Skip to main content

Year: 2018

The Catalan Revolution of English Football

Champagne football has well and truly reached the Premier League. Finally, a breath of fresh air, after the stagnant footballing reign of park-the-bus even amongst many star-studded clubs. Admittedly, the effectiveness of recent managerial styles cannot be doubted – with three of the previous four title winners leaving many questioning whether or not this remains the ‘beautiful’ game.

Last year, however, saw the beckoning of a new era for football in England and Wales, following the arrival of Pep Guardiola. Though envied by many, including myself, there is no denying the spectacular football which the Spaniard nurtures his teams into playing. As Manchester City showed during their 2017/18 campaign, when in full flow, he is unstoppable.

Trends are always apparent throughout English football. Case in point of this are Mourinho’s defensively-sound tactics which have seen many triumphant title campaigns, although the winners have played far from the best football. Other systems built from a solid back-line, such as Claudio Ranieri’s counter-attacking Leicester and Antonio Conte’s 3 at-the-back with Chelsea, were also adopted by many teams in the top flight after working their magic.

Conte’s system appeared present even within the English national team’s run to the semi-finals of the World Cup. Wherever success is seen, it will provoke copycats — imitation, after all, is the highest form of flattery.

That’s the beauty of Guardiola’s game: due to its complex nature, it cannot merely be picked up or cloned by those managing in the Premier League. Talk of ‘medio-centros’, ‘half-spaces’, and ‘inverted fullbacks’ can be intimidating jargon, and the beauty of it provides Manchester City with the footballing firepower they’ve inherited with their Catalan leader. As this difficult-to-interpret manner of football has invaded our shores, it’s enticed major clubs into employing and putting faith in other philosophers of the game.

Chelsea and Arsenal’s appointments of Maurizio Sarri and Unai Emery has led to a swift change-up in the manner in which they’re playing compared to recent years — and it’s working, as they currently sit 3rd and 4th in the table, 2 points behind Manchester City who lead the way at the time of writing.

Though Liverpool and Spurs have stuck with their managers; they are following a similar path to the other big clubs. The men in charge, Jurgen Klopp and Mauricio Pochettino, are incorporating their versions of the beautiful game. With support from their clubs, to great success, they complete the top 5, filling in above and below the blue and red sides of London.

Financial backing and confidence boosts from the owners and boards have seen these two developing into major footballing powers again in the last few years. All they need now to cement this is a trophy!

Though it’s early in the season, we’re seeing something we haven’t seen in many years. Five of the ‘top six’ teams in the land have graciously taken their defeat of last year with the intention of incorporating a style to their play. Needless to say, a certain Portuguese manager has not followed suit and is struggling to cope. This bamboozling of opponents is something we’re all used to watching, but not to this extent, 3 teams remain unbeaten after 10 games for the first time in Premier League history.

Gracias Pep, Grazie Maurizio, und Danke Jurgen.

Grassroots Football at serious risk due to funding cuts, warns Mayor

Grassroots football could face a period of serious decay resulting from reductions in local government funding, according to Mayor Andy Burnham.

The former Health Secretary issued the warning in an interview with The Telegraph, amid the paper’s six-point campaign to save grassroots football receiving widespread political attention.

Burnham highlighted that spending cuts would see players paying higher fees for pitch hire and related expenses, while simultaneously observing a decline in maintenance standards.

”The grassroots are looking at a pretty decade given where local government finance is”, said the 48-year old.

The former Health Secretary previously served as the administrator of the Football Task Force, a body that recommended that 5% of the revenue generated by the Premier League would be invested into the grassroots game.

Seen as one of the headline commitments of the scheme, it is believed that the Premier League agreed to meet this annual figure in exchange for government approval in their sale of broadcasting rights.

With the league now disputing that a formal pledge was made to invest 5% every year, Burnham has called for an investigation to be launched as to whether this level of funding has been provided annually.

With the Premier League’s current global broadcasting deal valued at £8.3 billion, it is understood that 3.6% or around £299 million is invested in schemes below the professional game. If that expected share of 5% was delivered, the funding would be worth close to the £450 million mark.

The Premier League has launched alternative programs, such as the Football Foundation, Britain’s largest sports charity that has provided £300 million of backing for projects since its launch in 2000. That figure, however, remains a thin slice of the television deal for 2016-2019 alone.

The need for more grassroots football-focused funding is blazingly apparent, with the six-point Telegraph campaign revealing that as many as 150,000 matches were called off last season due to poor quality pitches and a lack of available referees.

The six-point ‘Save Our Game’ campaign was launched late last month in an attempt to save grassroots participation in football after the sale of Wembley. Suggestions include the introduction of an independent committee, increased scrutiny on the distribution of funding, and the possibility of levies on transfers.

Burnham warned that an already-recognisable investment issue could snowball into much wider problems for the game at this level, without due attention.

”If we are not careful, this could end up being a classic piece of British short-termism where we are not investing in the base of the pyramid and then we start to suffer in a number of years.”

While there is an array of young British talent on show in the Premier League and at Manchester clubs, many often confuse the development of academies and youth squads in local areas with the need to financially support the participation of everyday fans in playing the game, at amateur and even beginner levels, on a week-in-week-out basis.

Increasingly often, casual teams are being priced out of the chance to play by the need to meet costs for private facilities, with local government-funded pitches regularly failing to meet the standards expected.

 

 

Five and Counting: History-maker Hamilton secures title at Mexican Grand Prix

Lewis Hamilton secured his fifth F1 Drivers Championship in style last weekend, with an accomplished performance at the Mexican Grand Prix.

The crown means Hamilton joins an elite club  F1 champions, alongside just two others, Michael Schumacher and Juan Manuel Fangio, who he now stands level with on 5 titles.

The 33-year old knew going into the race that a seventh-place finish would be enough to earn him his fourth crown in five years, regardless of rival Sebastien Vettel’s result.

Prolonging the title fight into this week’s Brazilian Grand Prix looked virtually impossible, and the Ferrari driver couldn’t deliver his necessary 1st place finish, as Max Verstappen produced arguably the greatest race of his career so far.

Red Bull looked to secure a fifth race victory of the season as Daniel Ricciardo and Verstappen occupied the top two spots in qualifying. The Australian started poorly, however, allowing Verstappen to take an early lead that he never looked like surrendering, eventually finishing over 17 seconds clear of Vettel, who despite moving up from fourth in qualifying never looked likely to challenge the Dutchman.

Hamilton and Mercedes looked uncomfortable throughout the race, their ultrasoft tyres clearly not the right choice for the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez, as the Englishman became the first of the leading pack to pit, during the 12th lap.

Hamilton began to look assured in second place, ahead of Ricciardo, but was left dissatisfied with the changes made in the pit, and eventually was calmly overtaken by Vettel. The German briefly set his eyes on race victory as Ricciardo pulled off due to a technical failure, failing to finish the race.

