Skip to main content

Month: November 2020

Are romantic relationships really important?

“Love is giving someone the ability to destroy you, but trusting them not to”

This anonymous philosophical comment could not have summed up my sentiments more accurately.

Love is not physical, but an emotional response we feel for another person, object, place or circumstance. It is a power that can conquer distances and spread across the world, reaching even the most remote places. Joseph Campbell wrote, “Find the place inside where there’s joy, and the joy will burn out the pain.” The joy love brings has been known to start many conflicts, but also heal broken bonds and restore peace as history has shown. 

Portugal, 1339. The heir to the throne, Pedro I, awaits his arranged marriage to the wealthy daughter of a Castilian noble, Costanza. The future queen appears in court accompanied by a lady-in-waiting, the beautiful Inés de Castro, who the future king is enamoured with. The couple meet secretly until Costanza’s death in 1345. Once Costanza had passed, Pedro I spoke of Inés as his ‘queen’ and loved her passionately. But, only one year later, Pedro’s father, Alfonso IV, convinced by several vassals that Inés could turn his son against the Portuguese in favour of the Castilians, ordered her to be killed. Enraged, Pedro challenged Alfonso, but had very little support and was defeated within a few months. In prison, Pedro’s future was uncertain until Alfonso died, and Pedro became King of Portugal. Once king, Pedro hunted the three killers of his lover. Two of the killers were caught and, as punishment, Pedro physically ripped their hearts out. The third killer died in exile. Having enacted his revenge, the king exhumed the body of his lover, dressed her in the finest robes and made his father’s vassals kiss her hand, recognizing her as their queen.

Tales such as these tell us the power of love. If a future king can threaten his political standing, his security and his loyalty for a woman he is not even betrothed to, then the power of love and the need for a loving relationship is far stronger than any scientific force.

But is this force necessary? Is it truly an aid, or is it a hindrance? Pedro I’s position meant that he had his entire future planned by his father, yet he still chose a woman he barely knew. He still chose risk above stability. If the future king hadn’t chosen to betray his wife, there would have been no cause for a war between father and son, severing their trust and love. Admittedly, it lasted less than a year, but still, there were casualties. 

But, before I prate on about the past chances I’ve let slip through my butterfingers, I must relay to you that I do not have vast experience in the world of relationships, nor do I see any emerging in my immediate future, so I have very little authority to talk about the importance of romantic relationships. But I’m going to anyway! 

The stereotypical image of the boy and the girl meeting on a hot summer’s day, flashforward to them kissing in the rain and confessing their underlying love for one another, much like Romeo and Juliet, frankly, makes me physically ill. Show me a couple that fits this impossible brief and I’ll show you a pair of liars. What the movies don’t show is that romantic relationships take work. They are tiresome, troublesome, and tenacious.

But we power through. Then we get to the enjoyable honeymoon phase filled with sickeningly sweet jokes and flirtatious lines that strike up envy in those around them, myself included. Us singles are bitter people. 

Nevertheless, it is a necessary evil. Our suffering is met with others’ joy. This contrast in emotions is a driving force for many; it creates ambition, passion and determination. 

Of course, we wish it wasn’t. In an ideal world, we would all be jovial and blissfully oblivious to the reality of life alone. I believe, and I do not mean offence by this, relationships are more centred around their outer appearance rather than enjoying another’s companionship. There appears to be more effort going into a couple’s Facebook page than into their relationship nowadays. The insufferable status of ‘it’s complicated’ has driven many a single up the wall when browsing social media in search of some clarity in this love-struck world.

Love itself is a questionable term. Much like the word ‘literally’, love has been manipulated over the years to mean different things to different people. The line between describing your love for a can of Coke and your love for a life partner has blurred considerably. Whereas love was once a powerful, heartbreaking, soul-wrenching term used by people in moments of passion, it has now devolved into everyday lingo. I myself am a victim of this catastrophe; I find I use the word love on a regular basis with no real reason to do so. This butchering of the English language has become a part of it – a sad truth I have yet to accept. 

Love is a foreign concept, one from far off lands where soulmates meet and live in everlasting harmony. This curious creature can create an Elysian relief for some, or a reason to retreat into a dark place and never return for others. Whilst love is a detriment for many, there’s hope at the end of the tunnel.

Old-fashioned romance is dead. However, a new romance has taken its place. Our modern-day love has shaped lives and created new ones. 

To finally answer the question I originally proposed, yes, romantic relationships are important. They inspire good and promising qualities within people, such as loyalty and a sense of humour. Rita Rudner, an American comedian, sponsors a very rational meaning for marriage, I think, saying, “I love being married. It’s so great to find one special person you want to annoy for the rest of your life.”

I am still searching.

I will now leave you with the words of Stephen Hawking, “One, remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Two, never give up work. Work gives you meaning and purpose and life is empty without it. Three, if you are lucky enough to find love, remember it is there and don’t throw it away.”

In the Beauty Bag #3: Culture editor Georgina Davidson

In the “Beauty Bag” Series takes a glance at the beauty secrets and decisions across The Mancunion Editorial team, This week we spoke to Our Culture Editor..
Name: Georgina Davidson
Age: 22
Degree: Arts Management, Cultural Policy and Practice
Degree year: 2
Do you stick to a beauty routine? 
I think beauty routines really depend on the person, and definitely change seasonally. In the summer months, I used more cleansing gels and oils to keep my skin hydrated.
In preparation for the winter, I focus on getting a quality, fragrance-free moisturiser and use a face mask once a week at night. This year, I have started using retinol for the first time too, which I have learned works better in the darker months.

What are your favourite skincare products?

CeraVe Body Lotion
Photo: Georgina Davidson @ The Mancunion

 

I am a bit of a skincare junkie who changes brands frequently, but I have some firm favourites that I always come back to. CeraVe has a fantastic all over body moisturiser and hydrating cleanser, which I use everyday. I have dry/combination skin which means the hyaluronic acid in this cream is really helpful in stopping dry patches.
My favourite face wash is Face Theory Vitamin C cream cleanser, which contains mandarin oil and smells so lovely – the products are also vegan-friendly and have active ingredients that help to prevent sun damage and city pollution – Always good news, especially in Manchester which can be so congested at times.
What are your favourite makeup products?
I don’t often wear makeup, but there are a few absolute staples which I use all the time. I love Glossier’s Lash Slick and Boy Brows, which I use everyday with a little Doctor Paw Paw lip balm.
For a night out my go-to red or pink tone lip colour is created using The Rouje Lip Palette in signature – a  quadrant of lipsticks that helps build a colour and is brilliant for someone who is a little indecisive about make-up. It’s lots of playing and blending; I never get the same colour twice, but it’s definitely a lot of fun!
Rouje Lipstick Palette
IMAGE: GEORGINA DAVIDSON @ The Mancunion
Anything you’re guilty of doing (or not doing)?
I am really guilty of not washing my face directly after a workout, which sounds very minor but it often leads to blocked pores, particularly on my chin. I also drink a lot of coffee, which can have positive impacts on my skin’s brightness and look. However, this surely adds to little circles under my eyes – I could probably do with getting more sleep too!
Are there any skin issues you struggle with?
My skin is quite dry, and when I get breakouts, they often form in one area around my mouth, which can be annoying. I think the problems stem from typing and touching my face – something that I am having to adjust to not doing during this pandemic.
Is there anything in particular you like to splurge on?
For a night out, I’ll use Charlotte Tilbury’s Magic cream, but that stuff is figurative gold dust: the smell and feel is really luxurious and perfect for the occasional treat. Definitely breaks the bank but it’s worth the investment.
On the contrary, is there anything that you think is not worth spending money on?
I used to really love Jeffrey Starr’s highlighter palettes and liquid velour lipsticks. But personally, they are very drying for my skin. The powder was also very clogging for my pores too, which meant I had some pretty angry blackheads when I used it.
How did you learn to do makeup?
My make-up inspiration comes from my auntie, who was the only woman in my family that really wore make-up, as both my mum and grandmother rarely wore any. She bought me my first lip gloss from Lancôme, (admittedly a strong first choice but completely based on an advert I had seen and been mesmerised by,) and taught me how to do a smokey eye and line my lids to match my eye shape. She also did my prom makeup, which gave me a little glamour despite how deep my tan was at the time.
What/who inspires you makeup-wise?
I am really inspired by Hollywood glamour and an effortlessly chic style. I often look to the make-up advice from Charlotte Tilbury and Lifestyle/Fashion influencer Jeanne Damas, the creator of Rouje, who constructs looks that revolve around a strong lipstick colour.
Do you like to play around with makeup? 
I enjoy playing around with my make-up style, but I could most definitely be more daring with my choices. I used to experiment with cat-eye flicks and quirky lip colours a few years ago. I also went through a chunky, dark eyebrow phase and had a highlighter obsession which thankfully I am now over – I literally highlighted the bridge of my nose like a Christmas reindeer!
                                                                   What are your favourite hair products?
Sebastian twisted curl foam.
Photo: Georgina Davidson @The Mancunion

