper the Manchester area with high crosses and long balls, but Morris and Self, combined with full-backs Jeanie Gordon and Grace Whitaker proved a resilient backline. Midfielder Lucy Spring never shirked a tackle, providing an effective shield to the defence. Despite increasing pressure, Salford were limited to a single clear chance; keeper Evans pulling off a fantastic reaction stop to thwart a shot seemingly destined for the top left corner. Manchester introduced a trio of fresh faces late in the second half; Chloe Mapp, Simone Wan and Laura Gilroy. Their energy helped to rejuvenate the seemingly dilapidated Manchester attack, Wan in particular unlucky to connect with a tantalising ball across the six yard box from Mapp. As Salford pressed for an equalizer in the tense closing minutes, the final chance fell in fact to Thackray. A quick counter attack left the talented midfielder in space, though she dragged her shot agonizingly wide of the right post.
The final whistle blew and Manchester had won; despite a gritty display from Salford, Manchester’s class had edged them the encounter. Manchester will now look with increasing optimism towards securing the league title.

‘Are footballers really the most manly men?’

What is most apparent about John Amaechi on first meeting is his great height. It is hard to imagine how the towering 6 foot 10 former NBA basketball player, who now works as a psychologist and political activist, could be apprehensive about ‘coming out’ in the sporting world, despite the industry being so riddled with taboos. Amaechi emerges in full basketball attire and welcomes me into his office at the Amaechi Basketball Centre in Manchester, a non profit organisation which he helped to set up in order to provide basketball activities to all ages.
Homophobia in professional sport is an issue which is constantly receiving media attention, so it seems relevant to speak to a man who has had firsthand experience of being a gay professional sportsman. Since revealing his sexuality in his 2007 memoir ‘Man in the Middle’, following his retirement, Amaechi has become a role model for homosexuals in the sporting world.
Although openly gay to his friends, family and teammates, the thought of going public with his sexuality remained a daunting prospect.
Amaechi isn’t alone is his reluctance to publicly identify himself as gay. Over the past few decades there have only been a few examples of gay athletes, particularly where football is concerned. Justin Fashanu, who in 1998 tragically committed suicide, remains the only publicly gay football player in Premier League history. With estimates of dozens more gay players, it begs the question: why are footballers so reluctant to ‘come out’?
‘There are very few work places where you can get away with homophobic abuse and not get fired. Whereas football is one of the few places where it seems like it is standard.’
It is, then, down to the support of the governing bodies. Openly gay athletes such as ex Welsh rugby captain Gareth Thomas and English cricketer Stephan Davies have benefitted from the support of the Welsh Rugby Union and the ECB. But many journalists have expressed the view that, at least where football is concerned, Fashanu, the first gay footballer in Premier League, will remain the last.
The FA has been accused of doing the bare minimum when it comes to tackling the issue of homophobia in football. ‘They’re very good at rhetoric and posters, there needs to be a genuine feeling that they want to make a change,’ Amaechi says. ‘They’re doing the bare minimum that they can get away with.’
‘It is an issue of performance, if what you’re trying to do is create teams where everyone on your team no matter their religion, colour, race can play their very best you, need to create an atmosphere that allows that to happen. A homophobic atmosphere is not one.’
On February 2nd the FA announced that all their Premier League clubs had signed up to the Government’s Charter for Action against Homophobia, in an effort to tackle the problem within sport. But just how effective can a piece of paper be in solving the age-old issue of homophobia?
‘There shouldn’t need to be a charter, that’s just how you should behave towards people,’ Amaechi says.
And does the introduction of a charter only increase the difficulty in finding a solution to the problem of homophobia by adopting a hierarchical approach to bigotry? It is the wrong approach, according to Amaechi.
‘The FA has been hacking away at the same head of a monster, with little success.’
‘You have to tackle all the problems at once, whether it’s racism, sexism, anti-Semitism or homophobia’.
In February the FA launched a new initiative called Opening Doors and Joining In, which aims to promote the adoption of a ‘So what?’ attitude in regard to homosexuality in football.
But while there is doubt surrounding the sincerity of the initiative, it is only through campaigns such as this, which consciously address the issue of homophobia, that any solution to the problem can be found.
‘It’s far more likely if the League and the Association look like they’re serious about making the environment better. If they do that, then yes, they’ll get players that come out. And yes, most teammates will think it’s no big deal.’
English publicist Max Clifford, who is said to have represented two gay Premier League football stars in the last five years, has warned major footballers against ‘coming out’. The issue, then, is not just the fans and the threat of homophobic abuse screamed from the stands, but how being homosexual affects the market value of a sportsperson.
‘The main worry is what it is going to be like every other day in practice. Is your coach going to look down his nose? You have to worry about whether you’ll get another contract.’ Amaechi says.
The benefits of these recent initiatives by the FA are yet to be seen.
Will any footballers be following in the footsteps of Justin Fashanu any time soon? ‘Soon?’ He says with a raised eyebrow. ‘I don’t know about soon.’ But sitting in his office at the Amaechi Basketball Centre, surrounded by young basketball players who will perhaps one day follow in his footsteps, it is hard to be pessimistic about the tolerance of homophobia in sport.