Verstappen, however, was in cruise control and took the chequered flag, the only disappointment for Red Bull being the missed opportunity for a one-two finish for the first time in five years.

Ferrari’s Kimi Räikkönen took advantage of Ricciardo’s exit and Hamilton and Mercedes’s continued mishaps to quietly steal a podium spot, following his victory at Austin the week before.

Further back, Valtteri Bottas took fifth spot having challenged for the podium in the opening laps. Nico Hülkenberg was the fastest behind the traditional ‘Big Three’ of Mercedes, Ferrari, and Red Bull, while Haas endured a nightmare race, as Kevin Magnussen and Romain Grosjean finished in the final two spots a number of laps behind the nearest rivals.

Fernando Alonso, Carlos Sainz Jr, and Sergio Pérez all failed to finish, alongside Ricciardo.

While a celebratory victory would have been idealised in the minds of Hamilton and his team, the ability to cooly see out a title-ensuring fourth-place finish in a race riddled with technical problems for the Mercedes camp underlined Hamilton’s sheer class.

The last few weeks have made Hamilton’s path towards the 2018 crown seem almost procession-like. This perspective belittles the 33-year old’s achievement, however. It is easy to forget that Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel left Silverstone in July with an 8-point advantage at the top of the standings — a fifth-straight Mercedes championship win looked an uphill challenge, not a formality.

For many, it was the events of a dramatic next race in Hockenheim that proved the season’s turning point. Hamilton recovered from 14th place to steal a narrow victory over teammate Valtteri Bottas, while Vettel crashed out of the race after a serious error in the wet conditions. Hamilton and Mercedes left Germany with a 17-point lead, and never looked back in an unrivalled domination of the season’s second half.

Picking up top spot in the Italian, Singapore, Russian, and Japanese Grand Prix, Hamilton boasted a 67-point advantage over his rival after victory at Suzuka, re-igniting the image of an individual and team that have come to dominate the industry in the past four years.

Given the way that Mercedes have closed out the title fight this season, it would be easy to forget that Toto Wolff’s team were on-par with Ferrari at the start of the season, and even fell behind in the battle of technical developments, with Vettel racing in the quickest car of all from the British Grand Prix onwards.

This, along with Hamilton’s admission that this season’s challenge from Ferrari was like one that he had never faced, shows the incredible professionalism behind this season’s victory. Mercedes’s technical choices have been excellent while Hamilton’s judgment has been essentially flawless — far from the case of his opponent Vettel.

With the picture for the 2019 campaign already taking place, Hamilton is emerging as a clear favourite to chase down Schumacher’s record of 7 titles and become the most successful driver in the industry’s history.

Big changes are needed at Ferrari if they are to scoop their first championship since 2007.

 

Mancunian Tyson Fury eyes up title prize as comeback mounts

The build-up to the Fury-Wilder fight is well and truly underway. With the huge heavyweight clash set to take place on December 1st at the Staples Centre in Los Angeles, the excitement surrounding the event is already growing.

Tyson Fury is known for his outbursts and his press conference last Thursday was no exception. Fury managed to kick out a reporter before the media scrum had even started. His reason? He feels the EsNews YouTuber is a ‘hater’.

Wythenshawe’s finest boxer isn’t the only one causing controversy in the lead up to the December showcase. Deontay Wilder recently punched a mascot live on TV, supposedly breaking his jaw; although the show has dismissed those rumours since broadcast. Wilder seemed to miss the fact that the bit was a joke and proved why he’s a world-class boxer, sending the unlucky receiver crashing onto the floor.

Wilder’s record of 40-0 proposes a big challenge for Fury, who will need to be back to his peak performance in order to retain his unbeaten record. If Fury beats the American a rematch will be required for the WBC Championship Belt. This will hold off a fight for either Wilder or Fury against the heavyweight world ranking number 1, Anthony Joshua.

If Wilder beats the famed Mancunian as well as gaining over a million Pay-Per-Views, Eddie Hearn (famed boxing promoter) thinks it’ll be fair to split a future fight’s earnings ’50-50′. This undoubtedly hints to a Wilder-Joshua fight on April 13th 2019.

Fury recently opened up about his battle with depression during his two-year absence from the ring. The former WBA (Super), IBF, WBO, IBO, Ring, and Lineal heavyweight titleholder was tested positive for cocaine usage twice during this time period and even contemplated suicide.

The Boxer revealed on Joe Rogan’s Podcast earlier this month that he “didn’t care about nothing” as he drove his Ferrari 190mph towards a bridge. However, the 30-year old went onto describe the resolve he showed to tear himself away from the edge of tragedy and re-ignite his flailing boxing career.

Fury is now training at the Big Bear base camp in California and will certainly make sure the fight, now only one month away, will be a great spectacle for all boxing fans.

Manchester Students’ Union ‘ready to help’ struggling NUS

The University of Manchester Students’ Union (SU) has told The Mancunion that it is ‘ready to help’ the National Union of Students (NUS) after it was revealed this weekend that the NUS, which represents 7 million students across the country, is facing “financial difficulty”.

According to a letter that has been leaked by several news outlets, the organisation faces a potential £3m deficit in its finances and might now have to borrow money against the building it owns and cut staff to remain financially viable.

The letter, written by NUS National President Shakira Martin and acting Chief Executive Peter Robertson was sent to affiliated organisations across the country.

It begins: “We are writing to you today because as one of our members you fund our organisation, you decide the strategic direction of our movement, and as a collective we share ambitions.”

The letter then goes on to say that “the NUS Group is facing financial difficulty. We are projected to post a significant deficit this year without enough resource to cover the loss.”

It then sets out some of the measures the NUS will have to take to stay afloat and ensure survival, both in the sense of remaining solvent and addressing “underlying governance issues”.

“We have taken immediate advice on the options available to us to ensure we remain solvent. It looks likely this will include a combination of borrowing against the building we own, making cuts to staff, and turning off some of the activity we deliver.”

The University of Manchester Students’ Union said: “The fact NUS is facing financial difficulties is a concern for the whole student movement. Students have never needed an effective NUS more than they do now, with uncertainty around education funding, the cost of living scandal and the mental health crisis just some of the issues facing us.”

“We are confident that with the right kind of leadership in place to turn the situation around, they will be back on solid ground soon. This has happened numerous times in its 96-year history and we are ready to help them do it again this time.”

An NUS spokesperson told The Mancunion: “We can confirm that NUS is taking measures to address a number of governance-related challenges. The boards, officers and executive team are agreed that we need to deliver fundamental corporate, democratic, and financial reform by Summer 2019.”