I have cycled through quite a few different hair products because my curls never come out the same way and always need extra hydration. At the moment, I am using Wella Micellar shampoo, Nutri-rich conditioner, and then Sebastian twisted curl foam.

I am also a big fan of RedKen All Soft heavy cream, as it really revives the curl when my hair feels a little brittle.
Any beauty secrets?
Coconut Oil, which you can buy in a jar for £2 at Aldi, works wonders on my hair as an alternative to conditioner, and smells so good. It can also be really great if mixed into daily moisturising cream to give a nice dewy glow. Whatever product I use, this one will always remain a staple.
Is there a specific product that you are endlessly looking for and still haven’t found the perfect one?
I will always be on a search for the perfect hair mousse that leaves my hair soft and curly all night regardless of the weather. Perhaps I am asking for a lot? I rarely get anything I expect from my hair, I just tend to go with it, add more mousse, and hope for the best.
It seems that despite my best intentions, I always come home to find my hair looking completely different to when I stepped out in the morning. It’s a curly girl problem!

UoM Rent Strike reject University offer for 5 per cent rent reduction

The occupiers of Owens Park Tower and organisers from UoM Rent Strike have rejected the University’s offer for a reduction of two weeks’ rent for all students in their accommodation.

In a press release, they said: “We have made it clear to both the Students Union and the University of Manchester that this offer is insulting, and we will not be accepting it.

“Rent Strike UoM have been consistent since the beginning of our campaign that we demand a 40 per cent reduction in rent.

“We would welcome any contact from the University’s Senior Leadership Team in relation to this statement. Our emails remain open, and we remain available for a Zoom meeting to discuss our demands. We do not wish to occupy the Tower any longer than we have to, but we must make it clear that we will not be patronised with insulting offers which the University must know we cannot accept.”

Signed by Nancy Rothwell and endorsed by SU General Secretary Kwame Karteng, the agreement pledges a 20 per cent reduction in rent for semester one, more flexible accommodation agreements, better maintenance support, better study spaces, and a commitment to tackling antisocial behaviour.

The current demands set out by UoM Rent Strike ask for a rent reduction of 40 per cent for the remainder of the academic year, for the university to offer a no-penalty early release clause from their tenancy contracts, and an increase in the current standard of support for students in halls of residence.

An 18-year-old English Literature student, Finley, who is currently rent striking, told The Mancunion: “Frankly, 5 per cent, or 2 weeks, seems insulting, especially when we’re expected to go home two weeks prior to the end of term anyway.

“The SU made the deal, not the strikers or the occupiers, so the strike continues until our own demands are met, not those of the SU.”

Hannah Phillips, a final year Biochemistry and French student from 9K4WHAT? is currently one of 15 students occupying Owens’ Park Tower. She tells me: “We have loads of food, all the students in Fallowfield and unions across the country are supporting us with supplies and more banners. We got free pizza from Glasgow Student Tenants Union on Friday.

“We’re happy here, and we’re going to stay here as long as it takes for the uni to talk to us directly, and not by proxy with the SU.”

The University has declined to give any further comment at this time.

AI in Teaching

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fast becoming an integral part of our daily lives. It can now beat us in games, provide us with smart assistants, and drive us autonomously, so it’s hardly surprising it’s making an impact in the world of education. This week, I explore how AI may change the way schools and universities run in the future.

In marking and assessment

The university has already begun using automated marking for some assignments, especially for computer science. Although these marking methods do not use AI, this might be a stepping stone to its use in the future.

Back in January, the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual) began to research this very possibility. Their main interest was using AI as a “second marker” in order to assist human markers and spot inconsistencies in paper grading.  They even launched an AI competition to train a computer model to mark GCSE English language essay questions, which are notoriously subjective. Unfortunately, Ofqual received so much negative feedback they had already suspended their research by summer.

Providing help

Photo: John Schnobrich

Many bots have been generated since the beginning of the computer revolution, from dummies that only respond to basic commands, to their highly advanced counterparts. Education is a field that could benefit hugely from the application of bots, and some universities have already begun to explore this area.

One example comes from Staffordshire University, which in January 2019 introduced Beacon, in an attempt to increase student participation. This bot was designed to give information on student timetables, enable contact with personal tutors, and provide answers to 400 frequently asked questions.

Another example is Jill Watson, an AI teacher assistant designed by Ashok Goel from Georgia Tech University. ‘Jill’ responds to hundreds of messages from students in the discussion board of Goel’s masters-level AI class.

Showing support

Photo: Alex Knight

University is sometimes stressful, and the huge number of students needing help puts an immense strain on counselling services and personal tutors. AI may provide some alternatives to these traditional help channels.

Georgia State University, for example, has created a chatbot to help combat the dropout numbers in enrolment by students. This bot provides tailored advice to students through a texting channel, and helped reduce student dropout numbers by 22%.

There seems little doubt that AI will soon develop capabilities that could revolutionise the university experience. However for some, it remains a controversial topic.

Who knows what the world of education will look like in 10, 20, 30 years’ time? All I know is that I’m excited to see it.

UoM security guards suspended following incident of racial profiling

A University of Manchester student has been left traumatised after an incident of alleged racial profiling on Fallowfield Campus.

Video footage has emerged of the incident, in which 19-year-old Zac Adan is pinned to a wall by 3 security guards who demand to see his student ID.

In the video, which was posted to Twitter, Zac can be heard telling staff: “I’m a University of Manchester student.

“They’re trying to snatch my card out of me. You see, I take this racial profiling. You didn’t go for them, you came for me.”

The University is currently investigating the incident and the staff in question have been suspended.

Zac, who is a first-year studying French and Linguistics, was returning to his halls of residence late on Friday evening and was asked to show his ID for security checks at the gate, only to be physically restrained moments later by the guards.

He told the BBC that “there was no conversation. They just pinned me up against the wall and said I looked like a drug dealer. Why? Because I am black and wearing a hoodie?”

A University of Manchester spokesperson said: “We are deeply concerned by these images.

“We have spoken to the student concerned, launched a full investigation and have suspended the security officers (without prejudice) pending the results of this investigation.”

Zac’s family came from Somalia as refugees and arrived in the UK a few years ago after previously living in Italy.

Izzy, a first year who witnessed the incident told The Mancunion: “Its a disgusting abuse of power, obviously racist but unfortunately not the first issue that weve had with the security guards, just the first one thats been filmed.”

The incident of racial profiling is the latest in a string of controversies which have taken place over the past few weeks at the University.

Notable incidents include Fencegate, in which students tore down fencing that had been put up to secure the campus following a series of large, illegal parties in halls and security breaches of the campus by non-students.