Player Profile: Jessica Rachwal

How did you get into cheerleading?
Well throughout first and second year at University I always wanted to do cheerleading but none of my friends wanted to. They played other sports like Rugby League and Netball, which are apparently ‘real sports’ compared to cheerleading something I will always challenge them on! Anyway then last year I went to Texas in my year in Industry and wanted to join over there but I couldn’t as wasn’t an official student because I was working at the labs. So when I came back to England I didn’t want to miss my last student opportunity to finally become a cheerleader so made sure I signed up during Fresher’s week!

What is it like being part of the Manchester Squad?
It’s very social and such nice people are in the squad; they were really welcoming and are always on the lookout for the next great cheerleader so get down to training! We do take training seriously as its three 2 hour sessions every week, so we put the work in and train a lot more than many of the other sports teams at the Uni.

What do you focus on in each training session?
In each session we warm up for 20 minutes which usually involves a jog and then we fully stretch mainly focusing on the legs for the flexible jumps and wrists for the stunts and lifting. For the last few months we have been practicing a routine over and over as we were preparing for a tournament in Loughborough where there were 15 University in our pool. To train for that the weekly sessions were split into two, in first half we practiced the ‘stunts,’ so these include the lifts and moves in the air and then the second half we looked at the dance sections.

What was it like competing in your first tournament in Loughborough?
It was very exciting and competitive but not in a bitchy way as portrayed in films like ‘Bring it on,’ etc. Everyone was cheering teams on and a lot of the uni’s brought their second teams to maximise the support. It was cool seeing all the different costumes that the other teams had on; some had amazing glitter and big hair. We kept it very professional and didn’t over do it too much, more about our performance than what we look like!

What components make up the Manchester Cheerleading outfit?
Well we all have the same white trainers which were designed for us, and of course they have the purple and proud insole, and then we have to wear white socks with those. We have our short under layer which is called ‘spankies,’ then a skirt which is very short but this is because we have to be able to move freely during jumps and moves. The upper part of the outfit is a high polo neck and then during competition we have to wear a very high pony tail with a purple bow. We definitely have the most purple and proud sports outfit at Uni!

If I decided to come down to a session what cheerleading moves would you teach me?
Ok, well it’s important to know the basics. We would first look at your stance and you would want to be in a ‘clean’ standing position so this means that you have your arms by your side and legs together. This would be whenever you aren’t doing a move; everything needs to be very neat for performance. Then I would show you a ‘high clap,’ so this is used in the chants- lock your hands in a clap position near your mouth with elbows tight together. There is also the high ‘V,’ where you raise your arms above your head at full extension, there is then a low ‘V’ which is it reversed. And if you’re feeling confident then we could have a go at a few jumps so a ‘toe touch’ which is legs out at full extension.

Stereotypically Cheerleaders and their sport are not always cast in a positive light, what is your opinion on this?
I know some people view it as a ‘joke’ sport but it shouldn’t be seen like this. You really need to be fit and have core strength to be able to perform because we have to be able lift the girls and also perform in the air. There are a lot of technical elements to the sport which are very difficult to learn and it combines dance, strength, athleticism, style and gymnastic elements- it’s tough! We had quite a few boys who started at the beginning but had to drop out as they couldn’t keep up the pace.ha. Also I know there’s the whole ‘stupid cheerleader’ image but we are all clever girls at the universities of Manchester; I mean I study bio-chemistry and hope to go into dentistry after. We need to get rid of these silly stereotypes!

Watch out for the Purple and Proud Cheerleaders who will be bringing their cheer to next month’s Christie Cup…

Where are they now? – Linford Christie

Linford Christie famously burst onto the scene in the early 1990’s, capturing the imagination of the nation with his 100m gold medal win at the 1992 Seoul Olympics that announced him as one of the world’s premier athletes. Christie seemed destined to go onto dominate sprinting, and establish himself as one of Brtiain’s leading lights in the world of athletics.A series of unfortunate events throughout the latter half of the decade saw his reputation shredded and ultimately, leave his legacy as one of controversy.

A routine drugs test in 1999 after a meeting in Dortmund found Christie to have nearly 100 times the usual amount of Nandrolone in his system, and despite being exonerated due to a variety of doubts over the intent to take stimulants, the decision was overturned, and Christie was handed a 2 year ban, as well as having his Olympic accreditation revoked by the British Olympic Association, a punishment which still stands for this summer’s games. A series of legal disputes with journalist John McVicar and comedian Nick Hancock after their comments about the sprinter did little to restore Christie’s tarnished reputation, and kept his name in the headlines for the wrong reasons. Controversy always seemed to plague Christie even long after the fall out from the drugs ban, for instance in 2004, under rather humorous circumstances, a sculpture erected in appreciation of the sprinter named ‘The B of the Bang’ was deemed as ‘unsafe’ and forced to be dismantled.