“This means there will be a range of proposals brought to a Strategic Conversation meeting in November 2018 for consideration and refinement with the help of our members, and subsequently to National Conference 2019 to be voted on by our members.”

The NUS is a grouping of 600 students unions, making up around 95% of all further and higher education unions. The organisation recently launched it’s ‘Totum’ student discount card to replace the NUS Extra discount card. 

Review: ‘Beige B*tch’

Nima Séne’s eclectic show, ‘Beige B*tch’ was staged by Contact at Z-arts’ STUN Studio. As we entered the theatre, we seemed to enter a different world; a decadently gold-encrusted desert setting, complete with a golden treadmill in motion. Piles of sand, ferns, coconuts and metal weights were littered about. The performer at the start was Jade Williams, and she laid the foundations for a highly original piece. She moved around the space effortlessly, movements fluid, occasionally accosting audience members with a few choice words- I managed to pick up the phrases ‘naked beauty’ and ‘in control’ from a few rows back.

This segued into a synchronised, infectiously fun dance number, as Nima Séne emerged, proclaiming delightedly about how ‘gorgeous’ we all were and getting audience members to take selfies with her. Lulled into a sense of security, Nima instructed us to ‘leave narrative at the door’.

Yet, I am unconvinced that without narrative, the show had much remaining. Made up of multiple seemingly self-contained parts, it felt fragmented, in a way that felt confusing rather than exciting. Indeed, there were moments when segments of the show became genuinely dull; the extended spoken word segments where Séne sat in the dark, for example. While the poetry had positive elements, it lacked the power to hold attention for longer than a few minutes.

Other parts of the show crossed into genuine discomfort. I’m all for making your audience uncomfortable with a purpose behind it, as long as they can figure out what that purpose is. The use of a video clip in which Nima portrayed three different east Asian characters competing in a ‘most ambiguous’ competition was jarring, not just because of the length of the piece (it felt like at least ten minutes) but because of the thick faux-Asian accent she was putting on. While I’m sure there was a reason for this, the disjointed format meant the intention was somewhat clouded, and it was difficult to gauge her purpose.  

There were some poignant moments within the performance. Contact’s stated claim that the work tackled ‘im/perfection in the era of the image’ rang true at many points. The use of video editing was ingenious, and the work of filmmaker Daniel Hughes was innovative and enjoyable; I would have happily seen more of Séne in the chat-show format. Many of the visuals were very effective, such as Séne dropping items of clothing onto the moving treadmill, or the use of a pineapple as an exfoliator. There was an ambitious attempt to deal with the nuances of racism. If each segment had felt more developed, this would have had more impact.

‘Beige B*tch’ often felt like being within someone’s internal monologue, with little context and no idea how we got there. While the start was promising, and Sené is certainly a talented performer, the incoherent structure did her no favours. The ending was so distanced from the beginning as to have conceivably come from a different show altogether. While many elements were enjoyable, the performance was ultimately underwhelming.

Review: Dante or Die’s ‘User Not Found’

‘I could be anybody.’

These were among the first words in Dante or Die’s breathtaking ‘User Not Found’. A lilting sentence heard, individually, through dozens of sets of headphones. Each audience member was seated in Pot Kettle Black, a cafe in Barton Arcade, as if we were there for a latte instead of a show. Yet we were each given headphones, a smartphone with an externally controlled screen, and the sense that this would be unlike any theatre we’d seen before.

It wasn’t immediately evident who the performer was, or if there was one at all. Through the headphones began a rising crescendo of cafe sounds; the familiar clink of ceramics, the hiss of the steam arm, some jaunty music. Then, softly, a murmuring voice emerged from the fray. ‘I could be anybody’, he observed, studying the others in the cafe. Terry O’Donovan, who had a moment ago been sat among us, made himself known. People-watching and distractedly looking at his phone, we shared his sense of ease. This was shattered, however, when his phone began to buzz and so did ours. It emerged that his recent ex, partner of nine years, Luka had just died.

Terry didn’t know how to feel. Nor did we. We learned that despite their recent separation, Terry had still been left a monumental task; that of deciding what to do with Luka’s digital legacy. Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, everything. The app used for this task, Fidelis, seemed so disconcertingly plausible that I googled it after the performance. It was an invention of Dante or Die – but as the scale of people’s online legacies become equivalent to their material ones, perhaps it won’t be a fiction for long.

We experienced Terry’s emotional tumult, encapsulated in the social setting of the cafe, a world in which people are both isolated from and in communion with each other. He walked among the tables, occasionally interacting with the audience, but crucially emphasising the emotional barrier between us. This artifice was underscored by constantly shifting images on our phones. Often we were shown what Terry saw on his own phone, trawling desperately through Luka’s social media, watching Laurent Mercier music videos (whom Terry hated, but Luka had loved) and dwelling on that all-important ‘Delete All’ button on Fidelis. Yet, the flawless technology also frequently transitioned into a visual representation of Terry’s inner turmoil. There was a pulsating, unidentifiable tearing on the screen, and a blurring, as if the screen was suddenly flooded with water. My personal favourite echoed Terry’s troubled dreams; an animated snail stating, with cool detachment, that ‘death is a story told by the living’. The absurdity only heightened the poignancy of the piece.

O’Donovan’s ease and charisma was compelling from the first, and he skilfully navigated the emotional complexity of Chris Goode’s writing. Under the artful direction of Daphna Attias, and utilising a wealth of talent in terms of technology and sound, the piece was utterly unforgettable. In the ‘cafe which is a metaphor for life’, it is impossible to know what others are going through.

After all, it ‘could be anybody’ experiencing this pain, and this digital dilemma. It’s a dilemma those who witnessed ‘User Not Found’ will be considering for a while.

Review: ‘Propel’

Curated by award winning company YESYESNONO, ‘Propel’ is billed as ‘a scratch night for the experimental, for the daring and for the alive.’ After its debut at PUSH festival, ‘Propel’ returned to HOME  with four new acts testing out the very bare bones of potential material – the idea being that they can get audience feedback on how to develop their work further.

Caitlin Gleeson kicked off the night with her one woman performance of ‘Spill.’ Based on her own struggle with a Catholic upbringing, the piece aims to examine how we view the truth and what happens when memories are questioned and re-imagined to suit a situation. The piece certainly has an interesting concept but the performance lacked any energy and the pacing was far too slow. The use of photographs to engage the audience felt clunky and served little purpose within the piece. I can see the potential and with further work and development the piece could certainly become an interesting performance adding to the discussion around believability of the #MeToo movement. It would be unfair of me to criticise the piece too much as the night focuses around the bare bones of what could be the start of a performance project.