Students from the UoM Rent Strike and the group 9K 4 WHAT? are also currently on their 5th day of an occupation of Owens Park Tower on Fallowfield Campus. Their demands include a reduction in University fees, faster responses to maintenance issues in halls, increased mental health support for students, and a halt on staff redundancies during the pandemic.

Horoscopes: Week commencing November 16th

With the second lockdown in full swing, we could all do with a bit of an extra boost. Let’s find out which Mario Kart power-up is perfect for your star sign!

 

Scorpio Oct 23 – Nov 22Scorpio Icon

You are very determined and a second lockdown isn’t going to get in your way. Just like a blue shell, you will continue to work hard and meet your targets – keep going!

 

Sagittarius Nov 23 – Dec 21 Sagittarius Icon

Now you are locked in your house, your energy means that you are bounding off the walls! The super star power-up is your personality to a T.

 

Capricorn Dec 22 – Jan 20 Capricorn Icon

No one can match your focus. Once you put your mind to something, it always comes through! Just like the red shell, you can see what is right ahead of you and are ready to attack.

 

Aquarius Jan 21 – Feb 19 Aquarius Icon

The green shell is random, sporadic but very motivated – just like you! You are energetic but sometimes need to focus your attention on the present.

 

Pisces Feb 20 – Mar 20 Pisces Icon

One of the newest editions to the Mario Kart world is the piranha plant. These toothy flowers always hold a grudge and will tear anyone down!

 

Aries Mar 21 – Apr 20 Aries Icon

The Bullet Bill is always racing ahead! With boundless energy and a short-temper, Aries are so similar to this mad metal-head.

 

Taurus Apr 21 – May 20Taurus Icon

The only cure for your laziness is the golden mega mushroom! This power-up has a short, unlimited supply of energy  – it is perfect to get you motivated.

 

Gemini May 21 – June 21

Just like the infamous Blooper squid, your view is often clouded but by emotions, not ink! This power-up should help you to remember to focus on what’s important.

 

Cancer June 22 – July 22Cancer Icon

Sometimes your mood can bring everyone (and accidentally yourself) down! Similar to the Bob-omb, you need to remember to be positive and not go off at small things.

 

Leo July 23 – Aug 22Leo Icon

You are the big, flashy thunderbolt! Sometimes your sense of entitlement can make others feel small but remember to stay down to earth.

 

Virgo Aug 23 – Sept 21Virgo Icon

The perpetual worrier. You stress about everything, especially slipping on a banana skin! This power-up might not be the most useful but the game wouldn’t be the same without you.

 

Libra Sept 22 – Oct 22Libra Icon

Sometimes, you just need a push to stop procrastinating. But your laziness can be defeated by the power of the speedy mushroom power-up!

Puzzle Page: November 16th

This week, we will be taking a break from the puzzles to give out some sought after answers!

Puzzle #1

Puzzle 1

Location, location, location: the university building is Carys Bannister, the building is named after a neuroscientist but they currently house the optometry department.

Puzzle #2

Puzzle 2

Puzzle Grid: the 6 bees tell you to start at square B6. Then follow the code of directions to find the message ‘what is four plus three’ and the answer is 7!

Puzzle #3 & #4

Puzzle 3

The answers to the crossword are:

locks         Deansgate —– (5)

arndale       pop to the shops (7)

unesco        Manchester is a —— city of literature (6)

roses         the stone —– (5)

environmental study of nature (13)

north         Manchester is the best city in the —– (5)

crazy         I think Pedro is a bit off (5)

ezra          —- and gil, fab brunch spot (4)

square        a great shape and a place of exchanging and saint peter (6)

that          Gary Barlow has taken (4)

exchange      the lovely theatre with a circular stage (8)

portuguese    10 chins of chicken shop specialise in — African food (10)

home          local arts and cinema venue (4)

engineering   north campus specialises in (11)

nurse         big course, Florence was one (5)

lewis money saving expert, born in Withington (5)             

oast          spinningfield bar, kin for drying hops (4)

walrus        you are the egg-man, good food in NQ (6)

rylands       John’s library (7)

yes           opposite of no, good night out (3)

And the artist is Laurence Stephen Lowry!

Puzzle #5 & #6

The words you are looking for in the word search are: treat, witch, nightmare, cackle, horror, pumpkin, magic, October, devil, fright, thirteen, trick, haunt

Puzzle #7

Music to my ears: Meat is Murder by The Smiths

Puzzle #8

Location, location, location: The building is the Alan Gilbert Learning Commons, named after someone from Australia!

Puzzle #9

The rapper is Aitch.

Puzzle #10

The artist is Frida Khalo.

China: What relationship do we hold with dictatorship?

In recent years, the Chinese government has all but confirmed what we knew of its operating position: they are a dictatorship. This is plain language for a complex issue, which the Chinese government has tried to hide for a number of years now.

The dictatorial nature of China’s government is clear in an alarming range of actions, from the cultural genocide of the Uyghur people to its state-controlled media and civil censorship. Now there is no doubt that China is run by a dictatorship, the question becomes, how do we treat China from here? Please note that I will be referring to the Chinese government when I use the word China.

China is one of the manufacturing titans of the world, which will come as no surprise to those who are reading this on a device that was most likely manufactured in China. Lax labour laws and efficient industrial processing mean that production running through China is an incredibly cost-effective method for transnational corporations. Though these policies are not specific to China, as countries such as Bangladesh, Vietnam and India attempt to lure in big business to help boost their economy, whilst these countries thrive, comparatively China excels.

These incredibly loose laws would never be sanctioned in the West, so how can we possibly have a positive relationship with a country that has such little regard for the conditions of working people?

One way to decide how to move forward with China, for countries like the UK, is to look to the past for lessons. An obvious example is the Cold War, as clear parallels can be made with the current Chinese regime and the former Soviet regime. However, instead of looking for comparisons between these two ‘communist’ regimes, our understanding of how to act must instead be informed by looking at how they differ.

Firstly, China, unlike the USSR, booms as an economy. It is likely that sanctions to the extent they were imposed on the Soviet Union would indeed slow down Chinese growth, but it is doubtful that they would have much impact.  In part, this is because China is working hard to push through massive foreign investment all over Africa and in parts of Asia, such as Vietnam and Cambodia. It’s ability to do this not only shows economic strength, but also that China is using the crucial measure of modern diplomacy to gain an international standing: money.

Secondly, China differs from the USSR on a diplomatic basis. Unlike the Soviet regime, China has attempted to stay out of many of the key conflicts around the world. Most notably, China maintains that it would never strike first in a nuclear conflict and condemns nations such as the United States who have.

Most recently, and impeccably ironically, China has been elected to the human rights council of the UN. Although this is a farce regardless of China’s acceptance, it highlights their attempt to appear diplomatically viable.

Finally, the significantly weaker position of the United States on the international stage both on an economic and influence basis means that there is not one significant lynchpin of a country that can directly counter China as a superpower.

The main question therefore becomes, given that we know how international relations have changed and what China does domestically and abroad, how do Western countries react?

We can initially look to what individuals can do. Getting in contact with your local MP to ask about their position and what they intend to do is always helpful, they need your vote after all. Boycotting companies that are either deliberately ignorant to the tyrannical regime, like the NBA, or produce goods in China would be an ideal. However, most mass-manufacturing companies, operate to a greater or lesser degree in China, so manoeuvring this can be incredibly difficult.

This means it becomes incumbent on our elected representatives to step up to the crease. The Conservatives and Dominic Raab stumbled onto a piece of foreign policy success when they offered a pathway to citizenship for Hong Kong citizens in June, a fantastic piece of policy that should aid in attracting those in Hong Kong who do not want to live under the constant threat of dictatorship.

However, this only solves part of the problem. The fact is that China has such a massive role in the cheap manufacturing process that it means politicians live in fear of breaking up the delicate supply chain. But this is the moment when we need the strong and principled politicians to make themselves known.