An appearance on the ITV reality show ‘I’m a Celebrity: Get Me Out of Here’ brought Christie back into the public spotlight, but once again, his public image suffered a hammer blow after he was found guilty of causing a serious road accident after driving on the wrong side of the road, narrowly avoiding a jail term. This summer’s Olympic games in London will see Christie take on a mentor role for the British team, a decision that has been greeted with some scepticism amongst some within the Team GB camp. Ultimately however, whilst he will be remembered for his various controversies, at his peak, Linford Christie rightfully will go down as one of Britain’s greatest ever athletes, a feat acknowledged by the awarding of an OBE.

British reputation on the line as Olympics approach

Reputations are an irksome concept; you spend years developing one only for it to be shattered in one single moment of misjudgement. Mohammad Amir, the richly-talented Pakistan seamer, was undoubtedly destined for a glorious career but instead has had his reputation torn apart after being convicted of spot-fixing.

Amir has been expelled from cricket for five years but re-constructing his broken reputation will take years of hard graft. Amir, is certainly not alone in making mistakes. Professional sport is synonymous with pressure and is what makes spectators flock to stadia; Billie Jean King once declared that ‘pressure is a privilege’ but a myriad of sportsmen and women react differently when the spotlight is blinding them. In these situations a psychologist would suggest that our natural instincts take over and as professional sportsman are elite athletes the skill they execute is normally accurate.

However, as with the majority of theories, there are exceptions. Wayne Rooney, during a Euro 2012 qualifier against Montenegro last year- lashed out belligerently at defender Miodrag Dzudovic- earning himself a dismissal and a deserved three game ban, reduced, incredibly, to two on appeal. England required a solitary point from that match to guarantee qualification and were cruising at 2-0 in the Podgorican cauldron of atmosphere and intimidation when Rooney saw red, illustrating the fact that pressure is permanent in professional sport.

It would not be unfair to argue that as professional athletes are continually pressurised-and are paid handsomely to deal with it-they should be able to cope. The behaviour of members of the England Rugby World Cup squad in New Zealand highlighted an inability to handle the overwhelming expectations of a nation.

Mike Tindall, captain at the time, was allegedly seen kissing a woman while inebriated in a Queenstown bar-weeks after his wedding with the Queen’s grand daughter, Zara Philips. Tindall was consequently fined £25,000 and was kicked out of the RFU. Chris Ashton and James Haskell were both warned about their conduct and fined £5,000 following unsuitable comments made to a female hotel worker in Dunedin. Furthermore, Manu Tuilagi was cautioned by police after jumping off a ferry and swimming to shore shortly after England were defeated by France at the quarter final stage; the Leicester centre was punished with a £3,000 fine.

A World Cup tournament is naturally very draining and achieving the balance right between training hard and relaxing is paramount, but the aforementioned players failed to realise their every move is scrutinised when representing their country. When things are going well on the pitch you earn a bit of leeway off it, fans and the media are generally more accepting but having under-performed considerably in the tournament, England returned home with a reputation of beer-swigging, social junkies rather than devout professionals.

It was British Boxing’s turn last month to have its opportunity to shoot itself in the foot with an embarrassing catalogue of incidents. The ever-controversial Derek Chisora was clearly on a mission to disgrace himself and leave another of our governing bodies, the Britsh Boxing Board of Control, very red-faced. The Zimbabwean-born heavyweight petulantly slapped his opponent, Vitali Klitschko, at the weigh-in, and spat water in the face of his brother Wladimir, before the fight. Only Chisora himself will know why he acted in that fashion but I am inclined to believe that the overpowering pressure of the occasion engulfed him. To his credit, he performed admirably in the ring and could have salvaged his reputation. However, he instead opted to become embroiled in a ludicrous war of words with retired British heavyweight, David Haye, at the post-fight press conference which escalated into mayhem with both men brawling absurdly. Chisora has paid the price with an indefinite ban from the sport being handed to him by the World Boxing Council.

On July 6th 2005 Jacques Rogge announced in front of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in Singapore that “the Games of the XXXth Olympiad in 2012 are awarded to the city of…London”. Six-and-a-half years of preparation and diligence and a figure in the region of £5-9 billion has been invested; attempting to make London a creditable host of one of the biggest, if not the biggest, sporting events in the world.

However, is all this planning being tarnished by the actions of a minority of our British sportsmen, our so-called “role models”? Do other nations view the British with a degree of disdain? We must hope that our reputation remains very much positive, despite recent events and that the impression London gives the Games and the people of the world is very much a lasting one: for all the right reasons.