Second in the running was ‘Ergon’ written and performed by the company of the same name. This piece felt more like a team building exercise than a performance, although that may well have been the point. The company place the audience in the year 2058. The population of the UK are living with an energy quota after a dramatic rise in sea levels forces the population to take refuge in more central cities. The premise is that each person is only allowed to use 10 Ergons of energy per day. The company take a volunteer from the audience who describes their day, the rest of the audience are then put into teams and challenged to re-create the persons day, using the energy chart underneath our seats. The performance runs as a workshop and is routed in truth. Research has suggested that the events presented may well be our reality. The piece needs more work and the comedy of the facilitators could be used to greater effect. But overall, the piece definitely has potential, even if only as an educative workshop.

The third act, and my personal favourite, was Spiltmilk Dance with their re-imagining of cult classic films in their piece ‘Desert Island Flicks.’ The duo danced through 15 films in 15 minutes – deconstructing favourites such as Grease, Harry Potter and Star Wars – with a twist. The pair recreated classic moves to unexpected movie soundtracks, making fifteen minutes of pure hilarity fly by. The added touch of audience film bingo was also a highlight. I can really see this piece going places.

The night ended with original music and overall the evening was entertaining, a scratch night in its purest form.

Review: The Pride

‘The Pride’, a debut play by Alexi Kaye Campbell, and adapted by Green Carnation Productions at Manchester’s Hope Mill Theatre, powerfully directs our attention to issues such as loneliness, intimacy, homosexual relations and abuse. The play switches in time between the 1958 and 2008, showcasing how much has and hasn’t changed in regards to our sexual relations and needs. In 1958 Sylvia and Philip are married, while Sylvia’s friend Oliver and Philip fall in love. We follow the same characters in 2008 when Philip breaks up with Oliver because of Oliver’s addiction to anonymous sex.

The set is minimalistic with a couch and drinks cabinet that were moved to indicate a different time period. The actors (Gareth George, Simon Hallmann, and Joanna Leese) changed their intonation, accent and manner of speaking accordingly with impressive easiness, which made the transitions fluent and enjoyable. The performance was convincing and intimate, which was enhanced by the thrust stage set up. The characters were life-like and flawed, their problems identifiable.

The way that different character traits were played out, such as Philip’s frustration with Oliver, Oliver’s dreamy and attention-craving personality, and Sylvia’s sensibility, highlighted how much changes in 50 years. In the 1950s Sylvia was a fragile failed actress, and Philip’s love affair with Oliver led him to believe he was ill and needed treatment, as being gay was in that period against the law. In 2008 Oliver was no longer a writer of children’s books hiding his true identity, and instead wasn’t able to refuse the option of having sex with strangers.

An over-arching theme in both eras is loneliness — when we can’t be ourselves or when someone close to you cannot be. The subtle repeated signs of wanting intimacy by touching one’s lip were contrasted with intensely realistic displays of domestic violence and other confrontations. What I liked in this play was that it made you reconsider your own life, intimacy, and relations. Moreover, the play delicately puts forward that every era has its problems, and we are far from having dealt with our own contemporary issues in a satisfactory manner.

‘The Pride’ raises questions about what our values are, what we have normalised, and what is sacred. How do we have to true contact with one another? True intimacy? Is polygamy an obstruction to intimacy? How do we deal with people diverting from the norm? The Pride is able to combine difficult topics without being normative and is at times surprisingly funny. I would definitely go another time.

Student campaign group asks UoM to become Living Wage employer

The University of Manchester Living Wage Campaign held an open meeting last Thursday to discuss its push to encourage UoM to become a living wage employer.

Employers who sign up must pay at least £8.75 an hour to employees and contractors.

It is separate to the government’s various minimum wage rates which are enforced by law. These stand at £5.90 for 18 to 20-year-olds, £7.38 for 21 to 24-year-olds.

A higher rate of £7.83 for 25s and over is called the National Living Wage but has nothing to do with the living wage campaign.

In a statement the university said: “The University recognises that the work of the Living Wage Foundation (LWF) is a means of encouraging employers to pay a minimum hourly rate of pay at the LWF rate of £8.75 per hour.

“This is commendable. The University of Manchester pays above the LWF rate at £9.04 per hour and in addition has an excellent package of terms and conditions.”

On Twitter it said: “… at the current time, we do not feel there is a need to become accredited, as we review our pay rates and raise them in line with the LWF rate.”

Second-year Politics and Sociology student Jack Swan acknowledged that the University does pay most of its employees fair wages, but challenged it to go even further by seeking accreditation.

He said: “There’s no reason why the university shouldn’t accredit as a living wage employer. It won’t be a huge issue for them to pay more — we know that they’re investing £1bn in the university and that the number of highest-paid staff members has increased a lot in recent years.”

“We know that the money’s there. It’s a matter of leadership — it is the University of Manchester and if they want to have that title of being of Manchester they also need to be for Manchester and they need to be for the Mancunians who are keeping the rooms clean so that they can deliver that world-class service that they are proud of.”

During the meeting an email was also sent to the university’s newly-appointed registrar Patrick Hackett, urging him to consider accreditation by the Living Wage Foundation.

The email was undersigned by a coalition of students including representatives from the Labour Society, Young Liberals, Save Our Staff, and the Living Wage Campaign.

They invited Mr Hackett to their upcoming rally calling for the University to become Living Wage accredited.

Swan told The Mancunion that he hopes Mr Hackett comes to meet them to engage with some of the workers who would be positively affected by accreditation.

“We all want this to be a positive relationship. The university is in a position where it can have a real influence. We want to study at a university which takes the lead on these issues and make us proud.

“Let’s work together to improve conditions to make this university and the community that it’s embedded in a better, more financially secure place: a better Manchester… a greater Manchester.”

The campaign rally will be held on November 7 at 12:30, outside the Social Responsibility Office at 186 Waterloo Place and will call for the university to join the 33 universities that have already been accredited.

Review: Peterloo

Peterloo is based on the Peterloo massacre — one of the bloodiest events in British history that took place in Manchester on the 16th of August 1819.

Director Mike Leigh is renowned for making historical dramas with a sense of reality. Peterloo is an emotional tribute to the massacre and Leigh, raised in Salford, does it justice by bringing to light the tribulations of ordinary men. With the massacre’s imminent 200 years anniversary, there could not have been a better time to highlight the importance of the event. It raised a nationwide outcry exposing the government’s patronage and insensitive approach to people’s lives and gradually inspired the working class to unite to have a voice.

The film starts with the end of the Napoleonic wars. As Parliament unanimously approves a massive financial gift to the Duke of Wellington for his victory over Napoleon Bonaparte, we see the darker side of those in power, with wages being halved and no action to counter the increase in unemployment of the working class.

Frustrated by enduring poverty and lack of suffrage following the Napoleonic Wars, people start gathering in meetings to discuss reforms and the need for representation of working men along with the propertied classes. More extremist views come from the younger generations who ignite emotions to slowly build up support. Female reform societies had also sprung up by then across the North-West, calling for women to participate in the rally.