In my opinion, governments should seek to isolate China from the rest of the world. We should accept the financial aid that China is offering, but without the greasy tyrannical hand holding the money. Geographically, it is hard to pry away those countries which rely so much on China, but if the lessons from the Cold War and the Marshall plan can be learned, the EU, US and Britain can offer an alternative to the Chinese regime.

The Chinese government are no political amateurs, they have clear domestic and international aims and curbing them will be a century-defining challenge for the West. Ultimately, the same democratic values which have overturned past dictators must be reclaimed by the West to restore global democracy, save lives in China and overturn one of the most evil regimes the world has ever seen.

Opinion: With a PM like Boris, of course the gym is staying shut

As we all foresaw, as of Thursday 4th November, the UK entered into the second lockdown of this year due to the Coronavirus pandemic – this time for a supposed 4 weeks. We’ll see about that.

Somehow, the smug “I told you so” that rests on the lips of the nation, directed towards the incompetent Prime Minister, is not as satisfying as it might be, given that the lockdown once again symbolises restrictions on our freedom. This time around though, there are so many different terms and conditions forced upon us, that it’s difficult to know whether or not we’re breaching the rules.

It is, arguably, significantly more difficult to actually care at this point, given how much the government has messed us around as a nation.

One of the groups who’ve been played around with most is, of course, students, who at this point don’t know whether they’re coming or going. University is the most on-again, off-again relationship I’ve ever had and, to be honest, if I wasn’t already at least £18,000 in debt, I would have absolutely pulled the plug on it by now.

Unfortunately, ‘the plug’ is connected to my laptop, whose battery level seems to dwindle in relation to my self-motivation and optimism for the future of my education. Thus rendering the time-old breakup line of ‘I just really need to focus on my work right now,’ useless.

“Unfortunately, ‘the plug’ is connected to my laptop, whose battery level seems to dwindle in relation to my self-motivation and optimism for the future of my education

To make matters worse, with new restrictions meaning that we are once again limited to our households – or boxy student accommodation flats in my case (I don’t want to concoct images of anything as lavish as stairs or 24-hour heating). I actually feel grateful for the scraps I’m being tossed. Nothing says one-sided relationship like Zoom links which fail to load and an online student system which crashes every so often.

Oh, overpriced education, you little flirt.

Part of the reason why I think this lockdown feels so different from the first one is that, before, we were wrenched from our carefully cultivated student communities closer to the end of term. While this meant that graduations were conducted via Zoom and exams drawn out over 24 hours periods, we’d not been initially sent to university under false pretences.

This time around, however, it has become painfully obvious that students’ money is valued over their mental and physical health. Especially here at Manchester, whose promise of blended learning in order to get students into halls was rapidly withdrawn less than a week after we’d arrived, and license agreements breached through the enforcing of flat isolation with people we’d only just met.

To borrow a phrase from the Spanish, which seems particularly relevant right now, ‘la aula es mi jaula’ (the classroom is my cage).

One of the closures imposed by the new lockdown which seems to be having the biggest effect on students, is that of the gyms. One of my flatmates even confessed that he’s going home for the month solely because his personal trainer back home has offered to continue training sessions during lockdown 2.0.

I think the closure of the gyms has caused so much push-back, both within the student community and outside it, because above all gyms are a place of mental, as well as physical, self-restoration. Joe Wicks is great and everything, but eventually the realisation that squatting in your living room actually just brings your arse closer to the cushions on your sofa becomes more significant than any motivation that even he can inspire at 9 am.

“Squatting in your living room actually just brings your arse closer to the cushions on your sofa

Once again, it seems that the mental health of the nation is poised precariously atop a helter-skelter of loneliness, boredom, and unproductive depression, with good ol’ Bojo behind it, ready to kick us down. Whilst this year has certainly been a rollercoaster, I’m not holding out much hope that a second lockdown will promise the same enjoyment inducing vertigo as a fairground does.

As well as the government’s undeniable incompetence and slow reactions, which are the primary cause of this new wave of restrictions, the statistics behind their rules and regulations seem contradictory. Based on data from ‘Test and Trace’, gyms have contributed to 2.8% of coronavirus cases whereas supermarkets contribute to 11.2% and secondary schools 6.8%. Yet my dad is still getting the train to the sixth form college where he teaches 5 classes of 30 students 5 days a week, and I don’t see Asda shutting up shop indefinitely. 

From my experience, I would argue that gyms and indoor exercise studios are actually one of the safest places, due to the rigorous disinfection performed at the end of each session. I can only imagine the germs that harbour on train tables or trolley handles, and I’m still haunted by 3 three-week-old gum emblazoning the undersides of school desks.

Furthermore, there seems to be disparities between the national effort to create a healthier nation, through healthy school meals and various exercise challenges such as ‘Couch to 5k’, and the assertion that gyms are not essential services. Surely keeping gyms open would ultimately create less stress on the NHS, as they’ll be able to worry less about the links between poor mental health and obesity, and focus more on the onslaught of sufferers of coronavirus?

Still, if the government are going to refuse free school meals to kids during half-term, at least they can’t be criticised for providing unhealthy options, so I guess that kind of balances out. Faultless logic there, so nice one Tory party!

Whilst I’m personally not a gym user myself, favouring the slap of my trainers on pavement rather than a treadmill, I completely recognise that many people use the gym as a place to de-stress and even socialise. My 80-year-old grandma, for example, attends a weekly exercise class, which is one of her main forms of social interaction. To be honest, in comparison to her, my social life currently reflects more that of a hermit.

Whilst exercising outside is preferential for a lot of people, it is something that becomes more and more difficult to find the time for. Especially as the winter months close in and day becomes night at roughly 4 pm.

It is painstakingly obvious that the Conservative government imposing these restrictions, composed largely of white middle-class men, have paid no mind to the effect this will have on vulnerable people like women or old people, who don’t feel safe outside in the dark, but don’t have any other time in their busy schedules to exercise.

In this sense, maybe the way that essential services have been ascertained is based on the fitness and physique of the Prime Minister himself, who certainly doesn’t look like weight training or a morning spin class are at the top of his list of priorities.

Can we be unique in a postmodern world?

Can we be unique?

We ask ourselves this question almost every day: when we wake up, when we shower, when we choose what we want to wear. Whether you realise it or not, your brain is making subconscious decisions to help you develop your own style. We all have an ‘image’ of how we want people to see us. But how do we decide that? How do we know what’s hip and what’s not?

In my opinion, the simple answer is: the media.

The online world bombards us with messages about what the biggest Tik Tok star is wearing this Autumn, what hairstyle Jenifer Lawrence is choosing next, and what secret message Kanye is trying to convey through his songs. These messages, besides playing a role in how we determine our ‘style’, they are the essence of the postmodern world. 

Postmodernism has leant towards many literary, political, and cultural movements, as well as various types of aesthetics. However, it can be simply understood as the most recent period of change in fundamental thinking. Before this period came the modern period, which was characterised by the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution. 

Although some dispute when the modern era ended and the postmodern era began, I think it’s clear that we are travelling further and further away from modern thinking and into a whole new age of globalisation. As a result of this, it’s important that we understand the world we are living in, especially considering it’s now mostly online. 

To give you an idea of the scale of this change, we can take American politics as an example. A hundred years ago, it would have taken several weeks of travel and a public announcement for every specific town to learn that Amy Coney Barrett had been inducted into the Supreme Court. In contrast, this morning it took me 30 seconds to log onto my news app and find out almost instantaneously from the breaking news article.

The way we interact with others has changed dramatically in the last century. We can chat with friends who live halfway around the world almost as easily as we do with our flatmates. One can’t recognise it enough how incredible this is. Could you imagine living in an age without Zoom, E-mail or WhatsApp? We’d be lost with Covid-19 restricting our daily lives. 

With our online lives taking centre stage, it’s no surprise our image does as well. Just think for a moment, are you the same person in real life as the person you are online? I have to admit that it’s not always the case for me. The online world makes us brave, makes us willing to try new things and branch out into communities beyond our local ones.