At every one of these gatherings, the menacing Deputy Chief Constable Nadin (Victor McGuire) eavesdrops in plain view, and it strained me to see how the brute is obviously placed into the background, without anyone noticing him glowering at them. He is one of the many ears to the Home Secretary, Mr Addington, who plays the most pivotal part in orchestrating a response to these agitations.

The main speaker, Henry Hunt, believes the government must be changed “peacefully if we may, forcibly if we must” but does not incite his audiences to violent rebellion. Upon invitation to lead the rally, he arrives in Manchester dressed in his trademark white top hat. Hunt is revered by a 60,000-strong crowd gathered at St Peter’s Field to demand political reform.

Reaching this point after two hours of talking, scheming, and preparations on the moors for the march, along with a clash of characters as to how to organise the procession leaves you a little anxious for the end. This is a testament to the film, with so much surrounding the chaos of organising such a march, you still feel a direct connection to the characters as the film comes to a close. The crows are dressed in their best with their wives and children, expecting speeches and a good day out, a day of innocence for them.

What they were not anticipating was violence, carried out by troops sent in to disperse them. The troops are drinking in local taverns, fired up, ready to unleash themselves. The authorities overlooking the rally fear the worst and call upon the troops. They storm the crowd, killing and injuring their own civilians.

The rushed climax of the film emulates the unexpected events of that day, but it did leave me questioning if such a climax was appropriate.  The reporters gathered at the site are reminded of Waterloo and a local reporter coins the event Peterloo, a brutal equivalent.  The film is immersive with strong performances but somewhere it misses the punch required for the commercial appeal.

Rating: 3/5.

Hot Right Now: HMLTD

Happy Meal Limited or Hate Music Last Time Delete?

HMLTD, a London-born sextet of glam, rock, punk, and pop merge together to produce some of the most exciting and experimental music that you could find in the current industry.

Embellished with the most garish, bold and sometimes even creepy costumes, HMLTD are totally unique in their stage presence. Henry Spychalski, the band’s flamboyant frontman, is one of the most dramatic performers I have ever laid eyes on, certainly similar to the likes of Adam Ant.

With an absolutely fascinating image, HMLTD draw influences from Satan, sex, love and nightmarish figurines to produce a bizarre concoction of seductive beats and compelling lyricism. In fact, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything quite like a HMLTD live set.

Albeit, some of their songs e.g. ‘Stained’ and ‘Kinkaku-Ji’ can come across abrasive on the studio versions and the rest may leave you questioning what on earth you have got yourself into, I still urge you to see them live.

Fans of HMLTD are exactly how you would picture them – everybody is welcome. Every age, race, sexuality, religion is welcome here because the caricatures that form HMLTD are constantly striving to push every social boundary and limit.

HMLTD live performances may leave you awkwardly laughing out of slight discomfort but will definitely leave the hairs on the back of your neck standing on end.

Songs to listen to: ‘Proxy Love’, ‘Is this what you wanted?’, ‘Music!’ and ‘Satan, Luella & I’

Upcoming tour dates: Supporting Shame* O2 Ritz Manchester (22ndNov) and Leeds Uni Stylus (20thNov).

In conversation with: People and Planet

Sophie Marriott is a third year History and Economics student who, besides being Head Opinion Editor for The Mancunion, is also an integral part of one of the university’s greenest societies, People and Planet. I met up with her to chat about their latest work.

Sophie initially got involved with People and Planet in her first year of university, after spying them at the freshers’ fair. She quickly got stuck in and is now an active member of their campaigns, as well as being their Publicity Officer.

So, who are People and Planet? They’re a group of like-minded individuals concerned with both national and local issues to do with sustainability, falling under an umbrella organisation that has various branches at universities all over the country.

“The great thing about this,” Sophie explains, “is that this allows each university’s organisation to target the issues they find the most important”. There are no set areas, and so each university’s People and Planet will have different campaigns based on the problems that their area is currently facing.

For Manchester, this area is fossil fuel investment. According to a Freedom of Information request by the Mancunion, the university has around £7m invested in fossil fuel companies like BP, Shell and Exxon Mobil. People and Planet think this really needs to change.

Fossil Free is a national movement that they’re supporting, which encourages divestment from fossil fuel companies by businesses and institutions, and urges them to reinvest their money in something much more sustainable and ethical. Student-led organisations at universities such as King’s College London, Liverpool, and Loughborough have persuaded their institutions to divest, most notably at King’s, where students took part in a two-week hunger strike to help their cause.

So far, Sophie says, The University of Manchester has not been particularly supportive of the divestment movement. Despite having said they will review their investment portfolio, so far little effort has been made to actually divest from these businesses, which may be because their portfolio is so large that it will take some time to change. One of the ways that People and Planet are attempting to help the university divest is to show them that their financial investors (us students) don’t think that fossil fuels are a good choice of investment for our money.

To this end, People and Planet have organised a Fossil Free Shindig (FFS) on the 21st of November. This is the national day of action for fossil fuel divestment, with the overarching theme ‘Time’s Up’. It’s going to be a very relaxed festival-style day, which aims to celebrate the support for a fossil free university and the possibilities this could bring. If this isn’t enough to convince you, it will also be full of lots of treats like vegan food and free plants, as well as performances from music and spoken word artists. Members of other organisations like Friends of the Earth, Frack Free and the MMU Sustainability Team will also be there for you to chat to.

“We’re trying to work with the university on this. Manchester is always seen as a city that’s so forward-thinking and dynamic, and it’s really disappointing that the university can’t claim to be part of this legacy whilst supporting an industry like fossil fuels,” Sophie continues. “They also have a responsibility to represent the views of the students who invest in them. We’ve been so impressed by the level of student engagement so far, and we’d love everyone to come along and get involved.”

If you’d like to get involved in a more permanent way than attending FFS, you can join the society, for free. There’s a Facebook group online, and regular socials at the pub so you can have a chat with the team. Weekly meetings are also organised to talk about current and future campaigns, and one of the highlights of the People and Planet agenda are the FRED (friendly earth discussion) talks. These cover subjects ranging from eco-fashion to eating sustainably, and are guaranteed to be both informative and good fun.

“We’re very open at People and Planet, so come along to our meetings and see what we do. If you’re worried about the time commitment, it’s not too demanding. In the meantime, give us a follow on our Instagram!”

Looking ahead, People and Planet have several other campaigns that they’re currently involved in, including lobbying the Students’ Union to put more food waste bins around campus, and trying to get the university to be totally free of single use plastics. They’re currently also working with the Activities Officer, Lizzie Houghton, to set up a Waste Free shop in the SU, which will also help raise awareness about lifestyle choices and waste.

Waste is a key theme for People and Planet, and they’re also looking at connecting local food banks and charities so that leftover food from mixers and events doesn’t go straight in the bin. Instead, it’ll go to those that need it most.

“Universities are supposed to be institutions that benefit society. We’re hoping that we can lead by example.”

Designs revealed for 200th anniversary Peterloo Memorial

Manchester City Council has revealed this week provisional designs for a Peterloo massacre memorial.

The council has commissioned the installation of a memorial to mark the 200th anniversary of the tragedy, that saw the deaths of 15 people during a peaceful protest for parliamentary representation, in what is now the modern-day St. Peter’s Square.

Calvary fired upon an estimated 60,000-strong crowd of men, women, and children, injuring around 700 in addition to those killed.

Artist, Jeremy Deller, has been chosen to produce the designs for the commemorative memorial, that were placed on display in Manchester Central Library for three days from Thursday.

The council website will also showcase Deller’s work for a week from November 1st, as the council begins its pre-planning consultation on the construction of the memorial.

The memorial is set to be unveiled next Summer on the exact 200th anniversary of the massacre, that took place on August 16th, 1819.

Peterloo Jeremy Deller and Caruso St John Architects
View of Deller’s design from above
Photo: Jeremy Deller and Caruso St John Architects

Luthfur Rahman, Labour councillor and Executive Member for Schools, Culture, and Leisure highlighted the long-term aspiration for a commemoration of events: “We have long had the ambition to create a lasting memorial to those who lost their lives there and it is fitting that the memorial will be in place in time to mark the two hundredth anniversary next year.”

Deller, who won the Turner Prize in 2004 for his film The Memory Bucket, is famed for the strong political messages of his work. He is best known for his 2001 Battle of  Orgreave, a reenactment of violent clashes between police and miners on the picket line in 1984.

The only previous testament to Peterloo was a commemorative plaque installed on the side of the Radisson Blu Hotel on Peter Street. The plaque was replaced in 2007 after pressure from The Peterloo Memorial Campaign, that effectively lobbied the council to install a plaque that was historically accurate and informative.

The Campaign holds annual memorial events to mark the anniversary of the tragedy and provides an online database with information about those present at the protest in 1819.

The organisation has also produced a document detailing the necessities of the memorial, asking that it be ‘respectful, informative, and permanent’.

The decision to commission the memorial comes at a time of increasing recognition for the events of Peterloo, with Mike Leigh’s film of the same name debuting in cinemas this week. The historical drama stars Maxine Peake and premiered in Manchester last month, as part of the BFI Film Festival.

150 new Drinkaware staff to keep Mancunian clubbers safe

Funding has been secured for the recruitment of an additional 150 staff members to ensure the safety of Greater Manchester’s club-goers.

The new Drinkaware staff will work in clubs and venues to help support the welfare and wellbeing of young people, working to reunite lost customers with their friends, help people into taxis and even provide a shoulder to cry on.

The Drinkaware Trust is an independent alcohol education charity that attempts to “reduce alcohol-related harm by helping people make better choices about their drinking”.

Staff also ‘mingle’ with those in bars and clubs that might be seen as vulnerable due to too much alcohol consumption and will attempt to promote a ‘positive social atmosphere’.

Sacha Lord, found of the Warehouse Project and Night Time Economy Adviser for Greater Manchester said: “We all know that a night out in Greater Manchester is one of the best in the world and we want to ensure that all our residents and visitors have the chance to enjoy themselves, safely.”

He added: “Drinkaware are the perfect partners to work with on this and we are delighted they have committed to extend their crew training and e-learning programmes to all of the boroughs across Greater Manchester. We look forward to rolling out these fantastic initiatives in 2019.”

The scheme has been trialled successfully in Bolton, with plans to extend the scheme to Altrincham in Trafford.

Rommel Moseley, Director of Business Development and Partnerships at Drinkaware, said that “Drinkaware is delighted to be expanding our successful Drinkaware Crew and Vulnerability training across Greater Manchester to support the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and the Night-Time Adviser in keeping people safe on a night out whilst promoting a vibrant night time economy.”

Drinkaware staff are also operating throughout the country in Nottingham, Exeter, Plymouth, and Cheltenham.

Robogals bridge gap for women in STEM

The number of non-male students entering the STEM world is still much much lower than desirable, but this week I spoke to a society that is try to change that! Robogals is a global student-led society that organises science and technology workshops for children across five continents.

They have two main aims. Firstly, Robogals strives to promote engineering and related fields through their robotics workshops. Secondly, it bridges the gender gap in STEM by providing both young girls and boys with opportunities to engage with the associated disciplines in practice and realise that choosing to become a brilliant engineer, for instance, is not a matter of gender.

Their mission is based around an inter-sectional feminist approach, and, as the name may not fully suggest, workshops are delivered to all genders, rather than just girls. In Manchester, Robogals target girl-only schools in particular, but excluding boys would be contrary to their mission, so when possible they have mixed workshops as well as girls-only ones. Robogals is about encouraging children to think critically about gender and career, and deliver the message that ability is not gendered. This is as important for boys to understand as it is for girls.

Workshops are delivered by both male and female students depending on their availability for that particular date rather than gender. They also provide examples of female engineers and other STEM-related professions, both within the university and the wider industry. The international organisation has a global target for the number of girls taught, which is kept in mind to make sure the team in Manchester reach girls especially, whilst educating across all genders and ages.

It’s not just female students that they encourage, but they have a specific focus on girls coming from minority ethnic groups. When asked how they think the low percentage of women from these background affects the industry, Robogals responded that improper representation in any industry can have damaging effects on the creativity and yield of that particular industry, as well as on the society as certain undesirable trends can multiply. Whilst they don’t target BME students specifically, they endeavour to be as inclusive as possible and thus reach more historically disadvantaged groups implicitly.

Robogals’ efforts are certainly not going to waste.  Only last year they organised an event with 760 participants in one day at the Museum of Science and Industry. In other workshops over the course of last year they taught a total of 464 children, of which 295 were girls. They also trained 422 adults. They partnered with three giant companies and reached a total of 29,158 unique daily users. Workshops are fun, challenging, and get great messages across in an applied way.

Robogals have worked with some really interesting companies, most notably Google for their Google Digital Garage. Former president Otilia Vintu headed up the project; the workshop conducted there, which she named “How To Train Your Robot”  was facilitated by her and other volunteers and received great feedback. Consequently, they were invited by Google Garage to continue with other workshops. Robogals also have other opportunities internally, like an annual convention, and management roles for the organisation internationally.