Online culture is always changing under the influence of trends that spread across the globe. From America to Russia, people share styles.  Some recent examples are e-boys and -girls, cottage-core, and countless other identities that are not locked to one location like they would have been in the modern era.

While we may not think about it, we form our identity based on what we see and the online sphere is an inextricable part of the world around us. 

Though online trends amass huge followings and can be found across the globe, they are far from monolithic. Everyone has their own interpretation of a trend because everybody wants to be unique.

A fantastic example is Punk Rock, which found its footing in Britain in the mid-1970s. Punk Rockers took material objects that otherwise had no connection to each other and mashed them together to form a whole new identity, one which defied the norms and portrayed a strong image, one that was independent of any other in the UK at that time. It is in this sense that Punk Rockers were unique.

However, as a collective, no Punk Rocker looked quite the same, as each of them had a different interpretation of what the symbols they chose to wear meant. Through subtle differences in clothing and style, Punk Rockers found uniqueness within a combined identity.

Can we, therefore, be unique?

Yes! I believe that we can be one of a kind in the postmodern world. No matter what everyone says, you have your own style, your own beliefs, and your own right to uniqueness.

Embrace your choices and be proud of what makes you your own person.

‘It’s a hoax’: Trump’s era of science miscommunication

The COVID-19 pandemic has swept over the globe and challenged countries to evaluate their own health systems and government responses. Science communication is a crucial instrument in this viral battle and must be accurate and understandable to citizens.

The Trump presidency in the US has been riddled with rejection of research, conspiracy theories, and the denouncement of respected scientific institutions. During this tumultuous election month, America faces a choice to continue Trump’s era of science miscommunication. As the rest of the world watches, America stands as an example of how dangerous a government dismissive of science can be.

Health Communication and Trump’s COVID-19 Response

Ed Yong, award-winning British science journalist, writes that Trump is a repeat offender of contradicting public health experts and scientific advisers in a poignant Atlantic article. Trump’s refusal to wear a mask and actively denouncing the virus as a “hoax” is coupled with his campaign strategies to host crowded rallies with no social distancing measures in place. Leading health institutions like the CDC was publicly shamed by the president for putting forth information that contradicted his agenda.

Miscommunication icons
Photo by thenounproject.com by John Salzarulo

According to the New York Times, The Trump administration not only attempted to reorganise the National Institute of Health (NIH) but also intended to cut the budget by several billion dollars. Researchers, especially in the health and biomedical sciences, rely on consistent funding to continue long term projects. The science industry needs to be working uninterruptedly to keep advancing toward vaccines and knowledge that are invaluable in the face of today’s pandemic.

Perhaps the most famous instance of Trump’s science miscommunication is his promotion of the drug hydroxychloroquine as a cure for the coronavirus. This claim is based on no scientific evidence and instead sparked a rush of unreliable and poorly designed experiments to test the claim. Nature’s compilation of studies concludes that hydroxychloroquine should not be used for treatment or prevention COVID-19 patients as there is no strong supporting evidence in drug makes an impact clinically. The BMJ warns that use of hydroxychloroquine is both “premature and potentially harmful” due to the lack of peer-reviewed evidence that the malaria drug does indeed make a significant difference in COVID-19 symptoms. Additionally, he perpetrated the conspiracy that physicians were overreporting COVID deaths for a bigger paycheck. An article by Forbes quoted Trump’s use of the word “incentive” for hospitals, a flagrant attack on the physicians and frontline health heroes committed to saving lives.

The message the President represents is that the virus is not a serious threat and that the expert health advisories can be ignored, and even worse: distrusted. With Trump’s denial and miscommunications, the immediate consequences are clear. The World Health Organization identified America as the country with the highest reported COVID cases and related deaths in the entire world.

The Environment and Climate Change

The dissemination and support of science did not just falter in the realm of health communication. The White House introduced budget cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency. Trump’s scientific agenda is more space-oriented and not Earth focused which is debilitating to many current issues like climate change and the carbon footprint of humans.

Trump poked fun at environmentalists, twisting their words into the lie that “you only have 11 years to live, folks, 11 years, because climate change is coming up.” After review by The Washington Post Fact Checker, Trump oversimplified science once again, manipulating the belief of expert climatologists that some consequences of climate change have the potential to be unfixable in about 11 years. These are both very different messages. However, the president has again painted scientists as extreme and unbelievable.

On top of this, Trump recently withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Accord. With no interest in decreasing greenhouse gas emissions, Trump’s motive to undo the Obama Administration initiatives labels America as the only country to leave the agreement. An article by Scientific American warns that the environmental consequences from withdrawing could be long-lasting and future action needs to be taken to remedy the progress lost during Trump’s term.

Actions and Reactions

Congress rejected Trump’s appeals to cut NIH funding and instead did the complete opposite. Congress approved some plans to increase money for health institutions like the NIH, saving the momentum of medical research and innovation in the health sciences. However, the presidential lack of support for these agencies can have lasting impacts as mistrust or confusion is now associated with them.

Science publications have also rallied against the president’s science miscommunication. Nature backs Joe Biden for the 2020 presidential election. For the first time in 175 years, Scientific American also endorsed Joe Biden for president.

Science has been a fighting force of innovation and learning which countries rely on. It impacts all aspects of life and offers a foundation on which solutions are built. Science miscommunication has trumped America these past 4 years. Being able to communicate science clearly, accurately, and honestly enables those who work in scientific industries to keep changing and saving lives.

Student protests are due a renaissance, Manchester has it covered

If you’re Gen Z, the terms ‘virtue signalling’, ‘snowflake’, and ‘social justice warrior’ are likely familiar to you. They are part of a broader criticism known as ‘slacktivism’, a pejorative term which accuses young socially-conscious people, particularly students, of doing the bare minimum to support causes without really engaging in them.

In some ways, critics of ‘slacktivism’ have a point. When we hashtag and tweet about a cause, we run the risk of believing that we are contributing to social good despite likely having minimal effect.

Almost 170,000 of us have signed a petition calling for a reduction in tuition fees until face-to-face teaching resumes. We are yet to see a reduction in the fees, despite the support of UoM’s Student Union.

This social theory goes deeper than just a criticism of Gen Z: riot theory, which emerged out of Freud’s crowd behaviour theory, argues that some people will only riot if their doctor, MP and lawyer are rioting; for others, it only takes one other person to start rioting for them to join in.

We all exist somewhere on this spectrum, and the modern concept of ‘slacktivism’ points to this herd culture of following social justice issues as though it’s a trend.

But Manchester students prove they are anything but. By contrast, their organised and decisive actions represent probably as much activism as one can achieve amidst a pandemic.

When students tore down the fences erected around Owens Park, they represented a demand for more comprehensive communication from the University. It was an example of the student population expressing their dissatisfaction with the University’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic as a whole – including provisions provided for isolated students and lack of mental health support.

Student mental health was one of the main talking points of the protest; students felt the university hadn’t considered the distress and anger that would be caused by fencing them in, especially in the context of the wake of the death of Finn Kitson.

Protesting during a pandemic is precarious: students knew a retweet or a social media post wouldn’t suffice. They took action, and in doing so, we are beginning to see a number of changes being made, including a formal apology from Vice-Chancellor Dame Nancy Rothwell and a promise that no legal action will be taken against rent-strikers.

The Internet Age may have made ‘virtue signalling’ easy, but Gen Z’s grasp of digital literacy has allowed groups such as SAFER to establish an activist network online.

The student-led activist group SAFER are establishing precise demands from the university, including a reduction of tuition fees to the Open University’s £6192 rate and risk assessments for staff still working on campus.

The New Yorker writer Malcolm Gladwell suggested that so-called slacktivism had erased cultural memory. Real activism, according to Gladwell, defined the social revolutions of the mid-twentieth century.