Robogals also works with a private education company which recruits every year exclusively from their flanks of volunteers as the type of work they do prepares volunteers for the companies opportunities. Clearly, joining Robogals is a brilliant opportunity to make a great difference in the community, as well as being a very good addition to your CV. It’s a great way to demonstrate your interest in the tech industry, but also in management and in social issues. Due to their demonstrable impact and global reach, not only do you have access to a vast network within Robogals, but you can also confidently approach big companies, having had experience working with the likes of Google and Apple. They work with a recruitment agency that provides them with new openings exclusively for Robogals volunteers.

Students from every discipline can get involved. The current committee has students from Politics, Anthropology, Law, and Management, as well as Physics and Engineering. Anyone interested in technology, science, education or gender equality should get involved — either as teachers or organisers and negotiators.

Robogals claim that they are really flexible in terms of time commitment. Some of their volunteers come for just one workshop a year and others nearly every time. Others are part of the committee and have more responsibility. This year, they are looking to expand the committee from the current number to add more positions as they also plan on taking on more ambitious projects without expecting more than a couple of hours of commitment every week.

For those interested to apply for committee positions or simply to join as a volunteer for a workshop, regardless of whether you have volunteered with them before, contact the society on their Facebook page, Robogals Manchester, before November the 20th.

A sombre week for football

Football fans from all around the world have been paying their respects to Leicester City following last Saturday’s tragic helicopter crash outside the King Power Stadium.
City owner and chairman, Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha was one of five people travelling on the helicopter as it made its usual post-game flight away from the stadium. However, shortly after taking off, the helicopter spiralled out of control and crashed killing all those on board.
Also on the helicopter were the two pilots, Eric Swaffer and his partner, Izabela Roza Lechowicz, the latter of which won the #polka100 award, given to “exceptional women who inspire the Polish community in Britain.” 2005 ‘Miss Thailand Universe’ runner-up and member of the chairman’s staff, Nursara Suknamai along with the personal assistant to the chairman, Kaveporn Punpare were the other two who sadly lost their lives.
Leicester keeper Kasper Schmeichel wrote a heartfelt post on Instagram where he shared his thoughts. “Dear Mr Chairman. I cannot believe this is happening. I am so totally devastated and heartbroken. I just cannot believe what I saw last night. It just doesn’t seem real,” he wrote.

“It is difficult to put into words how much you meant to this football club and to the city of Leicester. Never have I ever come across a man like you. So hard working, so passionate, so kind and so generous in the extreme. You changed football. Forever! You gave hope to everyone that the impossible was possible. You literally made my dreams come true.”

“We now have a responsibility as a club, as players and fans to honour you. From knowing you we do this by being the family you created.”

Black armbands were worn by players across the Premier League the following day, with minutes of silence or applause taking place before the games at Crystal Place and Burnley. After the Palace game, manager Roy Hodgson said the events really put the sport into perspective. “It’s a bad moment, a moment which sobers everyone up in football. It tends to put some of the glitter and glamour firmly to one side. Nothing can compare with life and death.”
“It’s important we recognise sometimes that football is a village. We know everyone very well in our village. They almost become family to us. When something like this happens you do get the feeling that in some way you’ve been affected by events which have hit you in your family.”
Thai businessman Srivaddhanaprabha bought Leicester City in 2010 and oversaw one of the greatest stories in world football, the 2015/16 title-winning season. The Foxes barely avoided relegation the previous season and defied the 5000-1 odds to claim the Premier League title.
In the days that followed the crash thousands of floral tributes, football shirts, and scarves were left outside the stadium, both by fans and by the friends and family of those affected. A book of condolence was also placed outside the stadium with a queue of people waiting to leave their comments before it even opened.
Elsewhere this week, former England and Tottenham Hotspur player Glenn Hoddle suffered a heart attack on his 61st birthday after appearing on BT Sport. Hoddle is said to be recovering well in hospital, in part thanks to the quick reactions of sound supervisor, Simon Daniels to administer emergency first aid.
A spokesperson for the family highlighted Daniels’ actions adding that “the family are grateful to everyone in the football family — and beyond — that have sent kind messages of support. They are very much appreciated.

“Glenn is now in the care of the professional NHS medical services, who have also been exemplary in helping him and the family during the last 24 hours. Doctors have advised the most important thing for Glenn is time to rest. Therefore, his family have reiterated the request for their privacy to be respected during this period.”

The sombre news continued as a Brighton fan died after falling ill at the Amex Stadium. The elderly supporter attended the game against Wolves with his son but was rushed to the Royal Sussex County Hospital before kick-off, being pronounced dead later that day.
Chief executive of Brighton, Paul Barber told the club’s website: “This is very sad news and the thoughts and prayers of all of us at the club are with the gentleman’s family and friends at this time.”
The Mancunion wishes to thank Instagram user, @reubendangoor for use of his image.
The Mancunion also wishes to extend its condolences to all those affected by these awful events. It is important to seek help and support in dealing with grief and the University of Manchester’s counselling service is available to students in need. For more information on the service click here.

Jacksonville Jaguars’ pre-match controversy

The temptation of a big night out is inevitable for many visitors to the UK’s capital city; when there’s an NFL match that weekend, however, it may not be the best idea.

This is exactly what four Jacksonville Jaguars players, named by nfl.com as Barry Church, Ronnie Harrison, DJ Hayden, and Jarrod Wilson, discovered after getting into a dispute over the £50,000 bar tab they had racked up.

Jacksonville lost their match on Sunday at Wembley against the Philadelphia Eagles 24-18, bringing their losing streak up to 4 games. The trouble over the bill at a bar in Piccadilly, that regularly puts on burlesque shows, surely can’t have helped their endeavours.

The Jaguars owner Shahid Kahn is a familiar name for both NFL and Premier League fans, owning Fulham FC and recently pulling out of his bid to buy Wembley Stadium. Kahn can’t have been too happy with the players, especially Church, who admitted to taking “full responsibility,”  after the match.

Those who watched Manchester City’s Monday Night Football match against Tottenham at Wembley would have noticed the worn-down pitch, left behind by the Jaguars-Eagles match. It seems as though American Football is causing controversy in England both on and off the field.

‘Come Slowly-Eden!’: Why allotments matter

Almost lost in the labyrinthine twists and turns that make up the Levenshulme allotment site, I finally locate it. Comfortably hedged in, Growing Together stands apart from its neighbours. Today it is bustling. At least twenty people (sometimes as many as fifty) are working hard to repair sheds and keep the plot tidy. What is immediately noticeable is how dedicated the volunteers are – everyone is involved in de-weeding and harvesting the crop. I can smell the just picked vegetables cooking in the small kitchen area fashioned out of a shipping container. What I also notice is the laughter. It ripples round the cabbages and infects everyone.

Growing Together is a charity for refugees and asylum seekers of all ages. It helps to nurture an ever-growing sustainable community on an experimental allotment site. Recently they have developed a vegan permaculture food-growing project and are often involved in fruit and vegetable growing competitions. Aneaka, who helps organise the charity, voiced the importance of Growing Together as a stable presence in people’s lives. For those facing deportation, having a safe and friendly space to come to every week is undeniably valuable.

Speaking to Bukky, an asylum seeker from Nigeria, she said that the allotment “keeps me from being isolated”. She particularly enjoys the social aspect, and has even included her young daughter into the Growing Together family. The allotment has provided her and her daughter with new skills and opportunities which she is keen to develop and, pardon the pun, let grow. “But not carpentry!” she exclaims and erupts into laughter.

Another volunteer, who preferred to remain anonymous, said that the allotment was particularly helpful during the stress of his A-Levels. Despite the physical challenge, he has thrived on the manual labour which transports him one day a week from the endless drudgery of revision. Amberley Garland, a graduate in Illustration from MMU,  volunteers at the allotment alongside her work at a community centre for children. She was particularly passionate about the lasting impact the allotment has had on her. She describes how “it’s nice to have grown something and then eat it… we always eat together”.

Each week the responsibility of the cooking rotates, the ‘allotmenters’ all get a taste of an entirely new cuisine. It is another avenue whereby cross-cultural relationships can be created and nurtured. However, like many small community oriented projects, funding is difficult to come by. They face increasing pressure to ensure all of their volunteers are equally supported with bus fares and safe living conditions.

As well as community havens, allotments facilitate alternative living or even just personal projects. All of this demonstrates a consistently positive impact on mental health. Art student Iolo Walker describes the benefits of living on an allotment site: “I wanted to leave my parents house after finishing school but didn’t feel ready to go to university”. The cheap rent (about £56 a month split between two people) made the allotment an attractive living space. However, he said he initially struggled with the lack of security on the allotment. But the “destruction of idleness” forced him – for the better he attests – to live less comfortably and to find new ways of spending his time and meeting new people.

Regan Bates, currently studying at Royal Holloway has cultivated an allotment with her boyfriend from scratch. It was after her mother’s death from cancer last year that Regan realised the “therapeutic nature’”of getting her hands dirty. For the couple, the relative freedom of the allotment was another attraction: “No one else can really tell us what to grow there, if I want just flowers then I can or if I want some fat vegetables then I can and there are no restrictions”. It became, not just a project they shared with each other, but with their friends, family and even allotment enthusiasts on Instagram (@allotment21b). Indeed, Regan herself voiced surprise when she learnt how large the allotment community online really was. She said “I get people commenting on my posts giving me advice and I get to see when other people are harvesting things so I can copy them. It is really helpful.”

There is a particular satisfaction, deep and primitive which comes from pulling a weed out of damp soil. This attraction to working the land, exploring a dexterity nearly unknown to our iPhone-programmed fingers is perhaps one of the reasons why young people are becoming increasingly more involved in working on or starting up their own allotments. We live in a climate of excess, in which a noxious cloud hangs over the twenty-something (post-grad career panic, financial insecurity, and a crisis in mental health). Therefore, it is unsurprising that scores of generation X and Y are jumping onto trends which are, at their core, about self-sufficiency, experimentation, and making-do alone.

The sentiment however, is not particularly new. The number of allotments increased significantly after the Second World War under initiatives such as ‘Dig for Victory’ and even later during the recession. The National Allotment Society website says: ‘people turn back to the land, wanting to reconnect with something tangible while at the same time experiencing home-grown food, which costs less and is better for us’. But it certainly has gained a lot of wide-spread popularity amongst young people especially, because of the positive impact on mental health as well as the environment. Perhaps allotments are the natural progression of the ‘green-living’ trend, a vision beyond houseplants, matcha lattes and garden eyebrows.

Help Growing Together continue the wonderful work they do by heading here.

Review: Daredevil season 3 – a show without fear

Marvel’s most successful foray into the streaming world comes in the form of the comic book adaptation of Daredevil, the man without fear, who upholds the high standard of realism and gleeful brutality established back in 2015’s season one.

Episode one opens with Matt Murdoch (Charlie Cox) and the supporting cast reeling from the events of The Defenders, a Netflix mini-series created in 2017.  It starts showing Matt Murdoch, who has barely survived the destruction of a building around him while his friends try to move on from his apparent death.

The series progresses with Murdoch’s return to health and his life as the Devil of Hell’s Kitchen just in time to combat the malicious rise of an old foe, Wilson Fisk (aka the Kingpin) and his new implement of chaos, Agent Poindexter – aka Bullseye.

As a superhero show, Daredevil will naturally live or die by the quality of the fight choreography, something clear in the poorly received and poorly choreographed Marvel series Iron Fist. Thankfully, the martial arts on display in season 3 even surpasses the excellence in previous seasons.

Most notable is another old-school style one-shot corridor fight in episode 4 that has become a welcome theme of the Marvel Netflix shows. It surpasses all expectations with what seems like a solid fifteen-minute, unbroken shot through a prison as the blind lawyer bloodies his fists and wrings information out of inmates. Such an achievement by director Alex Lopez should be commended as an equal to similar efforts seen in Children of Men and Goodfellas.

Bullseye also provides a new dynamic to the action of the series. His laser accuracy with any nearby object forces Daredevil to close the gap or suffer the ‘pen piercing’ results reminiscent of a Bourne scene.

One of the series’ highlights is a sequence in episode 5 dedicated to the characters’ disturbed past. It is displayed cinematically in black and white, with all notable events recreated in Fisk’s penthouse as he walks through them. Here the ambition of the show pays off by successfully exploring Bullseye’s psychotic beginnings through recordings of therapy sessions.

It is also an incredibly entertaining way of fleshing out one of the main villains, showing his depth, tender side, and barely hidden psychosis without the need for a Machiavellian monologue.

Other characters get a similarly in-depth treatment to great effect. Karen Page (Deborah Ann Woll), Daredevil’s friend and occasional love interest, finally gets a backstory to lift the fog of intrigue that had surrounded her nature in past seasons. The lovable Foggy Nelson returns as a more legal foil to Fisk’s plans and best friend to Matt, though while his role as comic relief is  welcome, it does reveal an unfortunate shortcoming in the writing of the series.

The benefit of being a later season shows as writers can spend more time fleshing out minor characters. These include an FBI agent who unknowingly facilitates Fisk’s dastardly plans, who in a lesser superhero show would be one dimensional and without exceptional motivational.

So, it is clear Daredevil season 3 can surpass all other comic book shows at their own game, with better action, villains, and character development. Yet it also brings a unique theme to the table — following Matt Murdoch’s struggle with his faith adds a new dynamic that deeply humanises his struggle. Coupled with the grizzled street-level gangster warfare, this transforms the show into something near a small screen effort by Martin Scorsese.

Rating: 4/5.