The sentiment of the student-led 1960 Greensboro sit-ins, which inspired many more non-violent sit-ins against racial segregation, had been lost in the social media revolution.

Gladwell is right to acknowledge the bravery of the African American men who protested against segregation, and their courage is certainly insurmountable by social media activism.

Some are suggesting we are seeing a renaissance period for student activism and protests. Despite the conditions of the pandemic which on the surface seem to isolate us, students are united, ossified, once again confirmed as key players in social change.

From Manchester to Warsaw, the battle for abortion rights continues

Abortion rights continue to be challenged across the world, as new protests erupt in Poland against the country’s top court ruling of a near total ban on abortion. New legislation also challenges US supreme court rulings, and in Manchester and York, abortion clinics battle against intimidating vigils.

Poland, one of Europe’s most conservative Catholic countries, has, since a 1993 ruling, compromised on competing public and church opinions, and legalised abortion for a limited set of reasons, including severe foetal compromise. Now, the ruling Law and Justice party has referred the issue to the Constitutional Tribunal, where rights have been further eroded, covering only instances of rape, incest, and when the pregnant person’s life is in danger.

‘Protesters turned out all over Poland, with one goal: to protest the bill to ban all forms of abortion’

Protesters reached 100,000 in Warsaw at the end of October after a month of rising tensions and protests across the nation, including staged sit-ins and interruptions of Sunday mass. This is not the first time the state has tried to force further restrictions on abortion, with mass grassroots protesters turning out in 2016 across 143 cities towns and villages, with no leader but one goal; to protest the bill to ban all forms of abortion, criminalise suspicious miscarriages and hand out prison sentences for women caught having an illegal abortion. The ruling party u-turned in 2016 under the weight of the protest, only for the issue to resurface in 2020.

After militant rhetoric from the leader of the Law and Justice Party Jaroslaw Kaczynski which saw him calling on his supporters to defend the churches from the protest, the right-wing president Andrzej Duda signaled potential u-turns. The first with a ‘legislative compromise’ on the 30th October and a second with confirmation of a delay in implementing legislation on the 3rd November, moves which have angered Kaczynski, who is seen as the real power in Poland.

In a country where public opinion is widely against abortions, protesters are focused on the undue influence the church exerts on the state in their secular country, with church groups increasing their social and state pressure on banning abortion and eroding women’s reproductive rights. Alongside the near ban on abortions, new legislation being debated would criminalise sex education, a move which campaigners say would ban sex education in schools.

Opinion polls in the country highlight a wide societal dislike for further limitations on abortion, underscoring the protestors’ arguments that abortion bans should go no further than current restrictions.

‘With the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the right to a safe abortion in the US hangs in the balance’

The rights of women, trans men, and non-binary people to choose abortion have been called into question in the US, after Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away on 18th September.

An ardent supporter of abortion rights, a right that Justice Ginsburg considered paramount to a woman’s equality, she worked hard to ensure the supreme court’s decisions lay in line with these principles. With her passing and the Senate’s confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett, reproductive rights may be eroded, including the landmark 1973 abortion rights ruling Roe vs. Wade, and subsequent abortion rights rulings, including Planned Parenthood vs Casey.

Anti-abortion legislation has swept across 30 states since the start of 2020, banning abortions as early as six weeks, when anti-abortion campaigners say the heartbeat of the foetus starts to form. The so-called ‘heartbeat legislation’ has been strongly opposed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

The ACOG argue that many are unaware of their pregnancy before six weeks, and foetal anomalies can not be detected until much later. The ACOG contest anti-abortion campaigners assertion that a heartbeat starts at six weeks, arguing what is developing at this time is a “portion of the foetal tissue that will become the heart as the embryo develops”.

Legislation is designed to challenge the ‘viability’ decision in Planned Parenthood vs. Casey, which defines the period after 23 weeks that a foetus could viably survive outside of the womb. The Planned Parenthood ruling stipulated terminations were lawful until the point of viability and states were unable to pose an undue burden on human rights.

Post viability, states were able to intervene and legislate against late-term abortions. With a 6-3 Conservative majority in the Supreme Court, and the newest justice with a previous record of supporting pro-life organisations, landmark rulings that have supported abortion will be called into question.

‘In Manchester, the impact of small-scale anti-abortion protests is felt most deeply by those seeking abortions’

Closer to home in Manchester, abortion rights have been subject to local disagreements. Local anti-abortion protesters may not hold the power of government and judges, but their presence has been felt by those working at, and visiting the abortion clinic.

After two years of alleged intimidation of staff, carrying out prayer vigils, and presenting graphic images of abortions, led by international Christian not-for-profit ’40 Days for Life’, a public space protection order has been set up, protecting the Marie Stopes clinic in Fallowfield. The campaign, led by the group Sister Supporter Manchester after a successful PCPO ruling in Ealing, West London, have welcomed the order.

In a statement posted on their website, Sister Supporters wrote: “Although this a very welcome step, it is simply not good enough that those accessing this clinic in Manchester will now be protected, but the same cannot be said for people accessing abortion services at almost every other clinic in the country. They still risk having to face verbal abuse, graphic images and physical intimidation on their way into their appointment.

“The right to privacy and unimpeded access to healthcare is not a local issue. Clinic harassment is, and continues to be, a huge national problem. We are calling for the government to do the right thing and legislate for nationwide restrictions on protests outside abortion clinics.”

A similar 40-day protest recently came to an end in York, led by 40 Days a Life, where residents of the area surrounding the currently closed British Pregnancy Advisory Service clinic felt harassed by the ongoing vigil, complaining of night terrors and weight loss. A petition, signed by more than 2,000 supporters, is asking the local council to enact a similar safe zone around the clinic before the vigil returns.

Global attitudes to abortion vary drastically, with the UK featuring high on supporting the right to choice in all circumstances, at 66 per cent compared with Poland at 33 per cent, and the US at 40 per cent. Pro-life groups, predominantly faith-based, argue that stringent measures are protecting foetuses with no voice, but with 1000 abortions carried out legally in Poland in 2019 and upwards of 80,000 carried out illegally overseas, a pro-life stance does not abolish abortions, but pushes them underground.

‘Coronavirus: A Not-So Student Life’ is out now on Fuse TV

This Friday on Fuse TV, a new student documentary will explore the myriad ways student lives have changed since the beginning of the pandemic.

It has changed our lives dramatically over the past 8 months, and no less for students. They left their university halls and homes in a matter of days, hours, even minutes, in the hope of getting back to a place of familiarity. Universities were one of the first institutions to close down before the national lockdown. Situations differ from university to university.

Students up and down the nation were left in limbo on whether to stay or go. Some had the opportunity to move out of their halls without collecting their stuff for free. Others spent the beginning of lockdown worrying about whether they would be freed from their accommodation contracts and be refunded. The University of Manchester initially said that students would be charged if they did not leave their halls before a certain date. This was reversed during lockdown, and students who were charged were then reimbursed.

International students were in an even more difficult situation. They had a matter of days to return home before international travel restrictions came into place worldwide. The price of a plane ticket home was a financial strain on some. But this seemed like a better option than paying for accommodation, not only in terms of money, but also for safety.

As lockdown took control of our lives, many could no longer go to work and were told to work from home. However, many students did not have this option. Their jobs in pubs, restaurants, bars, and pools were either furloughed or placed on redundancy lists. Some students then struggled to find new jobs. Many organisations cried out for people to work for them, the story was very different on the other side of the coin. Students waited for months to hear back from applications, whilst many post-graduates failed to find permanent work in their field.

As we enter the second wave, coronavirus continues to change our lives, at home and at work. Many students feel abandoned and unheard during this pandemic, and the people of tomorrow believe they need to be heard. They want to have a voice.

Coronavirus: A Not-So Student Life is due to be released on Friday 13th November, only on Fuse TV.

Deal or no deal? Brexit talks resume as deadline closes in

Just over a month after the United Kingdom officially left the European Union and entered an 11-month transition period, the WHO declared Covid-19 a pandemic. The Brexit talks took a backseat whilst the government focused on fighting the pandemic.

Now, as the final deadline for a Brexit deal approaches and cases continue to rise across the country, the prospect of a no-deal Brexit seems real once again. After the EU summit in Brussels on the 15th of October, Boris Johnson warned that the UK should prepare for this scenario since the EU allegedly failed to offer an acceptable trade deal like the one it maintains with Canada.

However, many believe the delays and missed deadlines are only political posturings by the Prime Minister and his Chief Adviser Dominic Cummings. Commentators claim that a ‘smokescreen’ has been created to distract the public from the criticism levelled at the government’s mishandling of the pandemic and national lockdown.

Josh Garside, a first-year LLB Law student, has told The Mancunion, “I think a no-deal Brexit was always Boris’s goal, regardless of the ‘oven-baked deal’ he had back in December.”

In September, the announcement that Boris Johnson plans to break international law, albeit in a “very limited and specific way”, by rewriting the withdrawal agreement’s provisions concerning Northern Ireland has only made people even more sceptical of a positive outcome. Still, pessimism prevails, as many believe the UK would have left without a deal months ago if that had been the initial aim.

Even so, neither side wants to bear the blame for leaving the negotiating table. Talks resumed on the 22nd of October, with diplomats meeting daily to discuss potential additions to the deal. This was decided upon shortly after the EU’s Chief Negotiator Michael Barnier announced a willingness to compromise with the UK.

Deal or no deal, opponents of Brexit have argued that it will have a devastating impact on businesses throughout the UK, especially after being hit hard by the recession caused by the pandemic. Greater Manchester, and the North of England as a whole, rely on trade with the EU more strongly than other parts of the country do, as 58 per cent of goods exports from Greater Manchester are accounted for by the EU. 

If no deal is reached by the deadline, the UK automatically drops out of the common market, the EU ideal that allows for freedom of goods, services, and people across all member states borders. According to a recent government analysis, a no-deal Brexit could cause a 12 per cent fall in the GDP of the North West of England over the next 15 years, compared to a fall of 8 per cent if a deal is reached.

The Brexit deadline also adds to the stress of university students, who are already facing increased stress and a feeling of uncertainty as cases continue to rise in Greater Manchester. The tier 3 lockdown announced in October has prompted many students to move back home and study remotely or even drop out. For EU and international students, the situation appears even more dire as Brexit may mean that students who have chosen to study from home could find it difficult to come to the UK after the December 31st deadline.

With negotiations still ongoing at the time of writing, it remains to be seen what, if any, type of deal the government will come to with the EU. However, almost a year on from the election which gave the Conservative Party a clear mandate to move forward with the Brexit process, it is clear that there is no end in sight for Brexit and we may be still discussing it for the foreseeable future even after the Covid-19 pandemic.

Police descend on Fallowfield campus amid protests – in pictures

Last night, a protest took place on Fallowfield campus in solidarity with students occupying Owens Park Tower

Police and security guards descended on the halls of residence, and riot vans were pictured near Wilmslow Road. 

The occupation continues

All the students that gathered outisde their halls were asked to go back inside
As the crowd of students started to grow the police intervened and requested them to go back inside
A banner hangs out of one of the windows of the occupied building in Fallowfield
Students argue with the police as they order everyone to go back inside
Fallowfield gets creative with Owens Park protest
 Two students hold a banner in support of the student’s request to the University

All photos were taken by Antonio Ross. His Instagram is reflectionless.ross 

Remote learning: Blues and growing pains

It is 2020: No one expected the world to shut down at such an unimaginable scale. No student, including myself, foresaw that attending university would mean sitting at home, facing a screen.

My laptop and I are halfway across the world from campus because the pandemic prevented me from returning to Manchester. A month into the semester and I am still not used to watching my lectures at the dining table at home; or interacting with everyone through a small rectangle on zoom for my seminars.

Being at home has its perks and disadvantages – good news is I can stay with my family but the bad news is that the sense of isolation does not go away.

Being so far away from Manchester poses a lot of challenges, and the feeling of isolation is just one of them. My biggest enemy at the moment is the time difference – my home city is eight hours ahead of GMT. That being said, all my real-time seminars are held during the afternoon and evening.

I know I’m one of the few fortunate ones who managed to arrange my timetable with the time difference in mind, so I don’t have to get up in the dead of night to attend a seminar. However, I do understand this might be a struggle for others. As a creative writing student, there are different literary events in Manchester that I need to attend, most of them start at 2:30 am for me.

To say I am barely awake then is an understatement.

The daily reality of most students in 2020. Photo: Heidy Lo @ The Mancunion

Not to mention, with all the classes conducted online, I need to muster all my self-discipline to stick to my schedule so as not to fall behind. With what seems like an endless to-do-list, the temptation of staying in bed all day instead is immense. The stress, however, does not go away.

No matter where I am in the world, the deadlines still hover above my head and the anxiety has become even worse because I am so far away from my peers. I feel alone in this fight. The silver lining is that all my friends are one message away and if I ever need help with my studies, and my lecturers are one email away.

I am sure a lot of us are feeling secluded from the outside world at the moment, while still trying to live as normally as we can. It’s like we’re living inside a bubble, one that won’t burst or let us back into the world we know. A world where we can see our friends and interact with them like we used to. Sadly, we are now living in times where receiving a hug is considered a privilege.

We are all living under a dome of uncertainty and constant stress; the only thing we can do is try our best.

If you need to take a personal day and take care of your mental health, do it. Be patient with yourself – you are still coping, you are still trying, and that is enough.

Don’t hesitate to contact people when you need help and use the University’s and Student Union’s counselling and advice services. When this is all over, give your loved ones the biggest hug and look back with a smile. You survived a pandemic, you’re still here.

The Moor – Freya Thomson

Saddleworth Moor exists as a barren expanse of moorland forever condemned to its murderous history.  Today, it is enveloped in a mist.  The fine cloud rests on the upland. It oppresses, it conceals, it protects, it invites.

The dark peak land’s earthy hue is interrupted only by vibrantly coloured ferns that skirt its perimeter.  Ripping through thick undergrowth of heather, moss and rock, the splayed fern leaves reveal an electric green.  The ferns jerk and jostle with one another, bobbing from side to side in the wind as they compete for the sun’s sporadic affection.   I park my car by the side of the road.  Finding a spot isn’t difficult; nobody wants to come here.

I get out of the car.  There’s an empty bubble tea cup discarded on the floor.  Normally, the plastic is brightly coloured, filled with weird milk tea and strange tapioca bubbles, but this cup is half-full of rainwater and a few cigarette stubs.

I continue to clamber across coarse heather and rocks and on to grass.  I walk in a now bizarrely familiar direction.  As I press on walking, I step upon a soft, spongy mound of earth.  I stop.  I press my foot down.  The small mound offers some resistance against my foot.  For some reason, I find the sensation comforting.  In the bleak landscape so devoid of humanity and human touch, I find solace in the squishy earth.

I walk on.  The feeling of content vanishes as an inch of blue comes and goes, obscured by the overcast day.  It is impossible to forget why I am here. I make my way to the place I always go. From my bag I pull two white roses.  They have become a little bruised from sitting in my bag in a warm car for a few hours, but it doesn’t matter.  I scatter the petals around me. The wind carries some of the soft, white curls away.  It is all I can do.

~

In our youth, Saturdays and Sundays danced by.  Although there were three years between us, we spent every day together.  More than a little brother to me, you were a best friend too. Our summer days were spent idling around suburbia under primary blue skies.  Even the mundane days seem perfect in retrospect.  Running, laughing, eating ice pops, going to bed when the sky was still light, and the pigeons were still cooing.  Sometimes our mum had already put us to bed when we heard the sounds of the ice-cream van making its rounds.  Sometimes, if we were lucky, she let us climb out of bed and nip across the street in our pyjamas to get an ice-cream.

Those days were perfect.  We were carefree, unthinking, naïve, happy.  We were just kids.

~

I’ll never be able to forget his freckly face, fixed in my mind forever.  It’s a nice image, but a sad one too.  Those bright eyes are tied up with too much nostalgia, an overwhelming combination of happiness and tragedy.

My little brother disappeared one day, and we never saw him again.

~

I was only a child when he went missing.  At first, I was confident he would come home.  But when he didn’t, I had to make sense of it somehow.  It was the only way I could cope.

I had heard stories about the Moor.  The children buried there.  One of them whose body was never recovered, lost on the Moor forever.  And so, I told myself the Moor had swallowed him up.  It seemed less violent than an actual person harming him, and I forced myself to believe it.

The Moor began to embody all of my fears which extended to horrendous nightmares.  A primordial, foreboding abyss lived in my head; it could strike me at any time, day or night.  I longed for it to go away, but it wasn’t that easy.

Looking back, school was difficult.  Everyone knew what had happened and everyone felt sorry for me.  Or thought I was weird, or a combination of the two.  After he went missing, I wasn’t like everyone else.  Now I look back, I recognise I had been through more trauma than most people experience in their lifetimes.  It was a heavy burden for a small child to carry.

We never found out what happened to him, and it’s heartbreaking to admit, but it’s likely that we’ll never know.  But I can’t forget, and so now I still come here, to remember and to mourn.

~

And just like that, I turn to leave the moor.  It’s cold and I want to forget.  I walk quicker and quicker and quicker until I reach the comfort of my car.  I sink into the seat.  I put the key into the ignition and turn.  Some soulless pop song plays, but I long for anything to fill the void.  I drive.

As I pull away from the moor, I am flooded with grief and relief.  I will never get over losing him.  But also, for the first time since he disappeared, I feel differently.

As I drive further and further away from the clutches of the moor, I consider the moor could be beautiful if not for its past.  After all, it is not nature but people who can be ugly.  We must go on, otherwise, we too will be condemned.  We must find beauty where it is difficult to see.

I drive away and leave the moor and the white roses behind me.

This time, it’s for the last time.

Freya Thomson is a third-year student studying History,  from York. She started writing her short story ‘The Moor’ out of sheer boredom during lockdown in July. Her piece started out as purely descriptive, but she soon realised it needed some sort of plot, which was inspired by a trip back to Manchester to clear out her student house at the end of her tenancy. The drive from Yorkshire to Lancashire often means passing the infamous Saddleworth Moor. The misty beauty of the Moor, combined with its gruesome and sad history, captured her imagination.  You can find more of Freya on Twitter @thomsonfreya.

 

Why we’ve had enough of designer labels profiting from ‘poor’ clothing

We’re no stranger to ripped jeans and distressed crop-tops, but the fashion industry has started taking it a bit too far in their outlandish commodification of worn and old-looking clothing.

Distressed garments that look rough-around-the edges have become a popular trend in recent years, but fashion brands are taking this to extremes with some controversial and ridiculously-priced pieces.

Imagine walking into a job interview hoping to put your best foot forward, only to notice a massive ladder in your tights. Disaster, right? Well not anymore, as apparently this is now the height of fashion according to Gucci’s £145 price tag.

In what has become this month’s most scandalous and viral fashion find, Gucci are selling a pair of ‘distressed’ tights with rips and ladders for £145. And if that wasn’t enough to make your jaw drop to the floor, they are currently sold out.

Gucci ripped tights
Photo: Diet Prada @ Instagram

When tearing a pair of tights is an accidental and embarrassing look, and to buy them intact is only a few pounds, it’s easy to understand why people were outraged by this. Many people took to the internet to complain about this blatant commodification of poverty and wardrobe malfunctions, especially given the extortionate price.

With the prominence of social media in dictating fashion trends and the advertising opportunities that it presents, we have to wonder whether Gucci were genuinely trying to create an iconic trend or simply wanted to make a viral post that they knew would outrage people.

This isn’t the first time that Gucci have been under fire for an absurd item that appears to profit off ‘poor culture’. Their ‘Screener’ trainers, which retail at £615, are designed to look scruffy and dirty when fresh out of the box.

Many people were quick to criticise the extortionate price for an item you could easily recreate at home and felt as though the brand were unfairly profiting from a look that people in poverty may struggle to avoid.

Gucci aren’t the only fashion house participating in this wild yet controversial trend – various brands are selling ‘moth-bitten’ t-shirts with holes and tears, and PRPS even went as far as selling the ‘Barracuda’ jeans that are made to look caked in mud stains.

This worn, unkempt look has also made its way into makeup, with models such as Bella Hadid sporting smudged, slept-in black eyeliner and mascara for Milan Fashion Week back in February.

For some, fashion is all about expression, whereas others believe it should be used to put your best foot forward. Whichever side of the debate you sit in, it doesn’t quite feel right that these fashion brands are commercialising poverty in their designs.

Goldilocks and the Three Masks: Why the silk face mask is ‘just right’

If you’re beginning to suspect that those new spots you see multiplying in the mirror might have something to do with the face mask you’re wearing, it may be time to tell yourself a new story, starring the silk facemask.

The clinical term for this year’s newest dermatological nightmare is ‘maskne’ – and yes, it stands for mask-acne.

But as you’re about to discover, my masked friends, face masks – though in public are practically required – don’t need to destroy your skin. Thankfully, there’s no law to say that a Covid-complexion is compulsory.

If maskne is playing havoc with your pores, pause to consider that unlike normal acne, hormones have nothing to do with this new outbreak of blemishes. Instead, maskne owes its miserable existence to the conditions created under our masks.

Ever noticed how steamed-up people’s glasses get while wearing face masks? It’s due to the lack of air circulating under the mask. This combination of moisture and heat from your breath makes it the perfect breeding ground for bacteria, which mingles with oils in your skin and clogs up the pores.

The cheaper the face mask, the worse the problem. The serial offenders are the synthetic masks you see around town, which are particularly troublesome for the delicate skin around the mouth. The heat and pressure from the mask gradually break down protective layers of skin, leaving your face a fertile ground for maskne to take over.

Woman wearing silk face mask
Photo: Mjoutfitz on Instagram

Unless you enjoy rocking the just-out-of-hospital look, sticking with those reusable, synthetic masks will doom you to further maskne outbreaks. The cycle will continue, week after week, so you need to bin these disposable masks before it’s too late.

If you want to tackle the challenge of the mask, you need to think back to your childhood and channel the story of Goldilocks and The Three Bears. It took Goldilocks several attempts to find the right bowl of porridge that wasn’t too hot and wasn’t too cold. One that was just right.

Your face mask is like that bowl of porridge. You need a mask that is just right for you, and most importantly for your skin.

For this, you can’t do better than silk face masks – they have a number of benefits that disposable and polyester masks can’t match. This is why they are the first choice for both beauty fanatics and the skincare obsessed.

According to News-Medical, silk masks are breathable, “don’t trap in moisture, and don’t irritate the skin or increase local humidity around the face beneath it.”

For cash strapped students, splurging out on silk might seem extravagant. In reality they’re not as expensive as you may think, and various independent businesses now sell them on online marketplaces such as Etsy.

Silk face masks
Photo: Mink and Honey Creations @ Instagram

One example of this is Mink ‘n’ Honey Creations, an independent firm whose silk face masks are made from 100% pure silk that do not cause damage to the skin. At under £10 for a mulberry silk face mask in an array of colours, you will instantly be sold.

Covid-19 is the reason we are even discussing face masks and sadly, the reason why so many independent businesses are struggling to stay afloat. Supporting these businesses when you purchase your facemask is not only good for your skin but it’s also helping the wider community.

As Covid rumbles on, it’s time to face up to what your face mask is doing to your face.